Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich welcomes Rick Santorum backers
Politico ^ | 4/10/12 | GINGER GIBSON

Posted on 04/11/2012 2:14:04 AM PDT by iowamark

Newt Gingrich pledged to stay in the race for the Republican presidential nod, even as Rick Santorum suspended his campaign on Tuesday.

“I am committed to staying in this race all the way to Tampa so that the conservative movement has a real choice,” Gingrich said in a statement released after Santorum’s announcement in Gettysburg, Pa.

Gingrich, whose campaign is carrying roughly $4.5 million in debt, immediately began trying to use Santorum’s exit as a fundraising vehicle, adding a banner to the front of his website declaring him the “last conservative standing.”

“I humbly ask Senator Santorum’s supporters to visit Newt.org to review my conservative record and join us as we bring these values to Tampa,” Gingrich said in his statement. “We know well that only a conservative can protect life, defend the Constitution, restore jobs and growth and return to a balanced budget.”

But in recent weeks, Gingrich was forced to dramatically scale back his campaign operations and slash much of his staff after winning just two primaries since the GOP race began — his former home state of Georgia and neighboring South Carolina.

Santorum, in contrast, won 11 primary states and was clearly seen as the leading conservative alternative to Mitt Romney, who has now all but officially clinched the GOP nod.

But Gingrich continues to doggedly pursue his long-shot campaign — he was in North Carolina on Tuesday while his wife, Callista, held events in New York — and has told reporters that he sees no reason to drop out while he can still push Romney to the right and influence the party’s platform at this summer’s convention.

It’s not even clear that the former House speaker will be eligible for nomination at the convention; GOP rules require winning five primaries. Gingrich has dismissed the rule as a technicality and an attempt by the establishment to ensure Romney’s nomination.

Even before Santorum’s exit, Herman Cain, the former presidential candidate and Gingrich supporter, signaled on Tuesday he was ready to fall in line behind Romney.

“I have always said I will support whoever the nominee is and it looks like Mitt Romney’s going to be that nominee, and we do need to get behind him,” Cain said Tuesday morning on Fox News. “I remind people all the time, … ‘Keep your eye on the mission.’ And the mission is to get control of the Senate, maintain control of the House and defeat Barack Obama. That means get behind the nominee so yes, I’m ready to get behind the nominee.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: fallingbehind; fallingbehindmitt; newt; newtgingrich; rickwasusedbygope; rickwasusedbymitt; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: MachIV

“If Newt is still on the ballot” If Newt doesn’t come up with the 5 C notes he won’t be on Utah’s primary ballot.

You can still vote fgr Santorum. Just because they suspend their campaign that doesn’t mean your vote don’t count or their delegate (if they carry a district) doesn’t get seated. I’ve already voted for Santorum in my state and he’s got those delegates. If I lived in PA I’d have a Santorum yard sign up and be voting for him on the 24th.


41 posted on 04/11/2012 7:05:37 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (The best way to punish a - country is let professors run it. Fredrick the Great p/p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Rick Santorum was not my first choice but I certainly would have supported him over Romney had it come to that. I wish him and his family well. I made the right choice in supporting and remaining loyal to Newt and I certainly understand those who get involved in the campaign and being loyal to another candidate.


42 posted on 04/11/2012 7:17:16 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

And you don’t think that works both ways?


43 posted on 04/11/2012 7:27:21 AM PDT by moonhawk (Rush, Mark, Sean: Conservative talkers. Sarah, Newt: Conservative DOers. Mitt: Conservative faker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Are you serious? Many, many FReepers seem to have political amnesia with regards to the amphibian.

On the couch w/ nancy ring any bells?

44 posted on 04/11/2012 7:30:26 AM PDT by NakedRampage (Puttin' the "stud" in Bible study)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Actually, what’s “crummy” is what Rick did.
e had stayed in, he and Newt and even Ron may have had enough delegates combined from stopping Romney before Tampa.


45 posted on 04/11/2012 7:33:59 AM PDT by moonhawk (Rush, Mark, Sean: Conservative talkers. Sarah, Newt: Conservative DOers. Mitt: Conservative faker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NakedRampage

I have common sense and not what you call political amnesia. On a sofa about a theory - seems to blind you - how dumb are you? Talk about how anything can blind those who are hell bent to be blind and remain blind.

How about the other candidates sitting with evil to do it’s will. That doesn’t seem to shake you - you must be comfy with evil!


46 posted on 04/11/2012 7:48:38 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: duffee
I certainly understand those who get involved in the campaign and being loyal to another candidate.

I can't because it is NOT about a candidate but OUR COUNTRY! And NEWT is the ONLY ONE with the love, determination, the know how, the proven past accomplishments to bring back our country from the hands of evil/Barry/Mitt.

47 posted on 04/11/2012 7:52:19 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk; iowamark

I agree that conservatives should stop Romney from getting a majority of delegates before the convention. Do the majority of former Santorum supporters endorse Romney, Gingrich, Paul, or someone else?


48 posted on 04/11/2012 8:11:23 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

“I can’t because it is NOT about a candidate but OUR COUNTRY! And NEWT is the ONLY ONE with the love, determination, the know how, the proven past accomplishments to bring back our country from the hands of evil/Barry/Mitt.”

I don’t disagree with you, I chose Newt for the same reasons.


49 posted on 04/11/2012 8:29:14 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks

“EVERY reason WHY we should support Newt”

...is contained in this speech:

2011, NRA Annual Meetings - Newt Gingrich - Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aMNzrPovu8


50 posted on 04/11/2012 8:35:11 AM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
You seem to hav a very uncommon definition of commen sense then. Gingrich is a slimeball in the same vain as mittens -- if you go back, you'll find plenty of damning stuff about the man who was no friend of Reagan* (Of course to hear him now you'd think he was Roland to Reagan's Charlemagne.)

*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOnWzGB7G1g

*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEHaF-6TEQ4

There is plenty more, if the above is not enough to convince you.

And this is the man whose favored brand of shoe polish you are so eager to taste?

Common sense...Tsch.

51 posted on 04/11/2012 8:41:04 AM PDT by NakedRampage (Puttin' the "stud" in Bible study)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Thxs, for the post. :-)
GO! NEWTON GINGRICH! GO!

52 posted on 04/11/2012 8:41:51 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Kill all the terrorists; protect all the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Romney’s court appointees may be no better than obama’s.


53 posted on 04/11/2012 8:43:01 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NakedRampage

You are one clueless dude and the kind the GOP E considers ‘right for the pickings’. It’s way past time you got dressed.


54 posted on 04/11/2012 8:46:34 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I guess you’re no fan of President Reagan then. Hmmm...


55 posted on 04/11/2012 8:52:44 AM PDT by NakedRampage (Puttin' the "stud" in Bible study)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jersey117; Lazlo in PA; cripplecreek; Steelfish; Mountain Mary
Rick's family was a primary concern that influenced his decision to suspend his campaign, but IMO, it wasn't the only one. There were a couple of times that Newt's people floated balloons about the possibility of forming a coalition with Santorum. One of these balloons was floated recently. There were threads on FR about it both times, and the majority of posts were very favorable. Most of us were not only open to it, we were starting to anticipate it with excitement. A coalition would be the best resolution many thought, and one we could get behind with enthusiasm.

It was a resolution that was realistic. Newt and Rick were friendly with each other, and Rick had also said publicly that he would definitely consider Newt as his running mate.

The next thing that happened was talk about Newt's meeting with Romney, followed by Newt's weekend comments concerning Romney's being the most likely candidate.

Now what is wrong with this picture so far? IMO (and I very well may be wrong - only time and leaks will tell), Newt decided not to back Santorum and/or form a coalition with him, and Newt's Romney remarks are a reflection of that decision.

Furthermore, I think Newt's stance became a significant factor which contributed to Santorum’s decision to suspend. And to add insult to injury, once Santorum dropped out, Newt made moves to get his campaign going again.

Stuff about this will be leaked. It's only a matter of time. I will stand corrected and make a statement saying so, if I'm wrong.

It's a shame that a coalition never happened. IMO, many of us were hoping for it.

56 posted on 04/11/2012 8:55:27 AM PDT by Lauren BaRecall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

I agree.


57 posted on 04/11/2012 9:06:25 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
thank you; for the link.
this is fantastic video
GO! NEWT! GO! :-D

58 posted on 04/11/2012 9:06:36 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Kill all the terrorists; protect all the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
We know good and well that if Santorum had done the right thing like Perry did, and dropped out when he was still at 2%, the race would be decided and Newt would be our nominee. About all Santorum has managed to do is, split the vote, disrupt the Conservative voice and then quit suddenly and leave us all hanging after the damage has been done.

But that is now impossible, since Santorum begged Romney to pay off his campaign debts. In addition to that, Santorum’s big financial backer has already gone over to Romney.

Newt's big backer is also about to pull the plug on the already sinking canoe that Newt is riding in. Reality does not choose sides. It is what it is, so we need to figure out how to beat Obama with what we have, as well as make sure our interests are represented as Conservatives.

59 posted on 04/11/2012 9:06:44 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

IT IS a fantastic speech and it was there and then, after I watched it, that I decided to support Newt.


60 posted on 04/11/2012 9:12:01 AM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson