Skip to comments.Free Republic Shows Us How To Give Obama Another 4 Years ( LOL Alert)
Posted on 04/14/2012 10:23:11 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
I've never seen anything close to the hatred of Mitt Romney than I see at FR. The hatred exceeds anything I've seen or heard from Debbie Wasserman Schultz, David Axelrod, David Plouffe or anybody else in the Obama Administration. Most of the people who can't stand Romney on our side say he'd still be much better than another 4 years of Barack Obama who will never have to face the voters again. You won't find that at FR.
Free Republic Jim Robinson: "A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:
Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesnt even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.
Ive stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that Id never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.
Screw Romney!! I absolutely will not support or vote for a proven compulsive liar with a known record of abortion and big government socialism, liberal appointments"
Another post (Jim Robinson):
Way to tell 'em! Then on the morning of November 7th, when Barack Obama has been reelected President for a second term, we all can high-five each other and say we stopped that establishment RINO! Makes ZERO sense. .
You’d think people would have gotten it how Willard the rat plays his hands.....what he does and is is behind the scenes...
Romney’s signature move wwe’ve been seeing has been to overwhelm and devastate his opponents..(our guys) with negative ads aimed NOT at bolstering his support, but at making the other candidate seem so unelectable that he is the obvious choice.
He is one deceptive and ruthless player...and of course he would be ...wolves in sheep clothing are like that...you never see their teeth until after the fact.
He has not only is own wealth, (power), to throw around , he has the entire LDS membership and leadership strong arming as well...and that on an International level as well.
No matter what funding he has that’s been revealed...you will never see the funding from the LDS organization supporting his run....
The LDS church wants to see Mormonism accepted as a Christian organization.... they have failed to do so for decades....getting Romney into the Whitehouse..to them..assures them of this recognition and places their man over the most powerful nation in the world...and the means to carry out their political agenda unhindered.
No...Imagine one man ready and willing to stop them, and has the tools to stop this nations fall...he's the Conservative candidate the Honarable Newt Gingrich which neither of them can remotely stand next to.
The fight is not over.....Romney does NOT have the Delegates...the Gop is fighting frantically to stop anything that gets in the way of Romney winning...
Obama is NOT in this Primary race.......Newt and Romney are!!!!!!
Para Ord’s post was NOT a vanity- it was a blogger’s post.
so you think Jim Robinson is an Obama troll??? that’s some clear thinking
Precisely what a "contest" between Zero & Willard is... a NON-election.
Ok, but next the time you feel like using foul language to agree with me, keep it to yourself. Thanks.
‘Ass’ in the context I was using it is not a dirty word.
Maybe I should have said it this way:
You come across as a pious ass.
No offense meant. I was just expressing the impression I got from your post.
Yep...the Gop is strong arming any media which might oppose Romney....and no wonder Levin fell too....they are just starting to pull all stops....
Meanwhile Obama and the demorats sit back and watch the show...amuzed beyond belief! I see it on thier sites....Obama supporters are delighted to see Romney out in front.....and they laugh because it’s our side putting him up there....just as they are saying “the plan” was.
Until Newt bows out, if he does... I will be supporting Newt. The process has been rigged for Mitt. Its unfair, it sucks, its beneath us as Conservatives to want to have to pull the lever for Romney the way he and his surrogates have behaved. So what do we do? I don’t know. IMO I truly dont think the GOP wants to win this, I think they have another reason for putting the worst possible guy up, and savaging the other Non-Mitts they way they have. What is that purpose? Again, I can’t say. I have a feeling the GOP has moved so far left now that the Democrat party is outright Marxist that they see the middle as the new normal of American view on things, and us Conservatives as all “extremeists”. This new normal in the middle is where the money is, where Liberals and Republicans can share common ground and make themselves rich (Ann Coulter). Personally, I havent decided if I’ll vote for Romney. I may, I hate Obama that much. But I also can’t stand being used, having the TP used by the RINO elites, and then thrown under the bus. So many of us feel that way, that Mitt Romney is just another McDole that what is the point? When the GOP thinks of its base as not worthy, that the process can be so tainted by a bunch of cowardly establishment types. Maybe the GOP should just crash and burn...maybe we we’ll have to start anew. I don’t know, I just know that Romney will likely lose with or without my support, so thank the GOP.. Thank all those sellouts on talk radio, Fox News, and Nikki Haley types. Its not a plan for victory to treat us so poorly then come asking for our vote in November.
Sorry, should have been clearer. The reference was not Romney, but to Newt being the last alternative to Romney.
Well FR has been infiltrated big time with Romneybots...and the war rages here.....can you not sense the "push" here for Romney is not coming from thinking individuals....it's coming from "fear" not choice... which is why they can't see Newt's still in...they are going by their emotions...and Romney and Obama know fully well what to put out there to move the masses who are all about making "emotional" decisions in their life.
I will vote for him in the general election, should he get the nomination, but I will NOT vote for him in the primary, even if he’s got it mathematically sewn up by then
Thanks for your courage and honesty, El Gato.
Para Ords post was NOT a vanity- it was a bloggers post
I apologized already. Several people on this thread made the same mistake.
Waste your vote? What vote?
You are not voting remember?
Just leave it to the voters.
You have earned my respect. Thank you. I realize that many others made the same mistake.
“A lot is going to happen between now and Nov. We might not even have an election.”
Precisely what a “contest” between Zero & Willard is... a NON-election.
Excellent point! That’s basically the bottom line. The fix
has been in all along and many don’t realize that.
FreeRepublic will be smaller and truer.
We need a 3rd party, once every 100 years the GOP will accidentally let a conservative run.
We need to abandon the GOP- Doing this two elections in a row is our sign.
You have earned my respect. Thank you. I realize that many others made the same mistake.
Oh, you were just expressing your impression and say you didn’t mean any offense, so the foul language shouldn’t matter. Well, silence is still golden.
You could be right, but I don’t sense RomneyBots or ObamaBots for that mater. Mainly because this debate isn’t new here, the vitriol has stepped up, but the basic debate is consistent.
IMHO of course.
Oh, you were just expressing your impression and say you didnt mean any offense, so the foul language shouldnt matter. Well, silence is still golden.
If silence is golden, why did you say an arrogant thing to the other FReeper that you dissagreed with?
Look up the definition of ‘ass” There are at two definitions and one is, I repeat, not a dirty word and not an offensive word unless it pertains to the one it’s being addressed to and that person takes offense.
Enough of this petty arguing back and forth. We’re on the same side.
Do you think FR could agree on a 3rd party candidate? Who would that be?
I refuse to vote for a fascist like Romney.
I cant stand Romney either..rumors are abound of him choosing the governor of puerto Rico as his VP..I would rather have the governor of puerto Rico as my nominee than Romney..
But I must confess, I will vote anybody but Obama and pray the tea party completes the flanking maneuver on the DEMS and secures us the senate.. Then we lay the groundwork for 3rd party in 2016 and rid us of RINO’s once and for all..
Now it’s wait and see time...
“Dole didn’t win. McCain didn’t win.”
No two, or three, elections are entirely the same.
Dole ran against Clinton, who was very popular although not with “us”. The economy was going gang-busters and remember Clinton ran on “it’s the economy, stupid” and so had kept that promise to improve the economy. Or at least that was how it appeared at the time. Plus the public had already slapped him down by giving Gingrich and Co. back control of the house during the midterms and Clinton was “triangulating” with them. Plus Bill Clinton never acted like he hated America or Americans.
As to McCain, he was awful and had gone out of his way many times to be a “maverick” by which he seemed to mean someone beloved by the NY Times. He COULD have been a good candidate, but he kept chasing that NY Times love, screwing over Sarah Palin in the process. He probably had the WORST campaign staff EVER, it seems to have been filled with two-faced, back-stabbing self-dealers.
Add to that the media frenzy over the “First Black President” (tm) and McCain never stood a chance.
So, what I’m saying is in the first case the incumbent (Clinton) was in a strong position for re-election and in the second the big O just out-politicked McCain mostly due to the failings of McCain and the cravenness of the media.
I get the arguments that Romney is 1. just as bad as Obama, 2. almost as bad as Obama, 3. worse than Obama, 4. neither better or worse than Obama but the country is going to collapse so let a Dem be at the helm when it does.
But I gotta say this, again, Barack Obama hates this country, hates its people. He, himself may not be an anti-white racist but FOR SURE Eric Holder is. Obama is violating the constitution on a regular basis in big and small ways. He’s lost Egypt and squandered our hard won success in Iraq. And.....he’s a nincompoop.
I’m voting “R” in November regardless of the nominee.
The GOPe was warned and still proceeded to push Romnrey down our throats, at great monetary expense and expense to conservatives and Tea Partiers. I guarantee way more people than just Free Republic will be in revolt. Mitt is a disaster both as a candidate and will be as a president, if he can limp along that far.
I don’t the the party is the problem. We had a weak field and we couldn’t agree on the notRomney opposition.
I’ll have the AIDS, please.
You have 4 choices
write in someone else
Only one has a chance of defeating Obama.
How did that work for you? Here's how it worked for me:
In 1972 we got Nixon over McGovern, IMHO a good thing, despite your best efforts. At the time I was the minor child of a serviceman, and I remember the palpable sense of relief in my parents' demeanor as the results of that landslide became apparent.
In 1992 you helped usher Clinton into ofice. At that time I was myself a serviceman, and the hell of the next eight years means that my personal feelings for you for that one cannot be spoken on FR or within 10 miles of a church without risking some sort of lightning.
If Romney gets in he will never get any wild, liberal legislatiion thru Congress. in four years we will have the opportunity to vote him out and put someone more to our liking in. If Zero is re-elected again, and we are lucky enough to still have elections, we will be back in the same boat we are now in now. We must get rid of this 4 yr old cancer.
It is more like 100 miles per hour and 95 miles per hour. Will you be able to tell the difference from the wreckage?
It’s always easier to stop a slower care than a faster car heading for a cliff.
What America? the one with the burned out cities and 30% unemployment?
If the LIAR and RINO Romney is on the ticket,
then Obama is a sure thing and
America is LOST.
Romney works with Soros (JET Blue) and partnered
with him also to put in Obama in 2008.
and if the GOP takes Romney, NO MORE GOP.
Even in a salad bar there are beneficial e coli strains.
In any case, such reasoning suggests the exception, regardless how remote, should govern our actions.
If Romney wins, we’ve lost the GOP forever.
If Obama wins, we still have all those things we bitterly cling to and the GOP lives to fight another day.
We will lose several RINO senators this cycle. A few RINO reps are under the gun, as well.
I might agree with that statement. A Romney win in the primary is not a win in the general election. The games that the GOPe are playing could bring the party to an end, similar to the Whig Party. Obozo could be the end of the Dem Party too. Where does that lead us?
Maybe Romney shouldn’t have pursued that scorched earth strategy. Does he expect conservative will rise from the ashes to vote for him after he burned down their candidates with millions of dollars worth of negative ads?
Yes, he actually does. Mitt’s bunch figured that conservatives would have nowhere else to go after he destroyed our candidates and would vote for him simply because Obama’s so bad.
Here’s a news flash for Mittwits and the rest of the GOP-e: We don’t appreciate Alinsky tactics being used on us, whether they come from a Democrat progressive or a Republican progressive.
You should think about that very carefully lest you ever take the votes of true conservatives for granted again.
And I come from a state (Mass. as it turns out) where
folks like Romney and Brown are considered “far right
Rethuglicans” by many, though each managed to get elected once. I am grasping for straws. No Obama, no Liz Warren, no way. Of course in terms of the electoral college, Mass will probably go Obama’s way but I’m making my own statement. I know I’m in the vast minority here.
—How does FR feel if Romney wins? (In all honesty during his term or terms, his “feet will be held to the fire”)
—What if he picks a running mate like Rubio (though I think I heard he doesn’t want it?), Palin, etc.? Maybe
he still won’t get support
—I don’t seem to hear anyone on the left saying, “Obama
is a DINO! He isn’t leftist enough for me. I won’t vote for him, even if it means that crypto-fascist Romney gets in.”
Mark Steyn’s new book has some sort of analogy about a train heading for a cliff, representing government spending. Do you stop the train a few yards before the abyss, or do you proceed at “Obama-crous speed” over the
side? I want to stop the train.
I want to stop Obama.
Don’t worry folks, in his second term he’ll get the Congress to repeal that amendment restricting himself
to two terms. He could run for a third, and win. By then
maybe it’ll be like Hitler, only one party will be allowed. Guess which one.
And yes you can vote against Obama by “not voting” or “voting third party”, but in the end Obama could still get in. That is the one result I don’t want.
I don’t know what shape America would have been in with
Pres. McCain and Pres. Palin, but how is it after four years
of Pres. Zero and VP Clueless Joe? I’ll bet many at
Daily Kos and Huffington Post visit FR and LOL. Four more years. Me, I’m voting for “change”...in the Presidential
race. Change IS good when it means getting rid of Barack.
oops that should say VP Palin
You are the only one to point out Obumo’s racism and utter hate for America. That alone is reason enough for me to vote Romney if necessary to get this excrement out of office.
Yes. I did vote for Newt and would gladly do so again.
I see no problem with Jim’s views and I must say that I feel the same way. When did you lose a sense if right and wrong? Are you going to go along to get along when Satan asks you to join his side?
” I don’t care who you wanted or what you wanted to happen we have Romney. Any vote for anyone else is a vote for obama. “
When did voting your conscience (based upon your principles) become such a bad thing? If this is the case, the electorate is even worse than I thought. A vast majority will blindly support candidate XYZ, just because he has an R behind his name. It’s pretty sad that the GOP-e has been so successful in the conversion of principled conservatives to mindless whores.
Look, if you support Planned Parenthood, abortion, global warming, gun control, liberal judges, etc....Romney is a pretty good candidate for you. Go vote for him and STFU. That being said, quit pimping the Romneywhore line of “if you aren’t a supporter of the GOP socialist, you are basically supporting Zero”. We’ve all had enough of that. The Romneybots do nothing but steel the resolve of principled conservatives to oppose him. Most of the posters on here have integrity. They vote based upon principles. If they vote 3rd party, it means they support that candidate’s positions.
Take the Romneybot talking points elsewhere.
Bunk. People hate the Vichy scam machine that anointed Bishop Romney with elephant urine and then activly worked to harm the campaign of every other candidate in the primaries with the help of the MSM.
People hate having yet another lying Vichy Republican pretending that he cares about anything conservative beyond the day votes are cast. People hate yet another lame Vichy Republican who had a conversion to a pro-Life position just in time for the primaries. But people don't hate Bishop Romney as a person.
They may dislike the sort of guy he is, refuse to shake his hand if given the opportunity, avoid him and people like him like they'd avoid the plague, but they don't actually hate Bishop Romney. That's just another sorry line of whine from the Bishop Romney religion and it's being spread by the Vichy Republican Party. They're hoping to distract attention from the fact that Bishop Romney did exactly the same thing King Barry is doing, trying to dictate doctrine to Christian churches. Of course, we all know the good Bishop Romney would never be a party ignoring the First Amendment of the US Constitution and denying people their Constitutional rights, now would he? He must have just been ill advised when he dictated the marrying of queers one to another and that even churches provide abortion insurance. Yeah, poor Bishop Romney just couldn't afford good advice, that's it.
I mean, it's not like the good Bishop Romney had ever tried to further his personal agenda by aiding and abetting mass murder, right? That's the sort of person that a lot of folks on FR hate, the ones who think a few thousand more infants being murdered due to their actions is a small price to pay to further their personal agenda.