Skip to comments.Jennifer Aniston spends almost $400 a day on her body, report says
Posted on 03/14/2012 1:37:29 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
Jennifer Aniston was recently dubbed the "Hottest Woman of All Time" by Men's Health magazine but, according to a new report, the "Wanderlust" spends $141, 037 a year maintaining her appearance.
That breaks down to almost $400 each and every day.
The website Shine has broken down what Aniston spends to retain her youthful glow, her golden locks and her taut body, based on the products and services that the star has sung the praises of.
Aniston recently revealed to Conan O'Brien that she is a fan of expensive laser peels, which cost $295 a pop, even if they leave her looking like a "battered burn victim for a week."
In addition, Aniston reportedly uses a $450 neck ointment by Euoko, and Mila Moursi Rejuvenating Serum which costs $350. She also regularly splurges on Tracie Martyn Red Carpet Facials that costs a reported $450. The star also uses a slew of other products, in addition to cosmetics.
As for Aniston's hair, her cuts with Chris McMillan, the creator of "The Rachel," cost a reported $600. The star also gets highlights from colorist Michael Canale, whose rate is reportedly $320.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
She should get her money back..................
Her 70+ beats Jens 40 something in my book.
Whop do you think reads Men's Health????...............
I can go to club publix here in tallahassee on any given day and find someone equally as hot.
And, I’m sure, a lot less whiney. Anyways, she must be a huge liberal because she is on every magazine and TV show and I just can’t see the interest. Yes, and I bet the Florida beaches are full of gals who make her look like $1 bill.
I would guess that a big chunk of the money she put down was buying votes for the “All Time” list.
Not only that, she’s in the glamour business where gorgeous=$$$. She more than recovers every dollar she spends on her looks in movie contracts. Smart gal!
More power to her - no free lunch in this world.
it sounds like she keeps more people employed than the current Post Turtle does... even if she is a stark-raving liberal.
A Raquel or Sophia or Liz Taylor hasn’t occured ‘naturally in Hollywierd in a while so PR has to create one. They started with JA in the Friends era, and always go back to her ‘building the legend’ as all the Megan Fox types flame out over a long weekend. Notice how she’s the go to story as soon as the flavor of the week outlasts her welcome in the celeb frunk eye. Lately it’s her, Kardashian and the eternal staged catfight with Jolie.
I’ll stick with Ginger or Mary Ann - even with the pot ;)
Good for her. I really don’t see this as a story. I mean it is her money she can spend it how ever she wants.
Good contrast btw.
Yeowza, you got that right!
A Raquel or Sophia or Liz Taylor
Unbeatable in my book! All the rest are wannabes.
Julie Newmar (drove me crazy!)
At least it’s not taxpayer’s money. I’m sure the daily cost of Moochelle’s personal staff exceeds the $400 spent by Aniston out of her own pocket.
I wondered about that, myself. Her face is plain. Her hair, for all the hype, is average. There are 100 girls in our church congregation (Spanish-language) with hair I’d give my right arm for. Her body is lean, if that’s a person’s taste, but 40-odd is 40-odd, anyway.
And as others have pointed out, it’s telling that she’s never had a lasting relationship with a man. Boring old gray-haired me (only a little older than JA) has kept one for 25+ years.
I forgot the girl who made me think,,,,,”Oh! Now I see!”
I’ll never ceased being amazed at Gen-Xers (I’m 46) and younger forgetting that prior to Tawney Kitean and Jaguars in Whitesnake vids, them ‘old gals’ had a serious case of ‘teh hotnesZ’ as well.
My God, June Cleaver was 1000 times ‘hotter’ than 90% of modern TV women her age today.
And Lucielle Ball? Ann Margret, Bridgette Bardeau? Yvonne whassername...BATGIRL?
We need more choices - I’m having trouble making up my mind ... ;-)
Maureen O’Hara was the most gorgeous woman ever, until Catherine Zeta-Jones. Der Prinz and I (he has a refined taste in ladies ;-) just named our daughter Kathleen, after one of Maureen’s best roles, “Rio Grande.” (And my aunt.)
And there are a lot hotter actresses you can watch nightly on the Spanish Channel Soaps.
I hear if you stare at that pic long enough a human face appears...
I quite agree with your choice.
Yvonne de Carlo. (She couldn’t dance, though.) Lucille Ball was a classic beauty with a very good, dancer’s figure. You might not notice her lovely face, except in stills, because of the exaggerated expressions of her kind of comedy.
The Tecate Beer girls at the Baja races.... same there. The worst one shames half of Hollywood. And after the gig, they go back home or some hovel in Ensanada like 20,000 other hotter than Hollywood senoritas that could just as easily replace them.
I’m sorry, were you saying something?
So true. I always saw Ball as a great comedienne...never really ‘looked’ at her beyond that. Then I saw an early promo/publicity still somewhere. My God that woman was gorgeous...then again I always had a thing for Redheads, so I’m biased ;)
That reminds me, I need to purchase two pickets to Tittsburgh......uh I mean two tickets to Pittsburgh.
Another vote for Natalie Wood. Her bubbly, perky personality just added to her considerable beauty.
Can’t think of her name right now, but the girl from “Valley Girl” was another.
Trivia - the ‘pneumatic’ blond in that movie (another hottie) went on to do cartoon voices on Rugrats and others and is an accomplished guitarist.
I'D HIT IT.
That and those dark, sultry eyes. Egad, those hauntingly beautiful eyes.
Lucille Ball was also in an early Three Stooges short back in the 30s.
She was one of those Russian women that wasn't going to wind up looking like a Babushka.
I bet you are correct.
There is NOTHING special about her.
She is easily substituted for some other female in ALL her movies. There is not “hers” role. (other than the utterly dislikable character from her friends days)
you can have it.
According to IMDB, the female lead was Deborah Foreman, and the girl with the bosoms was Elizabeth Daily. It’s funny that Nicholas Cage was the breakout star from that. I was the target audience, high-school junior in 1983, and I didn’t think he was cute at all. Still don’t.
How come the 99ers aren’t protesting Hollywood Greed!!!
She needs to become a poor struggling actress again. She looked much better in her pre-anorexia days.
Every time one is posted, all the old farts come in and tell us how some silent movie chick was the hottest ever.
The antique black-n-white photos are always sure to follow.
You'd have to do it, Philly style....."Uhh....Get Out!" (with apologies to Andrew Dice Clay)
She was never a poor, struggling actress. She’s part of a Hollywood dynasty.