Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The terrible truth told by Obama's open mic slip
Fox News ^ | 3/27/12 | Christian Whiton

Posted on 03/27/2012 2:04:31 PM PDT by Ron C.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: HereInTheHeartland

The problem with hold one’s nose in November is that is exactly the strategy that has given us such a weak congress and dismal GOP-e.

So...the strategy will give us what? A Romney? Romney isn’t going to stop, repeal anything. Once he is in he is going to rollover like a good dog.


41 posted on 03/27/2012 3:20:26 PM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.; TitansAFC; onyx; LuvFreeRepublic; Sea Parrot; SweetCaroline; matthew fuller; Gator113; ...

“In order to please Russia, President Obama will use a second term to weaken further the peaceful, purely defensive systems that can defend the U.S. and our allies from missile attacks.”

http://www.newt.org/2012/03/27/newt-gingrich-statement-on-obamas-flexibility-in-defending-america-and-her-allies/

Newt Gingrich Statement on Obama’s “Flexibility” In Defending America and Her Allies
March 27, 2012

The President’s remark to his Russian counterpart that he would have more “flexibility” on ballistic missile defense after the election underscores how dangerous an Obama re-election would be. The President promised the Senate during the ratification debate on the New START Treaty he would not compromise on the Russian demand to limit US ballistic missile defense. Now we find out that promise was nothing more than empty words. The Russian demands, including ballistic missile deployment restrictions, limits on the technological capabilities of our missiles, and joint control over launch decisions, if agreed to by the US government; constitute a clear-and-present danger to American security.

Background: The Russians are seeking the following:

A legally binding agreement to limit future US ballistic missile defense;

The Russians seek to impose deployment restrictions on US sea-based ballistic missile defense systems including the deployment of Aegis-class missile defense ships from the Black Sea – the path over which Iranian ICBMs would have to travel to reach the US;

The Russians seek joint control of a decision to launch ballistic missile defense interceptors – effectively “outsourcing” life-or-death” decisions about American security to the Kremlin;

Restrictions on the capability of US defensive missiles to prevent them from being able to shoot down ICBMs. This would be implemented by imposing performance limitations on US interceptors – the velocity (at burnout, Vbo) may not exceed 4-km/sec.

This figure reinstates the limitation derived from the now defunct ABM Treaty of 1972. The Obama administration would use these agreements with Russia to effectively recreate the constraints of the ABM Treaty.


42 posted on 03/27/2012 3:32:35 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
... more faith in our adversaries, more betrayal of our traditional allies and more unilateral indulgence in nuclear abolition fantasies.

The MSM - liberals - and the New York Times will be in there helping him get elected:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBFOmUXR080

43 posted on 03/27/2012 3:41:58 PM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite; Fred Nerks
The Russians seek to impose deployment restrictions on US sea-based ballistic missile defense systems including the deployment of Aegis-class missile defense ships from the Black Sea ...

Obama's part of a Russian team?

44 posted on 03/27/2012 3:45:01 PM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

It reveals why must fear an Obama 2nd term .

Even more than a Mitt first term.


45 posted on 03/27/2012 3:48:58 PM PDT by KSanders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

46 posted on 03/27/2012 3:50:01 PM PDT by tomkat ( FU obama !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright

One avenue of action is to limit your spending to essentials, particularly when it comes to products advertised on the Major TV networks.
Does two things:
reduces their revenue streams,
and two:
reduces those vendors who advertise on the aO Bama supported news.

It’s a matter of priciple.


47 posted on 03/27/2012 3:52:54 PM PDT by BilLies (Ass.Press ABCBSNBCNN, NYTimes, WaPOSt , etc., hate your Traditional American guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
If there’s really 40% out there who approve of this treasonous pig-with-blue-lipstick

Yes

....then is there really a country remaining to betray?

Doubtful, IMO.

48 posted on 03/27/2012 3:54:57 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

This is treason, pure and simple. The man deserves to be brought to trial.


49 posted on 03/27/2012 3:57:23 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
The problem, Marguerite, is that no one in a position of power seems to get it.

Guessing they are too close to the trees to see the forest.

The forest is shifting...everyday, things are developing more quickly.

Metaphysical things, I think.

Pray without cessation!

And hang on tight!

50 posted on 03/27/2012 3:57:28 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: "Who will rid me of this nettlesome Newt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.; All
Our elected 'representatives' the people have become sheep ripe for shearing

By their cowardice and inaction, CØngress has made itself complicit in the treason of Øbama.

Had I the power - even were it to guarantee my death by nightfall - I would impeach the treasonous marxist bastard tomorrow morning.

51 posted on 03/27/2012 3:59:03 PM PDT by tomkat ( FU obama !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“The problem, Marguerite, is that no one in a position of power seems to get it.
Guessing they are too close to the trees to see the forest.”

The only one who gets it is Newt.
He has taught courses to generals and other high ranked officers for twenty years at the National Military University. Foreign policy and national security knowledge is one of his many assets.

And the majority republicans are so dumb to want another dilettante (Rick/Mitt) in the White House ... *sigh*


52 posted on 03/27/2012 4:03:40 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright

How’s-bout this: do your own homework. Are your ears too Godly to hear things the rest of us report? if so, keep your head burried, but don’t expect most of us are going to screen your news for you, Mr. Wipe.


53 posted on 03/27/2012 4:05:10 PM PDT by Joshua Marcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente
"I wonder if he’s going to try and bypass the Supreme Court if they strike down his health insurance scam. Can he impose this monstrosity by executive order?"

Obama can do whatever he likes. He's not bound by the Constitution.

54 posted on 03/27/2012 4:05:36 PM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright

How’s-bout this: do your own homework. Are your ears too Godly to hear things the rest of us report? if so, keep your head burried, but don’t expect most of us are going to screen your news for you, Mr. Wipe.


55 posted on 03/27/2012 4:05:59 PM PDT by Joshua Marcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Admit it, it takes the MSM to stir things up before Congress takes action. Richard Nixon would still be with us if not for the determination of the Graham cracker woman (the owner of the WashPost at the time) to oust him.

Exactly correct. Watergate was essentially a media coup.

It is only with the rise of the new media, that the country is able to resist the Progressive agenda.

56 posted on 03/27/2012 4:06:17 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
who is going to put him on trial? no one. that is why he is getting away with anything and everything no one has a spine to stand up for what is or used to be correct.

Imagine what he will do if he loses this next election. Those final days could be unbearable.

57 posted on 03/27/2012 4:27:59 PM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
And I think the fact that Newt doesn't resonate is evidence that this cycle is the last cycle.

When things get as bad as they can get...usually the vacuum created by the negative is filled by a leader...a positive leader.

Newt has assumed that role and rightfully so.

But the world has spurned him (insanity of course...but the world was never particularly sane).

Seems to me that the manure is about to hit the fan (so pray without ceasing).

Just my humble opinion of course.

Be strong...be positive! And pray!

58 posted on 03/27/2012 4:28:51 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: "Who will rid me of this nettlesome Newt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Spot on. We cannot afford another Obama term.


59 posted on 03/27/2012 4:29:22 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer
"I watch the Media ,What story is that you are talking about?"

Nice one.

60 posted on 03/27/2012 4:35:13 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson