Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Suggests Obama Preferable to "Etch-A-Sketch" Romney.
latimes.com ^ | March 22, 2012 | Michael A. Memoli

Posted on 03/22/2012 6:27:59 PM PDT by true believer forever

Rick Santorum's latest attempt to use a Mitt Romney aide's "Etch-A-Sketch" remark against the Republican front-runner instead gave his rival a chance to fire back on Thursday, after Santorum seemed to say he'd rather see President Obama reelected than send Romney to the White House.

Speaking at an event in Texas, Santorum again made the case that Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom's comments Wednesday on CNN about a "reset" of the campaign if Romney clinched the nomination showed the former Massachusetts governor's efforts to appeal to conservatives were insincere.

"You win by giving people the opportunity to see a different vision for our country, not someone who's just going to be a little different than the person in there," Santorum told a crowd in San Antonio, according to NBC News. "If you're going to be a little different, we might as well stay with what we have instead of taking a risk with what may be the Etch-A-Sketch candidate of the future."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bidensantorum; deathoftheteaparty; election; emptyvest; fubo; fumr; fung; furs; getthehelloutnewt; helenthomasissexy; identitypolitics; idolatry; kenyanbornmuzzie; liars4mitt; liars4newt; mittbots; mittromney; mittusedbyobama; newt4philandery; newt4romney; newt4teaparty; newtgingrich; newtvsconservatives; nextstopobscurity; noideas; nomessage; novision; obama; obama4romney; obamabinbiden; palin4mccain; palin4newt; posromney; rickisusedbygope; rickisusedbymitt; ricksantorum; rickscrewedteaparty; romney4obamacare; romneyantifederalism; romneyantigop; romneyantiteaparty; romneywillgetcrushed; santorum; santorum4obama; santorumgaffes; santorumvsteaparty; sarah4mccain; sarah4newt; slickrick; stopexcusingrick; stopexecusingmitt; stupidparty; teaparty; teaparty4newt; weakfrontrunner; whatanidiot; whatasnob; whenindoubtblamenewt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 751-762 next last
To: true believer forever
Santorum Suggests Obama Preferable to "Etch-A-Sketch" Romney

And apparently many here on FR agree ... those that refuse to vote for Romney in the general election if he gets the GOP nomination.

51 posted on 03/22/2012 7:05:31 PM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Perdogg; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj
Wow...

Milt is (fill in the blank, I'm too lazy). But I don't think he hates this country and the concept of “America” like Obama clearly does. That's my limit on non-negative script I can conjure up regarding Milt.

Is Santorum serious? Well, now there's two GOP POTUS candidates I'll never vote for.

This is the proverbial “STAR TREK MIND RAPE BY AN EARTH PIMP “ Ping.

52 posted on 03/22/2012 7:05:35 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (The Establishment is the establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IceAge
If BO gets another 4 yrs. we won’t have any political parties to worry about.

A point that seems to be lost on all the party uber alles types around here.
53 posted on 03/22/2012 7:05:42 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker

How is Obama worse than Romney? I keep asking this over and over again to people like you, but all I seem to get is the same party-line refrain over and over again. Is it really so difficult to break with the establishment talking heads?

Romney signed both cap & trade and socialized medicine into law in Massachusetts. He then advocated Obama to adopt the individual mandate on a national level. Almost all of his judicial appointments were far-left liberals. He defended the bailouts. He promised NARAL in 2002 that he would do more to support abortion than a Democrat. HE’S ON VIDEO ADMITTING THAT HE’S A PROGRESSIVE.

Now tell me what -specifically- in that is better than Obama. Better yet, I’ll save the the effort: you can’t say what’s better, because those are Obama’s same damned positions!

You know the token opposition we get from the GOP now under McConnell and Boehner? Even that would melt away under President Romney, and we’d be left with nothing. The establishment machine would permanently extinguish what little remains of the Tea Party.

You don’t have to vote for Obongo to take a stand against this! Just ignore the presidential race and concentrate on where we can really make a difference: the Senate.


54 posted on 03/22/2012 7:05:42 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cll

“I think our only hope at this point is to throw all our $upport behind outfits like SarahPAC and revive the TEA party”

Sarah really needs to step in. We really can’t expect our current squad of GOP buffoons to take on Obama and win, can we?


55 posted on 03/22/2012 7:05:58 PM PDT by wk4bush2004 (No Newty, No Ricky, No Ronnie and Hell No, MItt...Sarah, Sarah & Only Sarah's All We're Gonna Take!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
The conservatives failed in this election cycle.

The only thing worst than nominating another RINO is Obama's re-election.

There are plenty of rising star conservatives out there. It's a long haul. Goldwater to Reagan was 16 years.

We are now in the danger zone, many have said that going over 50%+1 of Americans dependent upon the public teat will rob the rest of us. Elect a strong conservative Congress, hold their feet to the fire, and Romney Administration will know which way the winds blow.

The play know is for him to pick a Conservative VP who will carry on in 8 years. Reagan choose poorly with George HW Bush. Romney can't make the same mistake.

Who should it be?

56 posted on 03/22/2012 7:06:05 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Wow, Santorum really knows how to scuttle his own campaign. No way would I support anyone this desperate. I’m not excited about any of the GOP candidates, but any one of them is far preferable to Obama. These primary candidates just can’t handle the fact that Romney is kicking their butts. The constant crying about Romney’s money was bad enough, but now they have to go out kicking and screaming like this? Pathetic.


57 posted on 03/22/2012 7:06:19 PM PDT by LC Gladiator (Barack Obama is a malevolent Marxist cockroach and a foul festering pustule on the hide of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Santorum was my 3rd choice line in the sand candidate after Bachmann and Cain. If Romney is the nominee, I’ll be treating downticket races like the big show.


58 posted on 03/22/2012 7:06:29 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky
Good grief. There are “hot mike” moments, and then there are moments when you douse your own mike in lighter fluid, hold it over an open fire, and then plunge it down your throat.

You're funny. Sad thing is, it wasn't even a hot mike moment, he said it straight out. This is what happens when rick isn't stealing quotes from Newt and using Newt's ideas as his own... people get a glimpse.

59 posted on 03/22/2012 7:06:49 PM PDT by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Did the conservatives unite behind those conservative candidates who wanted to run in the beginning? NO!! Michele Bachmann didn’t get much backing and Santorum “claims” to be conservative and he can’t get enough backing to beat Romney much less beat Obama.

We won’t have a chance to unite unless you are talking about armed inserrection against the WH. Our freedoms are dwindling away daily.
I honestly believe it’s now or never to save our way of life in this country.....BO is being run by some wicked people in the background with lots of $$$.

Divide and conquer, that is Obama’s game and the R’s have fallen right into his hands.


60 posted on 03/22/2012 7:07:23 PM PDT by IceAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
we might as well stay with what we have instead of taking a risk with what may be the Etch-A-Sketch candidate of the future

Oh lord!

You might as well vote for Ron Paul, for cryin' out loud!

Why is it Romney and Santorum both keep walking right over the top of the dangers facing this country as if all they care about is getting the top guy's job instead of fixing this nation.

ARGH! GOD HELP US!

61 posted on 03/22/2012 7:07:57 PM PDT by GVnana (Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I want someone who can put some wings on the car before it goes over the cliff. Crazy times, but I just don’t see a solution with Mitt.


62 posted on 03/22/2012 7:11:10 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker

I really don’t think you will be doing anyone any favors by voting for Romney. In fact, it may actually be worse. Here’s why (from an earlier post)

“I won’t vote for Romney. He will pick up Zero’s play book and continue right where he left off...except this time it will be under a GOP banner.

Do you think the GOP losers who are running away from the Fast&Furious scandal are going to hold his feet to the fire? Maybe the GOP leaders who gave us the wonderful debt ceiling compromise?

If you don’t think this class of losers aren’t going to gobble up every piece of gun grabbing socialist healthcare drivel that Romney spits out, you are badly mistaken. He will appoint liberal judges just like he did in Mass....and the GOP leadership will embrace them.

Our only hope is the fact that Zero is in a different party. The partisan politics will make it at least tougher to pass things and approve judges.”


63 posted on 03/22/2012 7:11:36 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Anything is preferable to Obama.
Even Santorum.
My guy is still Newt.

I agree with all three, though after his latest idiotic remark I had to think about the "even Santorum" for a few seconds.

64 posted on 03/22/2012 7:12:52 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AU72
The conservatives failed in this election cycle.

The only thing worst than nominating another RINO is Obama's re-election.

There are plenty of rising star conservatives out there. It's a long haul. Goldwater to Reagan was 16 years.

We are now in the danger zone, many have said that going over 50%+1 of Americans dependent upon the public teat will rob the rest of us. Elect a strong conservative Congress, hold their feet to the fire, and Romney Administration will know which way the winds blow.

The play know is for him to pick a Conservative VP who will carry on in 8 years. Reagan choose poorly with George HW Bush. Romney can't make the same mistake.

Who should it be?

I can't think of anybody who could offset the distaste and disappointment of having to support Romney, which I will do out of a sense of duty to our country. Maybe Sarah or Mark Levin :) I still haven't given up on Newt...

65 posted on 03/22/2012 7:14:01 PM PDT by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Sure, Congress will listen to us just like they did on the debt ceiling. Just like they did on the Democrats’ ridiculously short-term tax cut extensions.

Boehner, McConnell, and company are already ignoring us. Do you seriously think that will change if we elect Willard Romney the open socialist, who’s ten times worse than they are? I’ve got news for you: what token opposition we get now will vanish.


66 posted on 03/22/2012 7:14:12 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
Santorum told a crowd in San Antonio, according to NBC News

Okay, I'm a Newt all the way to Tampa supporter. But, to be fair to Santorum, all we have is this quote according to NBC News. This would be such a crazy thing for a candidate to say that I'll wait for a more reliable source.

67 posted on 03/22/2012 7:14:36 PM PDT by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

The muzzy support group for DUmmys is to the left of here.


68 posted on 03/22/2012 7:17:11 PM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!!! 100% agree.

RINOmny would be the same as Zero. The difference is that the GOP losership will fully embrace the socialist gun grabbing drivel that comes out of his mouth. At least with Zero you can hope for bitter partisanship.


69 posted on 03/22/2012 7:17:48 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

“How is Obama worse than Romney? I keep asking this over and over again to people like you, but all I seem to get is the same party-line refrain over and over again. Is it really so difficult to break with the establishment talking heads?”

“Romney signed both cap & trade and socialized medicine into law in Massachusetts. He then advocated Obama to adopt the individual mandate on a national level. Almost all of his judicial appointments were far-left liberals. He defended the bailouts. He promised NARAL in 2002 that he would do more to support abortion than a Democrat. HE’S ON VIDEO ADMITTING THAT HE’S A PROGRESSIVE.”

“Now tell me what -specifically- in that is better than Obama. Better yet, I’ll save the the effort: you can’t say what’s better, because those are Obama’s same damned positions!”

“You know the token opposition we get from the GOP now under McConnell and Boehner? Even that would melt away under President Romney, and we’d be left with nothing. The establishment machine would permanently extinguish what little remains of the Tea Party.”

I don’t think the establishment machine would extinguish the Tea Party under a President Romney.

“You don’t have to vote for Obongo to take a stand against this! Just ignore the presidential race and concentrate on where we can really make a difference: the Senate.”

As I stated before, I really don’t like Romney, but I can’t bear to see four more years of our Country under Obama. If you feel Obama is no worse than Romney, then you should just stay home and not vote, and contribute to an Obama win. Its your choice. Personally I’ll take Romney over Obama.


70 posted on 03/22/2012 7:18:43 PM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

I don’t love Romney, but Santorum’s statement is really over the shark.

I never thought Santorum was a conservative in the modern American sense of a personally religious classical liberal who believes in individual liberty and God, and that individual liberty and economic liberty are intertwined with religious liberty.

Santorum is an ultramontane Catholic pining for Pio Nono and the 19th century church that denounced capitalism and the individual liberty of America as a heresy.

The best way to think of Santorum is as some sort of Christian Socialist — which makes his preference of socialist Obama over the very American Romney understandable, if not palatable.

Santorum is finished in the Republican party and with the Tea Party. He’s starting to make Pat Buchanan look like a team player.


71 posted on 03/22/2012 7:19:25 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Persae Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svxdave
Santorum is where he is at now because he was the last Anti-Romney to “peak” but if he were to have said something like this a while back, he would be worse toast than Herman Cain. Its too bad that Newt peaked so early leaving Santorum to make an a** out of himself with comments like that.

This is exactly how I see it.

Santorum is the same bad candidate he has always been, but he is essentially the last non-Romney standing and base conservatives simply don't have anywhere else to go if they want to register a protest vote.

I support Newt and hope he stays till the end. At least it gives me hope for a miracle. Unfortunately, I've concluded that the very things I like about Gingrich just don't seem to appeal to enough voters. I show his speeches to coworkers and friends and many just say he sounds too "strident" or too "opinionated". I guess, at least so far, Newt is not coming off to the public as the happy warrior I see.

72 posted on 03/22/2012 7:19:58 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

But this is exactly what you newt supporters say every day here. That you’d rather Obama wins, you won’t vote for mitt.

And then somehow you won’t support Rick. He believes what some of you believe.

Me, I will vote ABO if it comes to that, but at least I am out with my voice, keyboard, car, and money fighting against the Chosen Nominee for us. Supporting newt at this point is like supporting Romney.


73 posted on 03/22/2012 7:20:21 PM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012 - he's our only hope for change at this point)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

This is what happens to the serious man without a plan. The moral vanity brigade is running off the rails.

“Go Newt!”


74 posted on 03/22/2012 7:20:46 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucas McCain
Don't hold back    ;-)
75 posted on 03/22/2012 7:21:20 PM PDT by tomkat (FU.baraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joelt
The end of Santorum is near.


76 posted on 03/22/2012 7:21:59 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

It’s going to be tough trying to decide which GOP candidate sucks the least.


77 posted on 03/22/2012 7:22:50 PM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

>> Supporting newt at this point is like supporting Romney.

Deceptive nonsense. And his name is Newt.


78 posted on 03/22/2012 7:23:32 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Here is the difference between Romney and Obama...

Romney is Obama-white.

79 posted on 03/22/2012 7:24:35 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

bump.


80 posted on 03/22/2012 7:25:42 PM PDT by GVnana (Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Rick’s just reading FR.

There many are posts throughout the forum with people saying they weren’t going to vote for Romney if he was the nominee or that we might as well keep Obama since Mitt and Barack were so much alike. There’s no difference between THOSE comments and what Rick state.


81 posted on 03/22/2012 7:27:00 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Wow!

It’s a good thing for Saintorum that he became a politician, he would have starved to death as a lawyer.

I wonder how long before Obama will put out an ad, using this to show Saintorum endorsing him.


82 posted on 03/22/2012 7:27:47 PM PDT by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

If Romney looses to Obama, I hope you’re right.

But I’m not ready to sacrifice my country just to prove a point.

I’d rather get the best person we can get into the presidency. And then go election by election and get the best (read most Conservative) person in each office in Congress.

In my opinion you get the most Conservative person you can get, which at this moment, is Mitt Romney. My candidate was anyone but Mitt. But the simple truth is that’s a fantasy at this point.

Loosing to Obama just to be able to say, Hey Look! That’s a *Democrat* that’s destroying the Country, and not a *Republican* strikes me as kind of irresponsible. How about get the most Conservative president we can get?

Hint: Obama is *definitely* not a Conservative.

Then, get the most Conservative House, most Conservative Senate, most Conservative Dogcatcher, etc. The fact that the president is not Barry Goldwater does not mean you can’t get a Conservative Congress. It’s not an either / or.


83 posted on 03/22/2012 7:28:44 PM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Should I say the dread words: Third Party.

It doesn’t exist yet, but maybe it will. I wouldn’t vote for either Romney or Santorum, who are both big government, nanny state guys - the latter with an Evangelical twist and the former with crazy Mormon eyes.

Romney and Santorum are both career-driven liberals who have had to tack to the right and the Evangelical piety side in public for the purposes of the primary. And they’ll both renounce these things when it gets to the general election.

I wouldn’t vote for either one of them. Frankly, I’d rather vote for Ron Paul as a protest vote.

But maybe it’s time to acknowledge that the GOP is dead and go on to...a third party. And I honestly never thought I’d hear myself urging this.


84 posted on 03/22/2012 7:28:59 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Sorry folks, but that is just nuts.

Hillary Clinton would be better than Obama...Santorum is wrong.


85 posted on 03/22/2012 7:29:15 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
But this is exactly what you newt supporters say every day here. That you’d rather Obama wins, you won’t vote for mitt.

That is a pretty offensive statement, and not true. I have not seen any Newt supporter say that, though I'm sure there could be some.

But since you included me, my position has always been, and I have posted it here - I know Santorum supporters can't be bothered with facts - but I have posted it here prior, and that is: some of us will have the honor of fighting against Obama with our preferred candidate, and some of us will have only the honor of fighting against Obama to save our country.

Please get your facts, representations, and slimy statements to minimally reflect reality.

86 posted on 03/22/2012 7:29:52 PM PDT by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

That’s impossible, Santorum is, and I quote, from many a topic, “a stalking horse for Romney”.

Thanks true believer forever.

Apropos of nothing, remember those monks who poured gasoline over themselves and set themselves aflame to protest the Vietnam War?


87 posted on 03/22/2012 7:29:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: soycd

How typical. You point out obvious errors in logic to a party-line voter and they can only respond with insults or establishment talking points.

You know what? It was people like you, people who aren’t willing to think beyond the GOP lever, that pushed me to re-register as an Independent. No Democrat is worth voting for, but it’s wrong to go to the other extreme and assume that every Republican is automatically worth voting for.


88 posted on 03/22/2012 7:30:35 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: livius
Should I say the dread words: Third Party.

That's what the GOP-E will become if they nominate Romney.

89 posted on 03/22/2012 7:30:38 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker
So your argument is to hold our noses and vote for another Liberal Elitist RINO as the alternative? I did that with Dole and McCain never again!!!!! Nothing and I mean Nothing will change with Romney just look at his tenure as Governor of Mass.
Well this Conservative and many others will just say no.
The country for the most part is lost and the Economic Debacle that is coming can happen on Obama’s watch rather than a Republican’s.
Between Entitlements along with the Debt and Deficit we are heading Lightspeed into a mountain so let Obama have all the credit.
90 posted on 03/22/2012 7:30:43 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Santorum’s finished.

Concur; Santorum is out of his league. It is an anomaly he is still in the race. Santorum does not seem presidential.

91 posted on 03/22/2012 7:30:56 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The statement is bogus. Hopefully we are all more loyal to our God than our country, but how is that a bad thing? Mormons are a very loyal bunch of people who believe in obeying the laws of the land. If a Mormon is convicted of a crime he may get kicked out of his church, certainly he won't be allowed to go in their Temple.

I don't have a problem with being loyal to God, except I'm afraid that Obama is being loyal to the Muslim god.

92 posted on 03/22/2012 7:32:24 PM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NYCslicker

This same logic was used during dole,bush twice and McCain. Tired of est repubs taking my vote for granted every election cycle. Did bush help conservatism move forward or weaken our cause much like Romney will?

I’m not so sure


93 posted on 03/22/2012 7:32:41 PM PDT by Palin_Rubio2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Okay, I'm a Newt all the way to Tampa supporter. But, to be fair to Santorum, all we have is this quote according to NBC News. This would be such a crazy thing for a candidate to say that I'll wait for a more reliable source.

I looked for a video, but it's a little early yet. But the romney camp did respond, so they took it for fact, and may have their own sources (though they've never been stuck on truth, I know):

"I am in this race to defeat Barack Obama and restore America's promise. I was disappointed to hear that Rick Santorum would rather have Barack Obama as president than a Republican. This election is more important than any one person. It is about the future of America. Any of the Republicans running would be better than President Obama and his record of failure."

94 posted on 03/22/2012 7:33:03 PM PDT by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

It was an idiot thing for little Ricky to say, but it makes no difference really. If Romney is nominated, Obama will be elected.


95 posted on 03/22/2012 7:33:42 PM PDT by matthew fuller (A patriotic American would be ASHAMED to have 5 non-veteran adult sons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig
Hopefully we are all more loyal to our God than our country

Mitt's "God" is Joey Smith.

96 posted on 03/22/2012 7:34:02 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: svxdave

If Santorum had strickly stuck to economic issues and left the social issues alone he just might have made it.
The old Clinton playbook from the 1992 campaign fits more now than then. IT’S THE DAMN ECONOMY STUPID”


97 posted on 03/22/2012 7:34:36 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

But true believer, I’m afraid that to the rock solid Santorum supporters, NOTHING he says will ever make a difference. I have never seen such loyalty, not even for Huckabee. In fact, if they were to read our criticism, they would see it as persecution of Santorum, and would be even more determined to vote for him.

For the life of me, I have no idea what to do about this.


98 posted on 03/22/2012 7:34:58 PM PDT by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

And this is exactly why Newt should be the frontrunner right now, but for some reason many Republicans just refuse to vote for him. He would be a good President and MUCH MUCH better then Obama, he would crush Obama in any debate. Santorum seems like a good guy but saying stuff like this, considering he endorsed Romney in 2008, shocks me. ANYONE is better then Obama, ANYONE..now as much as I can’t stand Romney, even he is slightly better then Obama. If we have 4 more years of Obama we won’t have a country anymore. Obama will officially turn this great country into Greece. Its the GOP RINO’S fault for pushing Romney so badly instead of a true Conservative who would unite us all together


99 posted on 03/22/2012 7:35:23 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Hey, my asthmatic three legged dachshund resembles that remark.


100 posted on 03/22/2012 7:36:26 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 751-762 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson