Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Allowing IRS To Revoke Passports Described as “Stalinist”
Faith Issues ^ | 4/20/2012 | Paul Joseph Watson

Posted on 04/20/2012 6:18:05 PM PDT by sreastman

Bill Allowing IRS To Revoke Passports Described as “Stalinist”

by Paul Joseph Watson, Faith issues/Infowars.com

The ‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’ (MAP-21) is so crammed full of unconstitutional provisions that even the mainstream media is up in arms, with an "Investors Business Daily" editorial describing the section that allows the IRS to revoke passports of accused tax delinquents as “Stalinist”.

As we reported earlier this week, Senate Bill 1813 would empower the Internal Revenue Service to bar Americans from leaving the country if they are merely accused of owing $50,000 or more in back taxes.

Despite numerous Supeme Court cases and the Constitution itself, namely Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3 , which forbids “Bills of Attainder,” arguing against the provision’s legality, the Republican-controlled House is expected to pass the bill in its entirety without much fanfare.

However, a maelstrom of dissent appears to be brewing, even amongst mainstream media columnists including the "Investor’s Business Daily," a prominent national newspaper published in Los Angeles.

In an editorial entitled "IRS Might Have Stalinist Powers Under New Law," "IBD" remarks, “It is hard to imagine any law more reminiscent of the Soviet Union that America toppled, or its Eastern Bloc slave satellites.”

The editorial compares the notion of empowering the IRS with such authority as a new kind of unseen Berlin Wall, creating powers that will restrict mobility to a degree not seen since Communism dominated eastern Europe.

“Throughout the many decades of the 20th century’s Cold War, the freedom of movement Americans enjoyed as a cherished right was one of our secret weapons. As the Communists in Moscow promised the world utopia out of the barrel of a gun, people around the globe noticed that the Soviets needed walls and barbed wire fences to keep their people in, while in the US walls were as pointless as a fish’s bicycle.”

Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin was renowned for setting up a system of ‘internal passports’ that restricted citizens from leaving their area of residence without government permission.

“There remain few things more prized than American citizenship. Yet now our ever-expanding leviathan of a government is forcing Americans abroad out, and it might soon build its own Berlin Wall, restricting our “freedom of world travel,” as Reagan put it, even when there is no conviction from a court,” states the editorial, making the connection with the recent revelation that Americans are renouncing their citizenship in record numbers due to intensified efforts by the feds to pry into their financial affairs.

But it’s not just the IRS provision that has prompted a frosty response to a bill that looked set to sail through with barely a whimper of protest — anti-privacy measures are also coming under scrutiny.

“Infowars’ Paul Joseph Watson, reading through Section 31406 of the 'Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act' bill that’s currently making its way through Congress, made a nice catch: The bill calls for 'Mandatory Event Data Recorders' to be installed in new vehicles starting in the year 2015,” writes Megan Garber, of "The Atlantic," one of a number of publications to report on the enforcement of mandatory black boxes, a story that we first highlighted on Wednesday.

While some writers scoff at the privacy implications of “event data recorders,” pointing out that they are already installed in the majority of new vehicles, they overlook the fact that making these black boxes mandatory is the first step to a tax by the mile system that has been the goal of the Obama administration for years.

However, the most chilling section of the MAP-21 bill is also the provision that’s attracted the least attention – the deployment of a ‘vehicle to infrastructure’ communication system – in other words a two-way bug that will connect your car to the ‘Internet of things’ – a transformation recently hailed by CIA chief David Petraeus as a boon for “clandestine tradecraft.”

This coincides with the development of street lights that are wirelessly connected to the Internet and double as “Homeland Security” surveillance hubs that can spot suspicious activity and record private conversations.

This kind of technology only existed in Stalin’s wildest dreams, and yet it is about to be mandated in all new vehicles within a few years unless simmering discontent over the MAP-21 bill is raised to a crescendo.

© 2012 Infowars.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: irs; stalin; travelrestrictions

1 posted on 04/20/2012 6:18:09 PM PDT by sreastman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sreastman
The ‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’ (MAP-21) is so crammed full of unconstitutional provisions that even the mainstream media is up in arms, with an "Investors Business Daily" editorial describing the section that allows the IRS to revoke passports of accused tax delinquents as “Stalinist.”

They say that like it's a bad thing.

2 posted on 04/20/2012 6:26:16 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (For every black person murdered by a white, thirty-nine white people are murdered by blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sreastman

That’s going to prevent lots of government employees to travel overseas.


3 posted on 04/20/2012 6:27:30 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sreastman
You say "Stalinist" like it's a bad thing...
4 posted on 04/20/2012 6:29:16 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1186 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sreastman

Illegal aliens owing income taxes from illegal work don` need no stinkin` US passports to leave USA.
They just cross the secure border into Mexico hahaha.


5 posted on 04/20/2012 6:30:05 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (Illegal incomes???? Who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sreastman

So Buffett, who owes millions, will not be able to travel?

This must be the new “Buffett Rule”.


6 posted on 04/20/2012 6:32:59 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Limo-liberals all over the country will be pulling out their dyed blonde hair if they have to pay taxes!


7 posted on 04/20/2012 6:36:23 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

A man in our Town, Vietnam Marine, wanted to re-enlist to be a mechanic/contractor. Well he owned a mechanic shop and owed couple thousand to the state for taxes. Our state prevented him from getting his passport until his taxes were paid. This was a few years ago...This is already happening in some states...


8 posted on 04/20/2012 7:03:37 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
That’s going to prevent lots of government employees to travel overseas.

Nope, they're "special".

9 posted on 04/20/2012 7:04:59 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Do all the people in government have the red diplomatic passport? Unless they’re flying government airlines they may be held back. I’m thinking.


10 posted on 04/20/2012 7:09:34 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sreastman
Welcome to the government plantation! We are all wage slaves now, so get used it. You will only be allowed to travel abroad if it suits government interests.
11 posted on 04/20/2012 8:23:01 PM PDT by factoryrat (e are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sreastman

Isn’t Buffet one BILLION dollars behind in IRS payments? Can he leave the U.S. if he wants? I’d place money on “Yes.” Friend-of-the-One (FOO) after all.


12 posted on 04/20/2012 8:33:34 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sreastman

This bill in theory means that if you refuse to pay the fine / tax for not having good enough health insurance, you cannot leave the country to get medical care elsewhere.


13 posted on 04/20/2012 8:38:58 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Now there will be a market for Americans to get Matricular Consular cards to go to Mexico.


14 posted on 04/20/2012 8:40:09 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Anyone who thinks this will apply to High Dollar Democrats is kidding themselves.

Welcome to the Gulag.

15 posted on 04/20/2012 9:34:56 PM PDT by sjmjax (Politicans are like bananas - they start out green, turn yellow, then rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax

Most banana republics must put in some type of currency control and tax clearances to travel. Otherwise they would have capital and people leaving for greener pastures. The trouble with the policy is that it insures that people put there money and themselves elsewhere. The USG seems to be trying to establish a form of currency and travel control that has not worked in other third world countries.


16 posted on 04/20/2012 10:02:49 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sreastman
Outrageous!

If Obama wins, well it will be time to reverse the stream of border crossings. Just Saying.

FU Federal Government!

17 posted on 04/21/2012 10:22:21 AM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Buffet better be put in Debtors Jail and NOT get whatever health care he can afford. ObamaCare for him!


18 posted on 04/21/2012 10:24:47 AM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson