Skip to comments.SCOTUS meets Chicago style politics
Posted on 04/03/2012 7:54:27 AM PDT by opentalk
President Obama's Rose Garden remarks yesterday on the Supreme Court are shameful, a blot on his presidency.
"Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,"
As a purported constitutional law lecturer, President Obama is fully aware that laws passed by democratically elected majorities (that's how laws are made) are overturned by the Supreme Court on a regular basis.
His claim of a sizable majority is false when it comes to the House, where the margin was very close. But the size of the majority has no relevance, nor does the fact that the law in question was passed on a purely partisan basis with no Republican votes make any difference either.
Because the Harvard-educated lawyer knows all this, the words "unprecedented" and "extraordinary" are lies.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
What if the SCOTUS Judges wake up one morning and find a horse’s head in their bed?
Rush is discussing this now,... definitely intimidation by prez.
Add them to the "blot" array...
If Obama collects enough "blots", he'll be able to present himself as a "dark horse candidate".
Rush teed Obozo up today on his show. Think, "field goal", "practice", "Lou Grozsa, George Blanda, Tom Dempsey, Russel Erxleben, and Mark Moseley taking turns" with Obozo's skinny butt. Wunnnnderful!
They're almost as likely to find some dolabella or potassium cyanide in their Cream O'Wheat, or wake up with a 150-grain jacketed hollowpoint in their ear.
"Ladies and gentlemen, please fasten your seatbelts, we seem to be having a problem with the engines....."
>What if Bambicare is overturned?
>Will the Supremes be confined to Levenworth?
That would be most intriguing; especially if the court decided after hearing that they were to be confined, to hear an eligibility case.
The minority in this case are those that are for Obamacare, the MAJORITY have always opposed it.
Which is why Obama leaves out the part about the “democratically-elected Congress” being democratically UN-elected right after they voted for this.
hmmmm....so....someone did come out and say he is a “constitutional scholar?” I’ve been wondering if anyone would....I would think Hahvard Law School would be ashamed right now of this idiots misinterpretation of our laws and the organization of our government. He obviously is NOT well schooled. Sheesh.