Posted on 04/12/2012 5:17:42 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
In the R King case the prosecution filed charges the evidence didn't support. It was nothing more than a show trial, they never intended to convict the cops.
The trial was moved to Simi Valley so the not guilty verdict could be blamed on Republican Racism.
The not guilty verdict gave the left the excuse they needed for the orchestrated race riots that followed the not guilty verdict of the cops.
They are doing the same thing here.
Creating an excuse for race riots.
I agree with almost all of your post.
Exception. “One indisputable fact is that a person is dead as a result of contact instigated by Zimmerman.”
To the extent we know what happened, Zimmerman followed him at a distance. He may have wanted to initiate contact but apparently failed to get close enough.
Martin apparently chose to approach and speak to Zimmerman, which means he is the one who initiated contact. Many claim that Martin attacked Zimmerman without direct provocation. I don’t think there is sufficient evidence to make this assumption at this point.
But it does seem to be clear that Martin chose to approach Zimmerman and confront him at least verbally, from his girlfriend’s testimony.
This is all about political manipulation to sacrifice Zimmerman in a political show trial that puts the Communists to shame.
Zimmerman's only hope is that the government gets their hand picked judge, and he turns on them, and/or several very cunning nullification jurors.
There will be several trials.
Mustangman: you just demonstrated that you know nothing whatever about this case. None of what you just said is true, including '911'.
Also: try to stop using ellipses mid-sentence. It makes you sound like an emo serial-killer.
Is that Doofer Dumbutt?
Which for most is just an excuse to steal.
The judge will never dismiss the charges in Fl. for fear of his own hide. The case will go to a jury, probably not of his(Zimmerman’s) peers, but with enough “minorities” on it to insure a conviction.
You don't seriously believe Romney can beat Obama, do you?
We can. But 'they' can count on this rabbit...and many others...shooting back.
So we still do not know as fact which person initiated contact. Following someone is not against the law.
its not what the law says that matters. Now it’s all about the appeasement of the liberal lynch mob.
Face it Angela Corey is a Republican, appointed by Florida’s republican governor and she charged zimmerman with 2nd degree murder.
if Zimmerman tries this and its a lib judge they’ll deny it. and if its a RINO judge they’ll do the same.
Of course even if Zimmerman walks the DoJ will be waiting in the wings with federal civil rights charges. They are not going to let him get away.
On March 3, 2011, King was stopped by Los Angeles police for driving erratically.
He was issued a citation for driving with an expired license.
On July 12, 2011, King was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence.
Ol' Rodney must be a zombie.
What the jury nullification proponents never seem to realize is that it is a two-edged sword.
The OJ jurors practiced it, as did the jury in To Kill a Mockingbird. If the evidence is as is presently out there, the Zimmerman jury might have to do so in order to convict.
Conviction of an obviously innocent man because you dislike his politics or skin color is just as much jury nullification as is acquittal of a guilty one because you approve of his politics.
That's exactly why it only takes a few people to start a full scale riot.
A few start the riot and others jump in for the fun.
News media then creates the spin as to the cause of the riot.
Most people don't remember, but one of the guys that hit Reginal Denny in the head with the brick said he didn't know anything about the not guilty verdict when he started rioting, and that was pretty much ground zero for the riot.
The LA riots were planned in advance, the not guilty verdict was just an excuse.
I’ve heard it said -
crowds are kinda fun, until the first window gets broken and the authorities do nothing about it.
NBC convicted him.
He was found guilty before a trial.
“George...you now know why the 911 operator suggested that you not follow Trayvon....but, you found out too late....much too late.”
Are you saying that, after the 911 operator told Zimmerman, “we don’t need you to do that”, and Zimmerman said, “OK”, that Zimmerman continued to follow Trayvon? My understanding is that Zimmerman maintains that he at that point returned to his vehicle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.