Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum has come to take away your freedom (LEFTY GOES APOPLECTIC !!!)
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | March 16, 2012 | Junior Marxist NEIL STEINBERG nsteinberg@suntimes.com

Posted on 03/16/2012 10:23:47 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: Antoninus

Hmmm. “He had a position paper on his website...”

Would have been much better for all of us if he hadn’t.


61 posted on 03/17/2012 6:19:12 AM PDT by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
You are upset that the left uses government to force their morality on you. So, you’re response is to pick someone that wants to use government to force their morality on you.

You sound like an ACLU member. EVERY law comes from someone's version of morality.

The Founders openly said the Bible was part of the common law and rights were endowed by the Creator.

62 posted on 03/17/2012 3:25:38 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
So... as our founding fathers understood, we are not a homogeneous nation, with one set of ethics/morals/mores that all ascribe to.Therefore, do as they did, which was to leave those issues to the regional level.

And, what happened at those "regional" levels:

Maryland Constituion — 1776

We, the people of the state of Maryland, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberty ...

That, as it is the duty of every man to worship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to him; all persons professing the Christian religion, are equally entitled to Protection in their religious liberty; wherefore no person ought by any law to be molested...

...required "a declaration of a belief in the Christian religion" for all state officers.

63 posted on 03/17/2012 3:35:56 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Point?

It’s not that way anymore. Nor has it been for quite a long time.

Applying a modern standard of morality to the past is a fools errand. In 1776, that wasn’t all that strange.

And in 1206, it was considered normal for armies to kill off city dwellers in mass if they reneged on a surrender. Today, that’s a war crime.


64 posted on 03/17/2012 10:29:01 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Riiiight. Pull my other finger, too.

If you truly believe that, it will be very easy to answer a few questions.

1. What moral was used for the creation of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005)

2. What moral was used for the enactment of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1965? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivers_and_Harbors_Act_of_1965)

3. What moral was used for the Telecommunications Act of 1996? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996)


You claim that all laws derive from morality. Go ahead, prove it.


65 posted on 03/17/2012 10:45:13 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson