Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: Ryan endorsement 'a great achievement' for Romney ("I think he will probably get 1,144" )
TheHill ^ | 3-30-12 | Strauss

Posted on 03/30/2012 8:37:02 AM PDT by VinL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: VinL

To be fair, if Gingrich hadn’t called Ryan’s budget ‘right-wing social engineering’, perhaps he might have had a shot at an endorsement.


21 posted on 03/30/2012 9:03:08 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

To those suggesting that Newt is selling out- I genuinely don’t believe that’s true. If that were the case, the smartest thing to do would be to withdraw and endorse Romney- and that would end the race.

Newt’s only hope is to be the consensus candidate at the convention. One can’t be a “consensus” candidate by tearing down Rick and Romney.

With the left/right media and establishments now in full court press for Romney (for their own selfish reasons), Newt is trying to get to the convention and remain viable by flying under the radar.


22 posted on 03/30/2012 9:03:27 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Ryan and Rubio are the hope for the revival of free market economics.

Newt has some of the best policies, but Romney is the supply-side candidate and the vanguard of Reaganomics.

23 posted on 03/30/2012 9:07:05 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

It’s going to be a long 4 years during Obama’s 2nd term.
_____________________________________________________________
America will deserve what she gets.


24 posted on 03/30/2012 9:08:49 AM PDT by no dems (I've always been crazy but that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
I am now considering voting for Romney over Obama if he is the candidate.

??? That is a NO BRAINER.

OBAMA = total destruction of our COUNTRY within 6 months of the 2nd term.

ROMNEY = although any conservative with a brain will need to hold their nose and vote, it will bide us time and will be one small small notch above Obama. We will at least have a second chance of voting if Romney gets elected.

With Obama it will be CURTAINS! OVER!

I'm still hoping that Santorum or even Newt at a Brokered Convention will pull this out.

25 posted on 03/30/2012 9:09:25 AM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crz; All

Gawd, to think these slime ball establishment bastards have managed to pull off another theft.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It’s our fault. The Conservatives run 5 candidates to every one Moderate and the Conservatives split the vote and the Moderate wins. Simple.


26 posted on 03/30/2012 9:11:54 AM PDT by no dems (I've always been crazy but that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VinL

This is not news, but realitly politics.

Politics is the only track this competition runs on, in the absence of more Novembers, like the results we had last year in the mid-terms.

Without more Tea Party mid-term wins, what can be expected of Newt?

We are not going to get any short cuts. We can not escape building a movement any more than the Marxists could escape building theirs. They just started earlier, while we were at the beach with our feet kicked up.

I say it starts with our plans for primary night. Will we give a large enough damn to show up at our precinct meetings and become delegates, or not?

Whining is no longer going to cut it, patriots, and its time to start looking around locally for leaders in our own communities who are articulate and persuasive enough to get a strategy in place, increase our numbers and our morale and rebuild the schools, churches and institutions that matter.


27 posted on 03/30/2012 9:13:17 AM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Rush L just said that rumors are floating that Gingrich wants to be SoS if Romney gets elected.


28 posted on 03/30/2012 9:13:25 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather; Vendome

Newt is not saying anything different than he ever has
*****************
The only thing “different” and somewhat disheartening, is that he said Romney will probably get the 1144- whereas, up til this point, he’s been saying that Romney would not.

I think this change is likely because Rick is losing steam- and might lose both Wis and Pa-—

Otherwise, I agree with you- Newt’s statement is consistent with everything he has said prior to today.


29 posted on 03/30/2012 9:13:42 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Amen. Anyone who listens to that craphole obama plotting with the Russians and then takes pride in sitting at home or voting for a Fantasy Party candidate on election day is a selfish or naive Onanistic moron


30 posted on 03/30/2012 9:15:12 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

Romney is the supply-side candidate and the vanguard of Reaganomics.
***************
With due respect, my friend- that may or may not be so. That’s the point. Because he has no core, no one knows what Romney will do.


31 posted on 03/30/2012 9:16:09 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: livius
The meeting was before LA, and it involved all three of the candidates (everybody except Paul). They wanted Gingrich to drop out, and he refused.

Haven't seen that reported. Got a link?
32 posted on 03/30/2012 9:18:42 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VinL
The best we can hope for now is, that Newt gets the VP or a very high cabinet position. At least having his strong intellect and Satesman’s ability involved, it would keep Romney strictly honest towards Conservative ideology.

AND, best of all, could you imagine Newt going against Biden in a debate?!........The result would be PRICELESS!

33 posted on 03/30/2012 9:21:02 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Respectfully Tom, I don’t consider Rush a credible source on this primary-— he’s always been for Romney.

Now, please don’t flame- only because I’ve made this argument over a series of threads— and don’t want this thread to end up about limbaugh. It’s merely my opinion. Thanks.


34 posted on 03/30/2012 9:22:41 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VinL
We will always believe that Newt is a genius. What ever he does is probably what is best. If you really believe in him, don't ever doubt that his motives are what's best. We have followed him since the 90’s and feel pretty sure that he always puts country first.
35 posted on 03/30/2012 9:24:47 AM PDT by Cindy of Nashville (What has the Democrat party become???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
We both know that Newt said this, but Newt's campaign is over a Million dollars in debt and his big donor will likely pull the plug soon.

The moment that happens, (and probably soon) Newt will drop out and probably join Romney in order to beat Obama. Romney would be smart to pick Newt as a running mate. That kind of conservative voice on his side, would greatly ease the pain at the polls for most voters.

36 posted on 03/30/2012 9:27:09 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Agree with you. In the winter 2008, exasperated, I wrote Gov. Palin, and suggested that she announce that she would not seek re-election as Governor- but instead, start an enterprise instructing ground level constituencies on how to reform local government. She could have done this by CD, tele-communications, and video.

Probably didn’t make it through the millions of other suggestions— or was summarily rejected. -:)

But, did honestly believe she would have been the perfect person to organize the grassroots- which is, as you argue, has to be done.


37 posted on 03/30/2012 9:32:35 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Respectfully Tom, I don’t consider Rush a credible source on this primary-— he’s always been for Romney.

That's really absurd. The only one where there have been hints of bias towards has been Santorum and a considerable amount of bias against Romney pouring over his past flip flops and how problematic his health care record has been in providing a contrast to Obama, etc. He's always been "for" Romney by always pointing out negative information about him throughout the process?

38 posted on 03/30/2012 9:32:46 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

“e’ll have another Dole/Bush/McLame candidate who is:

Pro-Abortion
Pro-High Taxes
Pro-Homosexual Lifestyle
Pro-Mandatory Health Care shoved down our throats.
Pro-Appeasement at all liberal shenanigans

It’s sad that people like Newt, Palin, Bachmann (my favorite), Bolton, and Santorum are not anywhere in the race and, therefore, we’re stuck . . . again . . . with a certified liberal. I am so fed up!”

And we will get the Dream Act or some form of republican amnesty. White Newt was talking to Romney. Rubio, Hutchinson and Kyl were discussing it. You add Gingrich’s ideas as he discussed in the debates and something will be crafted. Comprehensive reform.

God save us.


39 posted on 03/30/2012 9:34:46 AM PDT by Mozilla (If Romney wins, I'm not in. Voting 3rd party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

The best we can hope for now is, that Newt gets the VP
***************
Actually Psych, the only way I would wish that Newt became VP- would be if Romney had diagnosed existing dementia- and had to be replaced immediately under the 25th Amend. because he couldn’t remember how to get to the White House.

On a serious note, Newt would be a bad choice for any administrative position, imo— he leads, he doesn’t follow.


40 posted on 03/30/2012 9:40:26 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson