Skip to comments.
Why Asteroid Panic Is On the Rise
space.com ^
| 08 March 2012
| Natalie Wolchover
Posted on 03/08/2012 1:15:15 PM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: presidio9
I have asteroids... Not one of your better efforts.
In that vein, it was a disaster
21
posted on
03/08/2012 1:31:23 PM PST
by
pfflier
To: Telepathic Intruder
I thought it was 179 feet across. The estimates from the scientists about its destructive power runs around a 15 megaton explosion. If it lands in the Pacific who will notice?
22
posted on
03/08/2012 1:31:28 PM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: presidio9
There are better things to worry about even than the absolute worst-case scenario
True, but none of few of those would involve destroying the entire planet, and or turning it back to the stone age.
The earth has been hit by many cataclysmic impacts in the past, and it will happen again.
The big question is when.
23
posted on
03/08/2012 1:31:36 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: presidio9
That's nearer than the orbits of some geosynchronous satellitesActually it has to be all one or the other.
In this case, the subject asteriod will pass inside the orbit of all geosynchronous satellites.
24
posted on
03/08/2012 1:32:11 PM PST
by
cicero2k
To: presidio9
next thing they’ll be telling us there’s Frogger and Pac-Man panic too...
To: crosshairs
You can be “anxious” for a good thing as well.
26
posted on
03/08/2012 1:35:44 PM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Buckeye McFrog
27
posted on
03/08/2012 1:37:52 PM PST
by
presidio9
(catholicscomehome.org)
To: patton
Yeah, except the last one caused the dark ages. Who needs an asteroid? We're on track to have another dark age without one.
28
posted on
03/08/2012 1:38:29 PM PST
by
thulldud
(Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
To: Jack Hydrazine
Well it’s not hard to calculate the megaton equivalent knowing the mass and impact speed, which can vary a lot, but that’s probably about right. Space rocks carry a lot of energy. Still, 15 megatons is hardly earth-threatening. City threatening, certainly.
29
posted on
03/08/2012 1:40:25 PM PST
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The right thing is not always the popular thing)
To: Jack Hydrazine
"If it lands in the Pacific who will notice?"
Ya' but what if it lands in the middle of Washington, D.C.? Like...that would be a bad thing. Right? Hey! Just thinking out. Just thinking.
30
posted on
03/08/2012 1:41:43 PM PST
by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: Telepathic Intruder
Not dangerous at all unless it lands nearly on top of you... It can be survivable... and it was in Sylacauga AL in 1954... from Wikapedia:
"The Sylacauga meteorite is the first documented extraterrestrial object to have injured a human being. The grapefruit-sized fragment crashed through the roof of a frame house in Oak Grove, Alabama, bounced off a large wooden console radio, and hit Hodges while she napped on a couch. The 31-year-old woman was badly bruised on one side of her body but able to walk."
31
posted on
03/08/2012 1:45:06 PM PST
by
C210N
To: thulldud
32
posted on
03/08/2012 1:48:05 PM PST
by
patton
(bad math joke omitted - this space for rent)
To: C210N
Monastic records indicate that a Monk got zotted by one long ago, but I don’t have a citation.
33
posted on
03/08/2012 1:50:57 PM PST
by
patton
(bad math joke omitted - this space for rent)
To: C210N
bounced off a large wooden console radio
In the case of a meteor (not an asteroid), the impact is almost completely slowed by the atmosphere before it reaches the ground. Big ones aren't slowed down. If that meteor had been coming down at the minimim required 11 kilometers per second like the big ones, the house would be a crater.
34
posted on
03/08/2012 1:51:46 PM PST
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The right thing is not always the popular thing)
To: Telepathic Intruder
Meteor crater in Arizona was formed by an object that same size. It's impact force was equivalent to 10 megatons or >600 Hiroshima bombs. I'd say anything living in that area had a pretty bad day.
35
posted on
03/08/2012 1:55:05 PM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Straight Vermonter
Yeah, maybe a little more than a mile would be a safer distance.
36
posted on
03/08/2012 2:00:56 PM PST
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The right thing is not always the popular thing)
To: presidio9
At 7-11 after school with a cherry coke slurpee, a bag of doritos-nacho cheese, Asteroids and a few dollars in quarters. I miss those days. Those are days my kids will never experience.
37
posted on
03/08/2012 2:01:06 PM PST
by
Bruinator
("For socialism is not merely the labour question, it is before all things an atheistic question")
To: presidio9
Program at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, blames the upsurge in asteroid panic on two main factors. "One problem is that the Internet is wide open to anyone to say anything,"
Anyone? Maybe like this guy?
2010 Jupiter impact event
The impact happened 3 June 2010, and was recorded and first reported by amateur astronomer Anthony Wesley from Australia, seen above. After he he got on the Internet to report what he'd seen, scientist world wide stood up and paid close attention, turning billion dollar instruments, towards the giant plant of Jupiter.
In the sciences in general, there are many professionals who hate to admit that amateurs can make valid contributions. And government bureaucrats just hate to admit they got it wrong.
38
posted on
03/08/2012 2:02:35 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
ER... After he he got on the Internet to report what he'd seen, scientist world wide stood up and paid close attention, turning billion dollar instruments, towards the giant planet of Jupiter.
39
posted on
03/08/2012 2:04:20 PM PST
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: presidio9
That's nearer than the orbits of some geosynchronous satellites LOL!
Is the author able to change the mass of the earth in order to change the orbital distance where geosynch occurs? All geosynchronous satellites MUST orbit in a narrow band around the equator, 22,236 mi above mean sea level.
I'm assuming they're not talking about eliptical geostationary, which can't be maintained very long.
I swear, why do we believe anything we read in the media?
40
posted on
03/08/2012 2:07:51 PM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson