Posted on 04/04/2012 6:37:36 PM PDT by TexasVoter
"Today is a total travesty for the Rule of Law, Article II and the U.S. Constitution. The State of Georgia has a law on the books giving electors the right to challenge the eligibility of a Presidential candidate. However, that would be in theory only because in reality the judicial process is prohibitive and the sanctity of the ballot cannot be assured. Therefore, my ballot challenge in which Barack Obama entered nothing into the record and ignored a court order to appear despite Georgia Secretary of State’s warning to do so would be at "his own peril", heads to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking not only redress for a judicial process that has failed its responsibilities, but ultimately seeking Constitutional compliance."
(Excerpt) Read more at art2superpac.com ...
Advice to you?
Go RUN a campaign, for yourself or for anyone else.
State Rep.
Dog Catcher
Precinct Committeeman
Take your pick.
Go Door to Door, and treat people the same way that you treat people on Free Republic -—
You will be lucky if your neighbors even vote for you!
DR. JEROME CORSI
‘VERY CLOSE TO IDENTIFYING THE FORGER’
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/04/dr.html
SNIP
As stated earlier, most of what Dr. Corsi spoke of and displayed was not new to most of the people but there were two, very important pieces of information that should be noted.
First, the investigators in the Cold Case Posse apparently are more convinced than ever that they know who the individual is that performed the actual forgeries. This is important because it is a significant starting place where professional investigators can begin to unravel the conspiracy.
That’s not to say that this forger will be water boarded, unfortunately, but you can be sure he will be completely and thoroughly “interviewed”.
Secondly and very importantly, it appears that Sheriff Arpaio, when his investigation and fact finding are sufficiently comprehensive, will make the entire package available to the public so the people will be able to print it out and present it to the over one thousand county sheriffs across this country, who will be compelled by law to investigate and take action.
The greatest cover up and conspiracy in our nation’s history is beginning to crumble. It’s complete collapse can’t come soon enough.
The question posed is not “whether or not he illegitimately is the president” as you state, rather the question is “does an individual qualify for ballot access”
Qualifying for ballot access is the issue in Georgia.
Qualifying for ballot access is the issue in Georgia.
There is no provision in the law to waive the qualification requirements for those who are politically prominent. There is no provision in the law to waive the qualification requirements for those currently holding the office being sought.
The qualifications specified by law are to be applied equally to all.
The law has not been applied equally.
You expected the affirmative action fraud to be made to abide by the laws? Haven’t you been paying attention since Johnson started his ‘great society’?
“The question posed is not “whether or not he illegitimately is the president” as you state, rather the question is “does an individual qualify for ballot access”
Qualifying for ballot access is the issue in Georgia.”
If that is the case then the Federal court has almost no place in this case except to remind the State court that it is the discretionary of state law to define who can and cannot access the ballot.
As I understand it, the argument against Obama is that his father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth so it wouldn't matter if he had been born in Hawaii, he wouldn't meet the "natural born requirement." But you're taking the argument further and saying that because Romney's father was born in another country, even though George Romney was an American citizen, that makes Mitt ineligible.
So in other words, not only does one have to be a "natural born citizen", he has to also be the son of a "natural born citizen." How many generations does this thing have to go back, or am I missing something in the "natural born" interpretation?
Why do you think our candidate was McCain and is most likely to Romney?
One of the reasons Romney is strong is his father was not born in the US as supposedly Obamas father. So no one can not jump on Obama. McCain had a birth problem too. That’s why he was chosen and Duncan Hunter a true conservative was not. Apparently Obama can not p rove anything about his birth or is unwilling too.
Get the connection. They are always choosing for us and I emphasize choosing for us a candidate that has some kind of birth problem. We have poor candidates and we the people are doing nothing.
They wouldn’t choose such candidates that clearly no one want if they had nothing to hide. I am not saying they would not cheat in other ways.
Heading to SCOTUS?
Excerpt from Carl Swensson's statement:
"GA Supreme Court makes it a perfect Trifecta ! They join with the Administrative Law Judge and the GA Superior Court in refusing to give an honest hearing to an honest challenge. This really does drive the point home that our courts no longer exist. It is now THEIR Courts, not meant for lowly Citizens to find or expect actual redress of grievances or justice. Yes, it makes me sad to know there isn’t one Judge in this State with nuts bigger than mustard seeds, with any observable civic conscience, and absolutely no guiding moral fiber. What it does show me is that we are now one step away from completing the journey. The journey through local, State and now Federal, in the form of the Supreme Court of the U.S., where I personally expect them to ignore our plea for justice. “
Nowadays, a lot of "good men" are willing to do NOTHING! Bad for the Republic, indeed.
Were both of Romney’s parents US citizens the day he was born? Was Romney born on US soil? If yes to both questions, Romney meets the requirements. His father may have been born on Mexico, but if he acquired naturalized US citizenship before Romney’s birth, the requirement is satisfied. Obozo admits his father was not a US citizen. He fails on that test alone. Obozo can’t prove he was born on US soil. His mother didn’t meet the 10 years a resident of the US including 5 after age 14 (she was 18 when he was born). Obozo fails by every measure, yet he sits in the White House dressed like a slob watching TV when his handlers haven’t dressed him to read from the teleprompter.
It states both parents must be born in the US. So it doesn’t matter if his father was a citizen or not. He wasn’t born here. Chester Hayes had this problem which they covered up. So it doesn’t matter where Romney or his mother were born.
No, Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen or was a dual citizen (British subject). I don't think that's true of Mitt's father. It has nothing to do with where their parents were born, but where the candidate is born and the citizenship status of his parents. You're really not making sense here, with all due respect.
Get the connection. They are always choosing for us and I emphasize choosing for us a candidate that has some kind of birth problem. We have poor candidates and we the people are doing nothing.
They wouldn’t choose such candidates that clearly no one want if they had nothing to hide. I am not saying they would not cheat in other ways.
As bad as I hate the outcome and the Super PAC money Romney has, no one is choosing anyone for us except stupid primary voters. This is not a conspiracy. It's about two candidates (Newt and Rick) who initially split the conservative vote and neither of whom had the resources or organization that Romney does.
If the story about Perry and the painkillers are true, then we may have lost a viable alternative to Romney right there because of bad timing.
I hope they take it to the convention, as long as the one left standing can defeat Obama. This is the most important issue, in reality the only issue.
What is "it" and where does it state that?
Really? Prove it, nooby.
Peril? What peril? Who’s going to go after those “unelected” crows? Two of those were seated by Obama. They will continue to “evade” the issue as they’ve done for the past 3 years.
That's a big IF. There were rumblings back when George ran for POTUS back in the 60s but he dropped out so the questions didn't get far. There is nothing to prove it one way or the other on today's internet. Anyone else would proudly wave that naturalization in front of every camera and newspaper they could but not the Romneys. Talk about a vote getter - Hey, this is how proud I am!...Hey, unlike my opposition...Hey, I AM a NBC!...Hey, this paper shows how much I love this great country!
So, where's the documentation? Nope, not a peep. Crickets.
LOL! Really?
Was his name Jorge Romney? Snicker...
Someone from 2009 is calling me a nooby? You go “old timer.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.