Replies

No, I'm trying to defeat Obama, not help him like your lot. If you want to be like a Japanese soldier wandering the jungle till 1979, be my guest. I will retain some sort of sanity and work to throw Obama out of the White House. Your way is just a road to defeat for defeats sake, a loser I might say. Right now the Democrats are tripping all over themselves and setting themselves up for defeat, but people like you would rather prop them up with your unrealistic fantasies. Your lot will not be happy until the GOP polls in numbers equal to the Libertarians. Me, I want 50%+. If Romney wins in November and we get only a pro-business federal government, then count me in. My suspicion about your lot is that down deep you like the Left’s handouts, you might be feeding at the trough right now. Honestly, I really don't care that much for the social issues, but the free market stuff I'm passionate about. So if that is all I get from Romney, great. But you I suspect are the opposite. Your all worked up about the social issues, but you do not want to lose your entitlements. I used to laugh at some Tea Party people calling for a cut government spending, but still wanted their own entitlements left alone. Are you this type also. See, I don't care what you do in your privacy, but keep your hand out of my pocket. That's the Left’s hand and the Right’s hand.

In the United States 60% of likely voters are conservative or somewhat conservative. There is no way Romney, a progressive and fascist, will win in November.

Romney will not win in November because HE ISN’T A CONSERVATIVE!!

Per the Washington Post:

“Mitt Romney was firm and direct with the abortion rights advocates sitting in his office nine years ago, assuring the group that if elected Massachusetts governor, he would protect the state’s abortion laws.”

“Then, as the meeting drew to a close, the businessman offered an intriguing suggestion — that he would rise to national prominence in the Republican Party as a victor in a liberal state and could use his influence to soften the GOP’s hard-line opposition to abortion.”

“He would be a “good voice in the party” for their cause, and his moderation on the issue would be “widely written about,” he said, according to detailed notes taken by an officer of the group, NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-governor-romney-worked-to-reassure-liberals/2011/11/02/gIQAookxgM_story.html?sub=AR

You seem to have the mistaken belief that Romney will be good for jobs and the economy. In fact, Romney was a lousy businessman: his company was to capitalism what a junkyard is to automakers. In other words, Romney did not know how to create wealth, only chop it up and divide the spoils. He failed at financing the Olympics with private money, and had to accept government handouts.

To answer your question about entitlements: I do not now nor have I ever received entitlement money.

If you truly want to defeat BHO2 than support Gingrich. Support a conservative. Newt Gingrich is pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment and loves America and understands its citizens. As a historian, he thoroughly knows the U.S. Constitution and our nation’s history.

He allied himself with Ronald Reagan to build the Reagan Coalition, the Religious Right, and the Republican majority (together the Reagan Revolution) which directly led the downfall of the Soviet Union, the Contract with America, government reforms, less government, tax cuts, a balanced budget, and the great, long-standing Reagan economy.

Washington is broken, it doesn’t work the way it is supposed to and Newt said, if elected, he will work to change the way Washington does business. You better believe the elitists who suck money off of government contracts are terrified he will be elected.

Romney is getting support from those holders of government contracts because Romney will not change Washington. It will be a non-stop gravy train.

You’re an idiot. You accuse us of wanting entitlements while you’re backing the father of Obamacare? If your goal is to get a progressive politician who raised taxes and fees by $700 million and instituted a bold new welfare entitlement, then vote Romney. The rest of us will continue to fight him and Obama every step of the way and back conservative candidates.

Romney is just as leftist as he can get and still be in the GOP. A government promoting certain businesses (which are de facto state owned) is no different from a government that owns the businesses. Except one is called fascist and the other Iis called communist. Romney has been a statist all the way.

I suspect you’re the one looking for the handout.

Romney is little different from Obama. Member of a flaky non-Christian sect, big government all the way, personally weird and crazy looking...

"...you do not want to lose your entitlements. I used to laugh at some Tea Party people calling for a cut government spending, but still wanted their own entitlements left alone."

Many of us are already aware that our local Republicans are accommodating environmentalism, animal "rights," property values and other irrelevant arguments from the left to stop new production business competition and violate real property rights. They are also pushing for Romney or anyone against Gingrich for the the sake of continuing their fat incomes from government debt (including established services mostly dependent on pensioners and government employees). They're the bipartisan, socialist establishment.

The default process will be completed quickly by Democrats and Republicans--two gangs of favored, socialist constituents crying for feminist/weirdo votes and milking this debt regime together. Recirculating debt is no way to run an economy, and there's nothing conservative about it. Local, yocal socialists, gobbling pork from bottom levels of government, are no better than federal socialists trying to take it all from the top.