Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Newt Gingrich haters (vanity)
Vanity | April 13, 2012 | CutePuppy

Posted on 04/14/2012 4:35:57 PM PDT by CutePuppy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-229 next last
To: CutePuppy

“Truth is, many of the evangelicals “leaders” and their organizations find themselves quite comfortable with the “kinder, gentler, compassionate conservative” GOP structure that provides them a certain measure of importance (or they just might support a “conservative” Democrat). All they are interested in, just as most “minority” groups within a structure is increasing (or at least not losing) their influence relative to some other groups.”

Wholehearted agreement here. Lukewarm compromisers, and we know what happens to the lukewarm.


101 posted on 04/14/2012 7:51:29 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
If I touch my nose, will that count as reaching out to evangelicals?

Evangelical! ——> Freeper Psalm 144 <-—— Evangelical!

As to your summation of the work of grace, credo!

:-)

OH, yes, I know!! I just meant we have to keep reaching to other evangelicals still supporting Santorum or ready to flip to Mitt...

You're funny!! :)

102 posted on 04/14/2012 7:55:09 PM PDT by true believer forever (GO NEWT! On to Tampa - hang tight - we can do this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Ah, gotcha. I should have logged off hours ago. Free Republic, like a plate of nachos, is a hard thing push away from.


103 posted on 04/14/2012 7:57:53 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife; dforest
RE :”I said before that whining isn’t attractive. It wasn’t when Santorum did it either

I am being accused of ending civilization for my comment.

Where have we seen such drama before?

104 posted on 04/14/2012 7:59:15 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I think Christie beach doesn’t understand that the whole purpose of ABR is anybody but Romney. I said I wasn’t voting for Newt in the primary.

You notice, I never mentioned Romney, but in her childish way Christie beach couldn’t help herself from the unfounded accusations she lobs like spitballs at those who won’t get on their “knees for Newt”. We are getting Romney because Newt was dead in the water and splitting the vote causing the closest person challenging Romney to lose by a few percentage points in key states.

I am told the whole idea is to deny Romney delegates in order to have a brokered convention. So I will vote for my original pick who is still on the ballot. There is no way for Newt to win 1144 delegates prior to the convention. Most likely there will not be a brokered convention when you look at the remaining states. Especially the “winner take all” states.

I will vote for the person I wish, running or not running, like many others around here profess to be doing with such pride.


105 posted on 04/14/2012 8:07:18 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I wasn’t even aware that you had voted in the primary, yet. How can all of this be your fault?


106 posted on 04/14/2012 8:09:35 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("For the sake of our party we must stand united, whoever our nominee is."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Sorry, but you are mistaken.

Nobama’s big donors are turning away.
In spite of what liberals spin, his 2008 voters are slipping away, either to vote against him or sit 2012 out. Even the black vote, even though will still vote 90+% (of those that actually vote) are not enthused (i.e. their need to reinvigorate blacks with racist flames).

These are a thousand littles signs, you just have to watch closely.

107 posted on 04/14/2012 8:14:38 PM PDT by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife; dforest
RE :”I wasn’t even aware that you had voted in the primary, yet. How can all of this be your fault?

Because I posted a comment on this thread to deforest of course. Typical Newt CT logic.

108 posted on 04/14/2012 8:16:09 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
All one ever needs to see is him on a couch with ms. pelosi.

That's the mittbot famous nothing comment. When I see that I see desperation from the known liar and backstabber. The are LOTS of pictures with mitt with liberals - to the left of Kennedy.

Newt IS every bit a conservative! Remember when mitt was passing himself off as a conservative. LOL! Now comes the talking point Newt isn't a conservative. Mitt - "if I can't be one, than neither can Newt"

The man is mental! Mitt is not even a republican - he is a LIBERAL.

PRO ABORTION, PRO HOMO, Big Gov't socialistic style healthcare, anti gun, appointing of liberal judges, is NOT A GOP PLATFORM. The empty suit is a LIBERAL. He's a known liar - he registers as a Republican thinking that makes him of Repub with his 'that will prove I am' with a record as liberal as one can get!

109 posted on 04/14/2012 8:16:45 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Some things never change. It is a personality type.

If I am gonns be responsible for ending life as we know it, I best go get some shut eye.

It is a tough job, but we can handle the task. /sarc on


110 posted on 04/14/2012 8:17:21 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I haven’t voted in the primary yet either.

My main job on that day will be to help boot Dick Lugar out of the Senate.

I can do that with relish.


111 posted on 04/14/2012 8:20:45 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

The Gingrich’s were seperated for years, then she pops back up into his life when he becomes Speaker.

They were married for 17 years but by all accounts it was a relationship made in h***.

Miserable is not strong enough of a word.


112 posted on 04/14/2012 8:26:56 PM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

“Obama or Romney....I’m not excited about either but our choices are pretty much etched in stone.....I think I’ll go with Romney”

Explain to me why, if you are Republican, you’d vote for one who isn’t?

Mitt Romney: ‘My “R” Does Not Stand for Republican’

http://youtu.be/vAOXQaY1UEM

Why, if you are conservative, you’d vote for one who isn’t?

Mitt Romney: ‘I’m not a partisan Republican, I’m moderate and progressive’

http://youtu.be/DwGQDXgzzVk

What is the DIFFERENCE between Romney and Obama?

Romney backs Obama on abortion, the stimulus, TARP, war time tables, gun control laws, amnesty for illegals, government mandated healthcare.

http://youtu.be/i1fThdWagJ4


113 posted on 04/14/2012 8:28:56 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

“If Newt and Marianne had been separated for 6 years by 1993, why was she with him at virtually every press conference when he was Speaker (eff. Jan. 1995)?”

Marianne, after leaving Newt in 1987 and filing for divorce (but not proceeded with it), went back to Newt in 1994, after more than six years of separation, because he had become the Speaker of the House and she liked being in the spotlights. Newt, I don’t know why, accepted her back, but the marriage link was already irremediably broken ... Finally he filed for divorce in 1998, the divorce was finalized in 1999, and in 2000 he married Callista.


114 posted on 04/14/2012 8:36:04 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy; RitaOK; DJ MacWoW; The Cajun; JoeProBono; musicman; LibLieSlayer; katiedidit1; caww; ...


Thanks very much, Cute Puppy! I'm so sorry for being late to this thread. I see some of the “can't stay away’s” couldn't stay away...LOL.

They're more predictable than rain.

Those idiots are not our on side. Why they're still here is a mystery to me.


115 posted on 04/14/2012 8:53:20 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
Every FReeper should read it. It is the most honest, complete research I ever read here.

LOL. You can't be serious.

I started to read it, discovered an obvious lie and quit.

Here is the lie.

Second, Newt met Callista for the first time and started dating her in 1993, 6 years after he was legally separated in 1987 from his estranged runaway wife #2, Marianne Ginther Gingrich (who chose to keep that name after the divorce) so Callista could not possibly have been the reason or cause for their separation and eventual divorce.

After Newt became Speaker he was in the news a lot. He spoke of his love, Marianne, a lot. So was that a lie too? Why did he think he had to lie??? Either way, he is a creep. Perv. I don't care what you call it. My dad left my mom for another woman. I have no time for that fool either.

116 posted on 04/14/2012 8:54:01 PM PDT by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Not that I forgive Mitt but it isn’t the divorces that are the problem for Newt.

It is the lying. The cheating. The whoring.

That’s all.


117 posted on 04/14/2012 8:55:58 PM PDT by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

What you see here is a perfect example of why Newt is such a flawed candidate. It’s always his ego before anything else...look at this stupid war. He should have gotten out long ago...should have NEVER gotten in, now NONE of us win.


118 posted on 04/14/2012 8:56:27 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Ditto that!! Ditto that!!


119 posted on 04/14/2012 9:01:23 PM PDT by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
That was marvelous, thank you. On all points you nailed it, further comments from me about Santorum, well I will just remain silent and refer all to your comments.

NEWT GINGRICH IS STILL IN THIS RACE, and I will not count him out and neither should anyone else.

ALL THOSE THAT hate NEWT, are Romney supporters and have always been, otherwise their comments make no sense as the objection is anybody but Romney. Guess that is by the wayside now, and their true colors are showing, (purple).

They had to destroy NEWT first, as Santorum was an easy target, he wasn't going anywhere fast. Newt was and has always been the THREAT to Romney, still is.

GO NEWT, your post needs the applause sign.

120 posted on 04/14/2012 9:03:22 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Newt wrote a book called “Rediscovering God in America,” based on religion and our founding fathers. I haven’t read it but do intend to do so and he has produced some religious films via his production company.
Newt needs money, fair coverage and a few more debates with Romney. Will he get it? I doubt Romney will debate him again and I doubt Fox will be fair. WE have to be the ones to get the word out.


121 posted on 04/14/2012 9:10:39 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Chronology is fine. Newt wanted to get a quick divorce from Marianne in 1994, but she would not give him a divorce, seeing that he was on a track to becoming a Speaker, 3rd most important position in the government and realizing the income potential of being his "wife".

It wasn't a good time for Newt to have a "scandalous" long drawn-out divorce proceedings (which he should have finalized long before, but the "bad, mean Newt" was financially supporting her all through these years, regardless of separation, including having much of his income from books and lectures being in the bank accounts in her name). No good deed goes unpunished.

He found her a cushy job in D.C., they "reconciled" and she was basically a "political function wife" for events and appearances, until that time when he could get divorced from Marianne ("ex-wife-to-be") and get married to Callista ("wife-in-waiting"). During that period (c. 1995) she actually threatened him of "destroying his career with one interview" (great "wife" eh?)

Not the ideal situation, of course, but in the period of 1994-1998 he didn't have time for divorce, the situation that his long-estranged "wife" Marianne decided to exploit... When Newt said few years ago (after meeting with James Dobson) that he "made mistakes in his personal life because of his love for the country," he wasn't kidding. It cost him during the divorce, too, Marianne squeezed just about everything she could from that "marriage".

The "opportunity" to become finally free of gold-digging Marianne presented itself after 1998 elections, when everybody on the right and the left decided to blame him and his push for Clinton's impeachment for the loss of some House seats. He resigned from the House in 1999, filed and finalized the divorce from Marianne, moved to VA and married Callista.

Do click on the links I have in my original post, as well as well as the link to the blogger's article in my first post - they provide a lot clearer and more complete picture and details of the "political accommodation" of Marianne during that time period (no, it wasn't as she claimed, an "open marriage").

Additional links re the same matter, with much more details:
Jackie Gingrich Cushman : Setting the Record Straight (about my dad's first marriage) - FR, posts #55, #56, 2011 May 15

"Cain/Gingrich 2012?" - FR, posts #64, #69, 2011 October 06

Dobson decried Callista Gingrich as 'eight-year mistress' at conservative confab - FR, post #271, 2012 January 17

122 posted on 04/14/2012 9:14:58 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
"""The sheep are lining up behind him as he leads us to the slaughter""""

Those sheeple are here tonight posting as if they WERE Santorum supporters, I seriously doubt that now, I suggest they were MITT ROMNEY BACKERS FROM THE BEGINNING.

To suggest anything else just does not make any sense, because from the start on FR, it was always ANYBODY BUT ROMNEY. Santorum dropped out and they turn to ROMNEY? LIARS all, and then say so many disparaging things about NEWT, what gall, ye hypocrites.

Something is just wrong with that picture, the Romney sheep have finally disclosed themselves as PURPLE WOLVES. They did their job well, but NEWT WILL NOT GO AWAY, rofl.

Hey to you Romney loving hypocrites, if NEWT is not going to win the nomination, why are you so concerned enough to keep posting TRASH about NEWT? Newt is still a threat, I see. Romney does not have this sewed up.

123 posted on 04/14/2012 9:22:28 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Marianne, after leaving Newt in 1987 and filing for divorce (but not proceeded with it), went back to Newt in 1994, after more than six years of separation, because he had become the Speaker of the House and she liked being in the spotlights. Newt, I don’t know why, accepted her back, but the marriage link was already irremediably broken ... Finally he filed for divorce in 1998, the divorce was finalized in 1999, and in 2000 he married Callista.


124 posted on 04/14/2012 9:23:10 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

“Those sheeple are here tonight posting as if they WERE Santorum supporters, I seriously doubt that now, I suggest they were MITT ROMNEY BACKERS FROM THE BEGINNING.

To suggest anything else just does not make any sense, because from the start on FR, it was always ANYBODY BUT ROMNEY. Santorum dropped out and they turn to ROMNEY?”

You’re probably right. Most of the Santorum’s supporters (except a few) are shilling now for Mitt - the “lesser” of two evils.

There is no lesser evil. It’s either evil or not. Such chutzpah. Reminds me of the criminal who murdered both his parents and asked for the jury leniency, because he’s an ... orphan.


125 posted on 04/14/2012 9:29:47 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite; JRochelle; EDINVA
Newt, I don't know why, accepted her back, but the marriage link was already irremediably broken ...

The post #122 explains why - Marianne wouldn't give him a quick divorce and exploited his time demands (the Contract With America, welfare reform and balancing the budgets while having to fight 84 bogus ethics charges filed by the Democrats and not contested by the Republicans on the ethics committee, and later, the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton) by threatening a "scandal."

It was a way for him, at least temporarily, to get on with all the things he needed to do as the Speaker with the new majority in the House. It was not the best course of action for him, personally, but it was the best he could do for the country.

No good deed goes unpunished.

126 posted on 04/14/2012 9:33:15 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Thank you for the good post and all the good links.

This race is getting closer to a bad end. A lot of us, like me, didn’t get our first OR second choice. There are three men still standing. Romney. Paul. Gingrich. And all the Gingrich stabbers continue to stab him. So you stabbers are pulling for either Paul or Romney.

Or Obama. Which? Tell us.


127 posted on 04/14/2012 9:40:08 PM PDT by CatDancer (Still pulling for Newt. Arms getting tired. Mood getting worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

Breaking News!

Rick Santorum donor Friess was Mitt Romney’s mole!
He dropped Rick and returned to Romney’s headquarters, that’s why Santorum dropped out, from lack of financial support and fear to lose his home state PA...

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/326628/20120411/santorum-drops-out-romney-foster-friess-endorsements.htm


128 posted on 04/14/2012 9:44:27 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
We could go through this thread, post by post and name each and every one of those traitorous pretened to be Santorum supporters, ALWAYS was Mitt Romney supporters by screen name.

Every one of them were always Romney supporters. To say otherwise would be a lie.

We Newt supporters never hated Santorum, and if Newt had dropped out we would all put our support to Santorum, not that we would like it, but we had to.

But not them, loyalty to conservatism and ABR, was not/is not one of their virtues. For them not to support NEWT at this point, proves my point. LIARS all and members of the well oiled and greasy Mitt Romney campaign, exposed.

I have read all of their comments, and literacy is not a virtue either it seems. NEWT IS STILL IN THE RACE, and still the THRONE IN MITTENS SIDE.

129 posted on 04/14/2012 9:45:15 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Well SAID, and exactly correct on all points. Applause, Bravo and a Standing ovation for your article. Thank you.


130 posted on 04/14/2012 9:47:59 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
There are many of Romneys MOLES posting tonight, as well.

His campaign is full of greasy low life, who think nothing of destroying anyone that gets in their way. His campaign I suggest was responsible for the Herman Cain fiasco, and many many other things that have gone on in this election, put Pontiue Pilot Romneys hands are clean. Twern't ME he says.

ALAS, their biggest threat NEWT GINGRICH IS STILL IN THIS RACE.

But, one can say, Fox News and Brit Hume don't even mention Newt anymore, so he is not a candidate any longer? But, why then are so many Romney supporters on FR tonight trashing NEWT, who isn't in the race? Oh, they are such a confused bunch, aren't they?.

131 posted on 04/14/2012 9:57:40 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: annieokie
Those sheeple are here tonight posting as if they WERE Santorum supporters, I seriously doubt that now, I suggest they were MITT ROMNEY BACKERS FROM THE BEGINNING.

To suggest anything else just does not make any sense, because from the start on FR, it was always ANYBODY BUT ROMNEY. Santorum dropped out and they turn to ROMNEY? LIARS all, and then say so many disparaging things about NEWT, what gall, ye hypocrites.

Something is just wrong with that picture, the Romney sheep have finally disclosed themselves as PURPLE WOLVES. They did their job well, but NEWT WILL NOT GO AWAY, rofl.

Hey to you Romney loving hypocrites, if NEWT is not going to win the nomination, why are you so concerned enough to keep posting TRASH about NEWT? Newt is still a threat, I see. Romney does not have this sewed up.

YOU. ARE. ABSOLUTELY. RIGHT.

An acquaintance of mine in the campaign, said that the Romney campaign won't address Newt because that would be treating him as a genuine, still viable, contender. Instead, they are directing Mitt's supporters to attack Newt over the net, and anywhere they can. And he told me this today. Looks like THE Mittbots got the message. Mitt thought he was finished with Newt - what's that saying - take a shot at the king - you better be sure it does the job.

Like most things, Mitt screwed it up bigtime...

NEWT'S BACK IN TOWN, BRINGING THE PAIN...

Newt terminator
                                                                 NEWT GINGRICH.

HE'LL MAKE JOHN BOEHNER CRY LIKE A BABY GIRL.

132 posted on 04/14/2012 10:34:43 PM PDT by true believer forever (GO NEWT! On to Tampa - hang tight - we can do this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
They have been EXPOSED tonight, and never let them have another word in pretending otherwise. They were never Santorum supporters. NEVER.

YOU POSTED: Like most things, Mitt screwed it up bigtime...

NEWT'S BACK IN TOWN, BRINGING THE PAIN...

_____________________________________________________ I love that: Seems NEWT is just smarter in all ways.

Your friend was right, and that is why the media, especially FOX will not address NEWT any longer as a candidate. BUT HE'S STILL THERE.

I'm Still with NEWT. You keep posting that on every thread that is geared to Mitt. We won't let him (Mitt) take this nomination by DEFAULT, will we?

133 posted on 04/14/2012 10:57:45 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: annieokie
They have been EXPOSED tonight, and never let them have another word in pretending otherwise. They were never Santorum supporters. NEVER.

YOU POSTED: Like most things, Mitt screwed it up bigtime...

NEWT'S BACK IN TOWN, BRINGING THE PAIN...

_____________________________________________________ I love that: Seems NEWT is just smarter in all ways.

Your friend was right, and that is why the media, especially FOX will not address NEWT any longer as a candidate. BUT HE'S STILL THERE.

I'm Still with NEWT. You keep posting that on every thread that is geared to Mitt. We won't let him (Mitt) take this nomination by DEFAULT, will we?

There is actually a vanity post tonight, supporting Mitt and chiding JR for not being willing to vote for Romney. I mean, the mittbots do what they are told BIG TIME..

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2872254/posts

NO DEFAULT. NO DEFEAT.

Delaware right now is the battlefield. If he can pull an upset there, people's head will be exploding everywhere, we won't be able to leave our houses for at least a week..

www.grassroots.newt.org - is the newt grassroots site for Newt.. it Rocks. It's only a few days old.. please check it out...

STAY STRONG!!

134 posted on 04/14/2012 11:06:23 PM PDT by true believer forever (GO NEWT! On to Tampa - hang tight - we can do this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
I will stay STRONG, we will not BE defeated by DEFAULT to a loser like MITT.

I saw that Mittens whining thread, and posted to that as well.

It is no longer necessary to mention all the things that NEWT has accomplised, imo. It will do no good to the Mittbots who have exposed themselves. Why bother?

Keep our conversation Upbeat,Positive and expose them for who they are and speak only to the like minds in agreement for NEWT, ALL OTHERS IGNORE. They are not here, we can pretend we are Britt Hume who is a past master at ignoring a presidential candidate.

They are really not NEWT haters either, they are just ROMNEY LOVERS and always have been, how much does that job pay, SUB SAMBICH?

I will check out the new NEWT website, thanks.

NEWT GINGRICH IS STILL IN THIS RACE. deal with it Mitten.

135 posted on 04/14/2012 11:28:33 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight; C. Edmund Wright

Yes. The moron up thread. (dforest)

LOL!


136 posted on 04/14/2012 11:42:53 PM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't hear, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: annieokie
I will stay STRONG, we will not BE defeated by DEFAULT to a loser like MITT.

I saw that Mittens whining thread, and posted to that as well.

Keep our conversation Upbeat,Positive and expose them for who they are and speak only to the like minds in agreement for NEWT, ALL OTHERS IGNORE. They are not here, we can pretend we are Britt Hume who is a past master at ignoring a presidential candidate.

They are really not NEWT haters either, they are just ROMNEY LOVERS and always have been, how much does that job pay, SUB SAMBICH?

I will check out the new NEWT website, thanks.

NEWT GINGRICH IS STILL IN THIS RACE. deal with it Mitten.

As per norm, you are right. The campaign is shifting, and so are the volunteers - collecting stuff and putting together an approach - wasting no more time debating sancto's supporters, or Mitt lovers, Just pushing Gingrich and his qualifications, experience, strengths to the forefront of every discussion...

they are hoping to have this in full swing by midweek... a lot of it is going to include encouragement, motivation, alot of people are very downhearted...

Delaware and NC are pretty much ground zero... DE only has 3 counties, 2 of them rural. He is working very hard there, and needs all the help he can get...

If you are the kind of person who can make phone calls those are going to be very important...

If you go to www.newt.org - they are upgrading the phone banks right now because they want to be able to handle a really big push to more than 1 state simultaneously...

Newt delaware choice


137 posted on 04/14/2012 11:55:26 PM PDT by true believer forever (GO NEWT! On to Tampa - hang tight - we can do this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Sorry, but it’s the whiners who let us down.

The only conservative left standing is the only conservative ANYWHERE who ate democrats for breakfast.

The rest discuss it.

It’s Newt, or it’s Obama around here. (With or without the Romney RINO regime, it’s Newt or Obama.)


138 posted on 04/14/2012 11:57:05 PM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't hear, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Why are you a moron? LOL!


139 posted on 04/15/2012 12:03:14 AM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't hear, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Your pathetic lack of reason is why RINOS work us over with regularity, putting up now a socialist you’re going to wave your tiny little flag for.

Your flag color, however, is yellow first and white on the edges, for surrender.


140 posted on 04/15/2012 12:11:56 AM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't hear, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Bite me, goofball sycophant.


141 posted on 04/15/2012 12:28:00 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Newt is NO conservative and I will NOT support Mitt.
When Newt was the house leader he spent MY money like a drunken sailor on shore leave for the first time in 9 months.
As for Mitt? look at my tag line.


142 posted on 04/15/2012 3:35:49 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

You are full of it. I knew personally the folks that were given a chance to work, they embraced it.


143 posted on 04/15/2012 3:42:41 AM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: dforest
Think as you please, this is who Newt is.

One question, who do you propose we vote for? Surely not Romney. Globalist, Pro Abortion, Gun grabber, Liar, Big Gov. phoney who never saw a tax he did not like.

Ron Paul? Have you looked at his foreign policy statements?

Jim Robinson is right, "rebellion is in the air".

144 posted on 04/15/2012 3:51:22 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Yeah, and my real rebellion starts with me. Neither Mitt or Newt is conservative, I am not going to pretend and forget the pasts of either of these two.

Rebellion isn’t settling for darn near the same thing you are rebelling against.

So there.


145 posted on 04/15/2012 3:57:51 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: dforest

OK who do you support?

Ron Paul?


146 posted on 04/15/2012 4:08:34 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Nobody at the moment. I thought we were going for a brokered convention. What does it matter who I vote for in the primary as long as it denies Romney delegates?

I want a brokered convention and a conservative dream candidate.

You know, like a real one?


147 posted on 04/15/2012 4:32:32 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

I have NO idea what you b talking about eye??


148 posted on 04/15/2012 4:40:22 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144; onyx
None of the candidates were what we Conservatives truly wanted... but here is the truth for you mitt supporters... those of us that stand against mitt would have voted for any of the candidates running... with the exception of Ron Paul and john huntsman... Paul because he is a staunch isolationist and his naive foreign policy and because hunstman is a socialist, obama but kissing employee.

mitt is evil... mitt is a socialist... mitt is a baby killer... mitt is a liar... mitt is a gun grabbing weapons ban lover... mitt is an appointer of hard left wing justices... mitt is a cultist... mitt is sh!t!

We DO NOT WANT mitt and we never have... and our primary election has been manipulated by reince prebeius and the rnc and through forcing certain states to hold open primaries and playing loose with electors and influencing certain Secretaries of State to keep mitt's competition off the ballot. To vote for mitt is to reward the decades of lies, tight control and corruption of the repblican elite and by ther forcing us to ALWAYS vote for THEIR candidate. We will NEVER vote for mitt because the list above... and while that list is damning... it is far from complete. FU mitt romney!

LLS

149 posted on 04/15/2012 6:39:48 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES! (accept only the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: dforest

You are always slamming Newt with lies. You must be a mittbot - because that is all Mitt does is lie.

The evil in him demands he lies as he breathes and he backstabs anything good! He needs to BUY support from others to talk about how *great* about him. Now he has others lying. Tainted for life when anyone touches mitt!

His record in MA is is disastrous! He’s a PRO baby killing
demon candidate! Prowling around the USA ready to destroy her - like he did to MA. BUYING votes because he hasn’t earn them - taking others into his web of deceit.


150 posted on 04/15/2012 7:07:47 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson