Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw

She certainly deserves the maximum sentence. In the original TV interview, she was absolutely indignant that she had done anything wrong and that she deserved every penny of that food stamp check.

But it will be a slap on the wrist, as it’s her “first offense”. A piddling fine, something in the order of a week’s worth of the interest on her lottery winnings, and “probation”, i.e., a warning that if she’s ever again on food stamps and wins another multi-million dollar lottery, she will eventually inform the state.


6 posted on 04/17/2012 8:18:00 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jiggyboy
she was absolutely indignant that she had done anything wrong and that she deserved every penny of that food stamp check.

And what part of "entitlement" don't you understand?

8 posted on 04/17/2012 8:21:43 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jiggyboy

I bet she has/does a lot of things that most of us would consider luxuries, even before her lottery win.

We have to pay for her necessities so she can spend on her wants.


10 posted on 04/17/2012 8:24:12 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson