Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The health-care law : Make your case
The Washington Post ^ | March 26, 2012 | The Washington Post

Posted on 03/26/2012 7:20:52 AM PDT by RobinMasters

This week, the Supreme Court takes up challenges to the sweeping health-care law that was adopted in 2010, including whether or not the mandate for individuals to purchase health insurance is constitutional.

As the justices hear arguments (view guide to hearings), we take the case to you. Tell us if you agree with the individual mandate by voting below, then explaining your view in the comments.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections

1 posted on 03/26/2012 7:21:02 AM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Dictator Baby-Doc Barack has ALWAYS ignored The US Constitution, ESPECIALLY with Obama”care.”

The cancer of Obama”care” now extends to Obama last week choosing a “Public health expert” for the World Bank Presidency.

The major problem with THE NINE SUPREMES is that they are chosen for political reasons by the POTUS, and then they vote as an un-accountable democracy, for a Nation that is NOT a Democracy, but a REPUBLIC.

As a result, THE NINE SUPREMES commonly vote 5 to 4 on most issues. Constitutionality is seldom a consideration, and their up-coming ruling on Obama”care” will prove my point.

Now is the time to stand and deliver to address our grievances to the dictates of the Left.

Oppose the dictates of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack!

Our ONLY chance to ABOLISH Obama”care” rests with THE NINE SUPREMES, because Romney will be defeated by Obama.

IMHO, if Romney is anointed as the RNC Nominee, THE main issue in the National Election, Obama”care,” will be taken off the campaign table. Hence, Romney will not only lose, but suffer another crushing, and sadly typical, RINO defeat.

To those who want poster ideas, here are a few ideas for demonstration posters:

Obama”care” was robo-signed by Congress, and is therefore illegal.

Obama”care” was 2700 pages long, and is still being written, but not by Congress: witness the forced contraception coverage recently added by HHS Regulators.

Obama”care” has caused “The Catholic Spring.”

Obama”care” reduces competition, and therefore is illegal by the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.

Obama”care” is designed to be a US Federal Government monopoly, with no competition.

Obama”care” also is illegal according to the US Constitution, because it violates our freedom of choice.

Will THE NINE SUPREMES notice any of these three violations? I seriously doubt it.

Impeached Bill Clinton proved that the US President is above US Federal Law, so anything that the President wants he gets, regardless of the Federal Laws that he has violated.

2 posted on 03/26/2012 7:29:11 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Did they fix the “problem” that when you click on “NO” it records your vote as a “YES” and asks for your reasons why you think it is constitution?

3 posted on 03/26/2012 7:30:02 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Unless the solicitor for the administration lies and says it is fact a tax and that fell to the congress, this is going to be defeated.

Then again, if it is decided that it is a tax, Obama got some splainin to do because it will be the largest tax in the history of this country.

4 posted on 03/26/2012 7:30:12 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Solyent Pink is Sheeple!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

If it IS deemed constitutional there will NO LONGER be any need for states as we know them! We will be just another European-type country?

5 posted on 03/26/2012 7:40:04 AM PDT by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Why are the Republians allowing Kagan to even rule on a case she defended?

6 posted on 03/26/2012 8:01:56 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

did anyone post this article linked on drudge:

“PAPER: Dem-appointed justices will move in lockstep; GOP-appointed justices look to Constitution...”

the direct link is comming up as unavailable.

if true then it means we are facing a 5/4 supporting decision.

7 posted on 03/26/2012 8:07:54 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! and
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

5-4 votes simply show what a joke the Supreme Court is. The highest court in America cares about politics, not the law or the constitution.

8 posted on 03/26/2012 8:15:00 AM PDT by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I voted No, yet the Wapo responded that I voted Yes. Then it told me I had to register in order to comment. The last thing I want is to give them my email address.

9 posted on 03/26/2012 8:22:37 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson