Skip to comments.Obama in Colombia plotting US Gun confiscation using foreign troops
Posted on 04/15/2012 1:07:28 PM PDT by yank in the UK
Enter the US Army Military Personnel Exchange Program, wherein officers in the US Army are being exchanged with officers from countries around the world for the purported purpose of cross training for international crisis. What is happening right before our eyes is the international soviet socialist elite are putting together an international coalition army for the purpose of disarming the American citizens.
Understand, this army must be coordinated and considering the reality of diverse languages requires a communication system which has to be established before this foreign army can begin operations in the United States. This is why we have all the cross training, in order to procure communication between the various foreign units.
This operation has been underway for many years now. We all remember guns being confiscated from American citizens during the exercises conducted after Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans and right now there are Polish troops training in Illinois for gun confiscation in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at fromthetrenchesworldreport.com ...
The media would be having screaming fits if this happened under the Bush administration.
They need troops to make it safe for the other Federal minions to come out of hiding and swagger around terrorizing people.
I feel sorry for them too... cause they’ll get slaughtered once they start in any other state.
Ever heard of the war colleges? There’s been foreign officers training in the US for a while.
I think the logistics of trying this in our least populace State would be impossible, let alone going into the belly of outraged citizens in the South.
Really? We’re they training for the purpose of disarming the American citizens?
Not something to ‘volunteer’ for lightly.
Make sure to say good bye to your family and all final business is resolved. It will be a one way trip for lots of these troops.
I can imagine many areas that would have such “troops” immediately surrounded with astonishing firepower.
I wouldn't want to see it come to this, but if the marxists really want to push it to the endgame, I say let's get it on.
I’ve often heard it said that Michigan deer hunters are the world’s 5th largest army. (in the sense that Michigan is very heavily armed)
However there have been some 3,000 concealed carry permits handed out in my county alone since the law came into effect in 06.
In fact I remember Henry Waxman whining that there were an estimated 1 .50 cal rifle for each county in Michigan.(83 counties) but I hate to tell him but there are considerably more than that.
I grew up within sight of the Naval War College. As far as I could see they read plato, studied ships and had picnics.
Sorry, but I have a hard time with this. Too bad the blogger forgot to include links to believable sources to back up these claims.
Hell, we’ve got people that can kill you from a mile out with a pumpkin if they get lucky.
Being in Virginia and a former Michigander from upstate I can say too that Virginia also is well armed. All my neighbors here in the mountains have firearms and many have small armories. It surely wouldn’t be wise of the dear leader to make such an proclamation.
I believe that before any Commander ordered his troops to confiscate arms from the US public - the commander would turn on this government and order his men to remove them from their elected position - knowing full well - that attempting to disarm US Citizens of their legal right to bear arms - would be unsupported and stupid.
Washington and the Commissar Obama are creating situations to drive legislation forward to where his supporters buy gun manufacturers - and stop selling arms to the public - then again - those that do will become very rich. Disarming the US public is a no win situation for any govt entity.
I know I wouldn’t follow those illegal orders - and if they passed a law - like they did health care - it would be an illegal law - and one not supported by local or state governments - not even the US military.
No soldier is going to take up arms against his brothers that may be out of service and armed protecting his family - they are all delusional!
"To you foreign troops out there who have had it whispered in your ear that you will be engaging the American people of the American race for the purpose of disarming and bringing us into a one world dictatorship, be advised. If you come here, you will die here, each and every one of you. Once you have put us to the task you have sealed your fate. We are not going to let you leave, we will slaughter you and leave your bodies to decay where they fall and your bones to bleach upon our soil as a warning to all others who might in the future entertain the notion of conquering we the American people in our own country."
...makes me laugh. I'm sorry to say but no militia stands a chance against a real army. Do you think they'll fight a conventional ground war with hessians going house to isolated house packing all your food into flatbed wagons?
Of course not. If this happens (and I'm betting it won't), they'll drop precision bombs on our heads from airplanes we can't even see or hear. They'll strafe us will choppers that no deer rifle will have any effect on.
But like I said, I doubt they'd even try and if they did, OUR military, the good old US military, would not allow them to so much as enter our airspace.
“Sorry, but I have a hard time with this. Too bad the blogger forgot to include links to believable sources to back up these claims.”
Shortly after Katrina hit there were videos all over the internet showing New Orleans police collecting guns from people in their homes.
In the case that I remember, a big, burly, black policeman was collecting a gun from a 72-year-old white lady.
You can probably find some of the videos on You Tube.
This would make the six day war seem like a stroll in the park. Rile up gun owners, they won’t stop at disarming any of the troops who were smart enough to toss down their weapons and put their hands up in the air. They will toss down the whole machine.
Oh, and then you got the issue of dealing with all the state National Guard units and regular military units who will take care of any organized resistance by those who thought they were in power.
Yep, only one way this type of thing ends: With a whole lot of dead people. Not going to happen.
The numbers on CCW are pretty astounding. I was looking at it recently for GA and FL, and it’s getting towards 1 in 20 citizens in both. Lots of good guys are packing these days.
EVERY Nov. 15th there are 750,000 marksmen in the wood of Mi.!!!
Weve had foreign exchange officers and NCOs since at least the late 70s.
There were 3,000,000 people living in the colonies when the Brits tried this. Now there are 300,000,000 people with 300,000,000 guns. It didn't work last time -- it certainly wouldn't work today.
Ridiculous crap like this makes look like fringe kooks ....
I’m going to wave the “BS” flag here. I used to FLY bombers for a living. To use “precision bombs”, you need to know EXACTLY where you want to hit, or have someone who knows the target and is illuminating it.
Add to that, the sheer number of possible “targets”, and even in such a fantastic scenario, they’d run out of bombs LONG before they ran out of “targets”. And, as we’ve learned in Afghanistan, the simplest way to get the locals to both hate you AND innovate all sorts of ways to kill you. . .is to bomb their homes.
So, kindly take your meds, and remember why the Japanese never even bothered to plan to invade North America: there’d be a rifle behind every blade of grass. . .
Cops, not military.
never seen a “district” targeted with one of those.
The author makes endless assertions of intent that have no substantiation.
If foreign troops were to be involved, it wouldn’t be the Poles. They are great allies who value freedom and despise tyranny.
I think that Europe could muster enough bombs to do the job. Would New England, for example, have many resisters? I doubt it. Wyoming? Yes, but there's only about 600,000 people in Wyoming and nothing much worth taking. They'd probably seal it off and let it starve.
Yes, the best way to tick people off is to bomb them, but do you think that a multi-national force bent on forcibly disarming America would really care much what people thought of them?
The japs didn't want to try it 70 years ago, but times have changed. The technological advances that have been made are staggering. Things as simple as helmets and boots have improved dramatically, never mind the weapons and other warmaking equipment.
Again, this is all applying to a purely hypothetical scenario.
If they were ever going to take guns it would be done the way they try to control everything else. Through the courts and manufacturers.
At this point, guns are one of our major success stories of late. In Michigan you can’t smoke on school property but you can carry a gun. LOL
Using NATO troops in Serbia to settle the dispute with Kosovar Serbians was a precedent for using foreign troops in any nation to settle internal disputes. A NATO force made up of mostly foreign troops would have little problem firing on American civilians. The poor bass turds.
Not entirely rational people over at "in the trenches" or whatever the site is.
Through my keen powers of observation, I have managed to ascertain the author’s driving principle:
“Evidence? We don’t need no stinkin’ evidence.”
As G Gordon Liddy often said: Head shots, boys, head shots.
Our fascist state will be more like the Matrix, an oppressive poultry ranch, where we are the chickens. Our ideology will be animal husbandry, not a republic or democracy, or even communism.
There will be no fences, no walls, no barbed wire. Too melodramatic. You can keep all the guns you want, because there will be no one to shoot at. The oppressors will be invisible, hidden on hard disk drives and supercomputers. We will accept our seeds with gratitude and love the rancher who gives it to us. And we will support him and make sure he stays in power, so we can have our seeds. And the rancher will get wealthy from our eggs. And when we can't lay anymore, he will help us save on veterinary care. We will go to the poultry processing plant. And we will love that, and agree that it is fair, because after all, the rancher gave us the seeds.
If we fight the invisible fences and chains, and want to live on the free range, only then will we be visited by our oppressors on the hard drives. They will clip our credit cards, our bank access, our ability to send money anywhere, and our Internet access. Then we will have to survive on our own. Most chickens will not accept this, and will run back to the hutch.
I’m not sure what to make of all of this, it does seem far fetched, but we have Some far fetched governmental functionaries running the show. If someone would have told me 30 years ago what would become of America I would have found it hard to believe as well. I have no doubt that those in power would live nothing more then to strip America of its right to bear arms, but how far would they go?
Nearly $100 million last year went to over 143 countries under the IMET (International Military Education and Training) portion of the Security Assistance budget. This is above and beyond the personnel exchange programs, so there are literally thousands of foreign military, normally with their families, in the US at any one time.
“Would New England have many resistors?”
You apparently don’t live in New England.
I live in Maine, and nearly every home here has as many guns as the typical home in the State of Texas. Plus, there are a lot of hunters here....and I mean a LOT. Maine is gun country, I’m happy to say.
There are no shortage of firearms in Vermont or New Hampshire, either.
As for Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island.....plenty of bed wetting liberals and lefty politicians in those states, but there are numerous gunowners in those locales as well, under the radar.
This whole claim of foreign troops planning to grab our guns is BS.
Frighteningly ironic, isn’t it?