Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Says Interception Of Its Satellite Is An Act Of War
Korea Times ^ | April 6, 2012

Posted on 04/06/2012 8:59:05 AM PDT by Fennie

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has ratcheted up his regime's militaristic rhetoric as Pyongyang threatened to retaliate against any country that intercepts a North Korean rocket booster or collects the rocket debris.

The North has vowed to launch a rocket sometime between April 12 and 16 to put an earth observation satellite into orbit, a move widely seen as a pretext to disguise a banned test of its ballistic missile technology.

The Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea in Pyongyang warned that interception of the satellite would be "an act of war" and would cause a tremendous catastrophe.

(Excerpt) Read more at koreatimes.co.kr ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korea; northkorea; obama; satellite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2012 8:59:18 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

He does realize that if he does something really stupid, Pyongyang could be turned into a large glass bowl...right?

Right?


2 posted on 04/06/2012 9:02:11 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I didn’t read the whole post just the caption and all I can say is Bring it Fata$$.


3 posted on 04/06/2012 9:04:17 AM PDT by Rappini (Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

“He does realize that if he does something really stupid, Pyongyang could be turned into a large glass bowl...right?”

You realize that might be an improvement


4 posted on 04/06/2012 9:06:12 AM PDT by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I’m okay with that............


5 posted on 04/06/2012 9:06:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Pretty funny. Draw a line in the sand that nobody cares about or notices, and then threaten them if they cross it.

Like father, like son.


6 posted on 04/06/2012 9:06:30 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

the “satellite” will never get off the ground, so why is he stressing about it


7 posted on 04/06/2012 9:06:54 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"North Korea Says Interception Of Its Satellite Is An Act Of War"

Yeah, and whose midget army is going to fight it?

8 posted on 04/06/2012 9:07:27 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

The prospect of nuclear war with North Korea isn’t even funny. This guy isn’t even 30 and is said by some to be impetuous and impulsive youth. MAD deterrence only works on the assumption that both parties are rational, clear thinking and want to live, and I wouldn’t be quite so sure about the first two...


9 posted on 04/06/2012 9:11:11 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Skinny Midgets


10 posted on 04/06/2012 9:12:58 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Considering if they had food to actually feed their army, they could be a threat...COULD is the keyword.


11 posted on 04/06/2012 9:14:55 AM PDT by InsidiousMongo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InsidiousMongo

Is blowing it out of the freaking sky an act of war?


12 posted on 04/06/2012 9:16:58 AM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jbwbubba
The North Koreans have been forced to eat grass and tree bark, with reports of some even eating their babies in order to avoid starvation. In the mid to late nineties hundreds of thousands of North Koreans died from starvation (see the book, "Nothing to Envy"). How is it that Kim Jong-un grew up as a fat, pasty kid in a nation of mass starvation? Quite an overt contrast that displays the problem, eh?
13 posted on 04/06/2012 9:26:58 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: InsidiousMongo

Didn’t we just send them 200 tons of food?


14 posted on 04/06/2012 9:26:58 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jbwbubba
It would make for interesting headlines:

"Obama saves millions from starvation"

15 posted on 04/06/2012 9:28:38 AM PDT by norton (I will transmit this information to Vladimir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

HA HA!


16 posted on 04/06/2012 9:30:01 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I know. It isn’t funny at all. Never meant my comment to be funny.


17 posted on 04/06/2012 9:30:55 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: InsidiousMongo
North Korea is capable of producing and employing chemical weapons that virtually all the fire support systems in its inventory could deliver, including most of its artillery pieces, multiple rocket launchers (including those mounted on CHAHO-type boats), and mortars. Some bombs the Air Force employs also could deliver chemical agents, as could the FROG or the SCUD missile.

Chemicals could increase the impact of a surprise attack. If the North should use this option, it would have an advantage over forward-deployed South Korean and US forces. Nonpersistent chemical agents also could be used to break through defensive lines or hinder a South Korean counterattack's momentum. Persistent chemical agents could be used against fixed targets in the rear areas, such as command and control elements, major lines of communications, or logistic depots. Not only do these weapons enhance North Korea's offensive capabilities, but this chemical capability could deter South Korea or the United States from using chemicals during hostilities. In any attack on the South, Pyongyang could use chemical weapons to attack forces deployed near the DMZ, suppress allied airpower, and isolate the peninsula from strategic reinforcement.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/cw/index.html

18 posted on 04/06/2012 9:30:55 AM PDT by McGruff (Umm...I'm thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I know. It isn’t funny at all. Never meant my comment to be funny.


19 posted on 04/06/2012 9:31:13 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
It's unclear if the US will follow through with the shipment after the missile flies. My bet is, Secretary Cancels will agree to send “humane relief” anyway.
20 posted on 04/06/2012 9:31:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson