Crowning Romney backfires on Fox News and RNC as Delegates, Voters say NO!

RightonWeekly ^ | 4/20/2012 | Tamara Heater

[katiedidit1]

Voters and Delegates say NOT Romney

This entire not Romney force is building to BUST like a water balloon in the face of Romney, his minions and the RNC on the Greta Poll this week on Greta Wire and pounded it within minutes! People are ANGRY. They are angry at our cowardly media because they cannot address the current King, and you want to force feed another via crowning Romney, and have pushed turnout to record LOWS far below what is was with Stinky McCain in 2008.

[SoConPubbie]

And I’ll be blaming you when Kagan’s lover and their two best friends get appointed to the Supreme Court while America has a $25T debt with $1T annual interest payment and unemployment is at 20%. You and the salaried Obama campaign workers who are posting the exact same thing you are, all over the internet, as we type right now. How does it feel to be indistinguishable from an Obama campaign worker?

And we will be blaming you for pushing Romney as a nominee when the only thing inevitable about him is that with his lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal, he is the only GOP POTUS candidate guaranteed to give Obama re-elctions.

It will be you, and others like you, backing a man with an 'R' next to his name but with a record that is comparative to Obama's that allows Obama to actually appoint leftist extremists to the SC of the US.

ANd even if Romney, improbable as it now appears won the election, those same bad USSC choices you are afraid of would still occur because Romney has a similiar record on judicial appoinments as Obama.

Out of 36 judicial nominations, he appointed 27 far-left extremists.

Legal analysts say candidate Romney is different from Gov. Romney.

Liberty Counsel Action Vice President Matt Barber said Romney’s appointments were constitutional “living document” poster children.

“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.

“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”

Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney not only failed in this regard, he appointed a number of very liberal, if not radical, ‘living, breathing’-minded judges to the bench,” Barber said.

“Two that come to mind were extreme homosexualists Marianne C. Hinkle and Stephen Abany,” he said. “They both had a long history of pro-gay activism, yet Romney didn’t hesitate to put them on the bench.”

“These are people who outrageously believe the postmodern notion that newfangled ‘gay rights’ trump our constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment rights,” he said.

Baldwin agreed, citing Romney’s statements about the two requirements he actually used when selecting judges.

“Romney did focus on two criteria: their legal experience and whether they would be tough on crime. In other words, the nominee could be a gay activist or a pro-big government, pro-quota, pro-gun control Democrat Party hack who detests every judicial principle treasured by our founding fathers,” Baldwin said. “But if he happens to be tough on crime and have prosecutorial experience, he gets past the Romney filter. Many of Romney’s nominees fit that description.”

Baldwin added that Romney did have some ideological criteria for many of his nominees:

“It was criteria commonly used by the left. For starters, his nominees were mostly pro-abortion. Indeed, while campaigning for governor in 2002, Romney told the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) that his judicial nominees would more likely protect abortion rights than would those of a Democrat Governor, according to notes from a person attending this meeting.”

A comparison between Obama, Mitt, and Newt showing the near complete equality between Obama's record and Mitt's and the almost complete inequality between Obama's and Newt's:

[SoConPubbie]

They can knock me down 1000 times, and I'm going to get up 1000 times - and I ain't walkin' away! (and *you* shouldn't, either!)

And the GOP-E thanks you for your support.

They can count on you to keep eating thier crap sandwich of a candidate, because at the end of the day, during each election cycle, they'll screen "Our guy is not as bad as their guy" and you will fall right in line.

You, and others like you, give them no incentive to change their approach or the rigged game they have given you.

Congratulations at keeping your principles intact!

[SaraJohnson]

The Rinos opened the primaries to liberals to serve themselves. Why did we let them get away with this????

[Jeff Head]

Perhaps Newt can pull it off and we will not have to...we can hope, work and pray for that. A brokered convention, though certainly not ideal, could certainly produce a better ticket.

[lu shissler]

Obama is ruling by Executive Orders, bypassing congress. He’ll keep on doing the same thing.

[JRandomFreeper]

I strongly believe that Barack Obama is by far the most destructive president in my lifetime and may do irreparable damage to the country if given another term.

Lyndon Baines Johnson was the most destructive president I've ever seen, including Carter, Clinton, and Obama.

He took over from a President that actually was doing good things, despite being a Democrat... like lowering taxes. And LBJ did the 'Great Society' thing that turned inner city areas into little Soviet Blocs.

We'll survive Obama, too.

Voting for Romney just tells the GOP that they can count on your vote for every crap liberal they put up. Again. See Dole, McCain &ect...

/johnny

[Nik Naym]

Where we disagree is that I do not think Romney will save us from disaster.

Why should I vote for a wishy washy left leaning, VERY non conservative clown like Romney if I don’t think it will do any good? The man INVENTED Obama care for crying out loud!

You can call me an ass kisser if you like, but I agree with everything JimRob has been saying about Romney. I had the very same thoughts as Jim well before he said anything. The way I see it, JR agrees with me, not the other way around.

I won’t vote for someone so opposed to what I know to be right. And that describes both Romney and Obama.

Romney won’t save us. He doesn’t even understand the problem facing this country and I don’t think he actually gives a damn. He just wants to be President and the GOP acts like it is HIS turn.

You vote for who you want.

But insulting the rest of us who are going to stand by our conservative principles because we won’t vote for the clown YOU want us to vote for is out of line.

I for one am no longer going to sit idly by while you or anyone else does that here.

There is no need to throw insults around just because we won’t do it YOUR way.

I can understand why so many are saying they will vote for whatever the GOP throws at us. A lot of people are afraid of Obama and don’t know what else to do. I understand that not everyone has courage.

But I will be damned if those who are too foolish to keep mum about it are going throw bombs at me without getting return fire.

[mo]

The Conservative Cause is clearly served by an Obama re-election rather than a Romney win.

A Right leaning/Conservative Congress can easily remain united behind an Obama re-election....whereas the same Congress will be sliced and diced by the RINOS if Romney is in the White House.

The Powers That Be fully understand this....

[JRandomFreeper]

we can hope, work and pray for that.

Amen, brother. And I do that.

/johnny

[Theodore R.]

GOP is too stupid and set in their ways to rethink their strategy.

Are you talking about the "leadership" or the clueless voters who blindly follow the "leadership"?

[Theodore R.]

We absolutely have to vote for Romney, for the Bushes have told us so, and Dole chimed in too.

[Theodore R.]

So why do you think Mitch McC in 2013 will start standing up to Obama when he hasn’t done so yet?

[JRandomFreeper]

Either way. I judge by results, not intent. GB 41. Dole. McCain.

I report, until everyone is sick of hearing it. You decide.

/johnny

[Theodore R.]

Well, don’t vote for Romney then, but Jebbie, Barbara, and GHWB are going to get you for that!

[Theodore R.]

You’re going to be sorry on November 6 when you spurn Mittens. He is our candidate, and we are obligated to back him. After Santorum pulled out, it was all over. GHWB, Barbara, Jebbie, and George W. will not be happy if you sit this out.

[mo]

So Mitch McConnell will be the Senate Majority Leader? Who knew?

[entropy12]

Poor excuse. Who sets the rules? REPUBLICANS!

Also Santorum received more democrat votes than any one else according to exit polls in Michigan.

The inconvenient truth is conservatives were not united. Either Newt or Rick should have dropped out sooner. Romney
won because the conservatives kept dividing votes, and none
of them was overwhelming favorite to overshadow other conservatives.

[Windflier]

Texas hasn't voted, but even if he pulls out a win against dead broke Newt Gingrich, that's no guarantee he can carry Texas against the Marxist, without conservatives coming out in massive numbers to vote for him and I don't think y'all will.

Too true. Romney has never truly shook hands with Texas, and Texans notice that sort of thing.

Most folks down here know a carpet-bagging snake oil salesman when they see one, and Romney is nothing, if not that. I think he knows better than to come down here pretending to be one of us.

By the time we vote, I expect most Texas conservatives will give Romney a resounding vote of no confidence.

[Windflier]

Windflier, that is a keeper.

I thought you'd like it. It's one of the best anti-Romney/pro-conservative posts I've seen on the site.