Posted on 03/13/2012 10:54:19 AM PDT by Nachum
Good point - it would probably be deliberately switched for a political reason as well.
Focus, people. This is in Great Britain, where humans who were alive in the late eighties are allowed to give blood. There would be no blood banks in England if they followed our rules.
Note, please, that in the USA, no one who was in England, or across the channel in Western Europe, for more than a few weeks in the late 80s, is even ALLOWED to give blood due to the mad cow scare there.
In our country, not a single Brit who was alive then could give blood here.
My blood is banned in the USA for life because I lived in Europe then.
In terms of gay, in this country if a man admits to one count of sex with another man he is forbidden to give blood for life too.
I am similarly banned, though not for serving my country, just for living over there. That rule is so ignorant that it should be changed WAY before the USA adds homosexuals to the blood donor list.
Anyone in Europe (I didn’t know it extended as far as Turkey) during the years where there was a mad cow scare in England is banned. Yet very few of those nations import any British beef. It makes no sense.
In short, MSM!! Main Stream Maggots who are affectionately called faggots?
Men Sans Manhood?
The rest would be relly, really X-rated!
I keep hearing among the sodomite community that their goal in therapy is to have an “undetectable viral load” - meaning HIV can’t be detected in the blood, but is still present.
How’s that for covert infection of the populous?
“Banking your blood” in many instances just means getting credit for the blood you bank - give a pint, get a pint, but not necessarily yours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.