Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Voids Part of Family Leave Act
Crooks and Liars ^ | March 22, 2012 | Nicole Belle

Posted on 03/22/2012 8:24:37 AM PDT by Beaten Valve

State workers who are denied unpaid sick leave required by federal law cannot sue the states, the Supreme Court said in a victory for states' rights that some liberal advocates saw as a bad omen for President Obama's healthcare law.

The 5-4 decision is a setback for millions of employees of state agencies and state colleges, and it voided in part a provision in the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Among other things the act said that employees had a right to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to recover from an illness or childbirth.

The rights of employees of private companies are unchanged by the ruling.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: familyleave; obamacare

1 posted on 03/22/2012 8:24:44 AM PDT by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve
drip..drip..drip..OBozo's (DEATH)CARE.

2 posted on 03/22/2012 8:36:53 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Simple: Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

this is a victory for non-union American workers and the U.S. economy, as it removes a huge impediment to companies offering jobs here.


3 posted on 03/22/2012 8:53:11 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
this is a victory for non-union American workers and the U.S. economy, as it removes a huge impediment to companies offering jobs here.

Actually, the ruling only affects employees of state governments, not private companies.

4 posted on 03/22/2012 8:56:46 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813
...it removes a huge impediment to companies offering jobs here.
______________
Not really. This was more of a State sovereignty issue and doesn't apply to the requirements on private companies.
5 posted on 03/22/2012 8:57:45 AM PDT by lp boonie (Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve
The 5-4 decision is a setback for millions of employees of state agencies and state colleges

And a victory for the poor slobs who have to pay the bill for a bunch of slackers.

6 posted on 03/22/2012 9:01:50 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
this is a victory for non-union American workers and the U.S. economy, as it removes a huge impediment to companies offering jobs here.

Actually it does none of that. Only says that the Federal Government can't force stated to go along with FMLA for their own employees due to states rights. Private employers still have to eat the crap sandwich.
7 posted on 03/22/2012 9:16:40 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

This is BS. How can the States have more rights than the people?


8 posted on 03/22/2012 9:21:14 AM PDT by CodeToad (I'm so right-wing if I lifted my left leg I'd go into a spin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
This is BS. How can the States have more rights than the people?

I haven't read the decision yet, but I assume it relies on the 11th Amendment, which says that states cannot be sued in federal court.

9 posted on 03/22/2012 9:44:10 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve
Ruh-Roh

Union Members pile up the over-time while co-workers regularly take "Family Leave", and then it's THEIR turn.

This should be fought by the SEIU, AFSCM, etc., as their "CONTRACT" says they have "RIGHTS".

10 posted on 03/22/2012 10:12:18 AM PDT by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“I haven’t read the decision yet, but I assume it relies on the 11th Amendment, which says that states cannot be sued in federal court.”

No, it doesn’t. That’s what it’s been interpreted to mean, though it actually says that citizens of one state can’t sue another state. SCOTUS has unaccountably extended that to mean citizens can’t sue their own states. Or at least not in some cases. Just like with Obamacare, there are all sorts of exceptions. For instance, you can sue states in federal court for violating your civil rights. Especially if you are a member of a protected race/sex/orientation group.


11 posted on 03/22/2012 10:25:34 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“This is BS. How can the States have more rights than the people?”

By selectively favoring the “states” part and xing out the “people” part of the 10th amendment.


12 posted on 03/22/2012 10:27:40 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

13 posted on 03/22/2012 10:29:37 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

cool.


14 posted on 03/22/2012 11:22:13 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
There's a long standing precedent that holds states are immune from Federal labor laws on the basis of Federalism-- the states cannot be directly coerced by the Federal government, otherwise it makes the states agents of the Federal government.

What's interesting is that 4 justices wanted to overturn that precedent.

15 posted on 03/22/2012 1:28:54 PM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

If Obama serves another term, these 5-4 decisions will start going their way.


16 posted on 03/22/2012 3:53:50 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar
not necessarily; IF he gets re-elected...
he won't need the congress or the courts.
*Nazi salute*
HEIL! OBAMA!
our historical freedoms shall be forfeit
from the Bill of USA Rights to the Laws of Chinese Rights..
You can work/vote for dear leader OBOZO; everything
else is severely restricted or forbidden.

17 posted on 03/23/2012 9:39:02 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Simple: Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson