Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: ĎIím Predicting Six-to-Three in Favorí for Health Care Ruling
The Blaze ^ | April 4, 2012 | Madeleine Morgenstern

Posted on 04/04/2012 11:16:54 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2012 11:16:57 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I wonder if she had a leak as well?

I never really thought about leaks from the Supreme Court, but you know the top dogs probably do know before big rulings come down.


2 posted on 04/04/2012 11:18:36 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I wonder if she had a leak as well?

The vote was leaked to her on April 1...by Scalia.

3 posted on 04/04/2012 11:20:18 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

I seriously doubt it. She’s just an idiot who spouts incorrect bullshit all of the time.


4 posted on 04/04/2012 11:22:53 AM PDT by snarkytart (http://www.freerepubli224%2C1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

6-3 in favor?

On what continent?

On what planet?


5 posted on 04/04/2012 11:24:46 AM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great; until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Pelosi is making a funny!


6 posted on 04/04/2012 11:28:50 AM PDT by MeganC (No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

Never ever underestimate the ability of the SCOTUS to betray the Constitution.


7 posted on 04/04/2012 11:29:36 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Not only is she nuts but where does she get the 80 million figure from? Will anyone call her on it?

Seems like BS to me.


8 posted on 04/04/2012 11:30:49 AM PDT by allen08gop (New Ticker, Tan, Rested, and Ready! Cheney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

She predicted the Dems would retain teh House, easily, in 2010 also.......


9 posted on 04/04/2012 11:33:48 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Unfortunately, this vote wouldn’t surprise me :(

After all, othe best arguements against this outrageous law, by the best minds, focuses on the Individual Mandate issue?
|
But, the most serious, impossible provision therein is that the law prevents USA citizens from purchasing personal health care, directly, with their own money ?????!!!!!!?????!!!
|
In other words, it enables USG to decide whether citizens have the right to _be_ healed; whether they are required to shut up and die when USG decides the treatment for their terminal health issue isn’t provided, ie., allowed. Neither We the People, nor the doctors are even allowed to choose a treatment if USG decides the procedure isn’t covered (allowed). Again, this is even if the people want to use their own money!

Duh, is all I can say anymore.


10 posted on 04/04/2012 11:35:33 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allen08gop

I was wondering the same thing.. where she got the 80 mil figure.. not sure of my math, but would that not be like 1 in 4 people benefiting?


11 posted on 04/04/2012 11:36:37 AM PDT by JoanneSD (TEA PARTY VERSES TEE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I have Pelosi for years. This baby killing which will say anything that pops into her head, the truth is not a factor.


12 posted on 04/04/2012 11:39:35 AM PDT by dennisw (A nation of sheep breeds a government of Democrat wolves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
“Right now there are over 80 million people who are benefiting from the bill,” the California Democrat added. “We can’t roll that back, so we have to find a way to keep it.”

A different kind of leak.

Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining, Senator.


13 posted on 04/04/2012 11:41:13 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorists savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Pelosi never read it, had to pass it to find out what was
in it, but “they” wrote it in an ironclad way? You can’t
hardly make this stuff up.


14 posted on 04/04/2012 11:41:29 AM PDT by kawhill (kawhill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

No one is leaking anything to anyone as no one is acting in any particulate manner that would either show total vindication or abstract defeat.

Why would any Democrat get out there and make a prediction only to look like idiots? Why would Obama get out there and threaten the court if he knew he won?


15 posted on 04/04/2012 11:46:16 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
“I have confidence that if we’re talking about the law of the land and our compliance with it that we will be OK,” Pelosi said during a private event at the Paley Center for Media in New York. “Right now there are over 80 million people who are benefiting from the bill,” the California Democrat added. “We can’t roll that back, so we have to find a way to keep it.

Ah, the Talking Points Zombie Hag (TPZH) vomits out the latest meme, before she's reconnected to her docking bay.


16 posted on 04/04/2012 11:47:50 AM PDT by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured....... But not everyone must prove they are a citizen."

-- Ben Stein

17 posted on 04/04/2012 11:54:22 AM PDT by QT3.14 (OBAMA: a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Well if Obama knew he lost then he would attack them.

Also I think they know he overplayed his hand when he challenged the court as unelected. So now they have to play make nice. The plan was to convince Kennedy to switch sides, but it may have backfired. Also Obama did say when the Supreme Court over tur....then he corrected himself. So He may actually know.

Now they are going to spin like it’s so obvious that it will be a 7-3 decision in support of the law.


18 posted on 04/04/2012 11:58:32 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Pelozi

vomitous.


19 posted on 04/04/2012 12:00:33 PM PDT by Gasshog (going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

what makes you say that?


20 posted on 04/04/2012 12:06:43 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson