So, your defense is the ‘level’ that this event was broadcast?
The fact that the webcam was secretly placed in the room, where the roomate had a legitimate expectation of privacy is irrevalent? The fact that his actions were recorded without his knowledge or concent are irrevelent?
The intent was to hurt and humiliate as much as possible. In this, he was wildly successful - now it’s time to pay the price.
I was responding to a post saying this was broadcast on the web, whereas it was not. I agree he is guilty of invasion of privacy. He may even be guilty under the “bias intimidation” law. I don’t agree with the law. If intimidation is a crime don’t limit it to any select groups.