Skip to comments.Trayvon's SECOND Twitter Account
Posted on 03/31/2012 10:12:27 AM PDT by astuddis
The Daily Caller has identified a second Twitter handle that was used by the late Trayvon Martin during the last weeks of 2011. Tweeting in December under the name T33ZY_TAUGHT_M3, Martin sent a message that read, Plzz shoot da #mf dat lied 2 u!
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/29/second-trayvon-martin-twitter-feed-identified/#ixzz1qiPI4qQ5
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
It was either that photo or the one with gold on his teeth and the dart board.
I don’t remember exactly which one, but it was the real TM and you claimed it wasn’t. It was many days ago, many photos were deleted, and I’m am done with this little game of yours.
You are just plain wrong. The proof is that there never was...ever..on FR or anywhere on google...a picture of Trayvon "Martin flipping the bird with the dartboard in the background".
If there was, you'd be able to produce it. You are wrong. Suck it up and admit it.
Or, produce a link to the photo.
You've lied about me, and I will not quit asking until you produce proof or admit your mistake.
The pics you are combining in your mind:
Trayvon and a Dartboard:
Trayvon and the finger:
So, your claim that I said the photo of Martin flipping the bird with the dartboard in the background was fake is incorrect.
Unless you can produce a pic of Martin flipping the bird with the dartboard .
Go ahead. Post it and make me eat my words.
In post 87, the poster of the pic says, It is on his Facebook page at link in #84
So, Ive done all of your homework. Just Click the link to post 84.
No, I cant ask you to do that, because you are busy and your time is precious.
Here is the direct link to the pic I debunked: http://forum.darwincentral.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=52527&start=175
2. The photo I refer to is still all over FR. When it was subsequently proven that it was indeed the real Travyon Martin it was allowed to stay up.
If they are all over FR, post one.
So do I but her prevarications make it look like she won't or can't. If it is legit it is explosive and, unlike the other Twitter/Facebook pages, would be relevant to the case should Zimmerman have to face a trial. The way WARCHICK is playing it if she and her "twitter friend" are the only ones who have it then it will never see the light of day. If it's not real then it's just so much cyber-junk.
If Zimmerman is forced to defend himself in court the thing to do would be to apprise his attorney's of the existence of her page. Then she can rant and rave at the cops when they serve her a subpoena to reveal its source. LOL
Then she can rant and rave at the cops when they serve her a subpoena to reveal its source. LOL
“Do you solemnly swear to tell the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?”
“Spare me your Islammunist fagatronics.”
I’ve found the same screen cap in several google caches. It seems that every one who posted it, has now removed it. I hit the “contact” on one blog and asked them about it. I did find a guy who tweeted it. I asked him where he got it, but no luck as yet on either request.
At this point, your honor is at stake. On a thread in which you participated, I pointed out the debunked picture.
Nothing can be proven one way or another since so many photos were deleted.
You are free to continue obsessing over something that cannot be proven.
Have fun playing with yourself as long as you want.
Frankly I was picturing her yelling that out the window as she lays down fire on the local sheriff with her AR-15. But maybe she would get as far as a court of law. LOL
Good work. I hope you get a reply. I did several net searches and found nothing at all. I never have been good at choosing phrases for search parameters. I keep trying though.
Bookmarked those links. I notice that the screencaps in the original Tweets aren’t as blurry as WARCHICK’s or the one at your Google cache link. As a criticism blurriness doesn’t hold as much weight in light of that. For some reason it got blurry when it was lifted from one source to the other.
They weren't all deleted. I provided you a link and a screen cap of one left intact.
Anyone reading this thread can see that you were wrong. You just won't admit it.
They can also see that I will admit when I'm wrong...and that you can't even accept an apology without issuing a lecture.
I suppose you you actually be that stupid, but my guess, now, is that you just like to get on people's nerves.
The one flipping bird has nt dartboard, I was wrong, there is one with dartboard and one flipping bird w/out dartboard. There may be a third one in that series, can’t remember. So my claim of “flipping bird w/ dartboard” is probably wrong, I was mixing 2 photos. Or maybe not. But at any rate they are all the “real” T.M. and that is the important point.
I don’t see that I was proven wrong because so many photos were deleted, so there is no way that I can see, that anything can be proven at this point, so no way anyone can know which specific photos were deleted. I know for a fact that some were deleted that were actually the real T.M. But I can’t prove it and neither can anyone else.
Here is a blanket apology - if I am wrong, and you did not claim any real photos were fake, I admit it in case I was wrong.
But there is no way to prove anything and IMHO your obsession with this is weird.
All either of us have to go on is our memories.
IMHO your obsession with this is weird.
Defending my reputation may seem weird to you, but I will continue to do it.
All either of us have to go on is our memories.
That, and all of the links and the screen capture I gave you. Weird, huh?
If that was the only photo you said was not T.M., then you are correct and I am wrong. My memory remembers that there were other photos you said were not him that later were proven to be him.
I don’t think anything can be proved at this point. But since you flat out said the FB exchange between Michael Suave French and Trayvon Martin had to be fake for reasons that have now been proven to not prove it fake, then perhaps you are not infallible; and neither am I. My memory may be wrong, or not; same with you.
It has nothing to do with “honor” or “reputation”, but with the fact that no one knows everything and no one is perfect.
If you had screen shots of every single thread that you said was bogus with the phot still up, then we could figure it out. But that was not the only photo you called “bogus”.
If I was wrong, then I am sorry, and I always apologize if I was wrong, on FR and in real life. But this situation is unclear. If that’s not good enough for you and you want to beat a dead horse, that is your free will.
But that was not the only photo you called bogus.
It is the only photo I called bogus. It is a photo from a kid who lives in Savanah GA. Your memory has already failed you several times on this thread, yet you keep falling back on it. I, on the other hand, have provide links to defend my point.
I dont think anything can be proved at this point. But since you flat out said the FB exchange between Michael Suave French and Trayvon Martin had to be fake for reasons that have now been proven to not prove it fake, then perhaps you are not infallible...
No, the screen cap was presented as a Twitter feed. To which I said, "That looks nothing like any twitter page Ive ever seen. Im calling BS. "
As we know now, it is not a Twitter page and I was right to question it.
Any other questions beyond that were driven by the fact that it was misrepresented in the first place.
Look hun, I have toyed with you for far too long. Until you can provide a link to single post to defend your position, or provide some indication that you are doing more that prattling on without rereading the thread, you've lost on all points and I am done.
I have a full understanding that it may be the part of the month where you MUST have the last word...so have it.
I do not want to have the last word but I will apologize.
It appears from everything you say that my memory is wrong, and I apologize about accusing you of claiming photos of the real T.M. were a different one.
Regarding the mysterious FB comments, you made other assertions that proved to not be accurate, but that is another matter. This exchange has made me very unhappy, and I will avoid doing this in the future.