Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s Vicious Attack Ads Against Conservatives May Doom Romney Now or in November
Conservative HQ ^ | 4-4-12 | Richard A. Viguerie

Posted on 04/04/2012 7:34:47 PM PDT by VinL

Coming off of his primary wins in liberal Maryland and DC and a relentlessly negative campaign in Wisconsin, Mitt Romney’s campaign has signaled to the other candidates for the Republican nomination for President that there will be no let-up in the negative tenor of his campaign going into Pennsylvania and the other spring primaries. Mitt Romney As Bloomberg’s Heidi Przybyla noted, the “defining feature of the 2012 Republican presidential primary race” has been Romney’s relentlessly negative campaign. According to Przybyla’s research, “Since the contests began, Restore Our Future has spent $35 million on commercials attacking Santorum and Newt Gingrich” and “just $1.1 million promoting Romney.”

According to Przybyla’s reporting, Kantar Media's Campaign Media Analysis Group, Romney’s super PAC Restore Our Future aired 16 negative ads 41,612 times in GOP primary states such as Michigan, Florida and Colorado.

Romney’s negative ads, many of them factually questionable, have carpet bombed the conservatives in the race. As Romney has unleashed this wave of negativity, the campaigns of conservatives from Rick Perry, to Michele Bachmann, to Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich have withered, leaving Rick Santorum as the last conservative standing to bear the brunt of Romney’s attacks.

However, these attacks have done nothing to build support for Mitt Romney, especially among movement conservatives, and to the extent that Romney can claim front runner status it is because he has come to be seen as the “least worst” alternative by rank-and-file Republican primary voters.

Romney’s campaign has already made clear that it will employ the same hard-edged tactics that he used to crush Newt Gingrich in Florida and overtake Santorum in Michigan, Ohio, Illinois and Wisconsin, to defeat Santorum in his home state of Pennsylvania.

Whether Romney’s slime machine campaign will work against Santorum in Pennsylvania remains to be seen – it didn’t work against Gingrich in his home state of Georgia where Newt buckled down and ran like he was running for county sheriff to neutralize the charge that he was an out of touch Washington insider.

Even if one accepts the fuzzy math that Romney claims puts him half way to the 1,144 delegates he needs to clinch the Republican nomination – and we don’t – his negative campaign has left him with a substantial enthusiasm deficit, and no real base upon which to mount a winning campaign against Barack Obama.

As long as Romney relies solely on negative advertising to tear down his more conservative Republican opponents, without making the positive case for his own bona fides to be the Republican standard-bearer, conservatives will have little reason to support him.

Given the huge hole that leaves in the Republican base, the other candidates should prepare to stay in the race all the way to Tampa, knowing that if Romney’s delegate count doesn’t give him the nomination on the first ballot, conservatives whom he has failed to convince during the primaries will continue to look for an alternative until the roll is called and the last vote is counted.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; gingrich; nevertrustromney; romneyattacksgop; romneysucks; viciousromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101 next last
To: dinoparty
We need ANYONE who will dave us from.

Dave me, Dave me, Dino!


51 posted on 04/04/2012 8:07:56 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Mark Levin was covering this tonight. 91% of Romney ad dollars went to smearing GOP candidates and not promoting himself or bashing Obummer. What a swell guy. What burns me is that the GOPe is going to blame Conservatives that it is our unwillingness to roll over and allow Milt to be the nominee now that is damaging to the party. BS. Romney is the one who has singlehandedly destroyed party unity and any good will towards him. He can screw.

We need to push back hard against the GOP-E and the willing conservative accomplices when this occurs.

We need to make sure they own the problem, since they are the ones who created it.
52 posted on 04/04/2012 8:09:54 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Statist Romney or Socialist Obama? Hmmm. That’s like giving me a razor blade and giving me a choice to slit my wrists or my throat.


53 posted on 04/04/2012 8:10:26 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Do not fool yourself into thinking that Santorum and Newt wouldn’t have run vicious attack ads against Romney, if they had had the money. They would have done so in a heartbeat.

And it seems to me that the anti-Romney people on web-sites, blogs and Twitter are just as vicious; they just don’t have the money for a wider range of ads.

Politics is not tiddlywinks. This is the reality of extended primaries, and it is a repeat of what happened in 2000.


54 posted on 04/04/2012 8:12:54 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Lazlo in PA
Do not fool yourself into thinking that Santorum and Newt wouldn’t have run vicious attack ads against Romney, if they had had the money. They would have done so in a heartbeat.

Sorry, but nothing of either Newt's or Rick's character or demeanor or their records support your contention.

Furthermore, Romney's lies and character assasination efforts are well documented and pervasive.

Not buying it for a second.

Romney is a lying, left-wing Progressive Liberal as his own documented record shows quite clearly.
55 posted on 04/04/2012 8:19:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

Fighting liberalism isn’t just about fighting one man, it’s about fighting an ideology. And if you let that ideology infect your own side at the highest levels how do you EVER put up a fight against it EVER again? What would have been more dangerous when fighting the Soviets, the Cold War as we fought it, or the Cold War if we elected a Soviet party member as our own president?


56 posted on 04/04/2012 8:22:38 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reily
One of the problems about reading this site is you start thinking that all GOP’ers think like people here. Bad news is they don’t!

Actually, in this case, it is good news that they don't. Otherwise Obama would be reelected. Any Republican, even Ron Paul, is preferable to another Obama term and his appointments/executive orders/destruction of our military. He was caught on an open microphone conspiring to betray our missile defense system. He wants to strip us of our ability to prevent a nuclear attack and to respond to the same. There is no way I can take anyone seriously who equates any of the Republican nominees with this socialist traitor.

57 posted on 04/04/2012 8:25:15 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mylife
It looks pretty bleak regardless of the nominee.
That is why the house and SENATE are so important.


Amen!
58 posted on 04/04/2012 8:26:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Do not fool yourself into thinking that Santorum and Newt wouldn’t have run vicious attack ads against Romney, if they had had the money.

No way. Tell me what election cycle where one of the candidates spend 91% of their ad budget on attacking the other candidates. It never happened. All the money to destroy the other candidates and all he can muster is 41% of the GOP vote thus far with Rick coming in close in contests with a limited budget.

The other huge issue with Milt is that you can go down the list of the other three candidates and list at least 2 issues you know are important to them through their messaging. Milt has nothing. Even his economic plan is 59 points of muddy garbage. Romney is a huge loser that the GOPe is pushing hard for and they can't even give Conservatives a reason to vote for him other than he isn't Obummer.

59 posted on 04/04/2012 8:26:59 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Do not fool yourself into thinking that Santorum and Newt wouldn’t have run vicious attack ads against Romney, if they had had the money. They would have done so in a heartbeat.

They wouldn't have run dishonest, lying ads. Of course with Mitt, they wouldn't have needed to. Just look at the ads they did do on him. They pointed out his liberal record truthfully. Meanwhile the lefty liberal progressive Romney put out lying ads claiming Newt and Rick were liberals. Truth matters.

60 posted on 04/04/2012 8:28:03 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Romney is the one who has singlehandedly ...blah, blah, ...can screw.

And what does Mark say after he gets done telling everyone how bad Romney is?

"We have to vote against Obama and for the Republican nominee."

61 posted on 04/04/2012 8:28:16 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Come August 27th nobody is going to remember squat about what ads were run in the primary. Once the Key note speakers at the convention take stage, and maybe we see another Palin like speech by the VP, from that point it will be all about sending Obama back to Chicago.
62 posted on 04/04/2012 8:28:25 PM PDT by NavyCanDo (You can take an idiot out of Chicago, but you canÂ’t take the Chicago out of an idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Come August 27th nobody is going to remember squat about what ads were run in the primary. Once the Key note speakers at the convention take stage, and maybe we see another Palin like speech by the VP, from that point it will be all about sending Obama back to Chicago.

We all saw how well that worked for McCain last time in 2008 and Romney is orders of magnitude worse than McCain and he doesn't have the War Hero thing going for him. In fact, Romney, with his left-wing Progressive Liberal record, makes McCain look conservative.

Wishful thinking and hope on your part isn't going to get it done.

Sarah, as good as she is, couldn't get it done in 2008.

Romney will lose in epic landslide proportions because of Romney.
63 posted on 04/04/2012 8:31:45 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

I didn’t know we had a nominee yet. Until I have to chose the orange juice can, I am fighting against Milt.


64 posted on 04/04/2012 8:35:56 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: garjog

“Why are people voting for this weenie?”

Which weenie, blue jeans/buttondown or sweatervest?


65 posted on 04/04/2012 9:11:05 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: citizen

“Romney’s ads will play just fine against Obama.”

Establishment R’s don’t attack progressives. They attack conservatives.


66 posted on 04/04/2012 9:17:44 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

“Do not fool yourself into thinking that Santorum and Newt wouldn’t have run vicious attack ads against Romney,...”

Mis Marple forgets it was Romney that fired the first shots back in December, and those ads were as close to outright fabrications as it gets.

Don’t try to excuse Romney of responsibilty for what he has done by saying Santorum and Gingrich WOULD have done it. That simply does not excuse what Romney ACTUALLY did to destroy party unity.


67 posted on 04/04/2012 9:18:04 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Karl Rove Approves of This Message (for Romney)

68 posted on 04/04/2012 10:06:52 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Archiving the most VIRULENT, FACT-FILLED Anti-Romney FR Articles (So Many of them) For Later Release)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I cannot consider a nominee for the GOP who crafted Obamacare initially, or supported gay marriage and assailed Ronald Reagan, to be a conservative and a patriot.


69 posted on 04/04/2012 10:09:56 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Archiving the most VIRULENT, FACT-FILLED Anti-Romney FR Articles (So Many of them) For Later Release)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: VinL

When did conservative become such crybabies?


70 posted on 04/04/2012 10:21:56 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

It sounds like Romney doesn’t pull any punches. If he attacks Obama with anything like this kind of fervor, it should be interesting to see whether he can make a dent in the Messiah’s numbers. I’m a Santorum guy, but I’ve always been curious as to whether McCain could have won in 2008 if he (1) hadn’t signed on for Federal financing, thereby ensuring he would be outspent 3 to 1 and (2) had relentlessly attacked Obama for his radical connections, instead of holding back in the interest of an unfair and one-sided “civility”. I think there are two ways for Romney to get the base energized. One is to pick a conservative VP - Ryan, Rubio, Palin, Santorum or Gingrich would do it. Another is to pick a non-conservative, but go nuclear on Obama, the way he went after his opponents in the GOP primaries.


71 posted on 04/04/2012 10:23:07 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

One thing’s for sure - whomever the nominee is, this cycle will be replete with Super PAC money ready to match Obama dollar for dollar in terms of negative ads. Can money parity alone win 2012 for the GOP? Given the lack of charisma among all the GOP candidates (with the exception of Cain), I think we’re about to find out.


72 posted on 04/04/2012 10:27:49 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

I think you hit it on the head. In the deabtes, they all went after each other, which means they dont have a problem with negative. Just mad that Romney had more money. Im not going to play the class warfare game.


73 posted on 04/04/2012 10:30:21 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

They are both politicians, so that would support it. They both went negative in the debates, which supports it as well.


74 posted on 04/04/2012 10:32:35 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
They are both politicians, so that would support it.

That is the most oblique reason you could ever give.
75 posted on 04/04/2012 10:41:06 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
They both went negative in the debates, which supports it as well.

1. When Romney goes negative he lies and spins.
2. When either Newt or Rick goes negative, for the vast majority of the time, they don't, in fact, they have enough ammo with Romney's lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal record that they don't need to.
3. When Newt's ads went astray, he had them corrected.

No comparison at all.

