Skip to comments.Forgerygate: Ignoring Arpaio's report is a scandal in itself
Posted on 03/15/2012 10:52:58 AM PDT by Danae
s President Obamas birth certificate a forgery? Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., believes it is. He recently held a press conference in Phoenix to discuss the findings of a new 10-page report. Mr. Arpaios investigators have come to a stunning conclusion: The long-form birth certificate Mr. Obama released last year is a computer-generated forgery.
With the exception of The Washington Times, however, no major U.S. media outlet reported this bombshell story. The liberal press corps is desperately trying to suppress any discussion of Forgerygate potentially one of the biggest scandals in American history. The media class is betraying its fundamental mission to pursue the truth.
Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic,
The Washington Times story, written by Stephen Dinan, points out that Mr. Arpaio has called for Congress to investigate the matter. Think about this: A high-profile sheriff orders a team of former law enforcement officials to examine whether the president is truly a natural born citizen and that he has the constitutional and legal right to occupy the White House. Their official report is that Mr. Obamas documents are shoddy and he likely engaged in deliberate fraud. And yet, most of the American press corps doesnt believe this is an important news story? The liberal media has become rotten to the core.
Ironically, the foreign press reported widely on the story. For example, Pravda thats right, the former official organ of the Soviet Communist Party did an extensive analysis of Mr. Arpaios findings. The article by Dianna Cotter asks the obvious question: What are U.S. journalists afraid of?
Read more at: http://times247.com/articles/forgerygate-ignoring-arpaio-s-report-is-a-scandal-in-itself
(Excerpt) Read more at times247.com ...
To be honest Fred, I have been thinking of ways to try and get around the Liberal media for a long time. It was Mark McGrew who gave me the key. He publishes at Pravda too. That was the primer. The more I thought about it, the more it became a question of just what I would do if anything I wrote went big. I decided to stop thinking along that line and just DO EEET! Well... that worked out pretty well. LOL
For those who question my publishing at Pravda... yeah.. well... it WORKED didn’t it? umm hum.
“the crack will continue to grow”
I’m hoping Arpaio and his team are continuing to dig into this and won’t let go.
Look, you’re missing the obvious here. It’s not a conspiracy - it’s worse.
It’s group-think. Newsmen aren’t the independent ‘go it alone’ types you think they are. They’re first and foremost - writers. English major types with a mission. The market for journalists is shrinking. These people studied and worked hard to crack a profession that’s dying - laying off their friends, people they’ve known for years... they’re afraid.
It’s an atmosphere of fear - they don’t want to go out on a limb for fear of losing their jobs. Most will play it safe. Bashing conservatives is safe. Going after liberals is NOT safe. Group-think is in. Safety in numbers works...
On the birth certificate - covering this story - which should be a natural - isn’t now. Bias has trumped integrity. The press of the past would have covered it. The New York Times of the past would have covered it.
It’s not ‘news’ until the New York Times says it news...
Papers - and TV journalists ( if that’s what we can call them) won’t cover a story until the New York Times does - it’s the stamp of approval other papers need to cover the story.
And why is that?
The New York Times - in the past - earned the ‘paper of record’ respect they still hold today. They are not worthy of that respect now - but they still whiel the power...
They’re saying ‘no’ to this story - see the link below - it explains.
Take the time and click on the link below. It showcases journalists - one connected to the New York Times. These are the kinds of people who are killing the newspaper industry today - people who treat a general circulation newspaper like an in-house rag - a rag for fellow elites. They show contempt for their customers.
Business that exhibit contempt for their customers don’t survive.
Contempt for their readers is the reason the news industry is dying. It’s not the internet. Timelines will show that...
The detractors are living in the past...they are fossils. Reminds me of what is going on with al Jazeera, they are running rings around the disfunctional MSM - the alphabets don’t ‘report’ - they are booth-bound propagandists.
(That Cotter woman, she’s brilliant!)
Sheriff Joe promised to keep investigating and he’s a man of his word. Plus he’s on record as saying this is 10x bigger than Watergate—does that sound like a man who is done w the matter to you?
One thing I missed in my first post. I should have said that *both* Sheriff Joe and his facts are impervious to ridicule. The one is as important as the other. When the MSM can’t ignore the issue they mock it. Sheriff Joe could care less. He’s in ‘honey badger don’t care’ territory. On some level, the Obots know this [even if the editors as NRO have no clue] and are scared witless.
I thank God, and I say that reverently, for Sheriff Arpaio.
Obama's signature on Selective Service form: I know that many people's signatures change as they get older, but when I look at Obama's signature today and compare it to the signature on the Selective Service form, I have great difficulty believing that the same person wrote both signatures, because they are so different, in my opinion.
Obama's signature on the Selective Service form looks like someone other than Obama wrote it.
It looks to me like a woman wrote Obama's name on the form.
(Please, no jokes about Obama being a woman in a man's body, so Obama could have signed that form.)
Yes, at last!
The crack actually isn’t Arpaio’s investigation; it’s wonderful though.
It’s Danae article in Pravda and Kuhner’s in some larger American alternative Media that’s tied to the Washington Times, a D.C. paper’s blog, no less.
Of course, 0b0z0 will refuse to read it and 0h0m0s arse is busy in March Madness brackets in between WH State Dinners’ fundraising, which is illegal and will be diligently prosecuted by H0lder’s corrupt DoJ!
Aye, them people ain’t gonna go unpunished for the violence that WILL BE unleashed on us!
On the birth certificate - bias has trumped integrity. The press of the past would have covered it. They would have shown if something was there - or put the issue to rest. They would NOT have sat on their hands and pretended the issue didn’t exist.
The New York Times of the past would have covered it.
Then again, in the old days, newsmen were working class people. The job didn’t have the pay or the prestige it has today. And it didn’t have the ‘upper-class educated elite’ bullshit either.
Please - watch the link.. .you’ll understand.
Glad you liked it...
Serpent’s breath, charm of death and life, thy omen of making...
One can only hope this story picks up traction. It is like a coup took place three years ago and nobody except a county sheriff, a few bloggers and genuine reporters, and a smattering of patriotic citizens noticed. Certainly, our chattering classes, elite media, politicians, and judges didn't!
We are finding out just what happens when a revolution takes place and "nobody" notices. But I'm betting when 0bamaCare, economic collapse, and the gulags eventually kick a lot more people will notice.
Not really arguing w you, Prof., but here’s how I see it. Arpaio cracked the dam, and Danae forced a wedge into the crack and hit it w a nine-pound hammer. It’s still a big dam and not broken yet, but as I said, there’s no undoing the crack now.
Ill be kind and just believe that you havent paid attention, instead of intentionally defending the fraudster in chief.
If the Selective Service form is authentic and it belongs to Obama, I have trouble believing that the postal worker who stamped the form---I would guess that he used that stamp many, many times on all kind of federal government documents and not just on Selective Service forms---would not notice right away that the "19" was missing on the stamp on Obama's form.
That is, I would think that once the postal worker saw that the "19" was missing, he would stamp the form again to make sure that "1980" was stamped on Obama's Selective Service form like it was supposed to be.
Postal worker's supervisor: I don't think the the postal worker's supervisor would have been too happy to accidentally find out later that the postal worker did not stamp Obama's Selective Service form correctly, because how could the supervisor ever be sure that the postal worker did not make the same mistake on other government documents and on other Selective Service forms?
So I believe that the postal worker would have re-stamped Obama's form in order to make sure that "1980" was stamped on the form correctly, because I don't think he would want to get in trouble with his supervisor and possibly be punished for his mistake like maybe losing his job.
“DO WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO”
Nota single person on FR thinks I support Soetoro and almost 4 years of posts attest to that fact..... but I don’t put much credence in the dates. Maybe dumba$$ was all doped up and put the wrong date.... or maybe the PO just forgot to change the date on the stamp. If I’m missing something, fill me in.
Well, it was a 16 pound sledge but I am not picking nits...
JUST KIDDING! I hope it has a positive result in the end.
I may be misunderstanding your post but, no postal worker stamped anything on this. Obama and his ilk forged this document.
The nine-pound hammer is celebrated in American folk music as being the one that “killed John Henry”. I learned about it from Doc Watson, whose storytelling skills are second only to his legendary flat-picking. [I’m not even a folk music fan, but I am a ***major*** Doc Watson fan.]
So in a sense, the nine-pound hammer is a greater tribute than a sixteen lb sledge, since I doubt as many musical tributes have been written about the latter. If the nine-pounder sufficed to lay railroad tracks prior to the steam hammer, let’s agree it can do the job on the dam constructed by Obama and his bots.
Thanks for the link. It went viral!
Postal worker: I have trouble believing that if the postal worker made a mistake, he would not notice his mistake immediately.
I think that he would try to correct his mistake by re-stamping Obama's Selective Service form until the correct "1980" was visible on the form.
So if you could present evidence of other postal workers making the same mistake of accidentally leaving off the first two numbers, then I might believe that the postal worker who stamped Obama's Selective Service form made the same mistake and didn't try to correct his mistake by re-stamping the form.
Present or retired postal workers: If you are a present or retired postal worker who used the stamp we are talking about, please give us your opinion on whether or not a postal worker would have allowed such a stamp mistake to stay on the form.