Posted on 04/04/2012 6:37:36 PM PDT by TexasVoter
"Today is a total travesty for the Rule of Law, Article II and the U.S. Constitution. The State of Georgia has a law on the books giving electors the right to challenge the eligibility of a Presidential candidate. However, that would be in theory only because in reality the judicial process is prohibitive and the sanctity of the ballot cannot be assured. Therefore, my ballot challenge in which Barack Obama entered nothing into the record and ignored a court order to appear despite Georgia Secretary of State’s warning to do so would be at "his own peril", heads to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking not only redress for a judicial process that has failed its responsibilities, but ultimately seeking Constitutional compliance."
(Excerpt) Read more at art2superpac.com ...
Standing issues usually work against individuals in that Federal system.
The fix is in gang. Grab some solent green and go watch TV. Those who no better that have infinite compassion for us will not let us down.
And who says that crime does not pay in government?
Could this be considered legislating from the bench since the Georgia Supreme Court, with their pronouncement, implied that the law must have been changed for Obama, who broke the law and order of the court? So, did the justices of the GSC change the law? (pssst: they can’t do that).
Remember the “dangling chads in the Florida election and how the SCOTUS slapped down the judges in Florida for changing the law from the bench?”
If they say Soros is supporting Romney which I laughing say either they are going to throw Obama out or they have the goods on him. Romney should not be our candidate in either case. he would not ket America win. He shouldn’t be running as his father was born in Mexico.
This was the first court ever to allow evidence and testimony to be entered on thsi issue of Obama's eligibility. This is the same case in which the judge found for the Respondent, Obama, despite that he, thru his attorneys, had flatly refused to honor a subpeona from the court and failed to enter any evidence or testimony at the hearing. Then the judge "pocket vetoed" (for lack of a better phrase) a motion to find the Respondent in contempt for failing to appear.
How can the highest court in the US deny this altogether legitimate challege; this travesty of justice?!
These guys deserve every scrap of the support we can muster:
http://article2legaldefensefund.com/
Really? That seems rather weak. His father was an American citizen at the time of Mitt's birth. That should satisfy even a strict interpretation of the "natural born" requirement.
“Onto the Supreme Court of the United States. If SCOTUS rejects this case, it seems to me that they do so at their own peril. ;)”
I suspect the author is right, the very concept of justice dies with the presidents name. The president is “above the law” even if the question is posed whether or not he illegitimately is the president.
It seems that once he is sworn in he is immune to all forms of accountability and question to the law.
Not a birther.
He was not born in this country and there is nothing weak about it. I am not a birther so don’t go that route. If we don’t start fighting for our country instead of yammering on; we will lose. Personally, I don’t care where Obama was born although it is important; but I do care about his coverups and criminal behavior and how he really became POTUS. We need to hold our own elections. The government is not playing by the rules; but we should and et our own candidates. We are letting these thugs take us over.
Ah yes, ridicule, the alinsky tool box. Give yourself a little more exposure.
I have spent most of my life fighting liberals.
However?
It saddens me that the “circular firing squad” tends to shoot in the wrong direction, most of the time. We on the right do more damage to ourselves than the Left has ever done.
Standing isn’t an issue in this case. The law in Georgia allows voters the right to challenge ballots with ineligible candidates. The Georgia decision is not based on legal evidence since none was ever entered.
And again I ask, how does this man have so much power? Apparently there’s only one judge in the country who’s not afraid of obama: Judge Smith from the 5th.
SCOTUS will reject. They will let everyone else do their dirty work.
BRAVO.. best post I have seen in weeks.
Irish
You ar e the most two-faced of the anti-birthers, so your words to me are as hollow as a fallen log. In short, you lie and you go out of your way to ridicule anyone questioning little barry bastard’s natality. Go lie to someone else, I’ve been keeping up with your deceits so you won’t fool me with your pretends.
Ah yes, ridicule, the alinsky tool box. Give yourself a little more exposure.
Don't pay any attention to him. He is like a crazy homeless person, if you notice him he'll just want to screech at you some more.
I would go beyond that. His arguments are the silliest thing I have ever seen since Yogi Bera. I don't mind someone disagreeing with me, but when the proffered arguments are so dumb that they make you feel stupid just trying to read them, you need to save your sanity and just ignore them.
This guy is the looniest anti-birther i've seen since squeeky fromme. Other than slapping him around, he's not worth the trouble it takes to respond. It's like arguing with a child.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.