Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama takes a shot at Supreme Court over healthcare (Obama's trying to intimidate the SCOTUS)
reuters ^ | 4/2/2012 | Jeff Mason

Posted on 04/02/2012 2:41:10 PM PDT by tobyhill

President Barack Obama took an opening shot at conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, warning that a rejection of his sweeping healthcare law would be an act of "judicial activism" that Republicans say they abhor.

Obama, a Democrat, had not commented publicly on the Supreme Court's deliberations since it heard arguments for and against the healthcare law last week.

Known as the "Affordable Care Act" or "Obamacare," the measure to expand health insurance for millions of Americans is considered Obama's signature domestic policy achievement.

A rejection by the court would be a big blow to Obama going into the November 6 presidential election.

Republican presidential candidates, who are vying to take on Obama in November elections, have promised to repeal the law if one of them wins the White House.

Obama's advisers say they have not prepared contingency plans if the measure fails. But the president -- who expressed confidence that the court would uphold the law -- made clear how he would address it on the campaign trail if the court strikes down the law.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; bullyinchief; deathpanels; dictatorinchief; kagan; narcissistinchief; obamacare; obamapoleon; obameltdown; scotus; separationofpowers; tyrantinchief; waronscotus; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: allmost
Nevermind then ‘Windflier’. Better?

No need to go all 'sneer quote' on me. I'm just trying to straighten out a simple mis-communciation.

Later.

61 posted on 04/02/2012 4:14:24 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
"No need to go all 'sneer quote' on me. I'm just trying to straighten out a simple mis-communciation. Later. "

Great. You understood.
62 posted on 04/02/2012 4:19:16 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
"Remember the scotus jab at his state of the union speech?????"

I do and I also am aware of Obama's recent appearance of a collusion with Russian's Medvedev. This half-Black, half-American is a snake-in-the-grass, America needs to be rid of his kind.

63 posted on 04/02/2012 4:23:12 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Sorry, got distracted your post55 rabble rouser sounds like an interesting take.
64 posted on 04/02/2012 4:23:16 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
I guess I should’ve said “supposedly” has any expertise.

No biggie. I just hate seeing liberal propaganda seeping its way into conservatives' knowledge base. It's false data, and should be rooted out, wherever it's found.

I totally agree with you that Obama is a puppet who's been molded and shaped by hidden and powerful masters. You're absolutely right about his hatred of traditional America, and everything our country stands for. It comes across in nearly everything he says and does.

In any event, he’s mostly a puppet. I’d love to see a thorough expose of who’s been moving him along all these decades. I’d guess it’s way more than just Soros and Ayers.

You've definitely got to figure in the radical black supremacist element and his Islamic ties.

Commie, Muslim, racist, narcissist. Who would have ever thought that we'd see that unlikely combination in a US president? It still boggles the mind.

65 posted on 04/02/2012 4:23:56 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Well, good day to you too.


66 posted on 04/02/2012 4:25:24 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

That was my thinking, as well.

But, perhaps we are over-thinking things.


67 posted on 04/02/2012 4:29:27 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

No sarcasm, no problem, Deep breath. I do not exist. That’s cool.


68 posted on 04/02/2012 4:31:54 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

And a good morning to you sir.


69 posted on 04/02/2012 4:43:29 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

And a good morning to you sir.


70 posted on 04/02/2012 4:45:04 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
I am reminded of the State of the Union address by Dear Leader, where a Congressman was brave enough to shout “You lie” when the Dear Leader told a Whopper. I also remember a different State of the Union address where a Supreme Court Judge mouthed the words without volume “not true” when Dear Leader again lied before the assembled political leaders of this country.

Maybe it is time for Judicial Activism and the majority of the Supreme Court to come out and tell the public that Dear Leader (and Nancy P. and Harry R) were all liars.

If the President will not be civil toward the Supreme Court, why should the Court be limited to civil discourse with Dear Leader?

71 posted on 04/02/2012 4:50:19 PM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
We’ve never actually seen proof that he was a “constitutional scholar”.

You know what cracks me up? That everyone is acting like O should have know better being a Constitional scholar and all.

But who among us actually believes he even read the bill much less scoured it for Constitutional adherence?

72 posted on 04/02/2012 4:50:42 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The only judicial activism is Kagan not recusing herself.


73 posted on 04/02/2012 4:54:19 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

They can change their vote.


74 posted on 04/02/2012 4:55:28 PM PDT by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Skittles has spoken.


75 posted on 04/02/2012 5:03:47 PM PDT by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
We’ve never actually seen proof that he was a “constitutional scholar”.

A "Constitutional Scholar" by whose definition? Usually those classes are just arguing about what the words mean without taking the words at face value....other opinions and we know what Obama's opinion is about the United States Constitution.

76 posted on 04/02/2012 5:07:17 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Thuggish towards the Court like his hero FDR? I’m shocked. /s


77 posted on 04/02/2012 5:11:08 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Newt says, "A nominee that depresses turnout won't beat Barack Obama.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Does he not realize this is likely to backfire on him? Just like his public scolding of them during his State of the Union Speech. People don’t take kindly to being bullied.


78 posted on 04/02/2012 5:15:27 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Narcissism. Obama believes he is the one.


79 posted on 04/02/2012 5:25:55 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can still go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Well, I go back and forth. I think one of them have given him a heads up. He’s acting like he knows he lost. But, he usually acts one way and is already planning strategy for the opposite direction. He’s planning to spring some kind of trap. That’s my convoluted theory. LOL


80 posted on 04/02/2012 5:39:08 PM PDT by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson