Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We will not waste our limited resources on FR in support for a liberal progressive LIAR
Click here to pledge your support! ^ | April 12, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 04/13/2012 12:13:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:

Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesn’t even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.

I’ve stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that I’d never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.

C’mon. These are the reasons the tea party sprang up and the reasons he and Rove loathe the tea party and our tea party conservative candidates. Romney famously expressed his loathing for Reagan-Bush conservatism several years ago when he was trying to run to the left of Ted Kennedy and now he’s cloaking himself in Reagan conservatism, knowing full well that it’s a lie, but he knows it’s the only way he can possibly win, er buy the Republican nomination.

Screw Romney!! I absolutely will not support or vote for a proven compulsive liar with a known record of abortion and big government socialism, liberal appointments, etc. He still lies about RomneyCommieCare today. Calls it a “conservative solution.” Get real!!

Listen to what Ronald Reagan had to say about the elites pushing socialism on America via compulsory health insurance:

Ronald Reagan speaks out against RomneyCommieCare

There will be no campaign for this Massachusetts liberal liar on FR!!

Damn the libs and RINOS, full steam ahead!!

But no matter what happens we must turn out in November to vote IN as many conservatives and vote OUT as many rats as possible at all levels of government. If we don't have a conservative at the top of the ticket we must turn out anyway and vote straight conservative DOWN ticket!! Just think of it an off cycle election and pour on the TEA!! It'll be doubly important that we control both houses of congress and as many statehouses as possible.

Restore the 10th amendment!! Impeach the leftist president whoever he may be!! Restore Liberty!! Rebellion comes from the bottom up!!

WOO HOO!! I CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM MY HOUSE!!

No Bama!! No Romney!! Go tea party rebellion!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adminlectureseries; bho2012; elections; fumr; jimrobinson; justsaynotomitt; mittbotpurge; ozone; romeymormon; romney; romney2012; romneymormonchart; smellslikemitt; springcleaning; teaparty; zot; zots4romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 1,251-1,3001,301-1,3501,351-1,400 ... 2,351-2,352 next last
To: Vanders9
Newt is still in this. He still could win the nomination. It's going to need a minor miracle but hey, I believe in miracles...

Me too Vanders...me too!.....Isn't this where Reagan was...oh wait it was June before he rose. So there's still time...we just have to wait to see how Newt plays his hand now.

I'd like to think he's going to send some false signals about what he's doing and then come in hard and strong....as so many have said...it's a mistake to underestimate Newt.

1,301 posted on 04/13/2012 11:48:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1291 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
Newt is still in this. He still could win the nomination. It's going to need a minor miracle but hey, I believe in miracles...

Me too Vanders...me too!.....Isn't this where Reagan was...oh wait it was June before he rose. So there's still time...we just have to wait to see how Newt plays his hand now.

I'd like to think he's going to send some false signals about what he's doing and then come in hard and strong....as so many have said...it's a mistake to underestimate Newt.

1,302 posted on 04/13/2012 11:48:32 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1291 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon
Sarah will do what she believes is right. That is one thing you can take to the bank with this lady.

Too true, but given her decision-making process over the last year, I can only conclude that even she is capable of being cowed by the ruling class oligarchy. She could have been the most dynamic, important president since Reagan, but she elected to choose obscurity and irrelevance over history-making importance, in this most pivotal moment in American history.

Who knows - perhaps she defaulted to the protective mother valence when she and her brood were threatened with certain annihilation by the powers that be? It's my informed deduction that that's exactly what occurred. Nothing else can explain her pre-emptive exit from the nominating contest.

1,303 posted on 04/13/2012 11:48:38 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1285 | View Replies]

To: LifePath

In a matter of days Perry imploded.
In a matter of days Cain imploded.
In a matter of days Santorum self removed.
In a matter of days Newt went from hero to zero to hero to zero to hero.

If you don’t think that once/if Mitt gets the nod, the unload with all the heretofor ammunition they have been stockpiling for the last 3 years and longer, you are not paying attention.

With all his record that we know, but the gen pub does not just waiting for wall to wall exposure by the lib/media, he will be lucky to last days before the implosion.

And then what? A mad scramble by the GOP to replace him with Jeb Bush most likely. Because, they’ll say, there is simply no other option!!! We HAVE to run Jeb or OBAMA WILL WIN!!!!!

Now granted, I could far better stomach Jeb than Mitt, but I don’t want to and most importantly, I shouldn’t have to. We have a candidate that is a lot closer to the ‘ideal’ than the raging lib or Compassionate Conservative III.

My point? 7 mos is a political eternity.


1,304 posted on 04/13/2012 11:49:15 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1295 | View Replies]

To: caww

If they can get him nominated, they can get him elected. They don’t need or want my support or vote. They loathe what I stand for.


1,305 posted on 04/13/2012 11:49:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (There's no crying in rebellion!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I didn’t. That verse expresses a principle about principles and that’s what I said about. Thanks for your opinion.


1,306 posted on 04/13/2012 11:50:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1249 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Edit

If you don’t think that once/if Mitt gets the nod, the MSM/dems/libs willunload with all the heretofor unused ammunition they have been stockpiling for the last 3 years and longer, you are not paying attention.


1,307 posted on 04/13/2012 11:55:21 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1304 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Who are you going to vote for if Newt is not the nominee?

Sarah Palin will be voting for Romney along with Newt and the rest of us who are sane.


1,308 posted on 04/13/2012 11:56:26 PM PDT by Newt 2012 (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: LifePath
Sweatykins

LOL (and I mean that sincerely...)

I assume you are talking about Newt. He’s toast. If every Freeper votes for him, and all of their families and all of their friends, then he only loses by 30 points.

Yes, but don't you see? The object is to deny Romney the required number of delegates to legally capture the nomination. We can't hope to do much more than that, at this juncture. We must use whatever strategies are still at our disposal to stop the election of another Socialist to the nation's highest office.

It's fight, or roll over and accept the coming Communist paradigm. Surely, you have some fighting spirit left in you, don't you? This is the whole agonized future of our country we're talking about here. Does that not raise a single hair on the back of your neck?

1,309 posted on 04/13/2012 11:57:54 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1295 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
It's no secret what mitt is like, they ain't getting anything that they don't know already. It's not time for them to spring it on those who chose to be uninformed. They want him to get the nod first.

Evil is drawn towards evil - so you can't convince evil people not to embrace mitt because he's evil. Newt is the real deal and all one with an ounce of sense knows if they media and GOP e are against him, he's the BEST for America. And he's the only one who could defeat Obama. The maggots don't want conservatism. And those who love America with deep seated values are drawn to him.

I believe when Barry gets re elected because of those voting for mitt, God will protect those who sought after goodness and a protector of America/Our Constitution and a helper of Israel. There will be calamity around us but we will not be affected by it as much as those who supported and voted for a PRO HOMO PRO baby killing anti-traditional marriage candidate. They don't belong to Him, no matter what they think. And since they chose evil over good, he will honor that request.

As our choice was for good, He will honor us by His protection against the evil they brought on this nation. That's how He will show His Glory. Let them whine and gnash their teeth and live in fear, they have it coming to them, they sought it out and drew evil towards them.

1,310 posted on 04/13/2012 11:59:30 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies]

To: donna

I see the Alan Keyes logic is taking hold here.


1,311 posted on 04/14/2012 12:00:28 AM PDT by Newt 2012 (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 840 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Well you have the option to be wrong, and I see you are exercising it. Good for you.


1,312 posted on 04/14/2012 12:03:19 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1306 | View Replies]

To: caww
What was it Carl Rove said?...Something about the Conservatives will have temper tantrums but in the end they’ll support Romney....as if we’re kids...what an insult! Just the way he worded this and delivery of made my skin crawl...I was so miffed! But I agree that they manipulate...give us just enough to keep us in the game and then drag us over their finish line. Not me...not this time..not going to do it!

caww, you have nailed just exactly how the GOP-e view us. They have nothing but contempt for us. They abuse us and our candidates and expect us just to always fall in line.

I am very much at peace knowing I will never cast a vote for Mitt. We must all vote down ticket for Conservatives.

1,313 posted on 04/14/2012 12:03:19 AM PDT by sand88 (Nothing on this Earth would get me to vote for Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

Who cares what anyone here will do? Conservatism is about individualism, not group think or following the herd over the cliff. I’m confident that all but the insignificant fringe will support the Republican nominee.


1,314 posted on 04/14/2012 12:05:02 AM PDT by Newt 2012 (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

If you think your actions carry no spiritual weight then you are the one who is wrong. And if you have never seen anyone use Bible verses to support their political arguments on FR then you as blind as a bat. LOL


1,315 posted on 04/14/2012 12:05:41 AM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1312 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Nope. I sold out my principles the last go-round, because Sarah Palin was on the ballot, but I'm done being played like that by the establishment. So is Sarah.

Well, considering that Sarah has said she will support the nominee, it's clear that you don't speak for Sarah.

1,316 posted on 04/14/2012 12:07:20 AM PDT by Newt 2012 (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

People that want Obama to win so that we get the next conservative messiah is just deluding themselves or are idiotic. I want another Reagan as much as anyone, but if Obama wins again the libs will take even more power and we will not recover. The county will probably elect some libtard as prez in 2016 to. We must stop the bleeding. BTW Im not a Romney supporter. Im voting ABO because this is it folks, we wont recover if the muslim commie wins. Bank on it.


1,317 posted on 04/14/2012 12:09:10 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

country


1,318 posted on 04/14/2012 12:10:14 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1317 | View Replies]

To: forbushalltheway
I am leaving and maybe the country, so you have have fun with OBUTTHOLE!

Bye! See ya later, traitorgator!

1,319 posted on 04/14/2012 12:10:14 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
You actually believe we would be better off voting in as many conservatives as possible and having Obama in office than if we voted in as many conservatives as possible and had Romney?

Potentially, that is correct.

Suppose 0bama wins in 2012. This means that there will be 8 years of rabid socialism (2009-2016). Sarah Palin would put an absolute halt to that trend in November 2016 when she won the Presidency.

Aside from destroying the GOP as a conservative party, if Romney wins in 2012, then we automatically end up with *12* straight years of socialism.

Think about it. If Romney won in 2012 then in 2016 he would be the incumbent, and there would be little possibility of a Sarah Palin candidacy. Thus, we end up with 4 years of 0bama and 8 years of Romney, or 4 years of 0bama, 4 years of Romney, and some NEW democrat socialist for another 4 years starting in 2017.

With Romney losing in 2012, however, due to a total de-energization of the GOP conservative/TEA party base (as we are seeing), the damage is limited to only *8* years of socialism.

Additionally, the GOP would be able to avoid the reeking taint of having embraced socialism under a Romney GOP administration, and the party might be able to survive as a legitimate coalition of social & fiscal conservatives and libertarians.

1,320 posted on 04/14/2012 12:12:52 AM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

How do you and the others not understand that when you cast a vote for a person, that IS giving them support?

Just admit it. Say “I will support Romney vith my vote.” That’s honest. All the Clintonian word games do not change the fact that to cast a vote for the man is to support the man.

If your vote for Romney is not supporting Romney, then pray tell which other candidate is it supporting? Don’t say “America” because “America” is not on the ballot. Nor is Conservatism.


1,321 posted on 04/14/2012 12:15:31 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1317 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
I saw this on the net today ....

Etch- A- Sketch Romney:

'Shake it up'... and the Massachusetts liberal "to the left" of Ted Kennedy is gone,... .... 'shake it again'... and you get someone who finds it "hard to disagree with" Rush Limbaugh, is "severely" conservative, and Santorum was too "liberal".... ... and then 'shake it once more'.... hoping all of us voters are completely stupid without memories.....

1,322 posted on 04/14/2012 12:15:47 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1217 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

You are damned right it does, but the main thing is getting Obama out, and damn near anyone else in. This buys us time. With a Republican in the WH we have a seat at the table, even if it means conservatives get the table leg. We can raise hell, push for real reform. If Obama wins, we get nothing.

And if your strategy worked, who would replace Romney? He has a huge lead in delegates. Brokered convention? I can hope, but that isn’t the same as planning. I want Newt to hang in there, but I think he’s gone soon, well before the convention. His checks are bouncing, for God’s sake.

I truly fear that with four more years of Obama we will, with utter finality, pass the tipping point. When the bloodsuckers outnumber the producers by enough, then there is no going back ever, short of societal collapse and/or revolution. I have three children, and I don’t want that for them.

Defeat Obama, then fight the next, inevitable battle with RINOS like Romney.


1,323 posted on 04/14/2012 12:16:06 AM PDT by LifePath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1309 | View Replies]

To: Newt 2012
considering that Sarah has said she will support the nominee, it's clear that you don't speak for Sarah.

Did you even bother to listen to Sarah's CPAC speech? How dare you call yourself "Newt 2012"? You obviously haven't the first clue of what we're talking about here.

1,324 posted on 04/14/2012 12:18:00 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1316 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Because Obama is destroying the country at every opportunity. He’s throw Israel under the bus. He is the biggest danger to the US constitution ever. The US will not be the same place after 4 more years of unchecked Obama, it is unthinkable that we will have to deal with more of his BS. I will vote Romney over Obama because Im a man of logic and reason and think with a conservative house and senate he could be steered much easier than the muslim there now. Obama is destroying the US military and NASA and that is personal for me. Im voting ABO and it is what it is.


1,325 posted on 04/14/2012 12:19:55 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1321 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Exactly!


1,326 posted on 04/14/2012 12:25:59 AM PDT by glock rocks (optimist , pessimist? I'm an awesomist - There's a dragon in that glass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1300 | View Replies]

To: LifePath
I want Newt to hang in there, but I think he’s gone soon, well before the convention.

Why is it that you can't see that you're creating that very eventuality by supporting Mitt Romney? You're rolling over for the wrong --- don't you get it?

All we have to do, is hang tough with Newt and deny Romney the required number of delegates to capture the nomination. That's it. We can STILL force a showdown in this contest, but you're going the pragmatic route and throwing in the towel before the fat lady's sung.

For cimininy's sake, man, get a grip. Don't throw away our future for political expediency!

1,327 posted on 04/14/2012 12:26:42 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1323 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

“Im voting ABO and it is what it is.”

Your choice, but logic and reason have nothing to do with it. Fear does though. Lots of fear. My daughter is USAF. You think you’re alone in military concern? You aren’t. And Romney is no friend of the military. Read up.

The military of G. Washington had a lot more to lose. What did he do when he/his family were threatened? He didn’t ‘vote’ for the lesser evil of the Crown loyalists. He opposed ALL the evil. And FOUNDED the country.


1,328 posted on 04/14/2012 12:28:11 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1325 | View Replies]

To: 240B
I think I do not belong here anymore.

I do believe you're right!

1,329 posted on 04/14/2012 12:31:23 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Thanks, Norm.


1,330 posted on 04/14/2012 12:33:13 AM PDT by Bradís Gramma (PRAY for this country like your life depends on it......because it DOES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1328 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

If you read my post you’d see I did not say your vote carries no spiritual consequences. I said you are not going to lose heaven over it if you trust in Christ.

Further since I responded to your post about distorting Scripture verses, I obviously see that people on FR use bible verses. Sometimes they use them out of context, like you.


1,331 posted on 04/14/2012 12:34:16 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1315 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Romney has succeeded in socialism where the democrats have long failed.

Thanks Jim. You've expressed reasons for rejecting Mitt Romney better in this paragraph (1300) than any posted above. I hope others get a chance to read it. Where to go from here? Heck if I know. The assault on private enterprise vs government is a clue.

The money being sucked out of the economy by government is insane. Put half those dollars to work in the private sector and unemployment drops to 4% or less tomorrow. A fuggin crime that nobody from either party says anything about.

Excuse me, but a guy with some business experience should trump a street thug from Chicago who's had three plus years to improve an economy when the thug in question has never held a job besides street-agitator. What's he given: Racial division, class warfare division, gender division, what's left? Zip Code division? FUBO.

Sorry, at this point I could care who we elect- just get rid of the sorry Jack Ass currently in the White House.

1,332 posted on 04/14/2012 12:35:07 AM PDT by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1300 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
I want Obama defeated. I don’t care if it is a blind monkey with one hand tied behind his back. Yep, that means, I will be be casting my vote for Mitt Romney, who is not my first choice by far.

Sell out. Romney is Obama's illegitimate twin brother, ya moron. And you've been here long enough to know that.

1,333 posted on 04/14/2012 12:35:43 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
I don't think I will take Scriptural advice from some dingbat who thinks he actually speaks for God and makes political points doing it then tells me I can't use Scripture to make a point which was not political.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:51:55 PM · 12 of 13
Secret Agent Man to C19fan

How about Jesus would oppose living beyond your means?

Jesus would oppose borrowing enormous sums of money and expecting your kids and grandkids to pay it back.

Jesus would oppose rewarding doctors for viewing living people as a budget item rather than a patient in order to save a few dollars.

Jesus would oppose 54 million abortions when instead there could have been 54 million adoptions.

Jesus would oppose those who think they are righteous and godly to blame the rich for all the problems in their lives they themselves are more responsible for than anyone else.

Jesus would oppose those who instead of being peacemakers, love to pit one group of people against another for their own benefit.


1,334 posted on 04/14/2012 12:37:53 AM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1331 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Sorry, will not dignify your gutter remark with any response!!!


1,335 posted on 04/14/2012 12:39:54 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy t, cast Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1333 | View Replies]

To: onyx
This primary is NOT over, but if he's the nominee, he does NOT get my vote. I'll not be a party to deceit and this choice of a lesser evil.

Onyx, you and I are still on the same page, regardless of nominee. Principles matter.

1,336 posted on 04/14/2012 12:40:11 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Always vote for principle,.. though you may vote alone,.. and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

-John Quincy Adams


1,337 posted on 04/14/2012 12:41:10 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1106 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I never respond to babbling or nonsense remarks, sorry!!!


1,338 posted on 04/14/2012 12:42:45 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy t, cast Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF
I think we're at one of those pivotal points in our nation's history where the confluence of events demands a showdown. We won't survive the current trajectory, whether the Socialist in the White House is a Democrat or a Republican.

Better to reject the loathsome fraud, Romney, and tell the left to Bring It. Let's get this thing over with.

1,339 posted on 04/14/2012 12:43:25 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Newt’s $500 check bounced the other day.

I stood up and cheered when Newt nailed John King. I cheered each debate where Newt showed his real ability to cream Obama. I loved those standing O’s.

But Newt’s $500 check bounced the other day.

This means that the Republicans are rejecting him. Not me.

Windflier, I appreciate your cordiality in these last several posts. I think we generally want the same result, but you aren’t as ready as I (unhappily) am to call this primary contest a win for Romney. I will do damn near anything to deny the White House to the Kenyan, even if it means a huge black eye to conservatives. I am ready to go third party, or alternative to the effing Republicans since they haven’t represented me for many years, but not until AFTER we throw Obama out. That is my number 1.

Good night, and God bless you and yours.


1,340 posted on 04/14/2012 12:43:50 AM PDT by LifePath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1327 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone,... and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

-John Quincy Adams


1,341 posted on 04/14/2012 12:44:36 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1305 | View Replies]

To: caww
Not me...not this time..not going to do it!

Amen!

The founders of our great country were given the same choice.

They faced insurmountable odds facing off against the greatest military power of their time. They had conquered great portions of the rest of the world, and yet, rather than capitulate, rather than giving up because it looked inevitable, they fought on, risking their very lives, their families lives and their fortunes.

The fight today, though not necessarily to the death right now, is along the same principled lines and requires us to face death, figuratively speaking, in the face, just as our fore-fathers did, and stand firm in our convictions.

Nothing else will do if we value our principles, if we value our morals, if we value God's very laws.
1,342 posted on 04/14/2012 12:46:47 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies]

To: caww

NO! We must vote Romney! All those ‘purists people keep posting about like Adams and Paine and Washington....what do they know? It’s not like anyone ever threatened their lives or livelyhood is it? Sheesh!

This is Obama we’re talking about here. He could do something BAD! Those old dead guys NEVER had to deal with any real threat to their lives/families/country like OBAMA!!!


1,343 posted on 04/14/2012 12:48:17 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts

You are wasting your time, I could care less what you think or write. You are entitled to your thoughts and opinion, and....I am entitled to mine. This is still a free country!!! As for upcoming POTUS results, only time will tell.


1,344 posted on 04/14/2012 12:48:17 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy t, cast Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

One word!!! Reality!!!


1,345 posted on 04/14/2012 12:50:28 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy t, cast Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: CSM; Jim Robinson

I generally agree with you. Have only made it through ~15% of this thread, and have already observed what can only be described as a circular firing squad. We claim to be conservatives, yet conservatives are being routinely desparaged here based on scant evidence. There are also numerous posts alleging the need for “saving” the Republican Party, but that disgusts me to some degree because I abandoned the party a decade and a half ago for good cause (Newt and Trent), and see no rational reason to return. I’m now unaffiliated with any party and will vote for the lesser of the evils put before me which I believe represents the attitude of most of us Tea Partyers.

Moreover, I almost got banned some weeks ago for calling fellow Freepers ill-advised names out of frustration, but now we have Jim doing the same thing on this thread with ample support from others. WTF is going on here???

Freepers have made a significant impact, but not so much as the various Tea Party factions, and I sure would hate to see Free Republic disintegrate internally due to sometimes petty disagreements about the ultimate objectives involved in taking our country back from the insidious, antiAmerican “progressives”! If this gets me ZOTTED, so be it...

JC


1,346 posted on 04/14/2012 12:51:26 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

BTW Windflier, I just noticed we exchanged private emails back on 12/23/2010. We are in the same area code. I hope your business is doing exceptionally well.


1,347 posted on 04/14/2012 12:54:00 AM PDT by LifePath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1327 | View Replies]

To: LifePath
Newt’s $500 check bounced the other day. Good night, and God bless you and yours.

What the hell is that supposed to mean? That you'll support the liberal Republican over the liberal Democrat? Excuse me, but No F***king Thank You. I will not willingly give away the last remaining portion of my God-given rights to informed self-determinism.

This is war. No different than what our forefathers waged against King George III. I will NOT accept a Socialist for my president, so help me GOD, come what may!

1,348 posted on 04/14/2012 12:55:25 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1340 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Sure I do. You’re talking about political suicide. I’m still supporting Newt and hoping he can stop Romney and have a convention floor fight... but I will NOT sit out the Presidential election in favor of the Marxist Usurper. Period. And I don’t care who rails against me.


1,349 posted on 04/14/2012 12:59:03 AM PDT by Newt 2012 (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1324 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

You sound unhinged.


1,350 posted on 04/14/2012 1:00:04 AM PDT by Newt 2012 (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1348 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 1,251-1,3001,301-1,3501,351-1,400 ... 2,351-2,352 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson