Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama impeachment bill now in Congress
WND ^ | March 10, 2012 | Drew Zahn

Posted on 03/11/2012 1:40:07 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

“This week it was Secretary of Defense Panetta’s declaration before the Senate Armed Services Committee that he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations,” Tancredo writes. “This led to Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., introducing an official resolution calling for impeachment should Obama take offensive action based on Panetta’s policy statement, because it would violate the Constitution.”

In response to questions from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., over who determines the proper and legal use of the U.S. military, Panetta said, “Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would … come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress – I think those are issues we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: drudge; foreigncontrol; impeachment; nwo; un; warpowers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2012 1:40:09 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Batter up! I can think of at least two dozen add ons to it. ABout time this was put forth.


2 posted on 03/11/2012 1:41:38 PM PDT by SueRae (Tale of 2 Towers - First, Isengaard (GOP-e), then, the Tower of Sauron on 11.06.2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

How many sponsors does it have?


3 posted on 03/11/2012 1:43:30 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
>"Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya."

Libya hell. What about Mexico?

Supplying arms to narco terrorists is an act of WAR!

Not just against Mexico, but also America!

4 posted on 03/11/2012 1:43:36 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Mohammedan law every woman must belong to a man will delay the end of slavery until Islam has ceased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

What is BHO’s high crime and misdemeanor?
All I see is policy issues.
Congress can stop what BHO is doing by growing a pair, which they wont.


5 posted on 03/11/2012 1:44:33 PM PDT by svcw (CLEAN WATER http://www.longlostsis.com/PI/MayanHelp2012.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The Hamster-balls republicans don’t have the courage to stop the Mau-Mau from doing anything.


6 posted on 03/11/2012 1:45:31 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“Come back here and I’ll taunt you again.”

So with everything Zero has done, they finally submit...a bill.

What is this, double dog dare?

“I double dog dare you to cross the Constitution just one more time. You do, and you’re really gonna get it!”

Just watch; that dog is all bark.


7 posted on 03/11/2012 1:47:17 PM PDT by Backstop73 (Always reading, seldom posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish; All

Every GOPe member of the House & Senate is now hiding in a cave........


8 posted on 03/11/2012 1:48:58 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Backstop73

Like Kadaffy’s ‘Line of Death’

This is the “Line of Death”, you cross it, you die!

Ok, this is another “Line of Death”, you cross it, you die!

Ok, another Line.

Ok, another Line

Alright, that’s it you come a-knocking on my door, I’m not coming out...nyaah!


9 posted on 03/11/2012 1:49:24 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Since 2010 what's kept the GOP-controlled House from sending to the Senate every week an impeachment bill with charges against Traitorbama?

Certainly it's not the lack of impeachable charges.

10 posted on 03/11/2012 1:49:41 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president.....”

.
You mean it took THIS LONG before this bunch of congressional eunuchs finally decided to stand up on their hind legs and challenge this usurper?

‘Home of the brave’, my foot.


11 posted on 03/11/2012 1:50:08 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Watching some pigs outside to see if any take off.


12 posted on 03/11/2012 1:50:42 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hc112-107


13 posted on 03/11/2012 1:52:19 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Well, that certainly gives me comfort Obummer and Pantless are going to Nato to get permission to bomb. /s


14 posted on 03/11/2012 1:52:55 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Too late, they signed over their manhoods last year when Zero went into Libya at the sniffling behest of France and congress played dead over it.
So they signaled to Zero that they are irrelevant.
Which is what he said through Panetta the other day.
The time for them to take a stand was last year.
Wonder how long until they figure that out?


15 posted on 03/11/2012 1:54:09 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Previously on Free Republic...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2857124/posts?page=1

“It appears this resolution is a hedge against Obama doing the war thing again by simply restating what the Constitution provides, and not the beginning of a congressional effort to remove O from office, at least at this time.”


16 posted on 03/11/2012 1:54:53 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

With the NDAA signed into law, Comrade Zero can simply have these pesky lawmakers who challenge his authorituh whisked away in the dead of night and held indefinately without trial or legal representation.


17 posted on 03/11/2012 1:56:20 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

So, it is “I double dog dare you....” on this bill by Congress?!


18 posted on 03/11/2012 1:56:41 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elephant

xactly,

we are under attack!!!! can we fire back????

