Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wearing A Hoodie Doesn’t Make You A Hoodlum, But Wearing One On The House Floor Makes You A Disgrace
CNSNews.com ^ | March 28, 2012 | Craig Bannister

Posted on 03/29/2012 10:07:29 AM PDT by CNSNews.com

“Just because one wears a hoodie does not make them a hoodlum,” Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.) declared as he donned a hoodie and sunglasses on the House floor – at which point the session’s chair called the sergeant-at-arms to enforce the House rule on decorum.

In a theatrical stunt to comment on the controversy surrounding the shooting of hooded Trayvon Martin, Rep. Rush pulled a hoodie over his head and went on a rant.

Rep. Gregg Harper (R-Miss.), the session’s chair, repeatedly banged his gavel and called for Rush to desist. “The gentleman will suspend,” Harper said. “The member is no longer recognized,” Harper added.

Rep. Harper eventually called on the sergeant-at-arms to intervene: “The chair asks the Sergeant At Arms to enforce the prohibition of decorum.”

He then reminded House members of the House rule banning hats:

“Clause five of rule 17 prohibits the wearing of hats in the chamber when the House is in session. The chair finds that the donning of a hood is not consistent with this rule. Members need to remove their hoods or leave the floor.”

Here’s the House rule on decorum Harper appears to be citing:

Comportment

5. When the Speaker is putting a question or addressing the House, a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not walk out of or across the Hall. When a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner is speaking, a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not pass between the person speaking and the Chair. During the session of the House, a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not wear a hat or remain by the Clerk’s desk during the call of the roll or the counting of ballots. A person on the floor of the House may not smoke or use a mobile electronic device that impairs decorum. The Sergeant-at-Arms is charged with the strict enforcement of this clause.”

Note that the hat embargo may apply only “during the call of role or the counting of ballots.” So, if neither one of those things was happening, Rep. Rush may be innocent on a technicality on the charge of violating House decorum.

So, I contacted the House Rules Committee and asked about this. Here’s the committee’s reply:

“Please see below – the highlighted portion is what Rep. Rush was in violation of…

From opening day this year:

6. Decorum in Debate

The Chair's announced policies of January 7, 2003, January 4, 1995, and January 3, 1991, will apply in the 112th Congress. It is essential that the dignity of the proceedings of the House be preserved, not only to assure that the House conducts its business in an orderly fashion but also to permit Members to properly comprehend and participate in the business of the House. To this end, and in order to permit the Chair to understand and to correctly put the question on the numerous requests that are made by Members, the Chair requests that Members and others who have the privileges of the floor desist from audible conversation in the Chamber while the business of the House is being conducted. The Chair would encourage all Members to review rule XVII to gain a better understanding of the proper rules of decorum expected of them, and especially: to avoid ``personalities'' in debate with respect to references to other Members, the Senate, and the President; to address the Chair while standing and only during, and not beyond, the time recognized, and not to address the television or other imagined audience; to refrain from passing between the Chair and a Member speaking, or directly in front of a Member speaking from the well; to refrain from smoking in the Chamber; to wear appropriate business attire in the Chamber; and to generally display the same degree of respect to the Chair and other Members that every Member is due.”

This clause calls for House members to respect the authority of the chair, and to wear appropriate business attire – which Rush clearly did not.

So, no, wearing a hoodie doesn’t make you a hoodlum.

But, if you do it on the House floor while disrespecting the session’s chair, it does make you an embarrassment.

See more "Right Views, Right Now"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blackpanther; bobbyrush; bobbyrushhoodie; hoodie; trayvonmartin

1 posted on 03/29/2012 10:07:33 AM PDT by CNSNews.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
So, no, wearing a hoodie doesn’t make you a hoodlum. But, if you do it on the House floor while disrespecting the session’s chair, it does make you an embarrassment.

What it makes you is a race-baiting, riot-inciting potential murderer of an innocent man on behalf of a probable thug who has been denied due process by your abuse of your authority as - of all things - a congressman on the floor of Congress.

What an absolute disgrace. He should be sanctioned and impeached for abuse of authority and position.

2 posted on 03/29/2012 10:13:48 AM PDT by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

It is unfortunate that the pullover sweatshirt with an attached hood has become a symbol for underground radical behavior, as it is good and useful garment when one is exposed to inclement weather, particualrly cold and wind.

But making a political statement is clearly an inappropiate purpose for this garment.


3 posted on 03/29/2012 10:13:53 AM PDT by alloysteel (College "education" may be the worst mischief to be inflicted upon the next generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
A thug is a thug...whether in a hoodie or a $1,000 suit.

FMCDH(BITS)

4 posted on 03/29/2012 10:14:03 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Wearing a hood on the floor? I didn’t know it was Robert Bird Day?


5 posted on 03/29/2012 10:30:13 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
Early life, education, and political activism

After dropping out of high school, Rush joined the U.S. Army in 1963 but went AWOL and received an honorable discharge in 1968.[2] Throughout the 1960s Rush was involved in the civil-rights movement. He worked in civil-disobedience campaigns in the South, and co-founded the Illinois chapter of the Black Panthers in 1968 and was made its “defense minister”. His son, Huey, was named after Panther leader Huey Newton. “We were reacting to police brutality, to the historical relationship between African-Americans and recalcitrant racist whites,” Rush later told People magazine. “We needed to arm ourselves.” Rush was present when fellow Black Panther Fred Hampton was killed in a police raid and later made an official statement that the police, referred only to as “pigs” by Rush, had murdered Hampton. Rush's own apartment was raided in December 1969 where police discovered an unregistered pistol, rifle, shotgun and pistol ammunition, training manuals on explosives and booby traps, a small amount of marijuana and an assortment of communist literature.[3] Earlier that same year Rush stated the philosophy his membership in the Black Panthers saying, “Black people have been on the defensive for all these years. The trend now is not to wait to be attacked. We advocate offensive violence against the power structure.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Rush

And this is what we have voting for laws in this country..Time to clean house..Time to redistrict the area he is in..

6 posted on 03/29/2012 10:30:43 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew

If you didn’t know better, you would think he was a member of the Black Panthers, and a fan of Huey Newton and Fred Hampton or something . . . oh, wait . . .


7 posted on 03/29/2012 10:33:56 AM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
OBAMA CATASTROPHE, OBAMA CATASTROPHE
8 posted on 03/29/2012 10:41:52 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

and here I’ve been wearing them to keep the wind out of my ears...


9 posted on 03/29/2012 10:42:27 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
THIS BE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTIN', BEYOTCHES!


10 posted on 03/29/2012 10:45:30 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

“I have a solution, you’re a d—k, South Carolina, what’s up?”


11 posted on 03/29/2012 10:46:39 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
Par for the course for an AWOL, commie, dope smoking, gun possessing, ex-con Black Panther.

Flashback to 1969: Bobby Rush Kept Handgun and Communist Literature in Apartment

12 posted on 03/29/2012 10:48:32 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson