Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RJS1950
They figured out that if you sell at a lower and reasonable price you make up the difference in sales volume, something I learned in econ 101.

Except that everything I've read says that Amazon was losing money on their ebook sales. It was a loss leader for them. So if they were pressuring publishing companies to sell them books at a loss, and then selling those books at a loss, they were a deflationary pressure.

I agree it seems goofy that ebooks should cost more than paperbacks. On the other hand I'm starting to really appreciate not having to find more shelf space!

Everything I've read from people involved in publishing makes me think Amazon wants to replace the big publishers. Is that bad? Maybe, maybe not, but as both a reader and an aspiring writer, I want lots of publishing houses.

28 posted on 03/14/2012 8:31:30 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: JenB

Amazon looses money on the Kindles, but not on the books.


29 posted on 03/14/2012 8:41:11 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: JenB

For general reading like novels, history, etc I love my Nook. It is much more portable and handy and if I want to switch from one book to another it is a breeze.

Now, for textbooks and technical material (I am an IT professor) it is not so great and for those I prefer my traditional hard/soft bound books. I’ve had students who have tried etexts and most were not very happy with the usability.


31 posted on 03/14/2012 8:47:50 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson