Skip to comments.
'Hanoi Jane' Set to Play Nancy Reagan in New Film
Big Hollywood ^
| 03/26/12
| Hollywoodland
Posted on 03/26/2012 6:13:51 PM PDT by DFG
Sometimes Hollywood casting directors must chuckle into their sleeves at the way their decisions drive conservatives to distraction. Case in point - this news flash concerning Oscar-winner Jane Fonda's new project: Jane Fonda is going to be playing Nancy Reagan in a new movie. Oh yes. According to Variety, the reviled-by-conservatives actress/activist has joined the cast of "The Butler," the new Lee Daniels drama about a White House servant (Forest Whitaker) whose career lasted from the Truman Administration to Ronald Reagan's. Daniels is also looking to Liam Neeson to play Lyndon Johnson and John Cusack to play Richard Nixon. Arch-liberals Fonda and Cusack playing a pair of major figures on the Right? Conservatives should stock up on antacids starting ... now.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fonda; hanoijane; nancy; reagan; traitor; treason; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-62 next last
1
posted on
03/26/2012 6:14:05 PM PDT
by
DFG
To: DFG
I’m sure it will be a BIG hit.
/s
2
posted on
03/26/2012 6:18:16 PM PDT
by
Wingy
(Don't blame me. I voted for the chick. I hope to do so again.)
To: DFG
Jane Fonda totally unfit to play any part of Nancy Reagan.
WTF are these people thinking to cast that traitorous scumbag in that part.
3
posted on
03/26/2012 6:19:06 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: DFG
Another propaganda piece coming up. Who would have thought that, after the uniformly failed series of agitprop films about Iraq, et al., that even the brain-dead marginally human lefty film producer types would have gotten the mssg.
Am I wrong, or has the only profitable "film" for the agitprop types over the past 5 years been Cameron's little blue-skin cartoon?
4
posted on
03/26/2012 6:19:20 PM PDT
by
SAJ
(What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
To: DFG
I don’t think she look like Nancy Reagan was Nancy petite Hanoi Jane too tall or too big LOL!
5
posted on
03/26/2012 6:20:54 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
(We are Freepers, all your media belong to us ,resistance is futile)
To: DFG
John Cusack to play Richard NixonThat's awesome. Who's playing Kissinger? Leonardo DiCaprio?
6
posted on
03/26/2012 6:21:48 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: DFG
These liberals do things like this because, subconsciously, they know they are crazed losers and they're trying to beat back reality.
7
posted on
03/26/2012 6:22:18 PM PDT
by
Vision
("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
To: DFG
This is for Hanoi Jane and the Hollywood libs.
8
posted on
03/26/2012 6:23:39 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
To: DFG
Not FONDA JANE, old statement but never tire of saying it.
To: DFG
Hanoi Jane?
Isn’t she a little tall to be playing Nancy R?
What we are seeing here is the re-writing of our
history from a socialist viewpoint.
When they control your history, they control
your future.
Jane would be better off portraying a panic stricken
traitoress on seeing the gallows.
10
posted on
03/26/2012 6:24:42 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: DFG
One day, that traitorous b***ch will become compost. I plan to “add nitrogen” to her grave.
11
posted on
03/26/2012 6:24:42 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: DFG
Sad leftists can only make money portraying conservatives. If they make movies playing other leftists, no one goes to see them.
12
posted on
03/26/2012 6:26:53 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: Venturer
“Jane Fonda totally unfit to play any part of Nancy Reagan.”
Nah, I might be ok with seeing her play the part Nancy Reagan flushed down the toilet every morning.
13
posted on
03/26/2012 6:27:41 PM PDT
by
MtBaldy
(If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
To: SevenofNine
In the words of the Gipper, “You’re no Nancy Reagan, Jane Fonda.”
To: Wingy
Why do they keep wasting their money on these cr*ppy movies?
Neither the libs nor the conservatives want to watch this drivel.
15
posted on
03/26/2012 6:32:09 PM PDT
by
Average Al
(Forbidden fruit leads to many jams.)
To: DFG
16
posted on
03/26/2012 6:33:45 PM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
(I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
To: DFG
Is Bill Maher playing the Pope?
17
posted on
03/26/2012 6:37:38 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: DFG
Maybe Ted will go see it...but not too many other people.
I won’t.
18
posted on
03/26/2012 6:40:04 PM PDT
by
moovova
(Poverty is a constitutional right.)
To: DFG
Clever marketing decision - half the country would never watch a movie about Nancy Reagan, and the other half would never watch a movie with Jane Fonda. I’m glad to see Hollywood doing something this stupid.
19
posted on
03/26/2012 6:43:08 PM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
To: DFG
Errr, where is the box office for the advance tickets to this movie? I wouldn’t miss it for anything, NOT!
20
posted on
03/26/2012 6:44:06 PM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
( WHO WE ELECT AS PRESIDENT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS WHO THEY APPOINT.)
To: dead
“Who’s playing Kissinger? Leonardo DiCaprio?”
LOL
To: Venturer
“WTF are these people thinking to cast that traitorous scumbag in that part.”
####
This is obviously intentional.
It is clearly an attack on the Right by the puerile, talentless scum bags who run Hollywood.
22
posted on
03/26/2012 6:47:46 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
(2012: When the Levee Breaks)
To: DFG
..and Michael Moore will play Ronald Reagan in this totally unbiased look at the workings of the Reagan White House....
23
posted on
03/26/2012 6:47:53 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: dead
Heheh, now that is funny to consider!
I must say...I was not a fan of DiCaprio for a long time, but after watching “The Aviator” and “The Departed”, I have to give the guy credit. He is pretty good.
24
posted on
03/26/2012 6:47:53 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: Venturer
“WTF are these people thinking to cast that traitorous scumbag in that part.”
####
This is obviously intentional.
It is clearly an attack on the Right by the puerile, talentless scum bags who run Hollywood.
25
posted on
03/26/2012 6:48:03 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
(2012: When the Levee Breaks)
To: DFG
26
posted on
03/26/2012 6:50:43 PM PDT
by
maggief
To: EyeGuy; Venturer
No doubt...liberals are pretty stupid, but I think of them like a dimwit spouse who might lack real intelligence, but has some kind of primitive embryonic emotional intelligence enabling them to push the right buttons that will unerringly drive their partner mad.
That is how I view them.
Don’t think for a second they don’t do things like that, because liberals understand conservatives have genuine respect for symbols, and that attacking those symbols is a way of pushing buttons for them.
27
posted on
03/26/2012 6:53:45 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: DFG
"... the new Lee Daniels drama about a White House servant (Forest Whitaker) whose career lasted from the Truman Administration to Ronald Reagan's..."I am going to guess this is NOT one of the career White House employees who have stated that working when Republicans were in the White House was far superior to the years when Democrats worked there.
Gary Aldrich references it in his excellent book: "Unlimited Access".
28
posted on
03/26/2012 6:58:03 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: DFG
"... the new Lee Daniels drama about a White House servant (Forest Whitaker) whose career lasted from the Truman Administration to Ronald Reagan's..."I am going to guess this is NOT one of the career White House employees who have stated that working when Republicans were in the White House was far superior to the years when Democrats worked there.
Gary Aldrich references it in his excellent book: "Unlimited Access".
29
posted on
03/26/2012 6:58:03 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: jazusamo; smoothsailing; snippy_about_it; Alamo-Girl; dixiechick2000; ntnychik; Squantos; ...
Aid and Comfort: Jane Fonda in North Vietnam, Henry Mark Holzer and Erika Holzer, 2001--a killer indictment, with the twelve transcripts, and the rest of the lawyers' treason brief.An American Traitor: Guilty as Charged By Henry Mark Holzer and Erika Holzer expanding the thesis, debunking the apologetics.
I had the pleasure to assist the authors in a modest way, and can attest to their thorough accumulation of the evidence.
Particulary relevant now as POTUS the islamo-commie crack-smoking closet queen assures Vladimir through mini-Vlad that he'll be "flexible" after the coup.
Treason never doth prosper. And we know the rest.
30
posted on
03/26/2012 6:58:45 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: PhilDragoo
When charges of treason were not leveled against Jane Fonda, I knew then that short of actual spying, Nobody would ever be convicted of treason again.
31
posted on
03/26/2012 7:01:29 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: rlmorel
Many thousands of patriotic vets will be walking the sidewalks.
32
posted on
03/26/2012 7:03:50 PM PDT
by
Liberty Wins
(Newt --named after Isaac Newton?)
To: moovova
Why would Ted go see it? He threw her out when she got too nutty even for him. It was about the time she started the group Pink Vaginas or something like that.
33
posted on
03/26/2012 7:05:41 PM PDT
by
Tammy8
(~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
To: PhilDragoo
When charges of treason were not leveled against Jane Fonda, I knew then that short of actual spying, Nobody would ever be convicted of treason again.
And great link in that post, by the way. Sadly, Americans don't care about Jane Fonda and what she stands for. This makes a difference to you, me, and a lot of others to whom it is important and symbolic.
The rest of them just go "Eh."
34
posted on
03/26/2012 7:06:31 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: Liberty Wins
35
posted on
03/26/2012 7:07:44 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: rlmorel
This is why we think of that, "Those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them." Obama in Kenya in 2006 with Raila Odinga and the muslims burning Christians--rinse, repeat.
36
posted on
03/26/2012 7:10:50 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: Tammy8
Why would Ted go see it? He needs a good laugh?
37
posted on
03/26/2012 7:12:15 PM PDT
by
moovova
(Poverty is a constitutional right.)
To: PhilDragoo; smoothsailing
But Fonda-ism is important because Americans who give aid and comfort to our enemies Communists then, jihadists now put at risk, not only our cherished institutions, but in todays world our very existence. That is a great article and the above last paragraph sums it up precisely! Hanoi Jane and those like her have been and are a clear and present danger to our Republic.
38
posted on
03/26/2012 7:13:56 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
To: DFG
She will portray Nancy Reagan. The public will get played.
39
posted on
03/26/2012 7:15:03 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: DFG
O Hollywood, thou art so
Clever!
40
posted on
03/26/2012 7:16:09 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
(Santorum 2012 - our sole chance to stop the Rominee)
To: jazusamo
Gushy Americans elected Bomber Bill Ayers' dummy whose daughter's initials are M.A.O. and whose communication director Anita Dunne reveres Mao--behold a president who is in a position to surrender to the Russians in a way JFK was prevented from doing.
41
posted on
03/26/2012 7:21:10 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: DFG
42
posted on
03/26/2012 7:23:09 PM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(Anyone not wanting an ID or purple thumb to vote isn't worthy of voting privilege.)
To: DFG
Does anyone watch this sh!t anymore?
I haven’t been in a theater since 2003 to see Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World..
43
posted on
03/26/2012 7:23:15 PM PDT
by
x1stcav
(There's a bunch of us out here spoiling for a fight.)
To: Venturer
That’s exactly why they did it! They’re giggling to each other right now.
Simple, join us in not pissin away our money on this sort of dribble. Only thing I’d pay to see Hanoi jane in would a be a real snuf-flick with her the subject.
44
posted on
03/26/2012 7:23:31 PM PDT
by
X-spurt
(Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
To: TribalPrincess2U
This will kill Nancy. Revisionists unfortunately follow this axiom, “History is written by the winners, NOT the losers”.
45
posted on
03/26/2012 7:27:47 PM PDT
by
Broker
(Talaga!)
To: PhilDragoo
Amazing, isn’t it?
Just amazing.
46
posted on
03/26/2012 7:33:01 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
47
posted on
03/26/2012 7:35:33 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Newt/Sarah 2012)
To: DFG
Jane Fonda is going to be playing Nancy Reagan Hollywood can enjoy the chuckle today.
On the way to the bank the money bag will be much lighter tomorrow.
48
posted on
03/26/2012 7:38:14 PM PDT
by
TYVets
(Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
To: DFG
Juliann Moore and Tina Fey playing Sarah Palin. Meryl Streep playing Margaret Thatcher. Now, Hanoi Jane Fonda playing Nancy Reagan.
Dingbat lefty actresses playing real women, and the pretenders look almost life-like. I’ll take the real thing, thanks anyway Follywood.
49
posted on
03/26/2012 7:39:14 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(our new, happy lives, thanks to Big Bro')
To: DFG
Who funds these movies??? No one goes to see them, and I’m sure they are all big time money-losers, even if the clowns like Fonda and Cusak work for free.
50
posted on
03/26/2012 7:42:21 PM PDT
by
PGR88
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson