Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Oil Profits Arenít Excessive ó The Left's Rhetoric Is
IBD ^ | 04/04/2012

Posted on 04/04/2012 4:21:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

One of the most effective arguments used against the oil industry is that it earns "excessive" profits that must be taxed away. But as with the rest of the left's failed energy agenda, it's based on pure falsehoods.

With prices for crude above $100 a barrel, it's no surprise the news media are fixated on oil companies' "record profits."

Predictably, Democrats and others on the left use rising profits to bludgeon "Big Oil" and push more subsidies for money-losing "green energy" schemes while working to raise taxes and kill subsidies for oil.

"When the price of oil goes up, prices at the pump go up, and so do these companies' profits," President Obama explained last week, calling for higher taxes on oil companies.

"Meanwhile," he added, "these companies pay a lower tax rate than most other companies on their investments — partly because we're giving them billions in tax giveaways every year."

A new attack ad for an Obama-linked political group excoriates the oil industry for its "record profits and ... billions in special tax breaks."

On closer inspection, those profits turn out to be nothing special. Government policies have driven up the price of oil, which has boosted oil companies' total profits. But their profit margins — the best measure of industry profitability — remain modest.

As of the third quarter of last year, the oil industry earned just 6.7 cents per dollar of revenue, less than the average for all manufacturing of 9.2 cents (see chart).

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bigoil; energy; oil; profits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: SeekAndFind

Still waiting for a Detailed analysis of the MASSIVE SUBSIDIES and SPECIAL TAX BREAKS Big Hollywood receives as well as the Court Jesters that perform in the minstrel shows they produce. I mean after all we are treated weekly with The Amount of Money each Movie made on virtually every news channel in America. Shouldn’t Big Hollywood be able to survive WITHOUT TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES??? This is Tax Season, look at your form and you will Find a SPECIFIC DEDUCTION for Court Jester, WHY???? while we are at it, I have not seen a detailed anaylsis on the MASSIVE POLLUTION and WASTED ENERGY by Big Hollywood since Rush’s first Book. WHY??? Change the Storyline to Big Hollywood and use their own Arguments against them while showing pictures of their Lavish Houses paid for TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES.


21 posted on 04/04/2012 5:25:56 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

“The supply is controlled to control the price...”

You notice how the lowest earnings according to the chart seekandfind posted are in food. Think that is connected to the fact that the supply and price of food was the first “sector” the federal government seized control of?


22 posted on 04/04/2012 5:33:44 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Not sure how to counter that. Any ideas?

The oil companies do not get subsidies. A subsidy is money given to an organization out of government funds. The oil companies take tax deductions just like every other business -- they are not given money.

Just as a business can depreciate a piece of equipment or an entire plant, the oil companies are allowed a depletion allowance on their wells which reflects the dropping value due to the oil being pumped out.

An example of a subsidy would be the $1/2 billion that taxpayers will give to the banks that lent Solyndra money. Make sure your lefty colleagues understand what a subsidy really is and don't allow them to misuse it in your presence.

23 posted on 04/04/2012 6:20:03 AM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Read and memorize Randall Hoven's arguments in About Those Oil Subsidies over at American Thinker. He published it 11 months ago and it is still very timely. Excellent refutation of all the nonsense heaped on us by demagogues.
24 posted on 04/04/2012 6:32:12 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Oil companies do not get subsidies. They get the same “deductions” as every other company. A truck driver gets to write off the declining value of his truck each year, an oil company gets to write off the declining value of an oil field as the oil is extracted from it.


25 posted on 04/04/2012 6:44:22 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oil companies profits are well in line with most other major companies in this country but the question I have is why are there reports that fuel has become our biggest EXPORT!


26 posted on 04/04/2012 6:57:17 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Old enough to remember when this was a Free Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angcat
What gives gas stations the right to raise a gallon of gas 6 cents overnight?

Are you serious?

27 posted on 04/04/2012 7:00:29 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama’s demagoguery also portrays bill oil as being owned by a few corporate fat cats. That might have been true 100 years ago when J. D. Rockefeller and a few cronies owned the virtual monopoly Standard Oil, but oil companies today are stock corporations with the majority of stock being held by investors like pension funds, mutual funds and private investors. Less than 5% of oil company stock is held by what could be considered corporate insiders. Obama’s punishing big oil with new taxes simply punishes its investors and will result in added costs being passed on to consumers at the pump.
28 posted on 04/04/2012 7:19:10 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Yes I am serious.

6 cents a week every week? Now we are up too 3.99 a gallon. I just don't understand I guess.

29 posted on 04/04/2012 7:23:20 AM PDT by angcat (PLEASE GOD SAVE OUR COUNTRY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36
I have is why are there reports that fuel has become our biggest EXPORT!

Many years of expanding and upgrading our existing refineries, combined with falling demand in the US, has finally put the US with surplus refinery capacity.

So now we import a little more crude oil than we need, refine it, and export the higher value product.

It helps our trade balance, it keeps more jobs in the US, it keeps a surplus capacity running so when we need it (more demand, refinery explosion, etc) it is already running and online.

What is wrong with that?

30 posted on 04/04/2012 7:34:16 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Ask them to give an example of one of these so-called "subsidies". You will quickly find that they have no idea what they are talking about. They are simply regurgitating the spoon-fed misinformation they get from the left talking heads in the media and obama.

It makes a great sound byte, but there is no substance to it. The alleged "subsidies" are the same tax write-offs for depreciation, business costs, depletion that are available to any company. They simply want the "evil" oil companies to be held to a different standard.

31 posted on 04/04/2012 7:38:18 AM PDT by American Infidel (Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Government earns far more from the sale of a gallon of gasoline than the oil companies.

You gotta ask yourself, "Who's doing the gouging?"

32 posted on 04/04/2012 8:06:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And gas is 4.00 a gallon. THAT IS WHAT IS WRONG!


33 posted on 04/04/2012 10:02:01 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Old enough to remember when this was a Free Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

And most of our oil used by the refineries is imported. That price is over $120 a barrel.

Gasoline is high for the same reason jewelry is high, the materials used to make them, crude oil and gold, has gotten very expensive.

Increase the supply of oil worldwide more than the increases in worldwide demand and it will bring down the price.


34 posted on 04/04/2012 10:35:08 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Answer the question. “Why is fuel the highest export for America?????” Gas is four dollars a gallon and we are exporting??? There is talk of opening our strategic oil supply and we are exporting fuel???


35 posted on 04/05/2012 8:40:41 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Old enough to remember when this was a Free Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36
Answer the question. “Why is fuel the highest export for America?????”

As I said above, we export refined products because we make more than we use. It is the highest dollar value export because nothing else has the volume and price combination.

There is talk of opening our strategic oil supply and we are exporting fuel???

You are comparing wheat and bread, or gold and jewelry. Refined Products are not crude oil. We are still importing a huge amount of crude oil, more than we produce ourselves. And using the SPR when no reduction of supply exists is the same mentality of paying your medical bills by getting rid of your insurance policy. It is only considered by fools and politicians, but I repeat myself.

Do you think the cost of cars, computers, etc would go down in price if we forbid their export? Refined Product is a finished product, crude oil is a raw material used to make the product. They are not interchangeable.

Do you think we would be better off shutting down more refineries, loosing more jobs, not having any surplus refining capacity? Refineries are not going to produce more product than can be sold. They are not going to operate at a loss. If you want to see the price of gasoline come down, we need to execute policy that puts more oil on the market and not just in the central states away from the ports.

36 posted on 04/05/2012 9:18:29 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So the answer is to keep importing more oil than we use at inflated prices to increase our debt. Combined with the devalued dollar it makes no sense to continue to go deeper into the hole to sell refined product at that devalued dollar, press on with the recession to to assure refinery jobs when the refineries would be used to full capacity when the recession is defeated.

Since we are already exporting a high volume of refined product how is bringing more oil into the country going to solve that? Supply and demand, if more oil is brought into the country and more is exported what changes.

Use the oil we are now importing in this country, reduce the price of fuel to allow industry to grow again. Industry will mean jobs, jobs will mean more fuel will be used and refineries will sell what they produce in this country and not to the world market and eventually Iran.


37 posted on 04/05/2012 10:30:01 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Old enough to remember when this was a Free Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36
So the answer is to keep importing more oil than we use at inflated prices to increase our debt.

Just the opposite. The refined products sell for more than the crude oil. So every extra barrel crude oil imported over our domestic use, and exported as refined fuel improves our trade balance with positive dollars coming into the country.

if more oil is brought into the country and more is exported what changes

It is not crude oil coming out of our refineries. It is higher value refined product. Think of it as importing steel and exporting cars.

reduce the price of fuel

That will require more crude oil on the market or less demand or a combination of both. Setting up other nations refine more while we refine less is NOT going to lower the price of gasoline in the US.

38 posted on 04/05/2012 10:47:46 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Apparently there is a technical answer and a logical answer.


39 posted on 04/05/2012 11:01:17 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Old enough to remember when this was a Free Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

Do you really not understand the buying a million barrels of oil at $125 and selling the refined products from the same at $145 is good for a trade balance?

Let us handle these one point at a time. Do we agree solely on the trade balance issue?


40 posted on 04/05/2012 11:09:26 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson