Skip to comments.Forgerygate: Ignoring Arpaio's report is a scandal in itself
Posted on 03/15/2012 10:52:58 AM PDT by Danae
s President Obamas birth certificate a forgery? Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., believes it is. He recently held a press conference in Phoenix to discuss the findings of a new 10-page report. Mr. Arpaios investigators have come to a stunning conclusion: The long-form birth certificate Mr. Obama released last year is a computer-generated forgery.
With the exception of The Washington Times, however, no major U.S. media outlet reported this bombshell story. The liberal press corps is desperately trying to suppress any discussion of Forgerygate potentially one of the biggest scandals in American history. The media class is betraying its fundamental mission to pursue the truth.
Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,
The Washington Times story, written by Stephen Dinan, points out that Mr. Arpaio has called for Congress to investigate the matter. Think about this: A high-profile sheriff orders a team of former law enforcement officials to examine whether the president is truly a natural born citizen and that he has the constitutional and legal right to occupy the White House. Their official report is that Mr. Obamas documents are shoddy and he likely engaged in deliberate fraud. And yet, most of the American press corps doesnt believe this is an important news story? The liberal media has become rotten to the core.
Ironically, the foreign press reported widely on the story. For example, Pravda thats right, the former official organ of the Soviet Communist Party did an extensive analysis of Mr. Arpaios findings. The article by Dianna Cotter asks the obvious question: What are U.S. journalists afraid of?
Read more at: http://times247.com/articles/forgerygate-ignoring-arpaio-s-report-is-a-scandal-in-itself
(Excerpt) Read more at times247.com ...
Heck, I've mis-dated things myself. And as far as the missing '19' in '1980' goes, maybe whoever set up the stamp accidentally turned the little rubber belts for those digits to a couple of blanks and didn't notice until he'd used it.
Sorry, I'd love to believe but there's just no proof here.
The ‘year’ in the pica stamp is one solid piece of rubber with four numbers on it. No one else’s stamp is ‘80’, it’s 1980, 1981, 1979, etc. etc.
I’ll be kind and just believe that you haven’t paid attention, instead of intentionally defending the fraudster in chief.
Google owns YouTube, Google is the authority reporting the number of hits, they can't stop people viewing it without banning it, they want to give the IMPRESSION THAT NOBODY CARES, thus throttling the info without reporting on it!
Liberal Google, the MSM and most of the "conservative media" media are agenda driven and/or intimidated by S0r0s and 0b0z0 g00ns by making them offers they couldn't refuse!
Danae might have cracked the damn dam...good for her and for all Americans.
It IS doing what is right that counts and this country (and world) is in dire need of more like yourself. Kudos to you. Unfortunately the top of the MSM is filled with envy and greed and what trickles down through the ranks are multiple forms of fear that results largely in nothing more than a production of propaganda that favors the elite establishment (their bosses). Not to patronize but I’m sure you know more about how that works than I do.
E mail your article, and Jeff K’s article to Arpaio.
” Also, notice that “Today’s Date” in the lower left corner is one day AFTER the Postal date stamp.”
I don’t have an email address I can send it to. Yes, I have the site address, but most likely they get thousands of emails daily, that would not surprise me anyway. I am betting someone has gotten it to him.
27 years postal service. I’ve changed literally thousands of dates on the “hand dater” and I can verify that the year date is all four figures and is only changed at closing time on Dec. 31 of each year. I am suspicious that whoever made this forgery did it some time after Jan 1, 2008, cut the 20 off the stamp, then turned the stamp around to come up with the 80. Reasonable????
In general it means you can send your work in to try and get it published and you never hear a word back.
Its like a black hole. It goes in and never comes out.
according to Arpaio’s/Zullo’s investigation, that’s exactly what happened.
Line from National Treasurer:
“Somebody has to go to jail.”
If the burglars were not bunglers in 1972 no one would know what Watergate is other than a hotel.
SOMEONE is forging. SOMEONE is committing fraud. SOMEONE is altering records. It is not the President.
It is the pawns, the throw aways.
It is Jess Henig and Joe Miller - FORMERLY of Fact Check - when they presented photos in 2008 claiming they took them ‘recently’ with no specific date and with time stamps in March.
It is the State Department contractors who work for John Brennen in 2008 who broke into the passport files - the last time - IN MARCH. (See above).
It is the owner of MAC in the White House who released an Adobe image that was “hack fake” 20 minutes before a press conference.
It is Loretta Fuddy who provided document and cover letter that is used in conjuction with a document she obviously did not issue - and she just keep quite. You do not think she made sure that she had copies of what she gave out do you? She probably does and her lawyer probably does.
It is Brian Schatz who refused to submit an OCON that included the Constitutionally Eligible language Hawaii law requires and that was submitted in 2004 in the same letter. Schatz specifically REMOVED the language in 2008. If the music stops - HE will not be charged with fraud by knowingly signing a document that contains a lie. But what should be the penalty for his silence in the face of broader fraud.
It may be Richard Flahavan. He provided the Selective Service card and image and problematic computer printouts in response to an FOIA request. He seems to have a history of ‘fixing’ things for politicians.
It may be Janice Okubo. She seemed to be the key person in every Hawaii DOH release in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Some releases were under Fukino’s letterhead but as communications director - Okubo was involved in every release. And Okubo is a lifer with ties to the Democratic functions in Hawaii. Fukino was part of the ONLY Republican administration ever in Hawaii and was only a figurehead. “natural-born American citizen”. Okubo provided the fodder and the MSM cowards ran with it.
Woodward and Bernstein - where are you.
I'm not quite following ... would it 'look' right? Why would that be easier?
Please explain HOW 0bama has a SSN issued in a state which he NEVER resided?
There is more detailed information here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/obama-guilty-of-at-least-one-felony.html
Guess I have to do it, Jane Citizen.
This is similar to when the New York Times couldn't find the South Side of Chicago - didn't know what a 'community organizer' was... had never heard of Hyde Park being home to entrenched communists since the 1930's... BUT, they had no problem finding Wasilla Alaska. It was almost like the New York Times was in the tank for one side...
Oh wait, they WERE in the tank for one side. I'll be back with the link that shows they know what they're doing. It's NOT a mistake when they ignore the birth certificate issue... it's intentional.
Absolutely! They know what they’re doing.
The Left is the Left...is the Left. Anyone of them who attempts to report a l’il truth could find him/herself belly up in some gutter!
That’s the offer one couldn’t refuse.
The link below shows journalists caught on tape talking about HOW they manipulate the news. Please take the time to see the first minute...
Think about any U.S. President, or anyone you know saying "57 States". That can ONLY happen if someone isn't the 'U.S. citizen' they say they are. 0bama uses a teleprompter, EVEN AT GRADE SCHOOLS because his presidency is SCRIPTED and he's merely the FRONT MAN for some sort of shadowy group working to overthrow America's free-market, capitalist foundation. Unfortunately, they are succeeding too.
CBS has reported on this. They also are the only major media that gave Fast and Furious a fair shake. In fact, they’ve been better ever since Katie Couric left.
Stunner! Balanced CBS report on Arpaio probe
Network affiliate documents evidence in Obama eligibility dispute
Then those responsible for the missing National Archives records and those that did nothing to secure them.
All the attorneys who represented the government in numerous FOIA cases. The should have known or did know his BC was irregular.
WH staff and others who purposely and unreasonably delayed FOIA requests.
All the judges who refused to hear the merits of challenges, including the US Supreme Court for dereliction of duty. Imagine a voter does not have standing to challenge a candidates eligibility.
All of Congress who ignored the problem and did nothing to uphold their sworn duty to the Constitution. They continue to do nothing they have not passed any new laws to make sure proper vetting will be done in the future and eligibility will be able to be challenged and must be shown by candidates. Corrupt to the core.
All Secretaries of State and Attorney Generals who did not properly vet Obama and let him on the ballot.
All Attorney Generals, Govenors, and Secretaries of State who are now aware of Arpaio’s report who continue to do nothing.
It may include those that kept his school records hidden if they show ineligibility. His relatives that said nothing... the list goes on and on...
Newspapers take their lead from the New York Times - TV News too... When the New York Times doesn’t cover a story - it’s generally NOT considered news.
The link below shows journalists (some connected to the New York Times) caught on tape talking about HOW they manipulate the news - and how they don’t like conservatives. Please take the time to check out this link... it’s connected to why they’re not covering this story.
It certainly wouldn’t “look” right but it certainly doesn’t look “right” on the sel. ser. registration submitted. Picture a stamp reading 2008, cut the 20 from the date and then insert into the round “dater” reversed, and you have a space and then the figures 08. The space is what makes it look faked.
Sorry, should have said you have the figures 80 when reversed.
That’s because most of the sheeple believe he put the matter to rest when he smugly waved the fraudulent, computer-generated birth certificate in the air. I thought for sure Arpaio’s findings and press conference would have everyone’s attention. The press should ask themselves why would law enforcement officers put it all on the line if there was no there, there.
Maybe Baby Barry forgot the date? After all, he's been known to forget what year it is. One day off on the date is no big deal for him. Being stoned all the time will do that to you.
Congrats! Tickles me no end the flack you’re getting from freepers who should know better - PRAVDA!
YOU’RE THE ONLY ONE WHO FOUGHT THEIR WAY OUT OF THE MEDIA BLACKOUT!
Isn’t that just exceptionally interesting! Wow, the quotes out of this... damn.
Sometimes a game changer isen’t immediately obvious. Like a hairline crack in a dam. At first not many people even see it, and those that do dismiss it. They think the dam is big enough and sufficiently reinforced to withstand such a tiny fissure.
Sheriff Joe put that tiny crack in the dam. His critics don’t realize the game has changed. They’re still resorting to ridicule, whereas his facts—the crack—are impervious to that tactic. The editors at NRO and the Obots are still fighting the last war. A brand new front has opened, however, and their left flank is fully exposed.
The crack will continue to grow. We on the right want it to happen immediately and we’re tired of waiting. It’s hard to be patient when we’ve faced so many setbacks. But the game really has changed and the momentum is slowly shifting. When it will all come to a head only God knows. But the tide has finally turned, and it’s not turning back.
To be honest Fred, I have been thinking of ways to try and get around the Liberal media for a long time. It was Mark McGrew who gave me the key. He publishes at Pravda too. That was the primer. The more I thought about it, the more it became a question of just what I would do if anything I wrote went big. I decided to stop thinking along that line and just DO EEET! Well... that worked out pretty well. LOL
For those who question my publishing at Pravda... yeah.. well... it WORKED didn’t it? umm hum.
“the crack will continue to grow”
I’m hoping Arpaio and his team are continuing to dig into this and won’t let go.
Look, you’re missing the obvious here. It’s not a conspiracy - it’s worse.
It’s group-think. Newsmen aren’t the independent ‘go it alone’ types you think they are. They’re first and foremost - writers. English major types with a mission. The market for journalists is shrinking. These people studied and worked hard to crack a profession that’s dying - laying off their friends, people they’ve known for years... they’re afraid.
It’s an atmosphere of fear - they don’t want to go out on a limb for fear of losing their jobs. Most will play it safe. Bashing conservatives is safe. Going after liberals is NOT safe. Group-think is in. Safety in numbers works...
On the birth certificate - covering this story - which should be a natural - isn’t now. Bias has trumped integrity. The press of the past would have covered it. The New York Times of the past would have covered it.
It’s not ‘news’ until the New York Times says it news...
Papers - and TV journalists ( if that’s what we can call them) won’t cover a story until the New York Times does - it’s the stamp of approval other papers need to cover the story.
And why is that?
The New York Times - in the past - earned the ‘paper of record’ respect they still hold today. They are not worthy of that respect now - but they still whiel the power...
They’re saying ‘no’ to this story - see the link below - it explains.
Take the time and click on the link below. It showcases journalists - one connected to the New York Times. These are the kinds of people who are killing the newspaper industry today - people who treat a general circulation newspaper like an in-house rag - a rag for fellow elites. They show contempt for their customers.
Business that exhibit contempt for their customers don’t survive.
Contempt for their readers is the reason the news industry is dying. It’s not the internet. Timelines will show that...
The detractors are living in the past...they are fossils. Reminds me of what is going on with al Jazeera, they are running rings around the disfunctional MSM - the alphabets don’t ‘report’ - they are booth-bound propagandists.
(That Cotter woman, she’s brilliant!)
Sheriff Joe promised to keep investigating and he’s a man of his word. Plus he’s on record as saying this is 10x bigger than Watergate—does that sound like a man who is done w the matter to you?
One thing I missed in my first post. I should have said that *both* Sheriff Joe and his facts are impervious to ridicule. The one is as important as the other. When the MSM can’t ignore the issue they mock it. Sheriff Joe could care less. He’s in ‘honey badger don’t care’ territory. On some level, the Obots know this [even if the editors as NRO have no clue] and are scared witless.
I thank God, and I say that reverently, for Sheriff Arpaio.
Obama's signature on Selective Service form: I know that many people's signatures change as they get older, but when I look at Obama's signature today and compare it to the signature on the Selective Service form, I have great difficulty believing that the same person wrote both signatures, because they are so different, in my opinion.
Obama's signature on the Selective Service form looks like someone other than Obama wrote it.
It looks to me like a woman wrote Obama's name on the form.
(Please, no jokes about Obama being a woman in a man's body, so Obama could have signed that form.)
Yes, at last!
The crack actually isn’t Arpaio’s investigation; it’s wonderful though.
It’s Danae article in Pravda and Kuhner’s in some larger American alternative Media that’s tied to the Washington Times, a D.C. paper’s blog, no less.
Of course, 0b0z0 will refuse to read it and 0h0m0s arse is busy in March Madness brackets in between WH State Dinners’ fundraising, which is illegal and will be diligently prosecuted by H0lder’s corrupt DoJ!
Aye, them people ain’t gonna go unpunished for the violence that WILL BE unleashed on us!
On the birth certificate - bias has trumped integrity. The press of the past would have covered it. They would have shown if something was there - or put the issue to rest. They would NOT have sat on their hands and pretended the issue didn’t exist.
The New York Times of the past would have covered it.
Then again, in the old days, newsmen were working class people. The job didn’t have the pay or the prestige it has today. And it didn’t have the ‘upper-class educated elite’ bullshit either.
Please - watch the link.. .you’ll understand.
Glad you liked it...
Serpent’s breath, charm of death and life, thy omen of making...
One can only hope this story picks up traction. It is like a coup took place three years ago and nobody except a county sheriff, a few bloggers and genuine reporters, and a smattering of patriotic citizens noticed. Certainly, our chattering classes, elite media, politicians, and judges didn't!
We are finding out just what happens when a revolution takes place and "nobody" notices. But I'm betting when 0bamaCare, economic collapse, and the gulags eventually kick a lot more people will notice.
Not really arguing w you, Prof., but here’s how I see it. Arpaio cracked the dam, and Danae forced a wedge into the crack and hit it w a nine-pound hammer. It’s still a big dam and not broken yet, but as I said, there’s no undoing the crack now.
Ill be kind and just believe that you havent paid attention, instead of intentionally defending the fraudster in chief.
If the Selective Service form is authentic and it belongs to Obama, I have trouble believing that the postal worker who stamped the form---I would guess that he used that stamp many, many times on all kind of federal government documents and not just on Selective Service forms---would not notice right away that the "19" was missing on the stamp on Obama's form.
That is, I would think that once the postal worker saw that the "19" was missing, he would stamp the form again to make sure that "1980" was stamped on Obama's Selective Service form like it was supposed to be.
Postal worker's supervisor: I don't think the the postal worker's supervisor would have been too happy to accidentally find out later that the postal worker did not stamp Obama's Selective Service form correctly, because how could the supervisor ever be sure that the postal worker did not make the same mistake on other government documents and on other Selective Service forms?
So I believe that the postal worker would have re-stamped Obama's form in order to make sure that "1980" was stamped on the form correctly, because I don't think he would want to get in trouble with his supervisor and possibly be punished for his mistake like maybe losing his job.
“DO WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO”
Nota single person on FR thinks I support Soetoro and almost 4 years of posts attest to that fact..... but I don’t put much credence in the dates. Maybe dumba$$ was all doped up and put the wrong date.... or maybe the PO just forgot to change the date on the stamp. If I’m missing something, fill me in.
Well, it was a 16 pound sledge but I am not picking nits...
JUST KIDDING! I hope it has a positive result in the end.
I may be misunderstanding your post but, no postal worker stamped anything on this. Obama and his ilk forged this document.
The nine-pound hammer is celebrated in American folk music as being the one that “killed John Henry”. I learned about it from Doc Watson, whose storytelling skills are second only to his legendary flat-picking. [I’m not even a folk music fan, but I am a ***major*** Doc Watson fan.]
So in a sense, the nine-pound hammer is a greater tribute than a sixteen lb sledge, since I doubt as many musical tributes have been written about the latter. If the nine-pounder sufficed to lay railroad tracks prior to the steam hammer, let’s agree it can do the job on the dam constructed by Obama and his bots.
Thanks for the link. It went viral!
Postal worker: I have trouble believing that if the postal worker made a mistake, he would not notice his mistake immediately.
I think that he would try to correct his mistake by re-stamping Obama's Selective Service form until the correct "1980" was visible on the form.
So if you could present evidence of other postal workers making the same mistake of accidentally leaving off the first two numbers, then I might believe that the postal worker who stamped Obama's Selective Service form made the same mistake and didn't try to correct his mistake by re-stamping the form.
Present or retired postal workers: If you are a present or retired postal worker who used the stamp we are talking about, please give us your opinion on whether or not a postal worker would have allowed such a stamp mistake to stay on the form.