Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNCís delegate count shows Gingrich ahead of Santorum (Stand down, Rick!)
WashTimes ^ | 3-8-12 | Dinan

Posted on 03/08/2012 5:47:11 PM PST by VinL

Rick Santorum may have won more primaries but the Republican National Committee's current delegate count shows former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has more bound delegates than Mr. Santorum in the race for the party's presidential nomination.

Frontrunner Mitt Romney has earned 339 delegates to the August nominating convention in Tampa, Fla., or more than the rest of the field combined, according to a chart the RNC sent to its members on Thursday.

Mr. Gingrich is second with 107 delegates, topping Mr. Santorum's 95 delegates and the 22 delegates pledged to Rep. Ron Paul of Texas.

Winning the nomination will take 1,144 delegates.

Press reports have put Mr. Santorum in second place based on projections about how delegates will be allocated in some of the caucus states where voters have cast their ballots, but where the actual delegates won't be decided until later, at county, district and state conventions.

Delegates have yet to be fully awarded in Iowa, Colorado, North Dakota, Minnesota, Maine and Washington. Mr. Santorum won the first four of those contests, while Mr. Romney won the other two.

Mr. Santorum and Mr. Gingrich are battling to be the conservative alternative to Mr. Romney in the race, and Mr. Santorum says his victories in seven primaries and caucuses gives him a leg up.

Mr. Gingrich, meanwhile, has won just two primaries — Georgia and South Carolina. But both those states bind nearly all their delegates to support the Primary winner.

Meanwhile Mr. Santorum has notched close wins in places such as Oklahoma, where he collected 14 delegates for his victory. But the Sooner State awards its delegates proportionately and so Mr. Romney and Mr. Gingrich earned 13 delegates each, making Mr. Santorum's victory gains him almost no ground on his rivals.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: emptyvest; gingrich; hailsweatervest; hate4newt; itsnotaboutstates; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newt; newt4romney; newtgingrich; newthaters; newtsfuzzymath; ricksantorum; ricksfanatics; romneylite; santoromney; santorum4romney; santorumfanatics; santorumsfuzzymath; viagranewt; whatanidiot; whatasnob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150 next last
To: Mariner
The RNC is a disease with MYTH ROMNEY as its main symptom.

A collection of country club blueblood Washingtonian leeches with creepy pulled back wives.

The sooner their ranks are purged, the better.

51 posted on 03/08/2012 6:22:28 PM PST by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum voted against Right toWork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Well, if you call whining like a little girl about not getting called on “fighting,” then I guess you’re right, Santorum is a fighter.


52 posted on 03/08/2012 6:23:31 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

“Funny, I didn’t see Santorum campaigning much in Massachusetts, Nevada, or Vermont. Maybe he was afraid to campaign in those states, and just wanted to have a ready excuse for losing them?”

Seriously? How’d Newt do in those states?


53 posted on 03/08/2012 6:24:45 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
I won't say anything against Newt but Rick is passionate and determined.

I watch some freepers post spam detailing all of Santorum's legislative mistakes, bonehead quotes, etc and am gratified no one has yet made a similar one for Newt - it would be easy to do as it would for any politician. At least not one that I've seen.

Its not helpful and frankly not very smart.

54 posted on 03/08/2012 6:25:04 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: VinL

I really wish these two guys could get together and decide about one stepping down. Heck, the bigger man should just offer to be the VP for the other and then together make a run at Mitt.


55 posted on 03/08/2012 6:26:51 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I believe his advice to FNMA was that it had a "failed business model". That's what he said.

I am having difficulty trying to figure out where you take that to say "FNMA is a model organization" ~ did you vote for Romney or something?

Regarding a Moonbase, I think we need a Moonbase ~ a REAL High Frontier that will create an American hammer over the Earth.

And a federal jobs program for kids? If you mean youth 16 to 29, they currently have something like a 75% unemployment rate in most communities. I suggest SOMETHING should be done before I start up my Red Armband Program ~ 'cause I intend to get rich on their need for political action of a positive nature.

56 posted on 03/08/2012 6:27:05 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Absolutely.


57 posted on 03/08/2012 6:27:46 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Seriously? How’d Newt do in those states?

Not well - but the point, which you're apparently not capable of grasping, is that what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If it applies to Newt for not campaigning in states he wasn't doing well in to begin with, then the same must apply to Santorum.

58 posted on 03/08/2012 6:28:19 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Uh, what do you consider an entitlement?


59 posted on 03/08/2012 6:29:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Really? You believe Rick’s a fighter? I hope you’re right - someone needs to fight. I still don’t think he can articulate his positions, and when he’d have to fight against Obama, what would he do?


60 posted on 03/08/2012 6:30:14 PM PST by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Don’t think so- they bought have to stay in- if not, Romney and the Gop-e steam rolls them one on one.


61 posted on 03/08/2012 6:30:49 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick
I still don’t think he can articulate his positions, and when he’d have to fight against Obama, what would he do?

I sincerely believe Rick could win against Obama. He was just on CNN and did a great job of articulating his positions and of using the opportunity to expose Romney's lies on Obamacare. I can't see the future and we've certainly had our heads pushed back under the water every time we try to come up for air but I think Rick's the real deal.

62 posted on 03/08/2012 6:35:04 PM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: VinL
I want a floor fight at the convention.

I will be there/fighting for my conservative.

63 posted on 03/08/2012 6:35:36 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

“is that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander”

Newt’s goose is cooked. The poster was making excuses for Newt because “he didn’t campaign” - no excuses were being made for Santorum in that regard, therefore the precedent in the groundbreaking case of Goose v. Gander does not apply.


64 posted on 03/08/2012 6:35:42 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I can consider an entitlement any time the government is said to “owe” people or organizations and can’t be undone. Everything from government bureaucratic positions, NPR/Pbs funding, corporate welfare, agricultural subsidies (redundant in most cases with corporate welfare), all funding of NGO’s, welfare and anyone who gets a check from Uncle Sam that didn’t involve doing any work in that pay period. (BTW, Medicare, Medicaid and SS are entitlements when you have gotten more out than you paid in).

At the point you want others to pay for your stuff, its an entitlement (heck most government JOBS could be called entitlements under my definition, lol)


65 posted on 03/08/2012 6:46:28 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I have one question for you, Would you vote for either Mitt or Rick, if they were the nominee?? Or would you not vote and give Obama a vote??


66 posted on 03/08/2012 6:47:32 PM PST by kaki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Hmm ~ your check is no longer in the mail.


67 posted on 03/08/2012 6:50:02 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I think its better if they both stay in.

I agree. If either drops out some of their support will go to Romney. The only hope for an other-than-Romney result is for Gingrich & Santorum to start winning winner-take-all states. Otherwise they will keep falling farther behind. If Gingrich+Santorum > Romney+Paul, then they can make a deal. Otherwise, I think it's Romney's game.

68 posted on 03/08/2012 6:53:36 PM PST by esarlls3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Where will the family value voters go if Rick exits???

**

If this is a serious question, I find it hard to believe.

It’s not like Newt is some sort of devil worshiper! The man is now happily married and attends church. He is a sinner. So are those family values folks. No one is above anyone in the SIN department. Real, honest, living the life Christians know all about it. Real and honest people stumble, fall, and then seek repentance.

Newt is not FOR anything that values voters would be against. He’s pro-life, pro-marriage, and pro-family. He wants a strong America which will enable families and religious institutions to survive. One of his main planks is to stop the persecution of Judeo-Christian heritage and values.

What else do people want? Newt is real, flawed, and brilliant. Would MUCH rather have such a person in the WH, as he understands hard times and might just have a bit of humility built into HIS character!!


69 posted on 03/08/2012 6:54:21 PM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VinL
In reality, with no Conservative candidates in the race, Romney was beaten down to getting 1/10 the number of votes he should have been able to expect in a normal process.

Sure, he gets the delegates, but who wants to be a Romney delegate after such a debacle.

Virginia's primary proved conclusively that Mitt's support is remarkably thin, and not enough to get out the vote in a real election.

Money isn't all you need to run. You need peeps and he hasn't got any.

70 posted on 03/08/2012 6:54:32 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Seriously? How’d Newt do in those states?

Newt had to encounter what establishment Rick never did: a week of false smears from the likes of Eliott Abrams and other GOP-E insiders. Those smears were carried throughout the media and in effect, a free multi-million dollar negative ad campaign. Even with those hurricane forces against him, Newt finished second in Florida and turnout in counties he won were up sharply as in South Carolina.

Newt arrived in Nevada days after Rick and Ron Paul and was expected to lose both to Mitt and Ron. Instead Newt finished second in Nevada, but the press played up Mitt winning (with a 90% Mormon vote) instead of Newt overtaking Ron Paul and beating expectations. Nevada was a case where Ron and Rick spent more time than Newt and came in third and fourth respectively.
71 posted on 03/08/2012 6:59:40 PM PST by red flanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: VinL

” Newt can’t beat Romney one on one- neither can Rick. Romney has too much money and institutional power. “ ——

Vin, I’m glad you lay the truth out there. It is a fact.

I have known this also for weeks, but clung to hope, which led to prayer, and that somehow this cycle was so very different that the truly daunting events and the present facts could be reversed, that Republican voters would wake up and see the machine fix in place.

What is left is to pray that ALL three candidates can mess with Romney long enough to GET US TO CONVENTION, so that we will have earned a hearing of our complaints there, a seat at the table, and be in a position to offer up the delegate war as our bono fidis!

THE DELEGATES, OF ALL THREE, ARE OUR FINAL AND ONLY WEAPON
TO HAVE A VOICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE RINOS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

Alone, none of these candidates against Romney have a prayer, and We The People, the instance one drops out, are silenced and dismissed, left with nothing but theater.

The Establishment is in no real panic and that is quite telling, but for Barbara Bush, of course. But the Establishment knows exactly how this ends because we have failed to unite in time to overwhelm.

Santorum will NEVER be the nominee, one on one.
Newt will NEVER be the nominee, one on one, maybe period.
Ron Paul will certainly NEVER be the nominee by any math.

IMHO, Rick and Newt are unlikely to allign because Rick is so naieve, but as you said, to have a prayer they MUST together get radical and present a united front against Romney at all costs, for us to have a prayer to change the party apparatus, agenda and defeatism of RINO leadership.

I am certain Newt knows this and has tried with smoke signals to confer with Santorum, but Rick is small picture and mostly for Rick, and runs on just enough grandiosity and battle drama to blind him to any need for unity. This is not a sign of wisdom.

We can not be demoralized but instead must push for a united front, and in a serious rebellion against the Establishment, rather than push for one to get out.

Now, the truth is out there.


72 posted on 03/08/2012 7:00:06 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"It will be 1968's Doppelganger. "

How cool would that be?

A million-armed-man march on Tampa, FLA.

Metaphorically, of course.

73 posted on 03/08/2012 7:01:50 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Excellent Rita, you’re quite a gifted writer.


74 posted on 03/08/2012 7:06:55 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; All
"The RNC is a disease with MYTH ROMNEY as its main symptom."

The RNC starts at your local precinct and county level. There's a committee in every county in the USA. When was the last time you were at one of the meetings and voted?

It's nearly a perfect direct democracy.

And don't give me that crap about being too busy...gotta work for a living...kids...etc. That's the same for darn near everyone else at the local VFW or County Auditorium.

Oh, they accept donations of both money and time at every stinkin' one of them.

When was the last time any of you showed up at the local meeting?

75 posted on 03/08/2012 7:09:43 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kaki
I have one question for you, Would you vote for either Mitt or Rick, if they were the nominee?? Or would you not vote and give Obama a vote??

Actually that is a minimum of two questions, perhaps three.

I will vote for the GOP nominee, whomever he or she is, on November 6th, because the prime directive is the removal of the Obama Administration, lock, stock and barrel. Period. End of story.

I have no use for those who say "I won't vote for so and so in the general", because the fate of the entire nation is at stake in a very real way on Nov. 6th.

Before the nominee is selected, I will fight for my candidate, which is Newt. After the candidate is selected, I will fight for them and AGAINST Obama, that is how critical this election is.

No one can afford to sit this one out.

Personally, after Nov. 6th, I would love to see a third party arise, like the Tea Party, for conservative values.

But if Obama is re-elected because a bunch of folks who should know better sit the election out, pouting, it will no longer matter--the second American Civil War will follow, as the Marxists in power will be unstoppable, and true patriots will have to respond in a way that has not been necessary since 1861.

76 posted on 03/08/2012 7:16:01 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa
"Where will the family value voters go if Rick exits???"

Excerpts from Santorum's voting record.

Voted for taxpayer funding of the National Endowment for the Arts.

Voted against a 10% cut in the budget for National Endowment for the Arts.

Voted for a Schumer amendment to make the debts of pro-life demonstrators not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Voted for mandatory Federal child care funding

Voted for funding for the legal services corporation.

Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to to the earnings of their sponsors.

Voted to strike marriage penalty tax relief and instead provide fines on tobacco companies.

Voted against repealing the Clinton 4.3 cent gas tax increase.

Voted to allow welfare to a minor who had a child out of wedlock and who resided with an adult who was on welfare within the previous two years.

Voted to increase taxes by $9.4 billion to pay for a $9.4 billion increase in student loans.