Assclowns


19 posted on 03/11/2012 1:58:21 PM PDT by himno hero (Obamas theme...Death to America...The crusaders will pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elephant

Yes, or whatever comes next after a double-dog dare.


20 posted on 03/11/2012 2:01:39 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Why?

It won’t go anywhere.

The Dems control the Senate.

If it does pass the House, it will be seen as a political move and will cost the Republicans.


21 posted on 03/11/2012 2:04:23 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

http://www.whitleycountypatriots.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/obama_shreds_constitution.jpg


22 posted on 03/11/2012 2:05:37 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
I think this is a big mistake. The public is divided on Obama and this will only allow him to divert our attention from the collapsing economy, crushing debt and skyrocketing gas prices. The media will sell it as a "racist" political "lynching" and at least some brain dead voters will buy.

Even if The House impeached him, and they won't, The Senate will not convict. This is a stunt. It may serve the interest of a few congressmen, but it will not help us bring down Obama.

23 posted on 03/11/2012 2:06:54 PM PDT by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

A triple-dog-dare. Like duh!


24 posted on 03/11/2012 2:08:01 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Agreed!


25 posted on 03/11/2012 2:08:25 PM PDT by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

the public is divided about a communist usurper forger? Just submit a forged Impeachment bill and call it even.


26 posted on 03/11/2012 2:10:43 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Or, I double-dog dare you and your friends too. Never heard of a triple-dog dare before. It’s been a sheltered life.


27 posted on 03/11/2012 2:12:01 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Secretary of Defense Panetta’s declaration before the Senate Armed Services Committee that he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations,".....led to Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., introducing an official resolution calling for impeachment should Obama take offensive action based on Panetta’s policy statement, because it would violate the Constitution.”

OH; HELL YEAH!!!
28 posted on 03/11/2012 2:13:03 PM PDT by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy and no "out of touch" Rev. Rick........Gingrich.... YES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

Boehner wouldn’t dare bring it to a vote.

He remembers which one lost his job when another Speaker brought impeachment charges against a sitting president.


29 posted on 03/11/2012 2:13:27 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: svcw
What is BHO’s high crime and misdemeanor?

By granting an international body--the UN--rather than Congress, the power to authorize the use of military force, Obama has committed the highest crime, treason.

30 posted on 03/11/2012 2:14:02 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Well, not having ever been a little boy, I was extrapolating a bit. Maybe shouldn’t have.


31 posted on 03/11/2012 2:14:35 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

I think this is a big mistake. The public is divided on Obama and this will only allow him to divert our attention from the collapsing economy, crushing debt and skyrocketing gas prices. The media will sell it as a “racist” political “lynching” and at least some brain dead voters will buy.
Even if The House impeached him, and they won’t, The Senate will not convict. This is a stunt. It may serve the interest of a few congressmen, but it will not help us bring down Obama.


I agree.


32 posted on 03/11/2012 2:16:34 PM PDT by unkus (After his discharge from the army he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: giotto

I agree with your statement....going to NATO. This sumbitch wants a one world gummit.


33 posted on 03/11/2012 2:17:55 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Interesting how the media went silent after the initial video went across the Internet. Little coverage on this, maybe Pravda has something on it.
34 posted on 03/11/2012 2:42:42 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; All
Would it end up with the offal that went on in the Clinton impeachment

Book review of 'Sell Out'.......

David Schippers, the chief investigative counsel for the Clinton impeachment, wants to be sure Americans know just who contributed to the debacle and how. A trial attorney and a Democrat, Schippers was hired by Republican congressman Henry Hyde to lead an oversight investigation of the Justice Department, then was redirected to handle the impeachment. The quintessential honest man, Schippers was shocked, not so much by Clinton's actions (which he calls a far-reaching conspiracy to obstruct justice with perjury, lies, and witness tampering), but by Republican and Democratic politicians who sold out the impeachment process.

If you ever want to vote again, you might not want to know what went on behind the scenes in the Capitol Hill meat grinder leading up to and during the impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Clinton.... Lies, cowardice, hypocrisy, cynicism, amorality, butt-covering--these were the squalid political body parts that, squeezed through the political processor, combined to make a mockery of the impeachment process.

35 posted on 03/11/2012 2:44:32 PM PDT by QT3.14 (Life is not a Dress Rehearsal - it is Showtime!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Presidents have been doing this at least since WWII.

And there are a hundred better, stronger cases to be made for Obama’s impeachment and imprisonment.

But if it works I’m all for it!


36 posted on 03/11/2012 2:52:30 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

People in America don’t want the idiot impeached. They want him fired.

Doing something like this just excites his crazy base...the race based voters, media buttkissers, and other true believers. Impeachment won’t hurt him politically, it’ll make him stronger.

We need to find ways to demoralize his supporters, not fire them up.


37 posted on 03/11/2012 2:53:36 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; All
Would it end up with the filth with Pubs involved that went on in the Clinton impeachment

Book review of 'Sell Out'.......

David Schippers, the chief investigative counsel for the Clinton impeachment, wants to be sure Americans know just who contributed to the debacle and how. A trial attorney and a Democrat, Schippers was hired by Republican congressman Henry Hyde to lead an oversight investigation of the Justice Department, then was redirected to handle the impeachment. The quintessential honest man, Schippers was shocked, not so much by Clinton's actions (which he calls a far-reaching conspiracy to obstruct justice with perjury, lies, and witness tampering), but by Republican and Democratic politicians who sold out the impeachment process.

If you ever want to vote again, you might not want to know what went on behind the scenes in the Capitol Hill meat grinder leading up to and during the impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Clinton.... Lies, cowardice, hypocrisy, cynicism, amorality, butt-covering--these were the squalid political body parts that, squeezed through the political processor, combined to make a mockery of the impeachment process.

38 posted on 03/11/2012 2:58:26 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

This won’t fly, so it is likely done strictly as a p.r. piece. This is why (my comments after):

“The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548) is a federal law intended to check the power of the President in committing the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress.

“The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of “a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”

“The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.

“The War Powers Resolution was disregarded by President Clinton in 1999, during the bombing campaign in Kosovo, and again by President Obama in 2011, when he did not seek congressional approval for attack on Libya, arguing that the Resolution did not apply to that action. ALL presidents since 1973 have declared their belief that the act is unconstitutional.”

The bottom line is that, since the very founding of the United States, the presidency has been on a trajectory of becoming an “imperial presidency”.

Presidents, the congress, and the Supreme Court have allowed this to happen, and it has reached the point where presidents are able to assume powers granted to the other two branches at will, utterly disregarding the constitutional checks and balances.

The rough timeline of some of the major events in this process:

1789 - George Washington uses 15,000 militia to suppress a “stupid tax” revolt during the Whiskey Rebellion, violating the constitution and establishing the supremacy of the federal government over the individual states and citizenry.

1803 - In the Marbury v. Madison decision, the SCOTUS asserts that it can declare federal laws unconstitutional. But when they try to order the president to obey their decision, he refuses. From this point the president is effectively above the law, though removal from office after impeachment is close to impossible.

1833 - South Carolina attempts to nullify federal tariffs by state law. Congress passes a ‘Force Bill’, authorizing president Andrew Jackson to use military force against the government and citizens of that state. He threatens to hang all government officials who voted for nullification, so they vote to rescind nullification.

1836 - Andrew Jackson destroys the Second Bank of the United States, then issues the ‘Specie Circular’ executive order, just before leaving office, which effectively wiped out the savings of many Americans, causing a terrible depression that lasts five years. Its intent was to “punish land speculators and bankers”, people of wealth that Jackson despised.

1861-1865 Abraham Lincoln invalidates much of the Bill of Rights during the Civil War; imposes the first direct federal tax on American citizens, the income tax; among many expansions of presidential power.

1865-1870 The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments further increase federal supremacy over the states, as well as making the federal government central to all government power in the US.

1890-1920 The Progressive Era diminishes the value of state citizenship, clearing the path for unhindered involvement by the federal government directly into the individual lives of citizens. It then proceeds to do so.

1933-1935 The National Recovery Administration effectively nationalized American agriculture and created (modeled on fascist economics) public-private partnerships of many industries.

1936 President Franklin Roosevelt declares the commerce clause of the constitution to be an overriding principle of federal economic control over all aspects of the US economy.

From this point, virtually every US president has in some way increased the power of the office of the presidency, until under most circumstances they may function as a dictator. Among the most recent abuses are:

The Presidential Signing Statement - in which the president asserts how he *chooses* to interpret a law, what parts he will carry out, and what parts he will ignore.

Czars and recess appointments - no longer even trying to get unacceptable individuals approved by the us senate, just declaring them to have governmental power.

Subordinate dictatorial authority - cabinet officers and bureaucrats making extreme regulations outside of their authority.

Executive privilege - asserted in any circumstance that could embarrass the president, in flagrant contempt of congress.

Refusal by cabinet officers to carry out duties against presidential allies, while unfairly prosecuting presidential opponents.

Radical expansion of the number of federal police organizations (100+) and their authority, while granting police powers to non-police federal agencies.


39 posted on 03/11/2012 2:59:27 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Does this picture inspire you with confidence that Obongo will ever be impeached?  For any reason whatsoever?  This is what we got for leadership on our side.  Feckless pant wetters.

 

40 posted on 03/11/2012 3:13:59 PM PDT by CaptainKrunch (I'm in the 99%, and I say... F communism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Voting him out is faster, neater and won't cause too much fuss.
41 posted on 03/11/2012 3:15:22 PM PDT by capt. norm (Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves for they shall never run out of material. c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Before this has an opportunity to be voted down by the Democrat Socialists, the Republican Party leadership will likely stop it.


42 posted on 03/11/2012 3:17:57 PM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: giotto

Doesn’t there have to be a charge, then a trial with conviction, then move to impeach, them removal?


43 posted on 03/11/2012 3:19:03 PM PDT by svcw (CLEAN WATER http://www.longlostsis.com/PI/MayanHelp2012.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
this resolution is a hedge against Obama doing the war thing again by simply restating what the Constitution provides, and not the beginning of a congressional effort to remove O from office, at least at this time.”

A little on the late side but understandable to at least try to prevent him from doing so again...unfortunately those efforts will get bogged down in congress as par usual and bm will do as he will and apologize after the fact....should he want to go into another war he will regardless of what's in the pipeline against him......

44 posted on 03/11/2012 3:27:42 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

There’s always an excuse not to do the right and honorable thing.


45 posted on 03/11/2012 3:48:17 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: caww

Since NATO commands our troops congress can abdicate its duty. Obama won’t ask congress he hasn’t before. Hillary and Obama will go to the UN for ‘permission’ and NATO will take over from there.

BTW, when you see a headline “NATO troops killed” they are always AMERICANS. The state of California has lost more soldiers than nearly all the NATO countries combined. We don’t run the ‘war’ we just provide the troops so NATO can have a standing army.

This is about as messed up as a country can get, unless you’re a globalist and you applaud the unconstitutional take over of our military by foreign commanders.


46 posted on 03/11/2012 3:52:52 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
We don’t run the ‘war’ we just provide the troops so NATO can have a standing army.....This is about as messed up as a country can get, unless you’re a globalist and you applaud the unconstitutional take over of our military by foreign commanders.

I didn't realize so many of our troops were the bulk of the NATO force....but then I read years ago that as things progress to a one world order that it will be the US selected as the military might within that once it's established...and the primary reason initially why they will keep the US significant for a time...but they will be deployed on an international scale at the will of that Order once established.

What I question is how many of our men and woman will be willing to serve then? But then I consider the youth of today are pretty much indoctrinated to become "World Citizens" from our educational institutes.

47 posted on 03/11/2012 4:04:20 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
We don’t run the ‘war’ we just provide the troops so NATO can have a standing army.....This is about as messed up as a country can get, unless you’re a globalist and you applaud the unconstitutional take over of our military by foreign commanders.

I didn't realize so many of our troops were the bulk of the NATO force....but then I read years ago that as things progress to a one world order that it will be the US selected as the military might within that once it's established...and the primary reason initially why they will keep the US significant for a time...but they will be deployed on an international scale at the will of that Order once established.

What I question is how many of our men and woman will be willing to serve then? But then I consider the youth of today are pretty much indoctrinated to become "World Citizens" from our educational institutes.

48 posted on 03/11/2012 4:04:20 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
There’s always an excuse not to do the right and honorable thing.

Why sure. What else could it be but excuses from this corrupt "Two-Party Cartel" owned by the elites fro the elites. You ain't seen to worst yet by these bastards.

49 posted on 03/11/2012 4:05:10 PM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; MitchellC; JaneNC; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; ...

Conservatives have been critical of Walter Jones in the past and rightly so, but he’s showing gonads that many other Republicans from safe districts don’t seem to have.


50 posted on 03/11/2012 4:10:07 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson