posted on 03/28/2012 1:19:16 PM PDT
(It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
...it's quite unlikely they've been tested against newborns. That would be considered unethical.
So it's unethical to "test" them on newborns, but not to administer them to newborns without testing? I don't get these people.
posted on 03/28/2012 2:39:55 PM PDT
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson