Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hard to find truth in Zimmermanís call to police

Posted on 04/01/2012 11:27:17 AM PDT by Java4Jay

I’m having great difficulty locating the original full version of Zimmerman’s call to police, one that is not enhanced to make wind noise sound like a racial slur.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: vanity; zimmerman; zimmerman911call
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-336 next last
To: 101stAirborneVet

And these cases mean what. Try again. I give you something for effort but you are way off the mark.


201 posted on 04/01/2012 2:54:58 PM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I thought that was an outgoing/taking off to flight pattern airliner. Gee, the things I miss by not lurking more!


202 posted on 04/01/2012 2:55:18 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

Liars should not be bringing God into the conversation. I tend not to be civil to people who make things up to harm another individual. You should be ashamed of yourself, but I fear you have no shame.


203 posted on 04/01/2012 2:56:36 PM PDT by beandog (Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
So why was Zimmerman so obsessed with "maintaining sight"

Anybody want to tackle that question?

Me! Me! Pick Me!

Maybe because he was concerned about the safety of his neighborhood. Being part of the Neighborhood Watch, about which Sanford Police say: "Training provided by law enforcement agencies to Neighborhood Watch organizations stresses non-contact surveillance of suspicious situations and notifying police of those situations so that law enforcement can respond and take control of the situation."

"Surveillance" would be "maintaining sight," in case you didn't make that connection. And he did call police, in case you missed that, too.

Frankly, I am a little tired of the idea that Zimmerman leaving his car was even unreasonable, much less illegal. One might argue it was poor judgment, as Zimmerman might (in fact, did) put himself at risk, but there is nothing illegal or threatening about walking around your own neighborhood. Or even asking a stranger what he's doing there. It certainly doesn't give that stranger a right to punch you.

Now we don't know for a fact that it happened exactly the way Zimmerman says, but his leaving the car and trying to keep an eye on Martin is certainly no reason to doubt it.

204 posted on 04/01/2012 2:57:12 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

You’re the one making the baseless assertion that Zimmerman received “special treatment” by having a felony charge reduced to a misdemeanor charge and then receiving a diversion sentence. Since you’re the one making the claim, you’re the one who must provide evidence. Just to be nice, though, I have proven that there was nothing “special” done at all. Such results are commonplace in that county’s court system.


205 posted on 04/01/2012 2:57:55 PM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
That Zimmerman was getting the s**t beat out of him is completely backed by witnesses, medical reports and physical evidence.

The police video tape shows no dressings on the back of Zimmerman's head nor any evidence of a "broken nose". Use your own eyes and look at the tape

These are called FACTS. Unlike your personal delusions and the voice soothsayers you're bring to the table.

Yes there are FACTS and you Zimmerman supporters are discounting what happened AFTER Zimmerman decided to pursue Martin, caught up with him and then confronted Martin

Remember: It was Zimmerman pursuing Martin after leaving his truck that led to the confrontation. Martin was continuing on his way home and Zimmerman made his decision to "pursue" and confront.

Under the rules of being a Neighborhood WATCH all Zimmerman legally could do was WATCH.

What is it about the definition of WATCH you Zimmerman supporters are confused about?
206 posted on 04/01/2012 3:05:48 PM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

“MSNBC has also located anonymous witnesses that saw Zimmerman break his own nose, bang his own head on the cement, and roll around on the ground in order to wet his jacket.....”

==

Well gee,that changes everything./s


207 posted on 04/01/2012 3:07:56 PM PDT by Mears (Alcohol. Tobacco. Firearms. What's not to like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: chris37

What happened to Jeff’s murderer?


208 posted on 04/01/2012 3:11:16 PM PDT by Mears (Alcohol. Tobacco. Firearms. What's not to like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: 101stAirborneVet
You’re the one making the baseless assertion that Zimmerman received “special treatment” by having a felony charge reduced to a misdemeanor charge and then receiving a diversion sentence. Since you’re the one making the claim, you’re the one who must provide evidence. Just to be nice, though, I have proven that there was nothing “special” done at all. Such results are commonplace in that county’s court system.

Frankly I do not know why Zimmerman got off light. Like you I can only speculate.

However we do know that Zimmerman overstepped his authority as a Neighborhood Watch and confronted Martin outside of his truck and that led to the shooting

And no amount of wiggling and twisting has changed those facts

Zimmerman had NO cause to leave his truck. He had observed NO CRIME being committed. Yet he decided in his own mind to step out of his truck and pursue Martin.

I have asked others who support Zimmerman to explain his actions. Can you do it?

Since Zimmerman had OBSERVED no crime in progress, on what authority did he have to pursue? Was Zimmerman a mindreader and figured that Martin would commit a crime at some future date? What?
209 posted on 04/01/2012 3:15:05 PM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
On a typical case, police contact the state attorney's office and speak with an on-duty assistant state attorney; they either discuss the matter by phone or the on-duty assistant state attorney comes to the crime scene. Investigators spoke to the on-duty assistant state attorney who did not come to the scene --- but State Attorney Wolfinger did.

Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee, along with Capt. Robert O'Connor, made the decision to release George Zimmerman after consulting with State Attorney Norman Wolfinger --- in person. After a conversation between Lee, O'Connor and Wolfinger, the decision was made to "cut Zimmerman loose".

Homicide investigator Chris Serino filed an affidavit stating that he did not believe Zimmerman's account of the shooting. He recommended charging the 28-year-old with manslaughter, but was advised by Wolfinger's office that there wasn't enough evidence to secure a conviction. Zimmerman was subsequently released.

If true, the account may explain why Wolfinger recused himself from the case, on the same day Lee announced he was stepping aside.

link

210 posted on 04/01/2012 3:16:26 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
The police video tape shows no dressings on the back of Zimmerman's head nor any evidence of a "broken nose". Use your own eyes and look at the tape

Just in case you missed this earlier:

"I saw George. He was banged up. His head had two big bandages, that weren't flat, had a bump on them," the neighbor, who did not want to be identified, said.

He described where the injuries were.

"I seen him have a big bandage on his nose and his nose swollen. On the side, where his eyes were at, it was swollen," he said.
Yes there are FACTS and you Zimmerman supporters are discounting what happened AFTER Zimmerman decided to pursue Martin, caught up with him and then confronted Martin

There is no evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin. The account of Martin's own girlfriend is that Martin initiated the interaction.

Remember: It was Zimmerman pursuing Martin after leaving his truck that led to the confrontation. Martin was continuing on his way home and Zimmerman made his decision to "pursue" and confront.

We know that he left his vehicle. We know that he lost sight of Martin while still on the phone with police. We know he tried to spot him again. We know that none of those actions are unreasonable, provocative or illegal. You are assuming other things which may or may not be true - but there is no known evidence that they are true.

Under the rules of being a Neighborhood WATCH all Zimmerman legally could do was WATCH.

There is no "Neighbor hood Watch law" that would prohibit Zimmerman from getting out of his car. But even if there were, there is no evidence that Zimmerman did anything but watch.

What is it about the definition of WATCH you Zimmerman supporters are confused about?

What is it about the definition of "evidence" that you are so confused about? Most of the people responding to you are not "supporters of Zimmerman," they are just trying to stick to known facts.

211 posted on 04/01/2012 3:18:00 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

The police video tape shows no dressings on the back of Zimmerman’s head nor any evidence of a “broken nose”.

The raw footage (before ABC news got through with it) shows a gash in the back of Zimmerman’s head. How can you tell Zimmerman’s nose wasn’t broken? He had received medical attention.

“Yes there are FACTS and you Zimmerman supporters are discounting what happened AFTER Zimmerman decided to pursue Martin, caught up with him and then confronted Martin.”

Zimmerman lost Martin. How did he catch up with him and confront him?

“Under the rules of being a Neighborhood WATCH all Zimmerman legally could do was WATCH.”

Wrong. It is not illeggal for Zimmerman to leave his truck, and has already been pointed out to you he was well within the “rules” to maintain visual contact.

Again Rooivalk you fail on EVERY point. Your inability to distinguish between the law and your personal preference, and to use any kind of logic or reason make it perfectly clear that you are either a) too stupid to even discuss this or b) willfully misrepresenting in order to advance an agenda. In either case, I am done with you (except I will get in touch with you again to gloat and to remind you how incredibly stupid you are).


212 posted on 04/01/2012 3:22:17 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

There's a good reconstruction of what probably happened here.

From another thread discussing this theory:
Like the rest of us, that blogger's start/end places are just guesses. Zimmerman told the dispatcher at one point during the call that he was parked at a cut through but we don't know how close or on which side of the road.

There is also this bit:
19:10:55 Zimmerman: Ayup, he's coming to check me out.
...GZ never mentions how close TM is to his vehicle but he was close enough for GZ to mention this:
19:10:58 Zimmerman: He's got something in his hands, I don't know what his deal is.
...more chat with dispatcher - who told GZ to let him know if TM did anything else - GZ doesn't mention TM turning, walking away, or increasing/decreasing his distance. How close did TM get to GZ's truck? How much of a lead would he have when he ran?....

Based on the call, there it was about 3-4 seconds between GZ's "ah, shit - he's running!" and the time the door opened. It was another 18 seconds or so before he acknowledged the dispatcher's "we don't need you to do that." How much of a head start did TM have? If TM only had a few yards and a few seconds on GZ, would TM's instinct been to have run down a straightaway that was completely exposed if he thought GZ might not have been too far behind? Could GZ have been able to reach the north end of the walkway in time to see TM if TM was running down the straightaway for home? Were there lamps or security lights between the building, any porch lights on, any ambient light from any of the homes? Could GZ hear running footsteps?

That GZ didn't mention any of the above is something that makes me think that TM ran and ducked.

And a followup on my part from the same thread:
I just realized that the blogger may have mislabeled one point.
"2:20 – He’s heading towards the back entrance. [referring to E]"

19:11:42 Dispatcher: He's running? Which way is he running?

19:11:44 [sound of vehicle door opening]

19:11:45 Zimmerman: Down towards the, uh, other entrance to the neighborhood.

19:11:48 Dispatcher: Okay, which entrance is that that he's heading towards?

19:11:50 Zimmerman: The back entrance…

See post 107. The back entrance to the neighborhood is south and west of the fiancee's home. It seems unlikely that GZ would claim that TM was heading down toward the other entrance if GZ only observed him running due west i.e., from C to E.

And lastly:
GZ would have had to have seen TM make the southward turn from his vehicle. Barely five seconds had lapsed from "he's running" to giving the dispatcher the direction TM ran. The distance from one road to the other looks to be about 60 yards. (World record for the 100 yard dash is over 9 seconds and that's under controlled conditions. We know that TM was wearing jeans and a hoodie and likely running on a damp sidewalk at best, over wet grass at worst, hardly ideal running conditions.)

But again, the points hinge on how close TM was to GZ when he took off. If he came close enough to check GZ out, that implies that he was closer to the junction of the road where GZ was parked and the beginning of the cut through. If he took off from that point, it seems that turning between the building would better fit the time and GZ's observation of his direction. Taking the first available turn (the sidewalk between the buildings) and breaking line of sight would also make more sense than running in a direction that would give GZ a sustained line of sight. The E point on the blogger's map/timeline just doesn't make sense to me.

Long story, short - While I think it likely that TM ran and hid and at some point he was either discovered or chose to reveal himself, the times seem a bit off for E to be the point at which GZ lost sight of him.

213 posted on 04/01/2012 3:23:00 PM PDT by Reese Hamm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

Zimmerman had no authority, and needed no authority (or “cause,”) to leave his vehicle. He was well within his legal rights to walk through his own neighborhood, even to follow Martin (if that’s what he did.) As to who “confronted” whom, we don’t know that. But I would suggest to you that even if it began with Zimmerman asking Martin who he was and what he was doing, that is not illegal, or provocative, or assault.

And it is quite possible to behave in a suspicious manner without actually being engaged in the commission of a crime.


214 posted on 04/01/2012 3:23:38 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

“Zestimated to be worth $160,500, “

==

Good Lord,that would be a dump in my area.

Wish I could relocate.


215 posted on 04/01/2012 3:24:47 PM PDT by Mears (Alcohol. Tobacco. Firearms. What's not to like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: PhatHead
Maybe because he was concerned about the safety of his neighborhood. Being part of the Neighborhood Watch, about which Sanford Police say: "Training provided by law enforcement agencies to Neighborhood Watch organizations stresses non-contact surveillance of suspicious situations and notifying police of those situations so that law enforcement can respond and take control of the situation."

Okay I am with you up to the Watch part. But Zimmerman decided to do more than watch. And that is where he got into trouble.

.... but there is nothing illegal or threatening about walking around your own neighborhood. Or even asking a stranger what he's doing there. It certainly doesn't give that stranger a right to punch you.

But you do not know WHO threw the first blow. Suppose Zimmerman ran up on Martin and "ordered" him to lay on the ground? Suppose Zimmerman attempted to frisk Martin?

Suppose alot of things. The FACTS remain that all these supposed eye witnesses only saw a part of the confrontation. And without seeing the condition of Martin's body and face after this confrontation why are you Zimmerman supporters so quick to accept one side of the story. And that side is Zimmerman's
216 posted on 04/01/2012 3:26:48 PM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

Go to the Sanford link in post #16 and read the burglary reports and see if you can find a common denominator, including the home invasion with the frightened woman hiding in her locked bedroom with the intruders trying to enter only to run when police arrive.

Pursue: 1 : to follow in order to overtake, capture, kill, or defeat. (Merriam Webster)

There is no evidence that Zimmerman was pursuing Martin. The evidence shows that he was following him in order to maintain visual contact. Completely legal.


217 posted on 04/01/2012 3:28:58 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Reese Hamm
The E point on the blogger's map/timeline just doesn't make sense to me.

I think he got the point "E" from an interview given by Zimmerman's father, in which he recounted that Zimmerman had continued in the same direction on the path through to the other street before turning around. Not that "E" was the point where he lost sight of Martin.

I agree with you about Martin's likely route. It is tough to square that route and running home with the rest of the timeline. The fight began no more than 2 1/2 minutes after Zimmerman hung up the phone in nearly the exact spot where Martin would last have been seen.

My own map and timeline is here. I welcome corrections.

218 posted on 04/01/2012 3:30:07 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
Frankly I do not know why Zimmerman got off light. Like you I can only speculate.

You're the only one speculating. I've backed up my facts with evidence. Nice job trying to walk back your earlier baseless claims, though.

However we do know that Zimmerman overstepped his authority as a Neighborhood Watch

He needs no "authority" derived from his Neighborhood Watch position. He has every right as an ordinary citizen to speak to, approach, challenge, call out, yell at or insult anyone he wants, anywhere he wants.

Zimmerman had NO cause to leave his truck.

He needs none. You're literally making up things.

I have asked others who support Zimmerman to explain his actions. Can you do it?

We don't have to. That isn't how our system of laws and Constitution works. You propose a fascist system wherein otherwise lawful conduct must be accounted for to some authority. No thanks. It's a different Amerika you seek. I want no part of it.

219 posted on 04/01/2012 3:32:25 PM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
And without seeing the condition of Martin's body and face after this confrontation why are you Zimmerman supporters so quick to accept one side of the story.

The mortician said TM's only injury was the gunshot wound. He has no reason to lie.

220 posted on 04/01/2012 3:33:16 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay
Next part of the tape? Please clearify and provide link. Thanks

WTH ??

a) proofread
b) do your own damned research

221 posted on 04/01/2012 3:33:36 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

Do you have a link?


222 posted on 04/01/2012 3:33:51 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

“Does race play a big part in this killing somehow?”


Race is the ONLY part of this killing that matters to most of the media.

Where have you been for the last couple of weeks?

The entire thing has become pure theater,with race being the theme.


223 posted on 04/01/2012 3:35:51 PM PDT by Mears (Alcohol. Tobacco. Firearms. What's not to like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
But you do not know WHO threw the first blow. Suppose Zimmerman ran up on Martin and "ordered" him to lay on the ground? Suppose Zimmerman attempted to frisk Martin?

Suppose alot of things. The FACTS remain that all these supposed eye witnesses only saw a part of the confrontation. And without seeing the condition of Martin's body and face after this confrontation why are you Zimmerman supporters so quick to accept one side of the story. And that side is Zimmerman's

If you really believe everything you say above, then I am not sure who you are arguing with here. My difficulty with most of your posts here is that you have made numerous assertions that it was in fact Zimmerman who struck first. I have no problem with you holding that opinion - but it is only an opinion.

And I am not sure what it is that makes me a "Zimmerman supporter." I have said repeatedly that we do not know exactly what happened. But the known facts do not contradict Zimmerman's claim of self-defense. Many of the people responding to you here feel the same way - try reading their posts a little more calmly.

And I very much disagree with your repeated attempts to cast reasonable, normal behavior by Zimmerman as somehow sinister, provocative or somehow illegal.

224 posted on 04/01/2012 3:37:37 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I stand corrected.


225 posted on 04/01/2012 3:38:26 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
George Zimmerman is a Dirty Harry wannabe who picked a fight with someone whom he mistakenly accused of wrongdoing and lost control of the situation he created, then probably panicked, shooting Trayvon Williams during the scuffle.

The "let's blame the victim" crowd isn't going to like that statement.

226 posted on 04/01/2012 3:40:32 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
Your whole analysis depends on Zimmerman initiating a confrontation with Martin.

There is no evidence to confirm that premise.
You seem to be saying that keeping a suspicious person in sight equals initiating a confrontation.
That's a pretty far-fetched conclusion.

There is evidence that Z's NW training advices not to approach the suspicious person.

There is evidence from a previous call of Z's(9:27) to the police reporting a suspicious person

where Zimmerman says...”I don’t want to approach him personally”

...it shows in that instance Z wasn’t acting like some wild vigilante. He was doing what NW is suppose to do, watch and report. It is a data point at odds with the claims of some that he was a predatory hunter stalking M with the intent of confronting/executing/assassinating him.

227 posted on 04/01/2012 3:41:23 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Greetings Clintonfatigued:

He was walking home armed with a bag of Skittles and a bottle of Arizona tea,

Other than the Martin family's scumbag liar lawyer statement: Skittles and Ice Cream. Kindly provide a link supporting evidence of Skittles and Iced Tea.

BTW, Skittles is street slang for Estacy and Ice Cream beez Crack.

Cheers,
OLA

228 posted on 04/01/2012 3:41:35 PM PDT by OneLoyalAmerican (In God I trust, all others provide citations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

He wasn’t walking home. He didn’t live there. And since when is walking in and out between houses in a rain storm “walking home”.

And there’s no telling what he would have done had Zimmerman not caught him. See how that works? I get to assume things just like you do. However, there is more evidence that Martin was a thug than there is that Zimmerman is a “Dirty Harry Wanna Be”.


229 posted on 04/01/2012 3:42:03 PM PDT by Terry Mross ( a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: beandog
Sorry, loser, but those two so called experts were hired by Martin's family. They're about as believable as you are, which means not at all.

The Orlando Sentinel contacted the voice identification experts. Both determined it was not George Zimmerman who called for help. Using different methods they took all the screams, put those together, and cut out everything else. You can listen to the extracted screams at the Sentinel’s site.

230 posted on 04/01/2012 3:44:31 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
There is evidence from a previous call of Z's(9:27) to the police reporting a suspicious person where Zimmerman says...”I don’t want to approach him personally”

That's an interesting find. I have been saying for a while that it is difficult for me to square the image of the "nervous Nelly" who calls the cops about open garage doors with the "vigilante" who wants to take the law into his own hands. I recognize that there is room for middle ground, but it seems to me he really can't be both. This recording certainly suggests that a confrontation with Martin is not something Zimmerman was likely to have desired.

231 posted on 04/01/2012 3:47:17 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk
According to Tracy Martin, the Sanford police recounted this sequence of events: Trayvon Martin walked up to Zimmerman’s vehicle and asked why he was following him. Zimmerman denied following the youth and rolled up the car window. Minutes after Trayvon walked away, Zimmerman got out of his vehicle.

Surely that would be on the 911 tape where Zimmerman says Martin is "checking me out"? But I don't hear it. Why would Zimmerman make that up - he had to know his call was being recorded? Or, why would the cops make that up - to get dad to back down? How's that working?

232 posted on 04/01/2012 3:47:44 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

This is likely the best thread...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2624216/posts

but there are quite a few more...

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/contrail/index?tab=articles


233 posted on 04/01/2012 3:50:26 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Alice in Wonderland

Well, the father’s recounting of the police recounting of Zimmerman’s recounting is not exactly evidence of anything one way or the other, because it likely something was incorrectly stated or understood somewhere in the repeating.

FWIW, Zimmerman did say during his call that Martin was approaching his vehicle and “checking (him) out,” but you are right, there is no conversation between the two on the recording.


234 posted on 04/01/2012 3:53:28 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
The Orlando Sentinel contacted the voice identification experts. Both determined it was not George Zimmerman who called for help. Using different methods they took all the screams, put those together, and cut out everything else. You can listen to the extracted screams at the Sentinel’s site.
235 posted on 04/01/2012 3:54:30 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
“By calling him Captain Zimmerman you are just pantering to his fantasy of being a CaptainOnPatrol.”

Fantasy, what fantasy, he was out on his Neighborhood Watch Patrol when he was brutally attacked.

236 posted on 04/01/2012 3:58:08 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Alice in Wonderland
So an audio expert who says there's a 50/50 chance* it was Zimmerman, combined with an eyewitness who both heard and saw Zimmerman screaming, adds up to "it wasn't Zimmerman" for you?

*48% to be exact

237 posted on 04/01/2012 3:58:15 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Alice in Wonderland
Trayvon Martin walked up to Zimmerman’s vehicle and asked why he was following him. Zimmerman denied following the youth and rolled up the car window. Minutes after Trayvon walked away, Zimmerman got out of his vehicle.

Wow, either her story has changed or you have things out of sequence.

Martin asked Zimmerman why he was following him,

then Zimmerman asked Martin what he was doing here.

This was followed by sounds indicating a scuffle had begun.

“The girl said Trayvon must have been pushed because his headset fell off and the phone call ended.”

link


238 posted on 04/01/2012 4:06:10 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: PhatHead
So an audio expert who says there's a 50/50 chance* it was Zimmerman, combined with an eyewitness who both heard and saw Zimmerman screaming, adds up to "it wasn't Zimmerman" for you? *48% to be exact

Combined with a few more pesky details:

1. Witness reports have TM on top, beating Zimmerman.

2. Zimmerman has head wounds and broken nose, TM's only injury (per the mortician) is the gunshot wound which abruptly ended the beating he was administering to Zimmerman.

There's no logical reason the guy on top is the one screaming for help. TM's own father originally said it wasn't him, and then changed his story later on. On the other hand, the "experts" who claim differently are getting paid to contradict the obvious.

239 posted on 04/01/2012 4:13:46 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

I see stories that claim that it was an aircraft contrail and other experts claiming that it was a missile. I haven’t followed it as meticulously as I could have but hadn’t heard a definitive determination had been made.


240 posted on 04/01/2012 4:13:46 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
Please get your cast of characters straight ...

Tracy Martin is Trayvon’s father. He was recounting the sequence of events as told to him by the police.

Dee-Dee is the girl on the phone. I don't believe the police have ever interviewed her.

241 posted on 04/01/2012 4:22:00 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

Domestic violence? Do you know how many men have been falsely charged with that by their ex-wives? In fact, my wife recently told a woman that if she went ahead and accused her ex, my wife would testify - for the ex-husband. Why? Because the ex-wife told her she was going to make the accusation to “teach him a lesson”...

“resisting an officer without violence”

That is, by definition, not violent.

“resisting an officer with violence”

You mean, putting your hand on an officer’s arm. If he had punched the officer, or wrestled with the officer, Zimmerman WOULD have been charged.

And THAT is your history of violence.

Now, who was committing the violence that night? We know the cops reported on Zimmerman’s injuries, consistent with Zimmerman’s story. And we know the witnesses support Zimmerman’s story. And Zimmerman’s story is self-defense.

Further, within hours, the autopsy would show if the gun was fired at point-blank range. Maybe THAT is why Zimmerman wasn’t charged...


242 posted on 04/01/2012 4:22:14 PM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
TM's own father originally said it wasn't him, and then changed his story later on.

I'm not overly concerned with what his father says, to be honest. I lost a son myself three years ago, and I would give the parents a lot of leeway considering the emotional strain they are under. I don't grant the same leeway to the people trying to exploit their grief.

As for the voice recognition part, I'm inclined to think the father's first reaction is the more credible, for the simple reason that I believe it was given in a less politically charged context.

Having said all that, I also think that the parents' statements, in general, could not possibly be less relevant, since neither was a witness to anything, and I don't think there is any point in debating them one way or the other. They are speculating, just like the rest of us.

243 posted on 04/01/2012 4:23:17 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

The folks at Contrail Science did a Yeoman’s job of putting things into perspective.

http://contrailscience.com/a-problem-of-perspective-in-the-oc-new-years-eve-contrail/


244 posted on 04/01/2012 4:24:20 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: MtBaldy

In fact I’ll go further and bet there are already lawyers out there building a case to present to Zimmerman. I know if I was a young lawyer looking for clients I would be.


245 posted on 04/01/2012 4:24:40 PM PDT by MtBaldy (If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: PhatHead; Reese Hamm

All interesting conjecture/observations.

Perhaps when Z made the statement (in his truck), TM was still seen running down the walkway heading towards the rear entrance. And then Z either “lost him” when TM turned, or perhaps faded away into the dark.

And Z may have assumed that TM did not live in the neighborhood (not seeing him around as TM was new), and figured he would just try to leave the complex as quick as possible - through that rear entrance.

From some of the witnesses it sounds like there was a verbal argument ahead of time. One person said something like “I heard voices, and could tell it wasn’t the normal conversation of people walking their dogs.”

So I’m not sure TM “Jumped” Zimmerman from behind - but probably started off with words that got out of control. (Although perhaps caught him off guard hiding behind a bush or something).

“Hey - what are you doing here?”

“Nothing man, I’m walking home”?

“Then how come you ran?”

“What are you - Mr. Cop or something?”

“Hey, listen punk - I’m the neighborhood watch Captain...”

“Oh - big shot watch captain, well how about you watch me kick your ass...”

Obviously all conjecture, but I could see each of their testosterone levels rising. Although from the phone call, Z doesn’t seem all that confident or cocky. Based on TM’s photos and posts, I can see where he might think it cool to go “gansta” on some guy.


246 posted on 04/01/2012 4:26:03 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: PhatHead
-- There is no evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin. The account of Martin's own girlfriend is that Martin initiated the interaction. --

Serino indicates a theory including two face to face confrontations, minutes apart. One at Zimmerman's car (I wonder if that's the one with no words, where Martin gets close, stares, puts his hands in his waistband, then turns and runs), the other at the location where the fight started.

247 posted on 04/01/2012 4:29:43 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve; Reese Hamm

Well, that’s as reasonable a theory as any, and it fits the known facts and timeline. It is similar to things I’ve suggested among the many posts I’ve made here during my (somewhat unhealthy) obsession with this case for the last couple of weeks. As I’ve said before, it is perfectly reasonable to believe that both Martin and Zimmerman started out acting reasonably, but things got out of control. In your scenario, I can easily put myself in either one’s shoes (up to a point.) And none of that necessarily means Zimmerman committed a crime.

Zimmerman’s account (via his father) is that the conversation went like this:

M: You got a problem?
Z: No, I don’t have a problem.
M: Well, now you do! *punch*

That may fit the witness account of raised voices, too, and again, the known evidence does not contradict Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense.

Remember, we haven’t actually heard Zimmerman’s account - just versions of various parts of it recounted by others. All we know for sure is that he claimed self-defense and the police concluded that none of the evidence contradicted his claim.


248 posted on 04/01/2012 4:39:57 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk; JoeProBono
Greetings Rooivalk:

Appreciate your skepticism, for FreeRepublic often suffers from chronic group think. Feel sad Trayvon's parents had to bury their child, and equally sad Mr. Zimmerman had to make a deadly force decision.

I'm mostly angered by media attention whores whipping up angry mobs reminiscent of a Klan lynch mob atmosphere. Worse are the race baiting politicians pimping the tragedy for fun and profit.

You've made a good point here: The police video tape shows no dressings on the back of Zimmerman's head

Wound appears as surface abrasion (road rash) but the lack of dressing atop the wound surprised me a bit. No sutures without a transport is logical. Head wound without a dressing an ice pack, later swelling is likely.

Freeper JoeProBono contributed this photo image. Known as a joker, I wouldn't rule a photoshop image. Asked for a confirmation of authenticity, but I haven't heard back.

Cheers,
OLA

249 posted on 04/01/2012 4:41:45 PM PDT by OneLoyalAmerican (In God I trust, all others provide citations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton
Fantasy, what fantasy, he was out on his Neighborhood Watch Patrol when he was brutally attacked.

If you want to call Zimmerman's brother a liar, I will not dispute it.

250 posted on 04/01/2012 4:44:23 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-336 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson