Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress approves punitive tariffs against China
AP ^ | March 9, 2012 | Jim Abrams

Posted on 03/09/2012 11:37:47 AM PST by 1rudeboy

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress on Tuesday overturned a court decision and reaffirmed that the government has the right to impose higher tariffs on goods from China and other state-run economies that subsidize their exports to the United States.

The House voted 370-39 to pass the measure and send it to President Barack Obama for his signature. The Senate approved it Monday on a voice vote with no debate.

"By passing this law, Congress has taken a clear stand against the unfair trade practices that have put countless American jobs in jeopardy," Vice President Joe Biden said in a statement.

The speedy and bipartisan congressional action came after a federal appellate court ruled in December that the Commerce Department did not have the authority to levy the punitive tariffs because Congress had never explicitly given the agency that right.

The Commerce Department has been applying these "countervailing" duties since 2007. The legislation ensures that 24 existing higher tariff orders and six pending investigations against imports from China and Vietnam will continue to be valid. Of those 24, 23 are directed at Chinese subsidies.

The duties are allowed under World Trade Organization rules to counteract unfair subsidies used by countries, such as China and Vietnam, with non-market economies. China agreed to abide by countervailing duty laws when it joined the WTO in 2001.

"China distorts the free market by giving enormous subsidies to its producers and exporters," said House Ways and Means Committee chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich.

(Excerpt) Read more at ctpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; government; loselose; notagain; nowin; stupid; tariffs; tradewar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: 1rudeboy
The free-traders certainly don't, because they understand the term.

You mean terms like "Undocumented Workers?"

21 posted on 03/09/2012 1:08:40 PM PST by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
If state-managed economies are your thing, enjoy your Chevy Volt and those curly-cued lightbulbs.

I'm thinking that it has a lot more appeal than our big business, big profit and Chinese managed economy

BTW, the Volt is pretty much history and those lightbulbs are likely made in China...

22 posted on 03/09/2012 1:23:41 PM PST by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Well, that’s a relief.
I wonder if we’ll get some nice 6% GDP growth soon?
Double digit?


23 posted on 03/09/2012 1:36:30 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

It will be interesting to see if obama will sign this. He may not because it would cause a trade war at exactly the wrong time.(elections)


24 posted on 03/09/2012 1:43:35 PM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Smoot-Hawley.... it didn’t work for them back then and it surely won’t work any better now. In fact, it may end up more devastating than last time.


25 posted on 03/09/2012 2:24:06 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
BTW, the Volt is pretty much history and those lightbulbs are likely made in China....

What are you saying? Our government can't manage the economy better than the people who actually operate in it?

26 posted on 03/09/2012 2:24:43 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

I would imagine most people understand the term, “undocumented worker,” even protectionists. I prefer “illegal alien.”


27 posted on 03/09/2012 2:26:12 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Goooooood. China is dumping products, manufacturing them using techniques which are illegal in this country: labor, production and currency games.

This enabled our factories to shipped to China and elsewhere because we supposedly aren’t competitive. There is too much regulation but have China++ instutute even proper regulations and allow currency float. Then we’ll see who manufactures cheaper. Esply adding on rising fuel costs.


28 posted on 03/09/2012 2:56:40 PM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Imposing tariffs is much easier than rolling back the taxes, regulation, and monetary policy that make us uncompetitive. Boob bait for the economic bubbas.


29 posted on 03/09/2012 3:40:50 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Some one steal your screen name, I don’t recognize you.


30 posted on 03/09/2012 4:05:54 PM PST by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Thank you.


31 posted on 03/09/2012 4:11:27 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
So that was your ham-handed way of implying that free-traders (and me, specifically), don't understand the term "undocumented worker."

It would be laughable if your attempt wasn't so pathetic. "Free traders want illegal immigration. Dur."

32 posted on 03/09/2012 4:18:40 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Reminds me of the idiot, don't remember her screen name off the top of my head, who insisted that if I was a free-trader, I HAD to be in favor of the free flow of labor across borders.
33 posted on 03/09/2012 5:11:09 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
C'mon, it follows. /s
I don't want the government to arbitrarily decide how much I pay for my products, therefore I'm in favor of busing in Mexicans and giving them in-state tuition. Dur.
34 posted on 03/09/2012 5:19:27 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: refermech
[It will be interesting to see if obama will sign this. He may not because it would cause a trade war at exactly the wrong time.(elections)]

He will be tempted to sign at the prospect of another revenue stream.

35 posted on 03/09/2012 7:26:13 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Stupid. Why does it seem like the 30’s all over again?


36 posted on 03/09/2012 8:52:44 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

While I agree there is much that can be done at home. If China is subsidizing their industry on top of already amazing cheap labor costs in comparison to American industry you must agree that is unfair and something must be done about it.


37 posted on 03/10/2012 8:55:13 AM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No it was my Ham Handed way of remembering you pimping ever open borders thread I was ever on.


38 posted on 03/10/2012 9:15:51 AM PST by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

What do you call punitive tariffs against China?

“A good start”.


39 posted on 03/10/2012 9:16:48 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("The door is open" PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

In the 30’s, we led the world in exports.


40 posted on 03/10/2012 9:18:15 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("The door is open" PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson