Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

Accepting for a moment that the data is correct, the problem they have is that considering the different emotional states, and other dynamics, between the two samples, a 48% match is not indicative of dissimilarity, and I’m sure they know that.


29 posted on 04/02/2012 4:24:46 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: csense
And that's probably why they didn't have a control sample(s), or if they did, didn't furnish it. It would have shown the values for dissimilarity, which would have been much lower than 48%.

Notice that they tell you the needed value for similarity under ideal conditions, but they never tell you the needed values for dissimilarity.

This is pure spin, and if I had an appropriate degree and the medium to dliver it. I would publicly humiliate these hacks in no uncertain terms.

Again, they lie to further an agenda.

34 posted on 04/02/2012 4:40:39 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson