Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Level Headed FReeper is *NOT* voting for Romney (VANITY)

Posted on 04/10/2012 6:20:28 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

With all of the chicanery that the GOP-E has done over the last year, and helped the media to do over the last year, there's NO WAY I'm surrendering to these creeps.

Romney is *NOT* our candidate! He's their candidate, we're NOT REPUBLICANS! We are conservatives and constitutionalists FIRST. We believe in small government! Not this big government crap that Romney has peddled for the better half of the last decade or two, and I certainly can't do any more nose holding at the ballot box.

Voting for a big government republican is the real world equivalent of cutting off my nose to spite my face. That I refuse to do.

Reforming the GOP into a small government conservative party doesn't just mean voting for the right tea partiers at the right time. It means refusing to vote for the wrong big government republicans at the wrong time. We need to starve the beast of votes. We need to teach the republican party that if they have any shot at electoral success in the future, they only have one viable path. Bold colors BOLD COLORS BOLD COLORS


TOPICS: Philosophy
KEYWORDS: mittromney; opus; rebellion; sillysoobamawins; teapartyrebellion; zots4romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-228 next last
To: Vindibudd
YOUR actions are the reason that we are hanging on the precipice with Obamacare at the Supreme Court. YOUR actions are why we are facing trillions and trillions of dollars in debt. YOUR actions are why gas is $4 a gallon. YOUR actions are why unemployment is on the exciting side of 8 percent.

These are the actions of the Republican Party, not Conservatives.

The GOP is dead, do not keep them on life support, they cannot and will not fight. They are weak, so weak that they move further left each year. They actively work with leftwing commies to destroy Conservative candidates, AND with conservative legislation. Many in the GOP actively campaigned FOR Obama in 2008. THESE are the traitors of which you speak.

Conservative politics will be dead too, if you continue to let the GOP marginalize us. We are stronger without them.
151 posted on 04/10/2012 9:26:52 PM PDT by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Maybe that will work, but most of the screaming pants wetters and penny party dictators will still miss the subtleties.


152 posted on 04/10/2012 9:27:02 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
Vote for anyone but Bath-House Barry and pledge and WORK to make Romney’s life in office HELL!!!!

No thanks. We've already seen how that goes. He'll just reach out to his friends....



That's your candidate, bro. Choke on him.
153 posted on 04/10/2012 9:28:53 PM PDT by Antoninus (The Republican Party (now a wholly owned subsidiary of Romney, Inc.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Yeah I am going to call you out, Mr./Ms. I’m not going to vote for Demons because they’re all so EVIL.

You apparently have not experienced the real world, where you have to make decisions based upon the circumstances that are available. Let’s play a game.

Psalm 144 is at the Alamo. He/She has the opportunity to help stall the advance of Santa Anna and save the Republic of Texas. Psalm 144’s solution: I don’t like Sam Houston’s mustache so I am just going to let the Mexicans rape and murder everyone.

Psalm 144 has two children in a burning house, but has time to only save one. Psalm 144’s solution: Let them both die, because I don’t like having to pick one or the other.

Psalm 144, congratulations, you killed Texan independence and no longer have any children. But you STUCK BY YOUR PRINCIPLES, DAMNIT.


154 posted on 04/10/2012 9:29:23 PM PDT by Vindibudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: armourup

I can’t have my way, F*** everyone else. Maybe you will rethink your approach after Obama gets reelected and puts two more justices on the USSC and then confiscates your house and makes you buy a cardboard box for shelter because you’re too rich.

AT LEAST YOU SHOWED THOSE F***ING REPUBLICANS!1!!1!1111


155 posted on 04/10/2012 9:34:26 PM PDT by Vindibudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
It occurs to me that a proper independent (or third party) candidate could win the Presidency in 2012.

It would take a very special individual, but I think she could succeed.

At this point, I believe:

Therefore, at this point, I'd like to see Sarah Louise Palin make an independent run for President of the United States in 2012. If not immediately, then at least once Romney becomes the certain nominee (as late as the convention but effectively sooner, I would think.)
156 posted on 04/10/2012 9:35:57 PM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sargon
Therefore, at this point, I'd like to see Sarah Louise Palin make an independent run for President of the United States in 2012. If not immediately, then at least once Romney becomes the certain nominee (as late as the convention but effectively sooner, I would think.)

I agree. All she needs to do is show up at one of the offices of a minor party that's on every presidential ballot in all 50 states and it's a whole new ballgame.

Say it softly for now...

Palin for President, 2012
157 posted on 04/10/2012 9:40:49 PM PDT by Antoninus (The Republican Party (now a wholly owned subsidiary of Romney, Inc.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

“The establishment RINOS will all be using that “So you’re supporting Obama?” mantra to try to get conservatives to again accept their slimy loser candidate. No thanks buddy.”


Yes, they will, but it won’t work at this household. There is nothing that they or anyone else can say to change our minds about not voting for Romney. We don’t vote for candidates that are pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun, pro-big government, pro-raising taxes, pro-mandates, lying liberals.


158 posted on 04/10/2012 9:42:54 PM PDT by Southnsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sargon

159 posted on 04/10/2012 9:44:54 PM PDT by Vindibudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd

“Psalm 144 is at the Alamo. He/She has the opportunity to help stall the advance of Santa Anna and save the Republic of Texas. Psalm 144’s solution: I don’t like Sam Houston’s mustache so I am just going to let the Mexicans rape and murder everyone.”

I didn’t like Reagan’s hair, and would have followed him to hell and back. Supported him every time he ran. Never did like his hair. Loved his policies. I will vote any conservative, fair, middling or ugly. Sam Houston also did not have a mustache. 0/10 Fail. Next.

“Psalm 144 has two children in a burning house, but has time to only save one. Psalm 144’s solution: Let them both die, because I don’t like having to pick one or the other.”

Inapt analogy. Neither Willard nor Hussein are my children, but this is an admirable effort to get me on board with abortion. Now, if Willard and the Lightworker - who are at issue here - were both inside a burning house, I would really be torn. Block the windows first, or the doors? 2/10, just for the creative effort to make abortion palatable, but still a fail.

“But you STUCK BY YOUR PRINCIPLES, DAMNIT.”

Damn straight sugarlips. At least we found one thing to agree on. 10/10.


160 posted on 04/10/2012 9:47:00 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Ha. The guy who posted the original thread where he said he was voting for Romney was not banned but the post was taken off and linked to Jim’s post stating he will not support Romney.


161 posted on 04/10/2012 9:48:54 PM PDT by Mozilla (GOP is going the way of the Whigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan

“...people must rally around the republican nominee I know it is hard but that is what you have to do.”

That is being subservient. You go right ahead and let a bunch of liberals tell you how to vote. I will not.

The Republican party does not own me. I DO NOT have to vote for their liberal candidate.

And I won’t.

FUBO!
FUMR!
FUGOP!


162 posted on 04/10/2012 9:50:00 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing; All
To all who wont vote for Mitt because he isn't the perfect candidate. Get this there isn't one, isn't gonna be one so get over it, be responsible and get Obama out!

He is the enemy if we split our vote they win!

I would say to you folks, its your fault we didn't get a more conservative in the primary. Stop blaming someone else, like the GOP establishment that is BS. Its your fault or more likely our fault, we have no one to blame except ourselves. We didn't do a good enough job up front. we didn't get out there enough and for not donating your time and money to get the right one in office.

Look at this as a long term incremental approach to gaining back the WH and Congress, you won't get it all at once.

Please prayerfully consider voting for Romney, write him, write your congressmen, get involved instead of ranting here and standing on your moral high ground.

Live to fight another day, vote to fight another day, if we loose this one we'll be so buried that it'll be next to impossible to dig out.

163 posted on 04/10/2012 9:51:45 PM PDT by Coffee_drinker (The best defense is a strong preemptive strike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

You might have missed the inside joke. Another poster posted that he was a level headed guy who will be voting Romney. Within 40 minutes the post was taken off and linked to a thread of Jim’s stating he won’t support Romney.

I’ll have you know some people thought he was a Obama guy because that poster was actively supporting Romney when he wasn’t conservative so Obama could win.


164 posted on 04/10/2012 9:53:12 PM PDT by Mozilla (GOP is going the way of the Whigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

In real life you have to make choices, and though you might not like one choice, it is without a doubt the better choice. You feel that voting for Romney is just as bad as voting for Obama. You feel that Romney and Obama are one and the same.

It is clear that I made a mistake in even talking to you because I’d sooner have a saner conversation with a rabid cat.


165 posted on 04/10/2012 9:54:26 PM PDT by Vindibudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

What if....

Romney quits?


166 posted on 04/10/2012 9:54:59 PM PDT by Eye of Unk (Liberals need not reply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Here's another certainty for you: in the next four years, Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy will each turn 80 years old. If Obama gets to replace either one of them, a far left-wing Supreme Court

Neither would retire with Obama in office. But, they likely will if Romney is elected. And, if Romney decides to give us another David Souter, will have a left-wing Supreme Court.

I'd rather pray for the health of Scalia and Kennedy than trust Romney to replace either one.

167 posted on 04/10/2012 10:02:20 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd; Jim Robinson; onyx
Anyone here who refuses to vote for Romney...is allowing Obama to get a second term.......You are not principled, you are stupid..... In fact worse than that,.... you are essentially traitors to your country....grow up!

You are a son of a b*tch for daring to call anyone here who has a right and choice for whom they vote...and you're stepping on every man and woman who fought and died in giving us that right.

You have no right whatsoever to call anyone here a traitor....rather than shout your nastiness and unwarrented skunky breath here....go pimp Romney some other place...

What a discusting work of art you are for daring to speak as this....have you no shame whatsoever? The answer is obvious

168 posted on 04/10/2012 10:03:07 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd

“You feel that voting for Romney is just as bad as voting for Obama. You feel that Romney and Obama are one and the same.”

No. Their records demonstrate that they are both comparable malefactors, but I concede that Romney is better disciplined, harder working, smarter and more organized. His misdeeds will be shrewder, more subtle, more persistent and farther reaching.

Rejecting both of these vermin is the only correct choice. Unless, of course they represent your ideology.


169 posted on 04/10/2012 10:06:07 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd

Romneys record is clear on his appointments of liberal judges....he won’t be appointing conservatives so you’re arguement for voting for him has no weight...rather if you vote for Romney you are indeed supporting those liberals who he no doubt will appoint.....


170 posted on 04/10/2012 10:10:02 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I’m with you man. I despise Romney and can not support him or defend him. I’ve become interested in supporting the constitution party candidate. They have 6 good candidates vying for the nomination. I favor Dr. Laurie Roth and Virgil Goode the most.


171 posted on 04/10/2012 10:10:55 PM PDT by Mozilla (GOP is going the way of the Whigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coffee_drinker

“Please prayerfully consider voting for Romney”

I think most all of us have. Looking at his record I conclude that it is impossible to support him in any way. Romney is not a compromise. He is a capitulation to the worst of our national vices.

God will not bless the smoking tophet on the right anymore than he will bless the smoking tophet on the left. It is sin to go to either one. It really is that simple.


172 posted on 04/10/2012 10:19:25 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd
Grow up.

I agree with you 100% vindibudd, however you might not want to be too harsh, with these kinds of people they are kind of sensitive.

I would say if you are not for us you're against us. Whether or not you agree with the general you stand behind him.

Eventually you'll get the general you like. If we divide our votes they win, all the time they will win. We are fighting for our country folks its more serious than you standing for your future "perfect" candidate. Let me clue you in, nobody is perfect.

Nobody is going to make everyone in the conservative party happy. Now go and do the right thing...

173 posted on 04/10/2012 10:23:38 PM PDT by Coffee_drinker (The best defense is a strong preemptive strike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Another Øbama supporter among us


174 posted on 04/10/2012 10:33:22 PM PDT by JJT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww; Vindibudd; Jim Robinson
What's this traitor business from member Vindibudd if we don't vote for Romney?

This candidate, this Romney, the inevitable GOP-E nominee, spent all $45 Million except a measly $2 Million savaging his top rivals! First Newt Gingrich and then Rick Santorum and now he wants unity and votes from conservatives, including us TEA Party, pro-life conservatives?

Those days of going long to get along because the GOP-E took us for granted are over. That Party ended in '08 when they blamed Governor Palin for moderate McCain's loss, knowing full well he was a lousy candidate who ran a horrid campaign, but at least McCain was pro-life and had served in our military.

I suggest "some" folks cool off for a few days and reconsider the language they're tossing around; "traitor" for example.

175 posted on 04/10/2012 10:43:08 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Establishment back stabbing has gone on as long as I can remember, and will continue until as long as conservatives allow it to.


176 posted on 04/10/2012 10:48:07 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

“Establishment back stabbing has gone on as long as I can remember, and will continue until as long as conservatives allow it to.”

But it used to be slick. This is insultingly crass and obvious.


177 posted on 04/10/2012 10:50:45 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No sir/miss, not voting for Mitt Romney. Threaten me all you want- done the supporting the beltway blue-bloods for the last time. I will do a write in. There is no way Romney will get the base energized. The man is distrusted for his liberal polices in which he put into laws in Massachusetts. If people cannot see there is no longer a republican party for conservatives, you are still in a daze of denial. Romney will lose to Obama. The debates, Obama will make Mittens out to be the fraud that he is— don’t come back saying that we should have got behind Newt (it will be too late) We need to help Newt win more states so he has power at the convention before it’s too late.


178 posted on 04/10/2012 11:18:35 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd

Well, bye.


179 posted on 04/11/2012 1:34:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (There's no crying in rebellion!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

Can’t vote for Obama or Romney. There will be someone else on the balot who will be a better president. Don’t know who.


180 posted on 04/11/2012 1:36:06 AM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. " -Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: onyx
That Party ended in '08 when they blamed Governor Palin for moderate McCain's loss....

She must have done something right, cause I'm STILL going to vote for her.

181 posted on 04/11/2012 1:48:00 AM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

Romney is a slime bucket. Remember this. We all on this site know how hell in a hand-basket things are going in this country. The general population does not. However, if by some miracle Romney does win the election, you can rest assured that all the stuff that the media does not report today will suddenly become very common knowledge on Jan 21. All of the building crises brewing today will suddenly be reported on and will instantaneously be Romney’s fault, as everything right before January according the the MSM will have been awesome, but as soon as Romney got in he proceeded to F’ up everything. Furthermore, we cannot trust Romney to begin to fix anything, he will just double down on the same crap Obummer was doing, though he will make no friends doing it in the media. Whatever Romney does, even if Obama would have had parades in the street for doing, Romney will be villified.

The republican party will cease to exist. That is a good thing as it needs to be rebuilt. However, it will guarantee a generation of liberal socialist rule, from which there will be no reclaiming the country without a brutal civil war, which our wonderful friends in the middle east will no doubt take advantage of.

I hate to say it, but I am truly beginning to believe that this country has a better chance of surviving 4 more years of Obama, during which the current brewing crises will finally burst to the surface, than we will have of surviving a Romney presidency. 4 years of Obama will sour the country on the loser in chief with some severe collateral damage, but in the end may bring about a new Reagan revolution. 4 years of Romney will ensure the death of america.


182 posted on 04/11/2012 1:49:25 AM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vindibudd

I was about to tell you where you can stuff your Romney loving tripe, but then I discovered that you had gotten the Zot. LOL @ you.


183 posted on 04/11/2012 2:10:28 AM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

If Romney wins, we could face 8 years of continued BS.....I look at as “If Romney wins, we can kick his libtard as out in four years.” But that’s just me.


184 posted on 04/11/2012 2:20:01 AM PDT by Safetgiver (The predator class is upset because they are being shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
What if the poster is spot on and you are choosing to miss the point of the fantastical story? What if the point is worthy of being made and the poster is not deluded?

What does that do to your neat dissection that followed?


Nothing at all, because the point of the fantastical story is one of delusion. Mitt is a BAD choice and offers poor prospects. Obama has been one of the worst presidents and is much more likely than Mitt to continue and exacerbate the current situation. Withholding a vote from Mitt is giving a vote to Obama. Pretending that that outcome is none of one's responsibility and withholding a vote from Mitt is an exercise in godly morality is delusion. It's also a pretty good example of moral masturbation.
185 posted on 04/11/2012 4:11:33 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

Inflamed Romnoid zottage by the boss hisself.


186 posted on 04/11/2012 4:42:07 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

“This Level Headed FReeper is *NOT* voting for Romney “...

Here we go once again. Both “parties” choose a looser and we have to pick between one of them. End result is we loose no matter which way we vote. Guess there is not justice. We are soooooooooooooooooooo screwed.


187 posted on 04/11/2012 4:42:51 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

“Withholding a vote from Mitt is giving a vote to Obama.”

No.

Fantastical as is sounds, voting for Obama would be giving a vote to Obama. That is actually a very different thing than not voting for Romney.

Withholding a formerly solid Republican vote from Romney means the Republican base is depleted by that one vote, and Romney would be down by ONE.

Actually giving a formerly solid Republican vote to Obama means that Romney not only loses one vote but (it gets complicated here) Obama actually GAINS one vote, thus Romney would actually be down by TWO. He will have lost the vote that any other Republican could have relied on, but also Obama would have PICKED ONE UP.

I know word problems are really hard, but I tried to keep it simple for you.


188 posted on 04/11/2012 5:02:35 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

” Palin may say it, but no way does she believe it.

A vote for Obama is a vote for leftwing government.

A vote for Romney is a vote for leftwing government.”

Here’s how I see it. First, I do think that Sarah believes everything she says. Second, Imagine if Romney had run and defeated Obama back in 08. I believe that we’d have been much better off today. We would not have an arrogant Marxist president teetering us on the edge of civil war.


189 posted on 04/11/2012 5:11:43 AM PDT by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

Republicans/Conservatives go through your type of argument every voting cycle, and oftentimes, we end up with a democrat getting voted into office, and then, those conservatives and republicans come back with their tired comments of regret that, we ended up again with another liberal destroying the economy and destroying our liberties and rights, and destroying the country.

You are correct that the GOP is giving us someone who belongs on the democratic party more than with republicans. But, Romney is at least much better for economic policy than the Marxist in power right now. So, I’m not voting for Romney to lead us on the many issues that matter; I’m voting for him on one issue, that being the economy. He’s a lot better for the free-market than any socialist/marxist, any time. On the other issues, we can hope to control his agenda by electing/re-electing more conservatives. Romney won’t be able to impose his liberal-like agenda when he’s got to contend with a republican congress which is up for re-election every 2 years. If we can limit Romney’s power, then we will be a lot better off than with any democrat.


190 posted on 04/11/2012 6:00:36 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I agree with you on Newt

Santorum shold toss his support to him now, and maybe he can be VP

I did not get a clear reason why Santorum dropped out (unless he just thought he was going to lose PA)


191 posted on 04/11/2012 8:32:24 AM PDT by Mr. K (If Romney wins the primary, I am writing-in PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
I'm writing-in PALIN!

Don't try to talk me out of it

192 posted on 04/11/2012 8:49:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (If Romney wins the primary, I am writing-in PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

You are so awesome! I hope you write it in with all caps too, just to even more prove your level of awesomeness!!! I’m gonna write-in Batman, but I so respect your useful choice!!! Go Fantasy Purist Candidates!!!!


193 posted on 04/11/2012 8:54:17 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

Fair enough - it is a complicated concept for some people


194 posted on 04/11/2012 8:56:49 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Newt is the only answer to those who continue to push Romney on these threads.....we STILL have a Conservative choice...what iin the world are they pushing Romney for since Santorum’s out now? People are nuts!

If they are voting Romney when they have the option of voting for NEWT, who has done more for Conservatives, with a record to prove it...then they simply cannot be the conservatives they claim...and they are being “bought” the bill of goods the media and others supporting Romney continue to dish out.....it’s really that simple now.

A vote for Newt now is a ‘win win’ for us...he’ll take out Romney and Obama just as we’ve been saying....A Vote for Romney remains a vote for Obama..just as also was said from the beginning.

Go Newt Go!!!!


195 posted on 04/11/2012 9:06:03 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse; All
I see no reason to vote for the GOP’s grinning idiot.

I DO see every reason in the world to aggressively vote ABOOR -- to vote against Obama AND Romney, to figuratively crawl over broken glass to register my vote so that whichever bastard wins, only gets in by the slimmest plurality and THEREFORE enters office as weak politically as possible, with opposition as motivated and powerful as possible -- good whether it's Obama or Romney.

The best case scenario: for enough of the votes cast to be AGAINST Obama and AGAINST Romney to give Obama a win of a 34 percent plurality, meaning the clear facts of the case will be that 66 percent of the voters OPPOSED HIM. This would fatally damage Obama's political viability and make him even weaker than he is now, AND it would BREAK the fatal hold liberal statists have on the Republican party.

There are five major liberal issues: global warming, nationalized health care, on-demand tax-funded abortion, the homosexual agenda, and activist judges. It is DOCUMENTED and crystal clear that Romney's position on all those issues is the same as the Democrat party's. Voting for Romney is as nuts as voting for Obama.

Voting third party for the express purpose of making sure whichever socialist wins, gets in as politically weak as possible because of an anemic plurality, is SANE and presents the ONLY chance we have of righting the ship.

196 posted on 04/11/2012 9:31:55 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JLLH
I’m no fan of Romney either - but it won’t really matter WHAT values we hold dear if Obama gets back in because there won’t be a free country in which to hold ANY values which are not those of that nightmare in the White House ....

EEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeEEEEE!!!! The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Obama is unstoppable, unbeatable, omnipotent!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

FRiend, your conclusions are mere guesses, and they are spawned by fear and panic. On the other hand, informed, plain common sense sees the obvious: if Romney gets in, liberalism would FOR CERTAIN SURE be made more powerful in both parties and the Washington Establishment would interpret it as the majority of Repblican voters giving the GOP their okay to adopt liberal stances on all five major issues: nationalized health care, global warming, the homosexual agenda, abortion on demand, and activist judges.

Vote for liberalism, reap liberalism. Vote AGAINST it, and we might have a fighting chance. I'm voting ABOOR so that whichever bad guy gets in, Romney or Obama, gets in by such a low plurality that his political credibility and viability will be as WEAK AS POSSIBLE and his opposition as motivated and strengthened as possible.

Stop rolling over and START CALCULATING HOW TO FIGHT BACK.

197 posted on 04/11/2012 9:43:57 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JamesA
I would vote for our local dog catcher before the dear leader.

I would vote for the local dog catcher before Romney.

198 posted on 04/11/2012 9:47:53 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: adorno
I’m voting for Romney on one issue, that being the economy. He’s a lot better for the free-market than any socialist/marxist, any time.

Romney is being supported big time by the Globalists....you really have to use a great deal of imagination to believe he will be loyal to this country when his sights and those of the leadership within his corporation 'church' to take us into the Globalist push.....and they are positioned Internationally to do just that.

....Which means Cap'n Trade.....Green energy and has no plans to take out the EPA.....plus all the other Globalist agenda ....and it all opposes the sovereignty of our country economically..... So NO to Romney....

199 posted on 04/11/2012 9:52:55 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: adorno
I’m voting for Romney on one issue, that being the economy. He’s a lot better for the free-market than any socialist/marxist, any time.

Romney is being supported big time by the Globalists....you really have to use a great deal of imagination to believe he will be loyal to this country when his sights and those of the leadership within his corporation 'church' to take us into the Globalist push.....and they are positioned Internationally to do just that.

....Which means Cap'n Trade.....Green energy and has no plans to take out the EPA.....plus all the other Globalist agenda ....and it all opposes the sovereignty of our country economically..... So NO to Romney....

200 posted on 04/11/2012 9:53:15 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson