Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clara Lou
. We looked beyond the obvious because we wanted to be sure that we came to the just decision.

Your job was to objectively apply the law to the existing facts. Nothing more. You sound like you did more than your job, maybe too much emotion involved.

27 posted on 04/02/2012 6:16:18 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

You weren’t there, so you don’t know what you’re talking about. You don’t know the charges, the evidence we heard, or anything else. You don’t know the commentary we got from the prosecuting attorney or the judge after we rendered our decision and the trial was over. [Both the judge and the assistant distract attorney agreed that we came to what they considered the fairest conclusion.]
So, I’ll discard your idle comment for the trash it is.


28 posted on 04/02/2012 6:27:04 AM PDT by Clara Lou (ABO! Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson