Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crowning Romney backfires on Fox News and RNC as Delegates, Voters say NO!
RightonWeekly ^ | 4/20/2012 | Tamara Heater

Posted on 04/20/2012 8:01:23 PM PDT by katiedidit1

Voters and Delegates say NOT Romney

This entire not Romney force is building to BUST like a water balloon in the face of Romney, his minions and the RNC on the Greta Poll this week on Greta Wire and pounded it within minutes! People are ANGRY. They are angry at our cowardly media because they cannot address the current King, and you want to force feed another via crowning Romney, and have pushed turnout to record LOWS far below what is was with Stinky McCain in 2008.

(Excerpt) Read more at rightonweekly.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newt2012; nobama; romneysucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last
To: Jeff Head

“I will do what I indicate above just like the actual survival of the Republic depends on it...because I believe it does”

I agree with you. Many here don’t, and I can’t say I don’t see where they are coming from, but I strongly believe that Barack Obama is by far the most destructive president in my lifetime and may do irreparable damage to the country if given another term.


51 posted on 04/20/2012 9:17:39 PM PDT by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Your state, Texas hasn’t voted, but even if he pulls out a win against dead broke Newt Gingrich, that’s no guarantee he can carry Texas against the Marxist, without conservatives coming out in massive numbers to vote for him and I don’t think y’all will.


That sums it up well. People are moaning about Romney. They are hyped up about shrinking the power of the government and getting back rights Congress and Obama have taken. Not a good thing to pick a leftist Republican. We need a screaming banshee. :)


52 posted on 04/20/2012 9:18:29 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"So what is the assured (uncontested) hard count of delegates from Colorado and Florida?"

Colorado "hard count": Paul 5, Santorum 7, Romney 22.

This could be off by one or two, since all delegates are soft (they can vote however they darn well please, though I don't see the Romneyites going anywhere).

--I was a Delegate to State and my Congrsesional District. I was for Newt, but we did not do well. Organization is extremely important for caucuses.

53 posted on 04/20/2012 9:23:31 PM PDT by cookcounty (We need Newt. The Black Belt Jaw-jitsu Master!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

A click on your profile tells me that I agree with you on virtually every aspect of my ideology. But it seems we don’t agree on the effect of the Obama administration on the country. I see it as arsenic that may have already soaked too deep, but potententially reversible. I believe another four years of Obama turns us into western Europe, and you do not.

I also think that a concerted effort to retain the House and take the Senate can force a windsock President like Romney to sign things written by Paul Ryan. It may be enough to reverse the inertia, it may not, but Obama means we really will have to go Galt.


54 posted on 04/20/2012 9:25:06 PM PDT by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I hate that we disagree. Because I care for you a lot. But we do.

I can't vote against my principles. Period.

/johnny

55 posted on 04/20/2012 9:25:47 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; JRandomFreeper
You may not want a liberal in office and I may not want a liberal in office but there are those pesky voters in primaries who keep voting for the most liberal candidate.

You mean those open primaries that allows Democrats and Independents to vote along with Republicans for the GOP Nomine??
56 posted on 04/20/2012 9:26:22 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Well I love your spirit!


57 posted on 04/20/2012 9:26:45 PM PDT by kreitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

As to the “uncommitted” in Colorado. Almost all of the office-holders who run, run as “uncommitted” because they don’t want to tick off any segment of the party unnecessarily.It just means they didn’t go to Romney until later. Sorry to give you the bad news, but that’s what’s really going on.


58 posted on 04/20/2012 9:26:53 PM PDT by cookcounty (We need Newt. The Black Belt Jaw-jitsu Master!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Anything that is bad for Fox, is good for America.


59 posted on 04/20/2012 9:30:22 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lwoodham
1woodham, she did spend a lot of time on research and the article goes on with various referrals. I read Doughty One’s post too and am very much in sync with them both.
Romney could have just as easily run as a democrat based on his record in Mass. Would we have voted for him as a dem?
60 posted on 04/20/2012 9:31:40 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck; Nik Naym
And I’ll be blaming you when Kagan’s lover and their two best friends get appointed to the Supreme Court while America has a $25T debt with $1T annual interest payment and unemployment is at 20%. You and the salaried Obama campaign workers who are posting the exact same thing you are, all over the internet, as we type right now. How does it feel to be indistinguishable from an Obama campaign worker?

And we will be blaming you for pushing Romney as a nominee when the only thing inevitable about him is that with his lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal, he is the only GOP POTUS candidate guaranteed to give Obama re-elctions.

It will be you, and others like you, backing a man with an 'R' next to his name but with a record that is comparative to Obama's that allows Obama to actually appoint leftist extremists to the SC of the US.

ANd even if Romney, improbable as it now appears won the election, those same bad USSC choices you are afraid of would still occur because Romney has a similiar record on judicial appoinments as Obama.

Out of 36 judicial nominations, he appointed 27 far-left extremists.

Legal analysts say candidate Romney is different from Gov. Romney.

Liberty Counsel Action Vice President Matt Barber said Romney’s appointments were constitutional “living document” poster children.

“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.

“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”

Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney not only failed in this regard, he appointed a number of very liberal, if not radical, ‘living, breathing’-minded judges to the bench,” Barber said.

“Two that come to mind were extreme homosexualists Marianne C. Hinkle and Stephen Abany,” he said. “They both had a long history of pro-gay activism, yet Romney didn’t hesitate to put them on the bench.”

“These are people who outrageously believe the postmodern notion that newfangled ‘gay rights’ trump our constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment rights,” he said.

Baldwin agreed, citing Romney’s statements about the two requirements he actually used when selecting judges.

“Romney did focus on two criteria: their legal experience and whether they would be tough on crime. In other words, the nominee could be a gay activist or a pro-big government, pro-quota, pro-gun control Democrat Party hack who detests every judicial principle treasured by our founding fathers,” Baldwin said. “But if he happens to be tough on crime and have prosecutorial experience, he gets past the Romney filter. Many of Romney’s nominees fit that description.”

Baldwin added that Romney did have some ideological criteria for many of his nominees:

“It was criteria commonly used by the left. For starters, his nominees were mostly pro-abortion. Indeed, while campaigning for governor in 2002, Romney told the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) that his judicial nominees would more likely protect abortion rights than would those of a Democrat Governor, according to notes from a person attending this meeting.”


A comparison between Obama, Mitt, and Newt showing the near complete equality between Obama's record and Mitt's and the almost complete inequality between Obama's and Newt's:


61 posted on 04/20/2012 9:34:19 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: The Duke; kreitzer
They can knock me down 1000 times, and I'm going to get up 1000 times - and I ain't walkin' away! (and *you* shouldn't, either!)

And the GOP-E thanks you for your support.

They can count on you to keep eating thier crap sandwich of a candidate, because at the end of the day, during each election cycle, they'll screen "Our guy is not as bad as their guy" and you will fall right in line.

You, and others like you, give them no incentive to change their approach or the rigged game they have given you.

Congratulations at keeping your principles intact!
62 posted on 04/20/2012 9:38:11 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The Rinos opened the primaries to liberals to serve themselves. Why did we let them get away with this????


63 posted on 04/20/2012 9:38:39 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Perhaps Newt can pull it off and we will not have to...we can hope, work and pray for that. A brokered convention, though certainly not ideal, could certainly produce a better ticket.


64 posted on 04/20/2012 9:39:21 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Obama is ruling by Executive Orders, bypassing congress. He’ll keep on doing the same thing.


65 posted on 04/20/2012 9:48:49 PM PDT by lu shissler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
I strongly believe that Barack Obama is by far the most destructive president in my lifetime and may do irreparable damage to the country if given another term.

Lyndon Baines Johnson was the most destructive president I've ever seen, including Carter, Clinton, and Obama.

He took over from a President that actually was doing good things, despite being a Democrat... like lowering taxes. And LBJ did the 'Great Society' thing that turned inner city areas into little Soviet Blocs.

We'll survive Obama, too.

Voting for Romney just tells the GOP that they can count on your vote for every crap liberal they put up. Again. See Dole, McCain &ect...

/johnny

66 posted on 04/20/2012 9:49:57 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Where we disagree is that I do not think Romney will save us from disaster.

Why should I vote for a wishy washy left leaning, VERY non conservative clown like Romney if I don’t think it will do any good? The man INVENTED Obama care for crying out loud!

You can call me an ass kisser if you like, but I agree with everything JimRob has been saying about Romney. I had the very same thoughts as Jim well before he said anything. The way I see it, JR agrees with me, not the other way around.

I won’t vote for someone so opposed to what I know to be right. And that describes both Romney and Obama.

Romney won’t save us. He doesn’t even understand the problem facing this country and I don’t think he actually gives a damn. He just wants to be President and the GOP acts like it is HIS turn.

You vote for who you want.

But insulting the rest of us who are going to stand by our conservative principles because we won’t vote for the clown YOU want us to vote for is out of line.

I for one am no longer going to sit idly by while you or anyone else does that here.

There is no need to throw insults around just because we won’t do it YOUR way.

I can understand why so many are saying they will vote for whatever the GOP throws at us. A lot of people are afraid of Obama and don’t know what else to do. I understand that not everyone has courage.

But I will be damned if those who are too foolish to keep mum about it are going throw bombs at me without getting return fire.


67 posted on 04/20/2012 9:51:14 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

The Conservative Cause is clearly served by an Obama re-election rather than a Romney win.

A Right leaning/Conservative Congress can easily remain united behind an Obama re-election....whereas the same Congress will be sliced and diced by the RINOS if Romney is in the White House.

The Powers That Be fully understand this....


68 posted on 04/20/2012 9:51:37 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
we can hope, work and pray for that.

Amen, brother. And I do that.

/johnny

69 posted on 04/20/2012 9:52:00 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
GOP is too stupid and set in their ways to rethink their strategy.

Are you talking about the "leadership" or the clueless voters who blindly follow the "leadership"?

70 posted on 04/20/2012 10:07:06 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

We absolutely have to vote for Romney, for the Bushes have told us so, and Dole chimed in too.


71 posted on 04/20/2012 10:08:49 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mo

So why do you think Mitch McC in 2013 will start standing up to Obama when he hasn’t done so yet?


72 posted on 04/20/2012 10:10:01 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Either way. I judge by results, not intent. GB 41. Dole. McCain.

I report, until everyone is sick of hearing it. You decide.

/johnny

73 posted on 04/20/2012 10:10:14 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Well, don’t vote for Romney then, but Jebbie, Barbara, and GHWB are going to get you for that!


74 posted on 04/20/2012 10:13:40 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Nik Naym

You’re going to be sorry on November 6 when you spurn Mittens. He is our candidate, and we are obligated to back him. After Santorum pulled out, it was all over. GHWB, Barbara, Jebbie, and George W. will not be happy if you sit this out.


76 posted on 04/20/2012 10:16:51 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

So Mitch McConnell will be the Senate Majority Leader? Who knew?


77 posted on 04/20/2012 10:18:09 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Poor excuse. Who sets the rules? REPUBLICANS!

Also Santorum received more democrat votes than any one else according to exit polls in Michigan.

The inconvenient truth is conservatives were not united. Either Newt or Rick should have dropped out sooner. Romney
won because the conservatives kept dividing votes, and none
of them was overwhelming favorite to overshadow other conservatives.


78 posted on 04/20/2012 10:26:58 PM PDT by entropy12 (Winning is the only thing...coach Vince Lombardi. Losers in elections have zero power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Texas hasn't voted, but even if he pulls out a win against dead broke Newt Gingrich, that's no guarantee he can carry Texas against the Marxist, without conservatives coming out in massive numbers to vote for him and I don't think y'all will.

Too true. Romney has never truly shook hands with Texas, and Texans notice that sort of thing.

Most folks down here know a carpet-bagging snake oil salesman when they see one, and Romney is nothing, if not that. I think he knows better than to come down here pretending to be one of us.

By the time we vote, I expect most Texas conservatives will give Romney a resounding vote of no confidence.

79 posted on 04/20/2012 10:34:34 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
Windflier, that is a keeper.

I thought you'd like it. It's one of the best anti-Romney/pro-conservative posts I've seen on the site.

80 posted on 04/20/2012 10:36:48 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

“He is our candidate, and we are obligated to back him.”

That is THE stupidest reason I have ever heard for why I should vote for Romney.

First of all, what do you mean “our”? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

For the record, I am not a Republican.


81 posted on 04/20/2012 10:37:24 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Oh wait....you were being sarcastic.

Never mind.


82 posted on 04/20/2012 10:40:11 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"We absolutely have to vote for Romney, for the Bushes have told us so, and Dole chimed in too."

Today Jeb Bush said he'd consider being Romney's VP!!

83 posted on 04/20/2012 10:43:17 PM PDT by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Sometimes, there is no good solution except to keep going and doing right by your principles and trusting in God. I don't get to pick the outcome. I know the rules I have to live by.

With all due respect, sometimes there is a solution, it just may not be easy. The solution was suggested upthread:

(Post 18: #3) Surround the convention center with 500k plus and don’t let them leave until they nominate some one good.

If just 5% (3 million) of the die-hard Conservatives (who reluctantly voted for McCain) convene in beautiful Tampa, Florida chanting "no-Mitt", it would change the course of history. The Republican-e would cave under withering fire.

That's the way Revolutionary Patriots would do it!
84 posted on 04/20/2012 10:46:17 PM PDT by 867V309
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I see I missed a commnet = deleted. Oh boy. LOL.

God bless Texas. I trust and hope Governor Perry can help bring Gingrich some votes and provide some rides to campaign locations for him.

If only, 1 million yet vote folks would each send him $10, he would get $10 million immediately, but that’s a pipe dream.

He needs to hang in tough, regardless, and I trust he will, if he possibly can.

Romney has all the money and this corrupt GOP-E process has to be stopped.

I remain praying for Newt, for Divine Intervent and for a bloody floor fight on the convention floor.

Time for Tea Party Patriots and conservatives to rebel. Romney is unacceptable and Romeny knows it, but his lust for power is insatiable.

Like I previously saidm he has seriousl trouble here in the South. Coming in third in both Mississippi and Alabama doesn’t bode well at for Novembe, provided he manages to buy the nomination.

Sheesh the GOP-E and RNC are STUPID along with IDIOT PRIMARY voters.


85 posted on 04/20/2012 10:46:31 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
I also think that a concerted effort to retain the House and take the Senate can force a windsock President like Romney to sign things written by Paul Ryan. It may be enough to reverse the inertia, it may not, but Obama means we really will have to go Galt.

You've got it exactly backwards. A Republican dominated House and Senate will lock arms in opposition to King Obama, but they'll go soft and mushy on a liberal President Romney agenda.

Those are the coming dynamics in play here.

86 posted on 04/20/2012 10:48:45 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Are you suggesting that the only way to save conservatism is to re-elect Obama?


87 posted on 04/20/2012 10:49:34 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lu shissler
Obama is ruling by Executive Orders, bypassing congress. He’ll keep on doing the same thing.

Obama has gotten away with much, because he's working with a legislature that is at least 50% Democrat controlled. He's likely to be facing a Republican dominated Congress in 2013 (should he be re-elected). It's highly unlikely that they'll keep letting him play dictator like he did the first four years.

Strategically, re-electing a hog-tied Obama is far less dangerous to the republic, than electing his virtual twin, who will likely get a pass on his liberal agenda from a compliant Congress, simply because he's the head of their party.

88 posted on 04/20/2012 10:59:47 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 867V309; Jim Robinson; onyx; caww; DoughtyOne; Norm Lenhart; Finny; katiedidit1; ansel12; ...
If just 5% (3 million) of the die-hard Conservatives (who reluctantly voted for McCain) convene in beautiful Tampa, Florida chanting "no-Mitt", it would change the course of history. The Republican-e would cave under withering fire.

That's the way Revolutionary Patriots would do it!

Damn, I like your way of thinking. That's rebellion done right!

You ought to re-post that all over the forum until the day of the convention. That's a real solution that we should start organizing now.

89 posted on 04/20/2012 11:12:56 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

I saw that too. Think about this. The weak-kneed fear mongers bully us into backing Romney against our better judgment, and we get him for 8 years, then Jeb for another 8. The Rovian dynasty shall have finally and utterly defeated any possibility of bringing in a true, or even a quasi-true, conservative, in our lifetime. We will be outcasts for a generation. Again. AND, to achieve this outcast status, all we have to do is panic and sell out conservatism to prevent the apocalypse. Such a deal.


90 posted on 04/20/2012 11:15:10 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Romney has all the money and this corrupt GOP-E process has to be stopped. I remain praying for Newt, for Divine Intervent and for a bloody floor fight on the convention floor.

I like the idea just posted about getting just 1% of American conservatives (that's 3 million people) to go to the convention in Tampa and shout, "No Romney!" It would stop the GOP-E in their tracks, and force a vote for an honest conservative.

91 posted on 04/20/2012 11:18:08 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
It’s almost as if some people here don’t realize four more years of Obama Romney means the end of America.
92 posted on 04/20/2012 11:19:55 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper; Flightdeck

Not only can I make a coherent argument that we cannot survive another Obama term, I can make a compelling argument that we did not survive F.D.R.’s presidency. The nation has never been the same since — not liberty, not sovereignty, not capitalism, not state autonomy.


93 posted on 04/20/2012 11:25:11 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

You said it far better than I have said it, but I agree with you 100%. We will not survive a lame duck term by Obama, and it is not just the actions he will take but the communists he will stack in civil service at all levels. It will be impossible to ferret them out.

I think at his essence, Romney is a political whore. If the polls run against Obamacare, he will put a finger in the wind and repeal it. If the GOP Senate and House drag him toward the right, he will co-opt and act as though he lead the charge. And I’m certain he will sell himself to the highest bidder to get that 2nd term, which would be who controls the House and Senate.

I detest Romney and I am ready to go Galt on the GOP for shoving a succession of RINOs down our throats, but this is not the election to hand the Dems a victory. Obama will NEVER repeal Obamacare, while Romney might be dragged to doing so. All other priorities are secondary. And no matter how weak the nominees, I refuse to believe that Romney will put red-diaper communists on SCOTUS the way Obama is licking his chops to do. I suspect Kagan and Sortamywhore are both communists. No, not members of the party, but people who espouse communism and are working toward that goal in America.

Thanks for your analysis as I agree 100% with you about it.


94 posted on 04/20/2012 11:35:32 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I’m willing to storm the convention and willing to get arrested...LOL.


95 posted on 04/20/2012 11:43:59 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I am seriously sick to my almost death, of the laid back, idiot, smug, arrogant GOP-E and conservatives just rolling over and complaining and I’m dead bang serious about this.


96 posted on 04/20/2012 11:46:38 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I’m willing to storm the convention and willing to get arrested...LOL.

Getting a bit feisty from lack of sleep are we, LOL.

97 posted on 04/20/2012 11:50:01 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Newt......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

LOL. You betcha and thanks for the reminder. I have completed my wook. One more post and it’s all yours. In fact, I will not put out the fancy sign You keep the thread open, okay? LOL. I don’t not want to catch that second wind.


98 posted on 04/20/2012 11:53:56 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

I’m with you on that. Held my nose and voted for McCain because of Palindrome. Will do the same with Mitt, because obama is an disaster that will only get worse


99 posted on 04/20/2012 11:58:42 PM PDT by mikefive (RLTW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You, and others like you, give them no incentive to change their approach..

They don't have to change their approach. All that is needed is for Tea Partiers to continue to swell the ranks of the Republican Party. If conservatives only knew what was *really* going on within the Republican Party they would get more engaged and start to shape the world according to their own vision.

It's not going to happen overnight ... but the tide continues to turn with every tick of the clock.

100 posted on 04/21/2012 12:18:23 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson