Posted on 04/12/2012 9:12:12 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
The insane overrating of this crappy nation China has been going on for longtime....
That’s about 20 or so feet longer than a Tico, but it’s still a DDG, eh?
Seven billion dollars better NOT be a DDG. It better be a BBNG or something like that!
Darn thing better be Super Dreadnaught!
Bath is definitely blue collar Maine.
Or simply look for a fishing boat that is throwing off more electronic emissions through it's radar searches than a third of Singapore. Once that X-band ESA starts throwing off juice it will be quite difficult to pass that off as some sun-and-salt scarred fisherman's skiff trying to nab some tuna.
Now, back in 2007 the following was said during a congress discussion on the development of a new cruiser based on the stealthy Zummwalt hull: 'The anti-missile cruiser also wouldn’t require the high level of stealth provided by the Zumwalt’s tumblehome hull, analysts said, since the ship would be radiating its radars to search for missiles. Returning to a more conventional, flared-bow hull form would free designers from worries about overloading the untried tumblehome hull.'
So, since the Zummy has a pretty nice X-band radar, and using the radar means that it would be detected (this is not some small aircraft radar that can use LPI), and looking at what was said, does this mean the Zummy will not be using any active sensors and depending only on passive and/or third party sensors, switching it's big @$$ radar only when necessary? And if that's the case, does it mean if something (say an actual fishing boat with a Klub missile hidden in it that is in a fleet of other fishing boats 30 miles away from the Zummy) would have a chance, no matter how small, of taking out a billion dollar boat?
Rhetoric question, but it does seem that the whole 'stealthy' aspect that makes it seem like some innocent fishing boat does not make sense if it is radiating like a freakin' Death-Star.
RR gas turbines burning what? Jet fuel? A giant step backwards, in my opinion.
“....cutting edge of technology....?” Running two gas turbines to generate power? How do you disguise THAT noise and make it “sound like a small fishing boat?” Sounds more like a crock, to me.
The Zummwalts are almost as heavy as battleships from a century ago, or heavy cruisers from World War 2.
well, the USS Texas from 1914 displaced 27000 tons, while the Zumwalt class should be about 14000 tons.
Looks a bit tippy Jeef
The Pentagon awarded a fixed-price contract to General Dynamics to build these three destroyers, replacing a cost-plus-fee contract that had been awarded to Northrop Grumman. The first DDG-1000 destroyer is slated to cost $3.5 billion (and it is well over 60% complete) see my DDG 1000 Site and watch the video there of the second large section being rolled out and mated up to the first at the bottom of the picturesb.
The second vessel is to cost $2.5 billion, and the third near $2 billion.
Originally both the 1st and second vessel were estimated to come in at 3.5 billion each which would have made the 7 billion.
In my US MILITARY BUILDUP PROPOSAL. I propose that with a strong economic turnaround, we should go ahead and build eight of these.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.