Skip to comments.Supermodel Elle Macpherson Loves Obama: 'Iím Socialist - What Do You Expect?'
Posted on 03/17/2012 4:52:45 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Supermodel Elle Macpherson Loves Obama: 'Im Socialist - What Do You Expect?' By Noel Sheppard Created 03/17/2012 - 6:02pm
By Noel Sheppard | March 17, 2012 | 18:02 Change font size: A | A Noel Sheppard's picture
Supermodel Elle Macpherson told shock jock Howard Stern Tuesday that she's pulling for Barack Obama to be reelected.
"Im living in London and Im socialist," she told her host. "What do you expect?" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
HOWARD STERN: Who should be the next President of the United States Elle MacPherson, go ahead.
ELLE MACPHERSON: I think Obamas going to do it.
STERN: You like Obama?
MACPHERSON: Yeah, Im living in London and Im socialist. What do you expect?
STERN: And youre living in London and you sense what other foreigners feel. Do they like him?
MACPHERSON: I think foreigners like him. Hes very popular.
STERN: Dont we look good having a black president and everything? Makes us kind of cool.
MACPHERSON: I think its more about his policy. But you know there are I understand that there are a lot of people who dont, you know, dont want change. We want change. We want change. And he says, Ill implement change, and you go, Oh, actually, I dont bleeping feel like I want change. Its too difficult.
And Obama's media wonder why folks think he's a socialist.
I think she should stay in London. Maybe take Obama with her.
No, your a pig woman. I started to say lady, but then remembered who you were. You are no lady.
Have any of you seen this Russian guy on youtube? - He’s awesome
It’s so EASY to say you’re a socialist when you have 30 million or so in the bank. What a twit...
Amazing how a beautiful woman can drop her attractiveness quotient to a thinking male with only a few well chosen words.
There must be something wrong with these people. (Maybe a short circuit in the brain?)
out of the mouths of, uhhh, babes...
She stated something which I think is obvious but it is also stupid.
She likes him because he is Black. I suspect maybe 80% or more of those who voted for Obama did so for the same reason. That actually makes him very hard to beat.
No matter how incompetent or just plain evil in my opinion, they are going to vote for a Black man.
MACPHERSON: Yeah, Im living in London and Im socialist. What do you expect?
Unlike 0bama, at least SHE is honest about what she is!
But I must admit: I would tap that. Then make her eat out of the same bowl as the dog just for being a leftist, for not even having the courtesy for using an ounce of her energy for trying out her brain.
"Like OMG I can think! I just realized 1 +1 = 11! Just put the numbers together! I get mathematus stuff! Call a press conference! I'm just like that Frankeneinstein guy!"
Like EVERY Media Liberal she is a hypocrite.
She uses lawyers to pay much less than the Bush rates.
I’m trying awfully hard here to decide if the rules apply here.
How about sharing all your wealth then?
If she is living in London soon she will be forced to join Islam.
She has nice teeth.
And that is as good an explanation as any of how we wound up with President Obozo the Collectivist Clown.
Holy crap that was GREAT! Notice at the end they call him “Racist human”...Where the hell do they get racism out of that? Typical lib argument isn’t is?
At a net worth of $45 million, that must put her in the top 0.01% - Easy to be a socialist from their...:^)
She’s the first celeb to admit that they and Obama are indeed socialists........Can’t knock her, at least she’s honest.......
Of course they do. Obama is making America weak, and they think that is good for them. They will regret it when no one is left to come to their defense.
Elle should contribute her wealth to the State. Her earnings, royalties, annuities, property and all financial instruments of any kind. She should also share the spotlight, limelight, facials, personal cooks, trainers, clothing endorsements, makeup ads.....
Let’s see exactly how socialistic she is.
I volunteer to spank some sense into her.
LOL- he has a bunch of videos on youtube- this russian guy is just awesome.. he gets right in there face..
I knew there was a reason why I told her to stop calling and sexting me.
Only rich people can afford socialism.
The whitest teeth I’ve ever come across...LOL !!
So McPherson spreads her wealth, huh? She lives in a 12x12 Unibomber-type shack. Has no vehicles...just a used bicycle. Sure she’s a socialist. (smirk)
Use her, abuse her, and throw her to the dogs.
The funny thing is that most teeth whitening products are illegal in Europe, due to the peroxide content. Isn’t Elle Australian? I really don’t care about her opinion, but at least she’s honest.
They’re super model cause they’re super smart.
I live my life by their advice because they know everything.
(/s, just in case )
Never trust a rich person who say they are socialist. These people are psychologically unstable, and they are corrupt, too.
A true socialist would have already done so!
Elle, put your money where your mouth is and GIVE IT ALL to the poor and downtrodden of the world. Of course, you will be expected to continue working while only receiving a small fraction of what you earn. But as an avowed socialist this should bring you real joy.
It sounds like Macpherson thinks socialism is a trendy elitist lifestyle rather than an ideology.
Most of the creatures in the fashion and movie industries are indeed Obama fans because they think it’s fabulously fashionable, cool and “in” to be for Obama nowadays.
As I have stated before I made the biggest vote mistake of my life & yes; subconsciously it was due to my strong liberal upbringing & NO, I won’t make that mistake again. I am not blaming my vote on how I was raised, I am old enough to know better, just explaining that it was a part of my decision. A decision I regret everyday.
My brother & many others who voted for him won’t be either. And yes, I would say a good portion of the voters feel smug about the fact that he is black.
Most rich are Socialist.
It salves their (hypocritical) conscience, and keeps the smaller fish at a disadvantage.
She’s paid to show her a$$ not to think ... I assume she excels in both categories.
"True" Socialist/Marxists would expect her to share "much more." Karl Marx argued that "everything" must be shared. South American Communists embrace this ideal...
we want change too. We want to undo socialists policies already implemented.
I'm sure there are many who would like a piece, know what I mean, know what I mean, nudge, nudge?
I would have zero interest, based on her ideology and hypocrisy.
>”There must be something wrong with these people. (Maybe a short circuit in the brain?)”
You are close. You need to understand r/K Selection Theory.
In biology there are two psychologies. All animal behavior in nature tends towards one or the other, as these psychologies guide the organism’s strategy for reproduction.
One psychology is designed for environments where there is little test of an organism’s fitness prior to mating, usually due to copious resource availability eliminating any competition for resources. Since there is no test for fitness, the only thing which confers Darwinian success is reproductive power. This is the r-strategy, and those who hold it will have four traits. They will be averse to any competitive tests of fitness within their population, they will tend towards promiscuity and away from monogamy, they will support mating as early as possible, and they will support low investment, single parenting. Each is an attempt to reproduce as many offspring as possible as quickly as possible, while avoiding any test of their own fitness relative to their peers.
This occurs most often in prey species, due to predators killing back the population to the point that they are well below the carrying capacity of the environment, eliminating the competition for resources. Hence Rabbits exhibit a pacifistic nature, they mate as early in life as possible, they mate with whatever rabbit they happen across (rejecting monogamy), and the mother alone, invests just enough to get the kids out the door, so she can get knocked up and start on another brood. Grass is freely available, so they need not compete for it, and this is what you get.
The opposite psychology is called the K-strategy (the names come from the variables r and K in equations describing population dynamics). The K-type psychology is what is produced in organisms which do not have sufficient resources for free expansion of their population. There, all organisms must compete for limited resources. Those who survive are competitive, and highly fit, while those who are not fit and able end up dead. As a result, those organisms who produce lasting genetic lines do so by adopting behaviors designed to produce competitive success in their descendents. This will comprise four traits, each exactly opposite to those of the r-type organism. First they and their offspring are aggressive/competitive, which moves them to engage in competitions for limited resources whenever possible. Parents don’t just mate with any idiot they happen across. They carefully seek out the fittest mate possible, and attempt to competitively monopolize their fit mate’s genes through monogamy. To protect their children in the competitive environment they inhabit, they discourage them from engaging in mating behavior until they are fully mature and capable of competing, while children evolve to avoid early sexual behavior due to it’s danger. And the parents engage in high investment, two parent child-rearing, both to protect their child better, and to maximize it’s competitive ability at maturity through careful, high-investment rearing.
Obviously, our Conservative/Liberal divide is just an intellectual version of the same r/K psychological divide in more primitive animals in nature. This is why support for competitions like capitalism travels with support for abstinence until monogamy, and two parent child-rearing. Likewise, Communism is a way to bring about the r-type environment of free resources for all with no competition, and leftists also tend to support promiscuity and single parenting.
r vs K comes down to either a strategy by which to produce a ton of idiots, knowing that a few will survive and reproduce themselves (since there is no competitive test for fitness prior to reproduction), or a strategy to produce a few children, but make them very competitive through heavy investments of time and energy, since only fit and competitive offspring survive. Which predominates depends on whether the less able are prone to be culled, or see any other impact on their reproductive fitness. If they aren’t (like when government pays their parents handsomely to raise them using other people’s money), then the population will slowly devolve into an idiot mass production line, at least until resources become scarce, and K-selection returns by force.
Humans have both strategies within our population (as a result of an early duality in environments that our ancestors were confronted with), so it is as if we have physically identical animals, living side by side in one population, but one group has a bunny rabbit’s mentality, while the other has a lion’s mentality. The problem is the bunny rabbits have further evolved to try and gang up to create the r-type environment. Their end goal is to eradicate any competitive disparity between individuals through oppression and the elimination of freedom.
I have written a book on this, but it’s not out yet. In about a week, check my website for a pdf I’m updating called “Modern Political Thought in the Context of Evolutionary Psychology.” I’m about to update this paper with some monkey studies, and should be done in a week or so. Turns out if you excise the amygdala of monkeys, you get animals one researcher described as, ...retarded in their ability to foresee and avoid dangerous confrontations. Research indicates amygdala damage also produces increased libido, low investment parenting, and docility - all r-type/Liberal traits. Interestingly Liberals have reduced amygdala volume in MRI’s, so yes it is probably a brain defect, but one which evolved purposefully, to facilitate a bunny-like reproductive strategy of avoiding competitions and mating with whomever they happen across.
Liberals sustain themselves based upon the premise that their Liberalism is a result of superior intellectual analysis and reasoning. As this work spreads, it will reduce Liberalism to a simple Darwinian psychology, devoid of any intellectual reasoning, and prone to devolve and destroy any culture it infects.
Even worse, it will align Liberalism (correctly) with the r-type reproductive strategy, which in biology is recognized as a sure fire way to idiocratize a population, through the suspension of competitive tests of fitness. In many texts, the r-strategy is even described as being about emphasizing quantity of offspring over quality.
Liberalism goes from some superior intellectual evolution of man to just a bunch of imbecillic r-strategists, unconcerned with children and just looking for promiscuous sex, and freedom from any need to prove themselves competitively prior to resource acquisition and mating. And on top of that, all of them are too stupid to even realize their own motivations.
It will alter the teaching of political science profoundly.
If you can spread this theory, please feel free to pass it around, especially among Liberals. The sooner it is out there widely, the sooner Liberals will begin to feel vastly inferior, and the sooner Liberal morale takes the hit.
I’m guessing that was a little longer than you’d have expected a response to be?
Since she is a socialist, she should join the national socialist party.
I’d hit that twice and film it.
Yep; 'look at me'. It is all about 'them'- and their voting for a 'black man'. We knew that of course.
How long can their 'high-fives' last? The novelty has yet to wear off; nor their their 'self-congratulations'.
Where liberty dwells, there is my country." Benjamin Franklin
Islam Delenda Est!