Voted against food stamp reform

Voted against Medicaid reform

Voted against TANF reform

Voted to increase the Social Services Block Grant from $1 billion to $2 billion

Voted to use HUD funds for the Joslyn Art Museum (NE), the Stand Up for Animals project (RI) and the Seattle Art Museum’s Olympic Sculpture Project (WA)

Voted to increase spending on social programs by $7 billion

Voted to increase community development programs by $2 billion.

Voted to increase spending for the Department of Education by $3.1 billion.


77 posted on 03/08/2012 7:17:15 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

oh, my gosh. This is so perfectly summarizing where everything is right now. I have just felt, in all my little contacts and universe, and prayers, that people are deepening at this moment, or trying to, and reaching to understand that we have to deal with reality, even if it hurts. And you are out there in the vanguard.

I want to send this around to my little “troops” tomorrow if that is okay because it is written so simply and so clearly, and I won’t or shouldn’t have to explain anything further. I will gladly credit you, if you tell me how I should name it. thank you for being brilliant at the moment we are all needing brilliance.


78 posted on 03/08/2012 7:18:49 PM PST by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

That’s sort of the plan. Exit polls after the Ohio primary demonstrated a lot of moderates and liberal Democrats came out to vote for Romney.

I suspect that is what the RNC wants and has promoted Romney: to sway Democrats dissatisfied with BHO2.


79 posted on 03/08/2012 7:25:16 PM PST by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Just saw Newt on GRETA, and I am pretty sure he said the same thing we are discussing. I would have to catch it on a rewind, but he is definitly convention bound for a purpose, and it includes hoping to short Romney on delegates.

The odds for change rise or fall with holding delegates from Romney.

The man invented how to score big. He knows.

Just hope we don’t fail to get the message.


80 posted on 03/08/2012 7:29:37 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: VinL

ONE of these guys has GOT to stand down or we have to choose between Obama and Obama Lite.


81 posted on 03/08/2012 7:32:57 PM PST by ZULU (LIBERATE HAGIA SOPHIA!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; VinL; Red Steel
HANG TOUGH NEWT!

Newt winning enough delegates could give him some negotiating power at the convention. The establishment needs to be sent a clear and resounding message. How many times will we be forced to vote for a watered down rino? and to be honest...I also consider RS to be weak on many fiscal and social issues after viewing his record.

Let's make Mitt sweat!

82 posted on 03/08/2012 7:35:46 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Rewind here. :-)

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1496616401001/newts-last-stand-in-the-south/?playlist_id=87485


83 posted on 03/08/2012 7:43:13 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

YOU are too kind.

Couldn’t care less if you credit me, just get the word out what the facts are, as VinL advanced first.

It was VinL who was the “vanguard” (a nice word, btw) and dared tonight to answer a poster with the truth, and the facts on the ground.

Once he led, I followed suit.

The thesis is pretty simple but it deals with the universe of factors in this election, from my point of view.

Share away, whatever way you wish. You are welcome to clean up my word misfires also! Ha!

Thank you! YOU do plenty! :)


84 posted on 03/08/2012 7:43:33 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: VinL

If you apply the williard rule, williard had to carry michigain because he grew up and was born there. Newt was born and grew up in Pa, so he needs to carry it.


85 posted on 03/08/2012 7:44:48 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

I just managed to catch bits and pieces of it... but his message was Endurance, a big-picture, long-road focus. It would make me feel better if I could know how much of this alliance is being stoked behind the scenes. Did you catch it when he said, “it’s all a game” - candidates calling on each other to get out? He is just holding his cards close, not a blink.


86 posted on 03/08/2012 7:49:37 PM PST by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Somebody needs to talk Santorum into doing something else, he’s the one basic shot we have at losing this thing in November.


87 posted on 03/08/2012 7:50:38 PM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Many of the “unbound” delegates simply aren’t chosen yet, but the process will lead to them being chosen as people project. It’s not like they are free. It’s like their election is next month, but the outcome is already set in stone.

Pretending otherwise is just silly.

Of course, I understand why Gingrich supporters want to play that game — he’s only won two states, and they happen to both be primaries so their assignments are done.

The Gingrich folks were also using the “who got more votes” argument — until the day their candidate stopped being the one with more votes.

If Rick Santorum dropped out, Romney would be our nominee. Gingrich has no chance of capturing more than half of Santorum supporters. If Santorum had dropped out after Newt’s disastrous showing in Florida, Romney would have swept February and the primary season would be over. Newt wasn’t competitive anywhere until Super Tuesday, and then was an also-ran in half the contests.

He could rise again, and if he does, more power to him. But if he needed Santorum to drop out so that people felt forced to support Gingrich, he wasn’t going to win anything anyway.


88 posted on 03/08/2012 7:54:31 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
The problem with open primaries is somebody might notice that you got about 150,000 votes in Virginia but we usually have 1,500,000 voters in that same primary.

WOW.

The message was certainly sent but was it received?

89 posted on 03/08/2012 7:56:46 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Get real? reality has little to do with these threads.

There was a story that was going to be told after Super Tuesday. It was based on Newt sweeping the south, and rising again in places like Ohio and winning Alaska.

Oddly, he fell flat on his face everywhere but Georgia.

But the story must be told anyway. So even though there hasn’t been a SINGLE state where Newt came in 2nd where Santorum’s votes would have put Newt into first place, the Newt folks still argue that Newt’s problem is Santorum.

And even though Newt has a SuperPac that has been given 20 million dollars, they still complain that Newt’s problem is Santorum getting too much of the “conservative money”.


90 posted on 03/08/2012 7:58:05 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VinL

I failed to ping you at 84.

I always forget to do that! When I mention another poster..just,dang!


91 posted on 03/08/2012 7:58:40 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
CW, in these states where you get your delegates based on your percent of the total vote NO ONE CAN BE SAID TO HAVE WON A STATE.

Wish people would give up that idea ~ it's just so wrong.

92 posted on 03/08/2012 7:58:48 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Yes. If Rick Santorum cannot win his home state, he probably should quit. If that happens, Romney will be the nominee anyway, whether Rick continues or not.


93 posted on 03/08/2012 7:59:19 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; All
Everyone should read the below article to understand how delegates are selected

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29_presidential_primaries,_2012

There are 457 unbound delegates going onto the floor in Tampa by design. They are essentially "the Party".

A candidate has to win only about 685 bound delegates and the party can push them over the top.

However, if you read the article and understand it you'll see it's an imminently fair process and count method.

IF you have 685 and another guy has 604 and another guy has 505...you have a brand new hose race on the convention floor.

Folks, you want D R A M A?

Read about the '76 GOP Primary. It's was the last GOP primary to go to the convention floor.

Millions of us dropped to the floor weeping when it was over.

Or the grand fight on the floor of the Cow Palace in '64 when Goldwater won on the first ballot. There were fist fights in the aisles!!

Now imagine these things in the modern TV/Internet era.

Simply wow.

94 posted on 03/08/2012 7:59:36 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ngat
the only calls for withdrawal I heard was Santorum’s campaign manager calling for Gingrich to withdraw.

You must be listening in some alternative reality, because Santorum's campaign has not, and will not, ask Gingrich to quit, and Santorum has publicly stated that he will not call on Gingrich to quit.

The guy who runs a SuperPac supporting Santorum called on Gingrich to quit. That's not part of the Santorum campaign.

95 posted on 03/08/2012 8:03:30 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: familyop
The problem every Senator (except Obama) has is that he votes for stuff, and he hornswaggles and swaps spit to get other Senators to vote for his own stuff.

In the end they look like political prostitutes.

Some of the votes you noted in your list are certainly questionable. Some of them were just political swapsies.

This is one of the reasons Obama voted "present" so terribly many times!

96 posted on 03/08/2012 8:03:30 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
But the story must be told anyway. So even though there hasn’t been a SINGLE state where Newt came in 2nd where Santorum’s votes would have put Newt into first place, the Newt folks still argue that Newt’s problem is Santorum

So true, it's like a cult. These believers think Newt was "attacked" and brought down from his throne. Truth is, Newt attacked and people didn't like the side he showed. But whatever, as long as everyone's happy with Romney who am I to protest.

97 posted on 03/08/2012 8:04:09 PM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
But the story must be told anyway. So even though there hasn’t been a SINGLE state where Newt came in 2nd where Santorum’s votes would have put Newt into first place, the Newt folks still argue that Newt’s problem is Santorum

So true, it's like a cult. These believers think Newt was "attacked" and brought down from his throne. Truth is, Newt attacked and people didn't like the side he showed. But whatever, as long as everyone's happy with Romney who am I to protest.

98 posted on 03/08/2012 8:04:22 PM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
"It’s like their election is next month, but the outcome is already set in stone."

ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE!

Please, study the party rules. Look at party history.

99 posted on 03/08/2012 8:04:26 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

They be breakin’ them cellphones on they haids!


100 posted on 03/08/2012 8:05:46 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson