Skip to comments.Why Women Want Rick (There is more to Rick’s support by Middle American Moms than meets the eye)
Posted on 03/08/2012 10:20:32 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The Lame Stream Media circle like sharks in a blood pool over Rick Santorums Catholicism. Funny, they asked conservatives if they were against Romney because they are anti-Mormon but no one is asking those attacking Santorum if they are doing it because they are anti-Catholic. Do we want a POTUS candidate who doesnt believe his own faith? We already have that, dont we?
Rick Santorum is laughing all the way to the ballot box as women swoon, and it isnt over his good looks. Women like Rick for a lot of reasons. He is every womans husband. He is every girls dad, complete with the sweater vest. He is every businesswomans handy banker. He is every school girls slightly geeky, but deliciously smart favorite math teacher. He is the Sunday School teacher we wish we hadthe one who actually fights for his faith rather than cowering for church attendance and tithes. He has courage.
Women feel the financial strain created by this administrations $1 trillion per year spending habit more than our sexier counterparts. We are the ones who have to abandon our choices and go to work. We have to clip coupons, stretch dollars, walk the tightrope between what our kids want and what our struggling budget allows, and we know we couldnt do it without our spiritual strength. The press contention that the social issues dont matter smack of government constrained churches to us, and we wont have it. Women need the freedom to worship where they want, how they want, and they dont want this government threatening their spiritual freedoms. Women understand what Sarah Palin said when she proclaimed that social issues and economic issues are not mutually exclusive-- They are inextricably linked, and women know that because we use the spiritual strengths guaranteed to us by social issues to survive the fiscal stresses every day under this imperial Presidents reign.
There is more to Ricks support by Middle American Moms than meets the eye. In the states where he has campaigned and delivered a message, women are feeling emboldened to support this hubby-daddy-slightly geeky teacher-type; they know things the media and GOP establishment wish they could dust away.
Moms like him. Rick and Karen have 7 living children. Karen is an attorney, nurse, and author. Rick knows firsthand what it means to run the carpool, pick up the kids from soccer, help with homework, and drop them at a friends house, all while trying to get to work on time or spiff up the house before dinner with the family.
Businesswomen like him. Santorum sponsored and passed the Womens Business Centers Sustainability Act that established numerous initiatives to support small businesses owned by women.
Work at home moms like him. He has been outspoken and boldly spoken up for women to have the choices they deserveto work outside the home, or not. He even placed the blame for taking away these freedoms where real women know it belongson the radical feminists.
Poor women like him. When he decided to take on the colossal battle of welfare reform, he invited 8 women on welfare to co-create the legislation with him. Who does that? This shows such cool creativity and cutting edge leadership, it would give a sweater vest some swag!
Pro-life women like him. He is an unquestionable champion of life. This means that unborn women probably like him, too. They just wont be able to say so until about 2013.
Pro-choice women like him. He is the only candidate who has declared that he would not criminalize birth control, unless killing babies is your method of choice.
Libertarian women like him. The Cato Institute had rave reviews for the Senator while he was serving in D.C.
Victimized women like him. Unlike Obama, he doesnt label them victims (AKA: Useful idiots). He empowers crime victims with his tough law for trafficking victims (Trafficking Victims Protection Conference Report) and Aimees Law. He co-sponsored the National AMBER Alert Network Act to strengthen alert capabilities and assist state and local law enforcement in catching those who would kidnap a child.
Academic women like him. His mother was the first woman to graduate from Yale. She was the primary breadwinner for his family growing up. His wife, Karen, is a lawyer, nurse, and author. He understands the importance of education and more importantly, the personal satisfaction that comes from women meeting their full potential. His life is living proof of that.
Moms of special ability children like him. As a mother of a child with a Trisomy 21, I can assure you that this hidden, but adamant voting block will move heaven and earth to get to the polls to support someone who loves and understands all the extra joy and challenge in raising a special child. His love for his baby, Gabriel who died, and later for his precious little Bella with Trisomy 18, is all most moms like me need to know the man has a heart the size of Texas, and he wears it on his sleeve for our special little ones.
Mr. Moms even like him! He championed initiatives to encourage participation of fathers in the lives of their children, and provide families with relief from the marriage penalty tax.
While esoteric, overeducated liberals stand in awe as Senator Santorum survives the ravages of the socialist attacks, we Middle American Women quietly smile to ourselves. We know where our vote will be in 2012.
-- Dr. Gina Loudon is the host of the PM drivetime show The Dr. Gina Show heard in 8 states across the Midwest and the South.
Just a picture of him and his family says more than words to the ladies.
Whats red represent and what does blue represent in your chart?
How about Middle American Mommies?
Or Middle American Mamas?
Yeah, we had the same deception that put clinton into office.
Nothing about him being good for our country, just that they liked him. Voters and their ‘feelings’ again.
There is NOTHING endearing about a liar to me!
RE: Whats red represent and what does blue represent in your chart?
BLUE —> MEN
You betcha! I'm very impressed with Santorum's positions on the economy, the Constitution, and repealing ObamaCare on Day One.
No, we don't. Barry seems to be a devout Humanist .
See Torcaso v. Watkins and Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda for Humanism being legally classified as a religion.
Of course, it can't really be ruled out that Barry is a good Mooze Lame hiding his real beliefs while working against the enemies of Iz Lame as the Profit instructs Mooze Lames to do when they need to.
RE: You actually used the word “moms” and expect to be taken seriously?
I simply copied a sentence from the author’s article ( see first sentence of the 4th paragraph above ).
Nothing very endearing about your post either. Rather offputting, in fact.
Why don’t you post something positive about Newtie?
RE: we Middle American Women quietly smile to ourselves. We know where our vote will be in 2012.
How can you vote of Santorum in 2012 if he isn’t the Republican nominee?
“Women like Rick for a lot of reasons. He is every womans husband. He is every girls dad, complete with the sweater vest. He is every businesswomans handy banker. He is every school girls slightly geeky, but deliciously smart favorite math teacher. He is the Sunday School teacher we wish we had”
LOL Laying there at night, hugging their pillows, wishing it was St Ricky. It was disturbing when Obama women did it,,, and it is now. Anyone who votes for such trite reasons should have their 19th amendment rights revoked.
You could say the same about Mitt/his family - if ‘image’ is your criteria in choosing a candidate.
“Whats red represent and what does blue represent in your chart?”
What does THAT matter when he’s the adorable yet nerdy math teacher they have a crush on? The husband they wish theirs was? LOL
Actually it does help willard as well.
It probably does. He’d probably be fine as a president, if we were in less tumultuous times. I haven’t seen evidence that he’s capable of prioritizing and being adaptable.
I know Newt could handle what is to come, but not sure about Santorum.
Dude, half of America wouldn’t have the right to vote in that case. I recall my MIL who voted for Bush in 2008 and that was out of character. Why? Because she couldn’t stand Teresa Heinz Kerry.
A large section of America is like that. If you doubt it, just reflect and all the dumb things the left does as it panders for votes. If it didn’t work, why would they work so hard at it?
One can vote for him in a primary in 2012. In fact, that’s the only year I know of in which there is any opportunity to vote for Mr. Santorum.
Did the TRUTH hurt your feelings? Can't help you with that one - the truth doesn't change for you.
Why dont you post something positive about Newtie?
HE/His accomplishments SAYS IT BEST!
Rick is a decent guy, who will honor the office of the presidency. You can tell a man on how he treats women, especially his wife and daughters, AND how he teaches his sons to treat women. He’s a good family man, who personally lives his pro-life stance.
I have 59 first cousins on one side & only one is going for Romney, the rest like Rick. I have an aunt who also is going with Romney, but her daughters say they will talk her out of it before our primary.
I have been around the block a few times, I have never found a lady that did not want a devoted husband and father for her children, and if he can fix thinks about the house he is a real keeper. It is just a fact of life.
RE: Anyone who votes for such trite reasons should have their 19th amendment rights revoked.
C’mon, that’s NOT the only reason. That’s one among MANY OTHER reasons (e.g. his fiscal, energy and tax policies) and the fact the women relate to it is to Rick’s advantage.
Its no worse than voting a straight DemocRAT party line ticket because you always have before, or because Hussein has such a mellifluous voice it makes you swoon, please.
After what this shill has done to the US, if you voted for Hussein in 2008 to prove you weren't a racist, vote against him in 2012 to prove your not a moron...
Okay, that’s it!
This is the MOST patronizing load of drivel I’ve read in weeks! Sorry, Dr. Gina, but as a middle American WOMAN who happens to be a mother, I find it highly insulting that you think I would base my vote on whether a candidate is the husband or Sunday School teacher of my dreams. The women I know care about national security, jobs, gas prices and yes, they are strongly pro-life. Articles like this reinforce the opinion that women are emotion-driven twits who can’t handle the responsibilty of voting.
I’d write more but the nausea is rising again.
What about Santorum's RECORD on his BIG GOV'T economy and campaigning and voting for the originator of Romneycare? Can you put 2 and 2 together? He ain't doing it.
The little mimicker said nothing about repealing it on day one until months after NEWT said it. Slick rick has no idea what he can do or how to do it.
He's a liar and liars do what they do - LIE!
I have not seen the kind of constant attacks on Newt here that I’ve seen on Rick. And, as I’ve said before, these constant attacks are not going to help Newt any. No doubt they suit some of Newt’s supporters, but they are only going to offend everyone else.
It helps only to bring in those who can be DECEIVED!
I always attack liars If you got a problem with that - I can’t help you. Nor with your attacking those with posting the truth.
RE: What about Santorum’s RECORD on his BIG GOV’T economy
OK, let’s forget the women, and talk about Santorum’s OVERALL (emphasis) fiscal record.
TITLE: WAS SANTORUM A SENATE SPENDTHRIFT?
The National Taxpayers Union (NTU) has been rating members of Congress for 20 years. NTU is an independent, non-partisan organization that per its mission statement mobilizes elected officials and the general public on behalf of tax relief and reform, lower and less wasteful spending, individual liberty, and free enterprise. Steve Forbes serves on its board of directors.
For each session of Congress, NTU scores each member on an A-to-F scale. NTU weights members votes based on those votes perceived effect on both the immediate and future size of the federal budget. Those who get As are among the strongest supporters of responsible tax and spending policies; they receive NTUs Taxpayers Friend Award. Bs are good scores, Cs are minimally acceptable scores, Ds are poor scores, and Fs earn their recipients membership in the Big Spender category. There is no grade inflation whatsoever, as we shall see.
NTUs scoring paints a radically different picture of Santorums 12-year tenure in the Senate (1995 through 2006) than one would glean from the rhetoric of the Romney campaign. Fifty senators served throughout Santorums two terms: 25 Republicans, 24 Democrats, and 1 Republican/Independent. On a 4-point scale (awarding 4 for an A, 3.3 for a B+, 3 for a B, 2.7 for a B-, etc.), those 50 senators collective grade point average (GPA) across the 12 years was 1.69 which amounts to a C-. Meanwhile, Santorums GPA was 3.66 or an A-. Santorums GPA placed him in the top 10 percent of senators, as he ranked 5th out of 50.
Across the 12 years in question, only 6 of the 50 senators got As in more than half the years. Santorum was one of them. He was also one of only 7 senators who never got less than a B. (Jim Talent served only during Santorums final four years, but he always got less than a B, earning a B- every year and a GPA of 2.7.) Moreover, while much of the Republican party lost its fiscal footing after George W. Bush took office although it would be erroneous to say that the Republicans were nearly as profligate as the Democrats Santorum was the only senator who got As in every year of Bushs first term. None of the other 49 senators could match Santorums 4.0 GPA over that span.
This much alone would paint an impressive portrait of fiscal conservatism on Santorums part. Yet it doesnt even take into account a crucial point: Santorum was representing Pennsylvania.
Based on how each state voted in the three presidential elections over that period (1996, 2000, and 2004), nearly two-thirds of senators represented states that were to the right of Pennsylvania. In those three presidential elections, Pennsylvania was, on average, 3 points to the left of the nation as a whole. Pennsylvanians backed the Democratic presidential nominee each time, while the nation as a whole chose the Republican in two out of three contests.
Among the roughly one-third of senators (18 out of 50) who represented states that based on this measure were at least as far to the left as Pennsylvania, Santorum was the most fiscally conservative. Even more telling was the canyon between him and the rest. After Santorums overall 3.66 GPA, the runner-up GPA among this group was 2.07, registered by Olympia Snowe (R., Maine). Arlen Specter, Santorums fellow Pennsylvania Republican, was next, with a GPA of 1.98. The average GPA among senators who represented states at least as far left as Pennsylvania was 0.52 or barely a D-.
But Santorum also crushed the senators in the other states. Those 32 senators, representing states that on average were 16 points to the right of Pennsylvania in the presidential elections, had an average GPA of 2.35 a C+.
In fact, considering the state he was representing, one could certainly make the case that Santorum was the most fiscally conservative senator during his tenure. The only four senators whose GPAs beat Santorums represented states that were 2 points (Republican Judd Gregg of New Hampshire), 10 points (Republican Jon Kyl of Arizona), 25 points (Republican James Inhofe of Oklahoma), and 36 points (Republican Craig Thomas of Wyoming) to the right of Pennsylvania in the presidential elections. Moreover, of these four, only Kyl (with a GPA of 3.94) beat Santorum by as much as a tenth of a point. Its an open question whether a 3.94 from Arizona is more impressive than a 3.66 from Pennsylvania.
So, if Santorum was among and perhaps even topped the list of the most fiscally conservative senators during this period, who were the least fiscally conservative? That prize would have to go to the two North Dakota senators, who despite representing a state that voted 23 points to the right of the national average in the presidential elections, managed to achieve GPAs of 0.08 (Democrat Kent Conrad) and 0.00 (Democrat Byron Dorgan). Honorable mentions would have to go to Max Baucus (D., Mont.), who got a 0.84 GPA in a state that was 18 points to the right of the national average; Harry Reid (D., Nev.), who got a 0.08 GPA in a state that was 4 points to the right of average; and Utah Republicans Bob Bennett and Orrin Hatch, who each barely cleared a 3.0 (3.11 for Bennett, 3.08 for Hatch) despite representing the state that, in the presidential elections, , was the nations most right-leaning (38 points to the right of average).
Every politician has to appeal to the women’s vote. Newt’s doing it now in his national ads where a woman is in a mock interview and you hear a baby cry, and they say something like even mom’s like Newt. Newt realizes he has to get his high negatives down, and he ain’t stupid.
“Dude, half of America wouldnt have the right to vote in that case.”
sad but true.
“You can tell a man on how he treats women, especially his wife and daughters,,,”
Yes,, we need a man like Jimmy Carter. A man who adores his wife,,daughters,,THAT’S what will save our economy.
They can't vote for him in the primaries?
Just one more woman, asking those who can afford it, to help Rick out:
Rick Santorum for President
P.O. Box 37
Verona, PA 15147
What does that have to do with anything?
You think these women fantasize that Rick or Mitt are handymen? They probably never picked up a tool in their life! And career politicians are home with the little ones more often than the 9 to 5’er? LOL!
Those two (rick/mitt career politicians) have an ego it would be hard to live with.
Newt, however, one could sit and chat with about anything. The other two, Rick/Mitt, the conversation would be all about them!
Could be that, in their own life, these women chose the wrong man, also, and still are doing it. Looking at what he says (wooo! sounds good!) and not what he does (his record).
Why isn’t Florida on the chart???
They vote for him every night,,,in their dreams. Where HE knows whats best and will never make them sad. LOL
Gee. A guy cheats on two different wives for YEARS. I call that lying.
Oh, my gosh. You’re trying to claim that Gingrich doesn’t have a HUGE ego? You people are unbelievable.
Gingrich thinks he is THE smartest person in the world.
Oh yes, the pick and choose - the political game continues.
Let’s see - those PA taxpayers couldn’t stand him being the best at reduced taxes - so they fired him! LOL!!
Thanks, but no thanks.
“Gingrich thinks he is THE smartest person in the world.”
Yes yes,, i bet Rick sits there when his wife talks,, holding her hand,, carefully taking in her opinions. Because you know,, he’s a good man. (there in that sweater vest)
Oh,, and he doesn’t interrupt, or EVER make her feel dumb. LOL
I derive great pleasure from thinking about Rick sitting at his desk in the Oval Office, wearing his sweater vest. :-)
You don’t know the whole story about his private life. You only think you do.
Rick’s record is public. He’s a liar - through the screen towards millions of American voters. If you can, you’ll see the difference.
I’m an American Kitty Mom, and I like Rick!
You are entitled to your dreams!
And so are *you*. :-)
RE: Oh yes, the pick and choose - the political game continues.
Nobody said his record was PERFECT. But his OVERALL record TILTS conservative.
Didn’t the conservative icon Ronald Reagan give us AMNESTY in 1987?
Didn’t Reagan compromise on many issues with a Democratic Congress as President?
The budget for the Department of Education, which candidate Reagan promised to abolish along with the Department of Energy, has more than doubled to $22.7 billion, Social Security spending has risen from $179 billion in 1981 to $269 billion in 1986.
The price of farm programs went from $21.4 billion in 1981 to $51.4 billion in 1987, a 140% increase. And this doesn’t count the recently signed $4 billion “drought-relief” measure. Medicare spending in 1981 was $43.5 billion; in 1987 it hit $80 billion. Federal entitlements cost $197.1 billion in 1981and $477 billion in 1987.
YET, We consider Ronald Reagan a conservative AND HE IS.
The fact, is a President (and in Santorum’s case, Senator ) CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH given the opposition he is faced with.
Did you see him after one of the last debates when they were starting to interview him, his wife came along to where he was and he pointed his finger at where she was to stand next to him like she was some dog. Then the kids came and stopped in front of him but got the ‘eye’ and dutifully they went behind him. The task master in play, nothing loving about it. They couldn’t or wouldn’t hug him after the debate. ‘It’s all about him’ in private and public life.
A disaster for America!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.