There is no question about it. If he wins a second term he will negate the Supreme Court, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the freedoms of all (free at this time) Americans.
Up to now, the GOP has ALLOWED all to happen due to their timid and politically correct ways.
The “glue” that will seal the papers on our country’s demise will be the selection for Romney to represent the Republicans and will ensure the safety of Obama’s reelection.
If, by sheer accident, Romney wins, we will have Obama “light” and the Democrats will rule with impunity for the next 4 years.
It’s a lose-lose situation for the American patriots and conservatives, all being staunch supporters of our Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
"Up to now, the GOP has ALLOWED all to happen due to their timid and politically correct ways."
True that there is no question about it DH, but the Constitution has been circumvented since Justice Roberts administered the oath of office. The GOP wasn't timid, they were complicit. The Obama/McCaskill bill, S.2678, to make McCain eligible, the Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act in February 2008 didn't pass, and wouldn't have survived judicial review if it had. The successor act by Democrats, Senate Resolution 511, April 2008, provided talking points for legislators and the media, but has no legal force. The principle at the core of SR511 was stated by former Judge Michael Chertoff, and agreed to by every US Senator.
My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen, Chertoff replied. That is mine, too, said Leahy.
The law, avoided by every pundit, every legislator, and ever judge remains on paper in our archives, at least for the moment, having citations to it scrubbed from Google and Justia by Obama operatives. It is unarguable, which is why there are many surreptitious Obama operatives who continue to lament forged “COLB”s, patently fictitious social security numbers and selective service documents. Obama can simply deny having authorized those documents. He can't, and has not, claim to satisfy Article II Section 1. He has honestly told us he is a naturalized citizen, but the media and ignorance protect him. He said “I am a native-born citizen of the US.” A “native-born” citizen is a citizen naturalized by having been born on our sovereign soil. Every anchor baby, born to illegal immigrants, is a “native-born citizen of the US.” Here is the Supreme Court clarification of the common-law definition of Article II natural born citizenship. Remember, definitions used in the Constitution were all based upon the common-law and common language of our framers.
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Minor v. Happersett, 88 US 163 (1875), as quoted above is precedent. There can only be one case defining “held” precedent. We are not honoring the Constitution while Obama is in the White House. Both parties had their reasons. Had the Republicans not accepted the quid-pro-quo, never performing their obligation to vet Obama, Hillary would be running for her second term in 2012. McCain was vetted and never found eligible; the Senate in SR511 said, in effect, “We think our framers would have amended the Constitution had they known McCain would be running, and Washington would not have rescinded the 1790 Nationality Act, which was the last action to attempt to expand the definition of natural born citizenship.”
This definition does not change. The media hope you, like changing the channel, will tire of the truth, since this law isn't being honored, respected, or protected. They are probably correct. When the the dictatorship of the proletariat decides that the 1st Amendment is also inconvenient, they may be sorry. There need only be one network, one organization reciting the edicts of government.