Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s Delegate Lead Grows
The Washington Post ^ | March 14, 2012 | Aaron Blake

Posted on 03/14/2012 8:40:27 AM PDT by Iron Munro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-192 next last
To: trappedincanuckistan
I thought California was WTA by congressional district? Maybe I don’t understand what that means. What does that mean?

Let me check up on that one.
51 posted on 03/14/2012 10:20:09 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Gingrich Senior Advisor Randy Evans Explains Delegate Math
52 posted on 03/14/2012 10:20:47 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“Both Newt and Rick need to stay in the race, primarily, to keep Rick honest and in the game to the end.”

Interesting. I have very mixed feelings about Gingrich remaining in the race. This is the best rationale for doing so that I have seen.


53 posted on 03/14/2012 10:21:38 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I think we ought to listen to Alinsky." - Governor G. Romney, father of Bishop Willard M. Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I looked at your website.

Your math may or may not be right (i.e., Florida and others apportionment is not settled at this moment).

However, Your political acument is lacking: “With Gingrich’s “southern strategy” now in a shambles (He has won two (Georigia and South Carolina), Romney has won two (Florida and Virginia) and Santorum has won three (Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama)), the pressure on Gingrich to unite behind Santorum is going to grow in both strength and urgency. Seven southern states votes and Santorum is leading the pack with three and Romney and Gingrich with two each in the south.”

No-indeedy. Romney’s Florida and Virginia have not been “Southern” for a long, long time. They may have been part of the Confederacy, but their demographics belie their geographic positions. Romney cannot win in “the South”. Period.


54 posted on 03/14/2012 10:25:25 AM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

They just need to keep Romney under 1,000 delegates

Losing Alabama and Mississippi is going to hurt his fundraising even more than it already is.

Gotta love it anytime he comes in 3rd


55 posted on 03/14/2012 10:28:39 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan; Jeff Head; SaxxonWoods; JediJones
I thought California was WTA by congressional district? Maybe I don’t understand what that means. What does that mean?

You were so right!

Those paying attention may have caught the media stating how the Republican Party has moved away from a winner-take-all process for the 2012 Primary Elections. A more accurate statement is that the party has moved away from a statewide winner-take-all process. Instead, the Republicans have moved primary races towards either a statewide proportionate winner or a winner-take-all by congressional district, a scheme which usually still awards a few delegates to the broader statewide winner. And if you weren’t confused yet, just for fun, there are a few other states with some combination of both.

This makes it even more impossible for Mitt Romney to win outright.

I was under the assumption that California, with it's 169 delegates, was a STATE-WIDE Winner-Take-All primary, IT IS NOT!

It is a Congressional District Winner-Take-All primary, effectively making it a proportional state.
56 posted on 03/14/2012 10:30:14 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I think the GOP bigwigs conceded 2012 before the primaries even started. I think Romney is the designated loser.


57 posted on 03/14/2012 10:33:20 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

That’s why it is so important for Newt and Rick to stay in. Both staying in denies Romney a larger % of delegates in big states like California than he would get if it was one on one. IMO anyway. As I said I’m not an expert, but it appears to me that the proportional states to come are more significant than the WTA states.


58 posted on 03/14/2012 10:35:21 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: order66.exe

But he did take Virginia and that’s what happened. It is about 10% (a little less ) of his total...but even then he would be far ahead.

Like last night, Alabama and Mississippi were wins for Santorun, but not by much and heavily split. He ended up with the wins and with 31 delegates to Romney’s 23. but then in Hawaii and Samoa, Romney added like 21 or 22 delegates more to Santorum’s 2-3 and so Romney added significantly more to his lead.

That’s they way it will continue to go IMHO unless Newt and Rick make a deal.


59 posted on 03/14/2012 10:36:10 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“Both Newt and Rick need to stay in the race”

If that happens it’s unlikely that either one of them will win any of the winner-take-all states you listed.

Your strategy can prolong the race but will not change the final outcome. The only way to change the final outcome is if the losing candidates begin to drop out.

Just looking at your scenario, if Romney takes the 8 winner-take-all states and wins only 30% of the vote in the proportional races that already puts him over the top with 1174 delegates.


60 posted on 03/14/2012 10:36:48 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012

Looking at how future primaries are structured, you will observe there are many states with WTA-CD & WTA-AL. Which means the winner in each congressional district takes all delegates. And the At Large delegates also win with a simple majority. With 4 candidates in the race one does not need 46% or even 40% to win all delegates, just 30% can win all delegates in a district if the other 3 candidates divide the other 70% with no one beating the 30%. Also observe the winner take all states of PR, DC & UT where one needs a simple majority to win all delegates.


61 posted on 03/14/2012 10:48:40 AM PDT by entropy12 (Republicans do not hate, that is a monopoly of democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aegiscg47

And don’t be surprised if Florida’s -50 penalized delegates suddenly reappear in the Romney column...


62 posted on 03/14/2012 10:50:39 AM PDT by magritte (Gladys Knight: Mormon Siren?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Just looking at your scenario, if Romney takes the 8 winner-take-all states and wins only 30% of the vote in the proportional races that already puts him over the top with 1174 delegates

Actually, no.

Total delegates in winner-take-all states: 219
Romney's current Delegate count: 475-496
Total possible if Romney wins all WTA Primaries: 715
Remaining Primary Delegate count: 1061
Delegates needed by Romney to Win: 1144-715 = 429

Percentage of remaining Delegates Romney must win to win nomination without going to a Convention: 429/1061 = 40%

That number will change dynamically, and not for the good of Romney, as the false mantra of FoxNews, the GOP-E, and the MSM about the inevitability and electability of Romney keeps sinking in with the base.
63 posted on 03/14/2012 10:50:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Illinois
Wisconsin
Maryland
New York
Pennsylvania
Connecticut
Delaware
West Virginia
Texas
California
New Jersey

most of the above states are NE Romney states, where he wins either a 2 or 3 man race. Rick might take his home state of PA, but remember he lost his re-election there by 18 points.

Rick could win in TX, WV and WI.

But, the math shows improbable path to Rick reaching 1144.

The goal must be to stop Mitt from getting to 1144 before the convention.

64 posted on 03/14/2012 10:53:11 AM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: magritte

Yep, more proof that the fix was in all along


65 posted on 03/14/2012 10:58:22 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“Futhermore, he needs 46% of the remaining vote to win the nomination outright, he won’t get 46% of the remaining vote and each primary he does not get 46% of the vote, that percentage only goes higher.”

Not correct. If Newt stays in the race we have 4 candidates dividing the votes since Dr. Paul will not drop out. There are a ton of states coming up where delegates are awarded by WTA-CD. Which means winner takes all by congressional district. Assume Paul gets 10%, Newt gets 25%. That leaves 65% divided between Santorum & Romney. Which means 33% wins ALL delegates in that district.


66 posted on 03/14/2012 11:00:21 AM PDT by entropy12 (Republicans do not hate, that is a monopoly of democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Just wait until Romney wins winner-take-all states like Puerto Rico (23), Maryland (37 delegates), DC (19), Delaware (17), California (172), New Jersey (50), and Utah (40). [Not sure if he’ll win winner-take-all Wisconsin (42).] Those wins add up to 358 more delegates. If he wins those and loses Wisconsin, Romney only need 33% of the remaining from the proportional states.


67 posted on 03/14/2012 11:01:51 AM PDT by MichaelNewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Not correct. If Newt stays in the race we have 4 candidates dividing the votes since Dr. Paul will not drop out. There are a ton of states coming up where delegates are awarded by WTA-CD. Which means winner takes all by congressional district. Assume Paul gets 10%, Newt gets 25%. That leaves 65% divided between Santorum & Romney. Which means 33% wins ALL delegates in that district.

All built on assumptions by you.

I hate to break to you buddy, but we ain't voting for Mitt ROmney.

And if he wins the nomination, we all lose.

Best be getting busy trying to make sure he does not win, than trying to convince everyone about the FALSE inevitability of Mitt Romney.
68 posted on 03/14/2012 11:02:20 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MichaelNewton
Just wait until Romney wins winner-take-all states like Puerto Rico (23), Maryland (37 delegates), DC (19), Delaware (17), California (172), New Jersey (50), and Utah (40). [Not sure if he’ll win winner-take-all Wisconsin (42).] Those wins add up to 358 more delegates. If he wins those and loses Wisconsin, Romney only need 33% of the remaining from the proportional states.

Sorry to break it to you, but as already discussed on this thread, California is not a winner-take-all state.

It is a Congressional District WTA state effectively making it proportional, which meand your 358 just became 189.

Which also means your 33% is north of 40%.
69 posted on 03/14/2012 11:04:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

RCP has it listed incorrectly then.

Romney got about 40% of the delegates yesterday and that was one of his bad showings.


70 posted on 03/14/2012 11:07:12 AM PDT by MichaelNewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
most of the above states are NE Romney states, where he wins either a 2 or 3 man race. Rick might take his home state of PA, but remember he lost his re-election there by 18 points.

Actually, as of today, Rick maintains a 20% lead over Romney in PA according to the Quinnipac poll.
71 posted on 03/14/2012 11:07:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"The following are Winner-take-all:"

1. Puerto Rico
2. Maryland
3. Washington D.C.
4. Wisconsin
5. Delaware
6. California
7. New Jersey
8. Utah

and Romney is ahead in all the above, winner take all states. Rick's best chance is WI with a slim chance at CA if he has the momentum at that time.

Romney must be denied reaching 1144 by being limited to gaining fewer delegates in the proportional states since Mitt has such an advantage in the winner take all states.

72 posted on 03/14/2012 11:08:12 AM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA

We just found out that California is a Congressional District WTA, which in effect means it is proportional as well.

Romney can win the nomination.

He’s dead in the water.


73 posted on 03/14/2012 11:10:37 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; A_Niceguy_in_CA

Sorry that should have read:

Romney CAN’T WIN the nomination.


74 posted on 03/14/2012 11:11:31 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Agreed, Romney is not the best candidate against Obama. That would be Newt. I do not feel comfortable with Santorum going in debates with Obama. Obama will suck him in a religious & contraception issues in debates and Santorum will jump in the trap.

However Santorum would make a better president than Romney.

I thought we were discussing probabilities of who might win nomination, NOT who we WANT & WISH to win.


75 posted on 03/14/2012 11:11:58 AM PDT by entropy12 (Republicans do not hate, that is a monopoly of democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

It will be a controlled convention and the liberals of the GOP will not allow a conservative to obtain the nomination. We will have a liberal lackey shoved down our throats with a conservative VP slot bone tossed to us in hope of keeping conservatives on the reservation. The fix is in.


76 posted on 03/14/2012 11:25:23 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"Actually, as of today, Rick maintains a 20% lead over Romney in PA according to the Quinnipac poll."

Rick needs to win his home state, Newt and Mitt won their home states by large margins. However, Romney will still end up with delegates from PA

77 posted on 03/14/2012 11:25:44 AM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Glad that CA is proportional. Romney has a lot of money to spend on negative ads in CA. He needs to be denied delegates.


78 posted on 03/14/2012 11:29:58 AM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Don’t count Paul. He will give his delegates to Romney in exchange for either VP or some other impt job.

Pray he doesn’t get many more delegates.

The winner-take-all states are the big concern. Plus, Romney will take Calif and NY.

Santorum will get Penn and maybe Gingrich will get Tx, but his 2nd & 3rd place performances won’t make it easy for Perry to sell him.

Gingrich would have been formidable had he represented a solid south. Instead, he looks weak.

I think that folks are looking at how candidates can be defeated and Gingrich took it on the chin in Florida. Folks are afraid that will be repeated.


79 posted on 03/14/2012 11:30:56 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
It is a Congressional District WTA state effectively making it proportional, which meand your 358 just became 189.

That's true, if Romney gets shut out - as in, he loses all 53 congressional districts. He'll probably win the majority of the districts plus the 10 at large delegates awarded to the overall winner. Worst case he gets 90 district delegates + 10. J.M.O.

80 posted on 03/14/2012 11:32:51 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

goes all the way and Col Allen West step in and run on our ticket..

\

well I can dream can’t I


81 posted on 03/14/2012 11:38:51 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman,It's not a conservative view but a true American view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You’re wrong on some of these and this is too important to be spreading misinformation. Almost no one seems to understand the PA, WV, IL system yet. It’s direct, plurality-takes-all by district. If Romney wins every district with a 26-25-25-24 split and he wins EVERY delegate.

I’m not looking at what gets “settled at a convention” either, I’m looking at the votes and delegates. Obviously the party or grass-roots maneuvering will favor Romney or Paul so we need to win those to have any chance.

We have upcoming 622 delegates from just 7 big states with partial winner-take-all where splitting the vote could make the difference between handing Romney hundreds of delegates or not...the first 3 groups below. These are the kind of mixed/moderate states/districts like Ohio and Michigan where vote-splitting WILL kill us.

We have upcoming 228 from pure winner-take-all, where I guess Romney might only lose in Wisconsin for 42. But that’s 42 we might not get with vote-splitting and EVERY DELEGATE COUNTS.

And we have 439 from proportional. If one conservative drops out, we lose nothing here, because all those votes and delegates go to the other conservative instead.

We have EVERYTHING to gain by one conservative dropping out and pretty much nothing to lose.

The types:

Direct delegate election by district. If Romney wins every district in the state with 26-25-25-24 or more, he gets ALL the delegates. The nature of these states shows there is very serious vote-splitting potential to help Romney in these:

Illinois
Pennsylvania
West Virginia
(172 total)

Winner-take-all by district:

California

(172 total)

Election becomes winner-take-all if a candidate meets a certain threshold (usually 50%):

New York
Texas
Connecticut (a mix)

(278 total)

Proportional:

Louisiana
Rhode Island
North Carolina
Oregon
Arkansas
Kentucky
New Mexico
South Dakota
Nebraska
Indiana
Montana
Missouri

(439 total)

Winner-take-all:

Puerto Rico
Maryland
Washington D.C.
Wisconsin
Delaware
New Jersey
Utah

(228 total)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html


82 posted on 03/14/2012 11:40:14 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
He can win the Nomination, but he has no shot in the General.

So if he does win the nomination, and IF a third party would immerge, WOULD the third party have a crack at winning? Just wondering........

83 posted on 03/14/2012 11:41:07 AM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
For instance, how can Rick or Newt singlehandedly prevent Romney from getting any delegates in California? That’s kind of naive IMO.

No, the opposite is naive. The Illinois polls show Romney winning with 35% and Newt and Rick split lower. But combined, Newt and Rick are 43%. With a 35-25-15 split in any given California district, Romney wins all its delegates. Combine our vote and we beat him 40-35, and we win all the delegates. Look no further than Ross Perot to see how a conservative split awards a win to a single liberal.

84 posted on 03/14/2012 11:43:11 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
It is a Congressional District Winner-Take-All primary, effectively making it a proportional state.

That's a bad misreading of district winner-take-all. Just see South Carolina. Newt won 92% of the delegates but only got 40% of the vote. District winner-take-all are likely to give someone the vast majority of delegates even with a small plurality of the vote. It all depends if each district votes about the same as the whole state did or not. Every district is its own mini winner-take-all state. It all depends how many districts are liberal enough to give Romney over 50% regardless of who else runs, and which would split more like 40-30-20, Mitt-Rick-Newt. Nevertheless, we lose nothing in either district if we move to just one candidate. Advantage is for one of our guys to drop out. New York is probably the only state out of them all where it might help Mitt if one of our guys drops out. Because it shuts out the opponents from delegates if the winner gets over 50%. But looking at the map, we can pull the same move on Mitt in Texas with even more delegates at stake, and we get big advantages in all the district winner-take-all and direct delegate election states with one candidate and no splitting.

85 posted on 03/14/2012 11:51:15 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
REPOST FROM ABOVE WITH SPACING FIXED

It is a Congressional District Winner-Take-All primary, effectively making it a proportional state.

That's a bad misreading of district winner-take-all. Just see South Carolina. Newt won 92% of the delegates but only got 40% of the vote. District winner-take-all are likely to give someone the vast majority of delegates even with a small plurality of the vote. It all depends if each district votes about the same as the whole state did or not.

Every district is its own mini winner-take-all state. It all depends how many districts are liberal enough to give Romney over 50% regardless of who else runs, and which would split more like 40-30-20, Mitt-Rick-Newt. Nevertheless, we lose nothing in either district if we move to just one candidate. Advantage is for one of our guys to drop out.

New York is probably the only state out of them all where it might help Mitt if one of our guys drops out. Because it shuts out the opponents from delegates if the winner gets over 50%. But looking at the map, we can pull the same move on Mitt in Texas with even more delegates at stake, and we get big advantages in all the district winner-take-all and direct delegate election states with one candidate and no splitting.

86 posted on 03/14/2012 11:52:04 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Mitt Romney, needing 46% of the votes

He doesn't need 46% of the vote. He needs 46% of the delegates. That could take as little as 30% of the vote depending on how many other candidates are running and how he does in winner take all states.

87 posted on 03/14/2012 11:52:15 AM PDT by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
The "war" is coming either way. If the American people are still so stupid to vote barry or mittens, perhaps we deserve to be destroyed...

I just heard this from the mouth of Mitt Romney on FOX. "This election is about the soul of America."

This election is about ONE NATION UNDER GOD. The question every voter will have to answer is WHAT GOD WILL AMERICA BE UNDER?

As Joshua said, "Choose this day whom you will serve, but for me and my house we will serve the LORD.

Vote your faith, not the party line.

88 posted on 03/14/2012 11:54:19 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Do you think all Newt’s support goes to Santorum, or vice versa? I don’t.


89 posted on 03/14/2012 11:54:35 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I wanted Palin, thought about Perry, then jumped on the Cain train, when that fizzled I went with Newt who is still the only candidate I like.

I’m not going to spend time on FR bashing any of the candidates because in Nov. I’m going to vote for whoever has an R beside their name and I hope it’s Newt.

Were MS and AL open primary states? Is it possible the Dems voted for the weakest link against Obummer, the one least likely to beat him? How do you think Rick will do with the independent vote? I think we all know the answer to that. We need someone that can get the conservative and independent votes, and if they have to choose one at the convention, so be it.


90 posted on 03/14/2012 11:56:13 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nitzy
He doesn't need 46% of the vote. He needs 46% of the delegates. That could take as little as 30% of the vote depending on how many other candidates are running and how he does in winner take all states.


Furthermore, there are only around 200 delegates available in WTA primaries left. Hardly enough to support your 30% number.

Don't count California in your WTA column, it is WTA by Congressional District which means it is basically a proportional state.
91 posted on 03/14/2012 11:57:35 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Rick is way ahead in PA in a new poll this week. He's pretty safe there probably even if Newt stays in, but would probably need Newt out to win the southeastern PA counties. Keep in mind that 18-point loss was with Dems voting. PA is a closed primary, requiring a party switch 30 days in advance to vote in it.

But, the math shows improbable path to Rick reaching 1144.

It's all but impossible for Rick to get there, but unless we stop vote-splitting, it's improbable that we stop Romney from getting there. Vote-splitting in the below helps Romney for sure and we can't afford to let him have ANY extra delegates. He's gotta be a couple hundred south of 1,144 to stop Ron Paul or the unbound party members putting him over the top. A single one-on-one race in the below states could mean moving maybe 100-250 delegates from Romney to us.

Wisconsin
Illinois
Pennsylvania
West Virginia
Connecticut
Texas
California

92 posted on 03/14/2012 12:00:19 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Don't count California in your WTA column, it is WTA by Congressional District which means it is basically a proportional state.

Bzzzt. See South Carolina, WTA by district. Newt got 92% of the delegates with 40% of the vote. Districts are not likely to vote all that differently from the rest of the state, so whoever wins the state is likely to win most or virtually all the districts.

93 posted on 03/14/2012 12:04:36 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

2/3rds of the remaining or about 850 delegates are in WTA states, WTA districts or districts which conditionally turn WTA if the winner gets 50%. This back half of the primary is FAR more WTA than the first half. The states are not as favorable to Romney, but vote-splitting from two strong conservative candidates will hand him maybe 100s of free delegates in these contests.


94 posted on 03/14/2012 12:07:36 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
Do you think all Newt’s support goes to Santorum, or vice versa? I don’t.

Virtually all of it would I think, and in many cases he wouldn't need 100% of it to raise his numbers high enough to beat Romney. It's hard to imagine Newt dropping out flipping any contest Santorum is winning over to Romney. The reverse, though, is what we want and far more likely to occur.

95 posted on 03/14/2012 12:11:34 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

I do vote my faith....and it isn’t mittens nor barry, one of a kind.


96 posted on 03/14/2012 12:19:24 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Didn’t Santorum fail to register in some counties in Illinois? not sure but read something


97 posted on 03/14/2012 12:20:15 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Romney’s Delegate Lead Grows

Even as his momentum and electability shrinks.

98 posted on 03/14/2012 12:24:53 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Romney’s Delegate Lead Grows

Even as his momentum and electability shrinks.

99 posted on 03/14/2012 12:24:54 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Well, I am going out on a limb here and predicting that Ron Paul will come in 4th:)


100 posted on 03/14/2012 12:26:39 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson