Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

My company (a multi-national) keeps sending out this crap about “diversity is good.” They never say WHY this is so, it is a stake in the ground.

In some specific markets, it is all about “diversity.” You have to understand the cultural norms. Don’t stare down Japanese. Emphasize family to Latinos. Don’t put Turkish and Armenians in the same room...

That all makes sense.

It isn’t the same as saying “Diversity Is Good.” It has no inherent benefits beyond perhaps interesting cultural anecdotes.

“Diversity” judges someone by what he/she is (color, ethnicity, nationality, etc.). It is the antithesis of the American standard of judging someone by what he/she DOES.


6 posted on 04/01/2012 7:51:40 PM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

Diversity is good ONLY when liberal whites are in charge. Like what my Filipino bud tells me, that the most racist people he’s ever met were white liberal democraps.

They keep preaching multiculturalism is awesome yet they themselves have absolutely no non-white friends in their circle and live in white neighborhoods.


7 posted on 04/01/2012 7:54:19 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003
Here is why liberals think diversity is good (I'm quoting some work of my own)):

There are two ways to motivate individual self-restraint: by consent or by force. Under consent, freedom of action is maximized under conditions of mutually agreeable values. It is when there is disagreement that the need for force arises (literally, “di-versity” means having oppositely directed interests). No matter how constiuted to limited powers a government is, it has been universal that authorities gain power via enforcing settlments. The more conflict there is, effectively the more power there is to be had. Hence, the only alternative to police powers (and conversely, the only way to preserve liberty) is voluntary self-restraint. Yet today, every institution of public education (including mass media) teaches the lack of self-restraint as “freedom” and with particular regard to the most powerful drive in human experience: sexuality. Why? The more passionate the differences, then the more authorities we need to settle those conflicts by force, and the more power acquired by said would-be enforcers.


22 posted on 04/01/2012 9:03:39 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Good grief! Spread the word. I don’t want my retirement money invested in an idiot socialist corporation.


23 posted on 04/01/2012 9:04:18 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson