Posted on 03/31/2012 10:12:27 AM PDT by astuddis
The Daily Caller has identified a second Twitter handle that was used by the late Trayvon Martin during the last weeks of 2011. Tweeting in December under the name “T33ZY_TAUGHT_M3,” Martin sent a message that read, “Plzz shoot da #mf dat lied 2 u!”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/29/second-trayvon-martin-twitter-feed-identified/#ixzz1qiPI4qQ5
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
I remember you specifically saying a photo of Martin with the dartboard in the background was not him.
Post it then. Go ahead. Your specific memory already wrote me out of the Dan Rather incident, so that's not working well for you.
I'll ask a 2nd time: post a "photo of Martin flipping the bird with the dartboard in the background", because I've never even seen that one.
And for a final thought, I do not know whether the FB comments between French and Martin are real or not.
I read up thread, and short of posting a link to the page in 26 above, you have said that all along. I retract my (double) posts 49 & 50 above, along with 53...with an honest and large apology.
The Dan Rather NG threads were many years ago. I remember Buckhead, I don’t remember you. Big deal.
Second, my time is precious. So, suit yourself.
Second, my time is precious.
It became that way when your memory failed you. Convenient. Where's that "photo of Martin flipping the bird with the dartboard in the background", you wrote about up thread? Go ahead and post it.
Live like a thug, die like a thug.
Next.
Posting this in support of someone who just launched gratuitous insults at me isn't the same as insulting me?
No. In what world would it be? My post never addressed you.
And, the OP was correct...it wasn't Twitter. Even the source of this fake has questioned it now. I stand by my post.
Your post was in reply to someone who had just addressed me so who were you talking about? And where did you get "Yet some her keep posting it?" I made one post about it and, as I told you, it was with the caveat that it hadn't been confirmed. You were talking about me you were just too much of a coward to say so directly.
So what if it wasn't Twitter? The "avatar" angle has been debunked as not definitive of anything. The "no live 'comments' and 'like' button" angle has been debunked as not definitive of anything. That leaves you with Zer0 to show that it was faked. It remains unconfirmed.
Well, I appreciate that. A little late to stop my last post to you but I do appreciate it.
The "no live 'comments' and 'like' button" angle has been debunked as not definitive of anything.
I have not seen that debunked. Can you point me to it?
Post #62That is correct, except if you have not been "friended" by the person who's posts you are reading. Or if you are reading posts in a "group" you do not belong to.
My husband belongs to a group to which I don't belong. I can read everything there, but can not "comment" or "like."
I am not saying that proves this to be a real facebook page, just that there are times when like and comment are not available.
Thanks. I check it out for myself too.
I check it out for myself too.
Sheesh. That should be "I checked it out for myself too." You are correct.
Sigh. You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension.
1. The photos you claimed were not the “real” Trayvon Martin and wanted them removed, were removed. So I cannot find the ones you claimed were not him, because - they are deleted! So, therefore, I cannot find those particular ones on the particular threads that you asked the mods to remove.
2. The photo I refer to is still all over FR. When it was subsequently proven that it was indeed the “real” Travyon Martin it was allowed to stay up.
You seem to like to make this thread about you. It bores me. I got other stuff to do, and I am not evading trying to answer you. My answer is clear.
Another point - when you are proven wrong (like about the avatars changing on previous comments when a person changes the avatar) you never admit you were wrong. So, that makes you doubly boring.
I’m not going to play tar baby with you more, it’s boring and a waste of time.
Just read your apology. Thank you. I suggest you not jump the gun and accuse people of what they do not say or assert. Makes life more pleasant.
Apart from the other complaint I had; if even a link to it can't be posted with a question about its veracity how can we get it in front of the broader FR community to have it scrutinized?
I have gone back every few hours to see if WARCHICK's page has anything new to add and nothing substantial so far. I don't want to sign up just to ask her where she got it ... but I might if nothing new comes up. I have also repeated a web search on specifics of that post of hers and get nothing there either. The internets don't seem to be picking up on it. The whole thing may end up fading into cyberspace never being verified or debunked.
The big news will be when the FL state's attorney makes her decision to prosecute or drop it and (if) the full police and prosecutor's reports come out. That will pretty much settle everybody's hash on one side or the other of this.
It’s got a new comment.
I agree - if a link isn’t even allowed then how will FR discuss and do the research and investigation that is the trademark of FR?
I suggest you not jump the gun and accuse people of what they do not say or assert.
It's usually best to humbly accept apologies.
Again, where's that "photo of Martin flipping the bird with the dartboard in the background", you wrote about up thread? Go ahead and post it. Go ahead. Don't say your time is precious...you've come back a posted more, so you have the time.
Post it. Go ahead. Post the pic.
Clearly someone picked up on this thread and sent her the info on how Facebook works. She still doesn’t say where she got that screen cap. The link she posts is to her own page. The same page. WARCHICK needs to give her source or no one can check it out very far.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.