And using the term negative to describe accurately the telling of Romney's record is the game of the left, not conservatives.
76 posted on 04/04/2012 10:43:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; af_vet_1981
I cannot consider a nominee for the GOP who crafted Obamacare initially, or supported gay marriage and assailed Ronald Reagan, to be a conservative and a patriot.

He didn't just support Gay Marriage, he implemented it single-handledly in an unconstitutional manner without the Legislature.

Furthermore he implemented a Cap and Trade system and an "Assault" weapons ban.

Romney IS the 2nd cousin to Obama in terms of policies and actions.
77 posted on 04/04/2012 10:46:54 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Any pro-lifer who ever votes for Romney is a hypocrite.


78 posted on 04/04/2012 10:48:54 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Fine, live in the bubble. Everything you dont like is a lie, the people you dont like are lying, and your people dont lie.


79 posted on 04/04/2012 10:51:11 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Fine, live in the bubble. Everything you dont like is a lie, the people you dont like are lying, and your people dont lie.

The only people living in a bubble are those refusing to take a good hard look at the left-wing, Progressive Liberal record of Mitt Romney and then believing that he can somehow win against an extremely aggressive Obama and the Media both of which have no scruples whatsover over using that record of Mitt's to destroy his candidacy.

All you Mitt Supporters and Mitt himself have to offer is Hope and Not Much Change.

And Mitt Romney has a long way to go before he wraps up the nomination, and there is still a good chance he won't.
80 posted on 04/04/2012 10:55:33 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: VinL
This election was handed to the repubs on a silver platter. Of all the available people conservatives could have had, the GOP-e found the most liberal person with the "R" after his name. After the sleazy selection process, they try to guilt/scare conservatives into voting for their libtard selection.

It looks like in the fall, the Mittster will still be struggling to win the republican base. Even John McCain had the base active with his selection of Sarah Palin. Mitt will probably be the only one in recent history, who loses with a significant portion of the base not supporting him.

"GOP, you could have been a contenda."

81 posted on 04/04/2012 11:14:58 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL
The author, Viquerie, supports Rick

Dick Viguerie gets it -- ever since Ronnie's first campaign, maybe since Barry's.

Good man to have on our side, with all the six-legged RiNO's crawling out of the woodwork now, and Hugh Hewitt bellowing at conservatives to quit being wiseguys and losers and get on board with The Man, Bishop Willard.

(First time I've shouted at my radio to go eff itself in a good while.)

82 posted on 04/04/2012 11:35:45 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; SoConPubbie
[SoConPubbie] Many people won’t vote for him, even though they are hectored by GOP-E types, because of the character assasination he practices on both Rick and Newt.

Speaking of hectoring .....

I cannot consider someone who won’t vote for the Republican nominee against Barack Obama to be a conservative or a patriot.

So now we're being TOLD to back Romney ..... or what?

It's a long way to the convention, pal. And a lot can happen between now and Wyoming's casting its delegates' votes.

83 posted on 04/04/2012 11:48:11 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Moorings
Even John McCain had the base active with his selection of Sarah Palin. Mitt will probably be the only one in recent history, who loses with a significant portion of the base not supporting him.

I expect that, if Romney is the nominee, the final outcome will look a lot like McCain's in 2008, only worse. Romney has given conservatives a real pounding, and he has lied to us copiously and relentlessly.

What a repugnant man. And he's going to beat the Lying King of the Welfare State?

84 posted on 04/04/2012 11:54:03 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You think that Obama’s ads against Romney will be devastating-—maybe they will, time will tell. On the other hand Romney should be able to create some quite devastating ads against Obama himself. If gas prices remain high Romney could pound him for that and his reluctance on the Keystone Pipeline and his wacky idea about using algae for energy. That’s an ad that even the Obama supporters could understand. He can nail him on the stimulus fiasco and the debt increases, something that the independents are usually concerned about. The list goes on and on and on....


85 posted on 04/05/2012 12:53:02 AM PDT by dupree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
One is to pick a conservative VP - Ryan, Rubio, Palin, Santorum or Gingrich would do it.

Going by Mitt's record in MA, he'll want a running mate who will be subservient to him. You think McCain's people muzzled Sarah? Watch Mitt.

86 posted on 04/05/2012 2:51:15 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
Establishment R’s don’t attack progressives. They attack conservatives.

Bears repeating!

87 posted on 04/05/2012 2:52:43 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
this cycle will be replete with Super PAC money ready to match Obama dollar for dollar in terms of negative ads.

Are you counting in the dollar value of constant MSM cheerleading for Obama?

88 posted on 04/05/2012 2:55:02 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
The Romney people and the GOP insiders can go screw themselves. They are vermin.

Many of them post here on FreeRepublic and try to intimidate anyone who dares to express reservations about Bishop Romney

89 posted on 04/05/2012 3:05:18 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Mitt Romney is SEVERELY conservative - and I'm SEVERELY against giving him my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Romney will lose deservedly.

He is a backstabbing RINO,and a poser for the DNC.


90 posted on 04/05/2012 3:27:09 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
I have never stayed out of an election before...It’s hard but, I think God will decide this one.

-

If Obama wins re-election because of a conservative temper tantrum, God will no longer be deciding things in America.

91 posted on 04/05/2012 3:40:10 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ((Racism Fatigue) America is the least racist nation on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Funny I dont see anything in the Article how romney is Going to carpet Bomb Obama,with, He is In over his Head,and He is A nice Guy and Has a Fine Family.
That will work with Obama calling Romney Mad and wanting to Kill seniors,more Dirty Air throw the Poor into the Streets,Let everyone lie in their own Vomit because they are taking away their Health Care. Good Luck MITT


92 posted on 04/05/2012 4:05:07 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

I hesitate to provide counterpoint to the “Mitt is unelectable and won’t take on Obama the way he’s taken on his competitors” groundswell I’m seeing here - until the esteemed owner of this fine site, sends some sort of signal it’s time for the teams to congratulate each other for a hard-fought campaign, shake hands and take on our real adversary.

I’ll just post this link, without comment:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/04/us-usa-campaign-romney-obama-idUSBRE83314120120404

“With new momentum, Romney accuses Obama of hiding”


93 posted on 04/05/2012 4:27:41 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ((Racism Fatigue) America is the least racist nation on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

“I am thinking of sitting out the election this year”

There are too many important down-ballot elections to do that. Those candidates need our votes.


94 posted on 04/05/2012 5:02:52 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VinL; All

“Romney’s negative ads, many of them factually questionable, have carpet bombed the conservatives in the race. As Romney has unleashed this wave of negativity, the campaigns of conservatives from Rick Perry, to Michele Bachmann, to Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich have withered, leaving Rick Santorum as the last conservative standing to bear the brunt of Romney’s attacks.”

This cycle started with me disliking Romney, now I loath and fear him. This Repub WILL NOT support Romney in a general election, regardless of his VP pick. I will leave the ballot blank. In my eyes, he is not an improvement over Obama....both are unacceptable. The RNC just doesn’t get it. I have voted for he GOP candidate every time (liked or not) since 1976. I won’t do it in 2012 anymore.

You are going to see the lowest turnout of GOP voters in history this November because Romney is on the ticket and many of us refuse to back him, even against the evil Obama.


95 posted on 04/05/2012 5:46:41 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

You are right. Maybe I will skip over the vote for president.

I have a sneaking suspicion that the RATS and the MSM are supporting Romney, knowing supporting him, will help obamma win.


96 posted on 04/05/2012 5:52:55 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Are you counting in the dollar value of constant MSM cheerleading for Obama?

Liberal cheerleading for Democratic candidates doesn't really vary from election cycle to election cycle. McCain was outspent 3 to 1 in 2012 before factoring in media cheerleading for Obama, but came within 5% of Obama's vote count. How close would he have come if he had spent the same amount? Or more?

Romney's record is less conservative than McCain's, although his stated positions are more conservative. If we give Romney the benefit of the doubt and average out his record and his stated positions, we could say that Romney is more or less McCain II. But Romney is apparently willing to spend tens of millions of his own money, and may have GOP contributors willing to chip in hundreds of millions either in the form of Super PAC money or direct contributions. Bottom line is that Obama will have no money advantage this year. So we get to re-run 2008, with a GOP moderate running yet again, but with either funding parity or a money advantage.

97 posted on 04/05/2012 8:05:57 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

“I have a sneaking suspicion that the RATS and the MSM are supporting Romney”

IMHO, the MSM is supporting Romney, mainly because he’s the least conservative Republican running. You may remember in 2008, the MSM liked McCain well enough, but swooned over Obama, so they attacked Sarah Palin vigorously because she was a real conservative and effective on the stump, while largely leaving McCain alone. Look for something like that if Romney chooses a great running mate.


98 posted on 04/05/2012 9:37:14 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
I think there are two ways for Romney to get the base energized. One is to pick a conservative VP - Ryan, Rubio, Palin, Santorum or Gingrich would do it.

In a word, no.

I don't care who Myth's VP would be. It's the top of the ticket that matters and I refuse to vote for Miss Congenality again.

Either a conservative drives the bus or I find a different ride. And any conservative who tries to put earrings on the hog known as Myth Romney by running with him is dead to me.

For too long the Republican Party has treated conservatives like battered spouses. We'll come back because we have nowhere else to go. No more.

Myth Romney needs me a hell of a lot more than I need him, but he's gone out of his way to give me the middle finger. Fine. There's a consequence for that.

99 posted on 04/05/2012 10:00:49 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (There will be no vote for Myth Romney in my house. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I agree!

To me Romney is just a cipher, an appratchik if you will. He takes on the political views of whatever the dominant group is in the room. Romney is not a conservative or a liberal; Romney is a Romneyian. Essentially he is a salesman, he reflects back his customer's personality and interests in order to sell the product, himself. Some may argue that this is hypocritical and in a perfect world it is. But almost all successful salesmen do this! Some are naturals some have to be trained. I think he is the consummate salesman all sales all the time and doesn't even know it! (Truth in advertising I had to take sales training once and these types of things were taught. However ENTJ engineers with the N and the J off the charts are horrible at such things! Yep that's me!) He is not a deep thinker, not a man with vision, he is strictly a “follow-the-program” manager. I am not saying he is stupid. He clearly is not! But his not an anti-American Marxist ideologue like Zero who as you pointed out might leave us defenseless.

At best he will be the John Anderson administration that never was. (Not a good thing in my opinion!) At worst another Jimmy Carter, a prickly micro-manager incompetent. However again I don't think he is the "See-me-look-at-me-See-I-am-smart-and-capable-and-I-matter" buffoon that Jimmy Carter has morphed into.

Another 4 years of Zero and we could be a permanent 2nd class to 3rd class power, at best Britain or France at worst Spain or Greece. Romney will not do this! Now Romney will manage our decline optimally so its slower, he won't have a clue how to change it. Instead of racing off to be the next “Greece” at the 1000 mph and accelerating, we head there at 300 mph with the rate of acceleration decreasing.
Mainly he does this by not being Zero, which won't require a lot of thought on his part.
To get control of this run away freight train first you have to slow it down, if Romney leaves us with at least that then OK.

Truth in advertising I prefer Gingrich mainly because ideas matter and I think major changes have to be made and he is the only one who has articulated them responsibly. .
.
(Responsibly is the key word that excludes Paul! I wish Paul would realize there are two stampedes headed right at us, he understands one, the economic problem. However he fails to acknowledge the other Islamism. It doesn't make any difference in what we do, or don't do appease or don't appease. They hate us and want to kill us because we exist. It's that simple! World war is coming because of the chaos that Islamism is causing, we need to get the economy back on track and prepare. I can't decide if its like 1920 or 1930.)

100 posted on 04/05/2012 2:44:03 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson